The Ancestors of Haplogroup G-Z6748: A Frisian or Frank – Part Nine

This is the ninth and last part of long multi-part story about a 2,850 year gap or absence of documented YDNA haplogroups in the Griff(is)(es)(ith) genetic YDNA paternal line. The final, ninth part of the story focuses on the possible indigenous socio-cultural groups that might have been associated with these YDNA generations leading up to and including the most recent common ancestor asociated with the haplgroup G-Z6748.

Living in a Fluctuating Frontier Zone

As indicated in previous parts of this story, the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of haplogroup G-Z6748 may have been born around 668 CE. It is estimated that he had a 68 percent chance of being born between roughly 525 CE and 800 CE. [1] This 275 year time variance is not that big when attempting to pinpoint ancient DNA remains. [2] Illustration one depicts the archaeological time period of this roughly nine generation period or 275 year range of time.

Illustration One: Estimated Birth Date of tMRCA of G-Z6748, Archaeological Time, Periods, and Historical Events

Click for Larger View | Source: Modification of part of Fig. 2. Palaeogeographical maps of (A) AD 100 and (B) AD 800 in Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human – landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

During this 275 year period of time, the MRCA of G-Z6748 or preceding YDNA generations may have lived during the Early Medieval period B or the beginning of period C of the Early Medieval period. [3] These generations also lived at the end of the dark ages and during the ‘Great Migration’ when various social groups migrated in western Europe and specifically in the Netherlands area. It is also a period of time that witnessed shifting alliances and patterns of interaction and dominance between indigenous social groups from the post Roman era and emerging groups such as the Frisians, Franks and Saxons.

Between about 500 and 800 CE, the area of the later Netherlands lay in a fluctuating frontier zone where local post‑Roman populations, “new” Frisians inhabiting the North Sea coast, incoming Saxon groups in the northeast, and expanding Frankish power from the south interacted through shifting warfare, overlordship, and alliances. Multiple historical and archaeological studies explicitly frame this as a period of changing political configurations and changing social group relations rather than simple ‘ethnic’ group replacement. [4]

In the 19th century, Dutch historians believed that the Franks, Frisians, and Saxons had populated and inhabited the Low Countries, but this theory fell out of favour in the 20th century. Due to the scarcity of written sources, knowledge of this period depends to a large degree on the interpretation of archaeological data. The traditional view of a clear-cut division between Frisians in the north and coast, Franks in the south and Saxons in the east has proven historically problematic. Archeological evidence suggests dramatically different models for different regions, with demographic continuity for some parts of the country and depopulation and possible replacement in other parts, notably the coastal areas of Frisia and Holland.[5]

Boom, Bust and Slow Recovery

As depicted in illustration one, based on various archaeological studies that have analyzed population fluctuation and density during this time period, the first millennium CE in the (present‑day) Netherlands shows a broadly shared “boom–bust–slow recovery” demographic pattern, with strong regional divergence in the depth and timing of the bust and the speed of recovery. Two major population highs have been documented and reconstructed: a middle Roman era peak (roughly AD 70–270) and a renewed rise in the early medieval period C (ca. AD 725–950). Illustration two provides a more detailed reconstruction of this pattern. in the Rhine-Meuse delta region. [6]

Between these, there is a pronounced demographic trough: a sharp decline from the later third century into the fifth century, after which population levels remain low for several centuries and never return to middle Roman values within the first millennium. [7] In the Rhine–Meuse delta, quantitative reconstructions indicate a rural population drop on the order of roughly 80 percent (ca. 78–85 percent) between the middle and late Roman periods.[8]National‑ scale’ estimates suggest that a comparable late/post‑Roman decline affected much of what is now the present‑day Netherlands, though the magnitude of contraction varies between coastal, fluvial (landscapes associated with river systems), and inland sandy regions. [9]

Illustration Two: Reconstructed Palaeodemographic Trends for the Rhine-Meuse Delta During the First Millennium CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Rowin J. van Lanen and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence – based reconstructions, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune, eds, Across Medieval Europe: Old Paradigms and New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Lieden: Sidestone Press, 2019, 113- 134, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

This demographic trough coincides with the withdrawal of Roman military and administrative structures, larger general regional political instability, and increased flooding in parts of the fluvial zone. In the post-Roman era (the Early Middle Ages), the fluvial zone in the Netherlands was a highly dynamic, wet, and largely primitive landscape characterized by the environmental configuration of the Rhine-Meuse delta. It was an area of increased flooding, and significant shifting of river branches (avulsion). This period marked a transition from a Roman managed landscape to a more natural, water-dominated enivornmental area, particularly in the central Netherlands. [10]

After several centuries of low demographic levels, settlement numbers and inferred population start to rise again from roughly the later seventh to eighth century, with a clear demographic upswing in early medieval period C. By around 800 to 1000 CE, some regions (especially parts of the coastal and fluvial zone) are on a trajectory toward becoming among the most densely populated landscapes in northwest Europe, though still below the middle Roman peak in absolute terms for many areas. This recovery is tied to more stable political configurations, renewed agrarian exploitation of wetlands and floodplains, and large‑scale land reclamation and embankment processes that accelerates from the later first millennium into the high Middle Ages. [11]

Coastal and tidal marsh zones show strong late/post‑Roman contraction and, in some sectors, near‑abandonment, with relatively late reoccupation of specific areas on dwelling mounds and reclaimed grounds. The fluvial Rhine–Meuse area follows the classic boom–bust–slow recovery curve, with very high Roman densities, severe late Roman Era depopulation, and re‑growth from the eighth to ninth centuries onward as settlements shift to slightly higher levee positions under rising flood stress. Inland coversand and higher regions tend to show smaller population fluctuations. This area also witnesses the Roman‑era rise and post‑Roman decline, but with less dramatic contraction and sometimes earlier or smoother recovery relative to the low‑lying deltaic tracts of land. [12]

Various studies stress that demographic change was not a simple, uniform “collapse,” but a set of regionally differentiated trajectories produced by the interplay of political, economic, and environmental factors. [13] Through the use of high‑resolution, evidence‑ based demographic analysis (e.g. using ancient settlement inventories, large excavation datasets, and environmental proxies) these studies have provided a methodogical basis for explaining the spatial variation in cultural change and landscape transformation across the Roman–early medieval transition. [14]

The Migratory Path Among the Franks and the Frisians

As reflected in illustration one above, during and just prior to this 275 year period when the ancestor of haplgroup G-Z6748 lived, the Merovingian Dynasty became an emerging power. The Merovingians were a dynasty of Frankish kings who ruled much of what is now France, Belgium, western Germany, and parts of neighboring regions from the mid‑fifth century until they were replaced by the Carolingians in 751 CE. The northern border of the dynasty’s territory covered an area that included the migratory path of the ancestors of the MRCA of haplogroup G-Z6748 (see illustration two). [15]

Illustration Two: Map of the Rise and Expansion of the Merovingians, c. 639 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Simeon Netchev,Map of the Rise and Expansion of the Merovingians, c. 639, 28 Dec 2025, World History Encyclopedia, https://www.worldhistory.org/image/16909/map-of-the-rise-and-expansion-of-the-merovingians/

In addition to the Frankish Merovingian Dynasty, Frisian “power blocks”[16] , in what is now the northern Netherlands, crystallized as a coastal realm under kings or group leaders like Aldgisl and Radbod between roughly the mid‑seventh century and 734 CE. Their local dominance then fragmented under Frankish rule; and later re‑emerging as looser, more regional Frisian groups into the ninth and tenth centuries (see illustrations three through five). [17]

Illustrations Three, Four and Five: Various Stages of Magna Frisia

Illustration Three

Click for Larger View | Source: Frans Riemersma, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Sep 1, 2018, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail Blog,https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Illustration Four

Click for Larger View | Source: Frans Riemersma, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Sep 1, 2018, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail Blog,https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Illustration Five

Click for Larger View | Source: Frans Riemersma, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Sep 1, 2018, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail Blog,https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Depending on where specific generations of the ‘immediate’ or preceding ancestors of the MRCA of G-Z6748 lived, they may likely have lived in areas controlled by groups identified as either Frisians or Franks. Based on the analysis of possible migratory corridors discussed in part eight of this story during this time period, illustration six depicts two possble migratory paths in the context of Frisian, Saxon and Frankish control.

In the context of the larger social and political influences, the genetic ancestors of the MRCA of G-Z6748 migrated through the Roman Limes area around the collapse of the Roman Empire, at a time and place that became increasingly controlled by the Frankish groups. These ancestors continued to move northward into areas inhabited by social groups known or identified as Frisians.

Illustration Six: Estimated Migratory Path of YDNA Ancestors and General Areas of Control by Frisians, Franks and Saxons Around 716 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Modification of map developed by Mauls Catulus, Map of Magna Frisia in Latin, 14 Feb 2010, Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frisia_716-la.svg

A Period of Dynamic Interaction, Negotiated Power, and Evolving Identities among the Post‑Roman Communities

Archaeological evidence suggests dramatically different experiences for different regions, with demographic continuity for some parts of the area and depopulation and possible replacement in other parts, notably the coastal areas of Frisia. [18] The area that is currently the southern Netherlands experienced more continuity, with Frankish groups absorbing or mixing with remaining Romanized populations. Archaeological studies of late Roman and immediate post‑Roman settlement in the Low Countries stress continuity of local communities in parts of the river and loess zones, even as the coastal zone and nothern areas experienced major demographic change. This continuity in the southern area underlies the idea of “indigenous” post‑Roman groups (Franks) living in the river area interacting with incoming ‘re‑labelled’ Frisians and Saxons in the coastal and northern areas (see illustration seven). [19]

Illustration Seven: Approximate Positions of Indigenous Groups known from Roman Era Sources

Click for Larger View | Source: Andrew Lancaster, Netherlands in the time of the Roman empire, 2 Jul 2013, Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Netherlands_in_the_time_of_the_Roman_empire.png

During the third and fourth centuries, the population of Frisia steadily decreased, and by the fifth century it dropped dramatically. [20] The population decline of the Frisii was caused by flooding, disease and the fall of the Western Roman Empire. [21] The ancient indigenous groups—the Frisii, Batavians, and Cananefates who had lived under or alongside Roman rule—largely disappeared from the northern Netherlands. Archaeological surveys indicate that only small pockets of the original population stayed behind in areas like the Groningen coastal marshes, while coastal lands remained largely unpopulated for the next one or two centuries. [22]

Studies of the Anglo‑Saxon and Frisian migrations into the coastal Netherlands argue that new groups (Angles, Saxons, Franks) moved into lands formerly inhabited by the ancient Frisii, Cananefates and Batavians. Merovingian Frankish groups ‘retrospectivey’ labeled these mixed coastal populations “Frisians,” which itself points to a dynamic social reconfiguration of identities over the fifth through seventh centuries. [23]

Relationships between Frankish and Frisian areas in the Netherlands were highly porous in economic, social, and cultural terms, even while political and military conflicts periodically hardened boundaries between the groups. Archaeological and anthropological studies during this time period generally treat the Rhine–Meuse delta and coastal Netherlands as a long‑term contact zone rather than a firm frontier between two closed ethnic blocks. [24]

From an archaeological and anthropological standpoint, the Frankish–Frisian relationship in the Netherlands is best described as a semi‑porous frontier:

  • Politically: there were real contests and shifting borders, especially around major river‑mouth centers; [25]
  • Economically and socially: trade, mobility, mixed communities, and shared religious and legal frameworks created strong cross‑border connectivity; [26] and
  • Ethnically and culturally: identities were fluid and situational, with overlapping Frankish and Frisian social spheres rather than sealed or self-contained cultural groups. [27]

Written sources and archaeology show alternating phases of Frankish expansion, Frisian autonomy, and shifting overlordship in the central river area (e.g. the Utrecht–Dorestad region) in the seventh–eighth centuries. [28] Studies of Dorestad and neighboring sites describe the Rhine delta as a frontier where Franks and Frisians “came to oppose each other,” yet this opposition coexisted with dense cross‑border interaction. The so‑called Frisian– Frankish wars underscore competition over key emerging ‘town settlements‘ like Utrecht and Dorestad in the river lowland area, but modern scholarship emphasizes that these conflicts did not create impermeable ethnic or social barriers. [29]

Studies on Merovingian and early Carolingian political geography emphasizes that Frisians could function both as rivals and as allies or clients of the Franks, depending on local rulers and phases of expansion, showing that power relations were contingent and negotiable rather than strictly binary. [30] Broader studies of cross Channel and North Sea politics in the sixth to seventh centuries (e.g. on Frankish–Britain relations) explicitly reject simple hegemonic models in favor of “balance of power” and “complex influence” frameworks to descibe the intergroup relationships. [31] The same authors of these studies apply similar concepts to North Sea coastal regions including Frisia, underlining that elite strategies involved selectively displaying Frankish connections, trading, and raiding in a fluid political environment. [32]

The Impact of the Great Migration During this Time Period

The term ‘Migration Period’ in Europe has been predominately used to refer to the ‘Migration Period’ (around 300-800 CE), when Germanic and other ‘tribes’ or groups reshaped Europe and were associated with the Western Roman Empire’s fall (see illustration seven). [33]

Illustration Seven: The Migration Period in Europe Fourth – Sixth Centuries CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Modification of map by Simeon Netchev,Map of the Migration Period in Europe in the 4th-5th Century, 16 Jun 2021, World History Encyclopedia, https://www.worldhistory.org/image/14250/map-of-the-migration-period-in-europe-in-the-4th-5/

The Migration Period specifically refers to the important role played by the migration, invasion, and settlement of various social groups in western Europe, notably the Burgundians, Vandals, Goths, Alemanni, Alans, Huns, early Slavs, Pannonian Avars, Bulgars and Magyars within or into the territories of Europe as a whole and of the Western Roman Empire in particular. [34]

The Migration Period (circa 300–600 CE) fundamentally reshaped the Netherlands area as Germanic ‘tribes’ or aligned groups, including Franks, Saxons, and Frisians, moved into the crumbling Western Roman Empire’s northern territories. This triggered the abandonment of Roman-occupied southern areas of what is known as modern day Netherlands, leading to new cultural, linguistic, and political structures. [35]

All three of these groups were the result of early medieval ethnogenesis rather than direct continuation of Roman-period ‘tribes’ or indigenous groups. Archaeological studies also stress strong regional continuity from late Roman provincial and “native” communities, so these labels mask a heterogeneous population incorporating Batavian, Cananefatian, Chamavian and other pre-Roman / Roman-period indigenous groups (see side bar discussion on ethnogenesis).

New groups of Germanic peoples—primarily Saxons, along with Angles and Jutes—migrated into the northern regions. [36]. As mentioned above, the ‘ancient Frisii’ likely disappeared around 300 CE or the end of the third century due to coastal flooding and resettlement. [37] The newcomers who settled in the northern Netherlands adopted the name or were referred by outside groups by the name “Frisians,” though they were not descended from the ancient Frisii. These “new Frisians” became the ancestors of the medieval Frisian population.

Archaeological research suggests that the Migration Period brought an initial dramatic depopulation of specific areas, ecological and settlement reconfiguration, and later Frankish consolidation in what is now the Netherlands, rather than a simple “replacement” by incoming social groups.[38] The “Great Migration” in the area that is presently the Netherlands is partly visible as the absence of population: fewer sites, shorter occupation spans, and gaps in archaeological material culture rather than a clear mass-arrival new social groups. [39]

Ethnogenesis: Ethnicity, Tribes and Archaeology

Ethnogenesisis is the process by which a distinct ethnic group comes into being, emerges, or is formed, often arising from the blending, reformation, or interaction of existing groups, cultures, and populations. It involves the creation of a new, shared identity, frequently influenced by factors like migration, political changes, or social, economic, and historical experiences.  [40]

Archaeologists have shifted from treating ethnogenesis as the simple “birth” of a fixed ethnic group to seeing it as an ongoing, contested process of identity making under specific historical and political conditions. Archaeologists in the late 20th century increasingly treated ethnicity as a relational process of boundary making rather than a bundle of traits. Ethnogenesis became a way to analyze how interaction, competition, and alliance in plural societies produced new ethnic boundaries, while highlighting internal heterogeneity and situational identities. [41]

Scholars highlight cycles of emergence, maintenance, transformation, and disappearance of ethnic identities (e.g., Hu’s concept of “ethnomorphosis”), pushing archaeologists to track identity work across multiple scales and articfacts (time, landscapes, and material practices).[42]

Ethnic identities are always constructed in close association with political systems. It is politics that define ethnicity, not vice versa. Ethnic affiliation may be expressed at different scales of social organisation. At the highest level, there are macro-ethnic formations (Großstamme) such as Ionians and Achaians, or Gauls and Germans. At a local or regional level, smaller social groups may be discerned that coincide with localised political communities (e.g. poleis, civitates, or tribes). Despite frequent claims by ethnic groups to the contrary, all ethnic formations are intrinsically unstable and dynamic over time.[43]

Read More on the Use of Terms “Ethnicity” and “Tribe” to Describe the Complexity and Fluidity of Groups Across the Late Prehistory and Early Historical Periods

Here is a breakdown of the movements that shaped this territorial map:

  • Salian Franks (South/Central): Pushed by Saxons, the Salian Franks moved from the east over the Rhine into Roman territory in the fourth century. They settled in the Texandria region (modern-day Southwest Netherlands/North Brabant) as foederati (Roman allies) before establishing their base.
  • Frisians (North/Coastal): Coastal areas, especially in the north, were occupied by the Frisians, who populated the coastal provinces. This area was known as Frisia Magna or Greater Frisia (illustration six).
  • Saxons (East): Saxons pushed into the north eastern parts of the Netherlands with some Anglian/Jutish elements in the earliest coastal influx.
  • De-population and Migration: The Roman border (Limes Germanicus), which ran along the Rhine, saw a significant reduction in population, with many settlements abandoned as the Roman army withdrew, leading to a largely rural, sparsely populated landscape in the center.
  • The Power Shift: By the seventh and eighth centuries, a time when the MRCA of G-Z6748 lived, the region was contested between the Frisians in the north and the expanding Frankish Kingdom in the south, with major trading centers like Dorestad and Utrecht (Traiectum ad Rhenum) developing as key trading hubs. 

The Migration Period’s impact in the lowlands and coastal areas is best understood as an extended period of demographic and environmental change, a reorganization of settlement systems, and a gradual emergence into a Frankish – Frisian and North Sea cultural network, rather than a series of discrete migratory events.

Overlapping, Shifting Power Blocs of Franks, Frisians, and Saxons

Between 400 and 800 CE, research scholarship sees Saxons, Frisians, and Franks in the Netherlands not as three sealed “tribes” or ‘ethnic groups’ but as overlapping, shifting power blocs whose relations ran through trade, warfare, and Frankish‑driven ethnogenesis.

If we consider the above mentioned 275 year time span that encompassed the time of birth for the most recent common ancestor of G-Z6748 or his ancestor, we can portray the the larger, general social context and general impact of the Migration Period on these roughly nine generations that lived in this time frame (see table one).

Table One: Political geography and ”Ethno’ Political Characterstics Over Time

Geographical Aspectc. 500–600 CEc. 600–700 CEc. 700–800 CE
Overarching regional powerFragmented Frankish kingdoms; local warbands.Merovingian monarchy; strong regional dukes/counts.Carolingian majores domus then kings/emperors.
South of Rhine & Meuse riversFrankish control, patchy but established.Integrated into Frankish heartland.Core Carolingian domain with fiscal/monastic structuring.
Central river zoneFrontier between Franks and northern ‘Frisian’ groups.Contested Frank–Frisian interface; rise of emporia.Fully within Carolingian realm, Dorestad at peak.
North/coastal zoneLoosely organized “Frisian” and Saxon groups.Frisian kingdom controlling much of North Sea coast.Frankish conquest of Frisia and Saxony under Karl Martel–Charlemagne.

Historians today tend to characterize the tri‑partite relationship in the Netherlands as:

  • Frankish hegemonic core pushing north;
  • Frisian maritime middle ground mediating trade and resisting, then accommodating Frankish power; and
  • Saxon‑linked hinterlands interacting militarily and socially with both, later violently drawn into the Carolingian realm. [44]

Rather than three stable ethnic blocks, the literature treats them as fluid coalitions whose boundaries, political structures, and even names were repeatedly renegotiated through raids, alliances, Christianization, and the growing power of Frankish kings. The interaction is often framed as a long frontier struggle: campaigns by Frankish Merovingian and then Carolingian rulers to control northern tolls and convert Frisian and Saxon elites. [45] Frisian–Frankish wars in the seventh–eighth centuries end with Frisian defeat and incorporation; soon after, protracted Saxon wars extend similar Frankish domination eastward. [46] Nevertheless, studies emphasize continuity of local populations and laws (e.g. Lex Frisionum) under Frankish rule, suggesting integration through tribute, law‑codes, and missionary networks more than wholesale replacement. [47]

The Rhine–Meuse axis remains a political and fiscal frontier into the later seventh century, with successive shifts in control of key sites like Utrecht and Dorestad between Frankish and Frisian rulers before final Frankish consolidation. The Frisian–Frankish wars of the early eighth century, culminating in battles such as the Boarn (734 CE), bring most of the coastal Low Countries, including the northern parts of the watershed, into the Carolingian sphere. [48] From roughly the seventh century onward, a dense North Sea trading system linked Frisian, Frankish, and Saxon (in practice often Anglo‑Saxon and “Frisio‑Saxon”) communities into a single commercial zone. [49]

The Franks

The Franks first appear in the historical and archaeological record during the late Roman Empire, with evidence of interactions—often as raiders or federated allies (foederati) along the Roman frontier, especially in the lower Rhine region. [50] During the third to fifth centuries CE, Frankish groups increasingly settled within Roman territories, sometimes forcibly as a result of Roman policy (deportations or settlement of war captives), and sometimes through negotiation for land in exchange for military service. This led to a blending of Frankish and Gallo-Roman populations, as well as the transmission of Roman military, administrative, and material cultural practices to the newcomers. [51]

‘Franks’ is a Roman collective label for a series of smaller tribes in the areas east and north of the Lower Rhine who had long maintained relations with the Roman Empire. However, it wasn’t until the early 3rd century that they were given this name by the Roman authorities. The ethnicon ‘Franks’ was subject to change in the course of time, with the 3rd-century meaning differing considerably from that of the 5th century. . . . Frankish groups underwent a serious social transformation during the Late Roman period and that this was closely tied to increasing interaction – both friendly and hostile – with the Roman Empire. Viewed from this perspective, the Franks can be regarded as a ‘product’ of the complex dynamics in the Late Roman frontier.[52]

The Franks rose to prominence in the centuries following the Roman era through processes of sociopolitical consolidation, adaptation to post-Roman contexts, and deep interaction with remaining Roman systems and populations. Archaeological and anthropological studies highlight their transformation from loosely organized tribal or indigenous groups into a dominant political force that shaped early medieval Western Europe.

“(T)he Frankish identity emerged at the first half of the 3rd century out of various earlier, smaller Germanic groups, including the Salii, Sicambri, Chamavi, Bructeri, Chatti,  Chattuarii,  Ampsivarii, Tencteri, Ubii, Batavi and the Tungri, who inhabited the lower and middle Rhine valley between the Zuyderzee and the river Lahn and extended eastwards as far as the Weser, but were the most densely settled around the IJssel and between the Lippe and the Sieg. The Frankish confederation probably began to coalesce in the 210s.

The Franks eventually were divided into two groups: the Ripuarian Franks (Latin: Ripuari), who were the Franks that lived along the middle-Rhine River during the Roman Era, and the Salians, who probably originated in the Salland in Overijssel, before pressure from the Saxons then forced them to move into the empire in the 4th century and became the Salian Franks.[53]

The Salian and Ripuarian Franks emerge from the same broader Frankish confederation on the Rhine frontier, but they crystallize in different border zones and under different types of Roman interaction as reflected in table two and in illustration eight. [54]

Table Two: Summary Diferences Between Salian and Ripuarian Franks [55]

DifferencesSalian FrankRipuarian Frank
OriginsEarliest named in late Roman sources (Ammianus) as Franks “whom custom calls Salii,” living inside the Empire in Toxandria (southern Netherlands / Belgium between Meuse and Scheldt). They appear as a coastal and river‑delta frontier population, initially pirates/raiders, then foederati settled by Roman permission in the 4th century. [55a]Their ancestors are ‘right‑bank’ Rhine peoples of the middle Rhine zone (Bructeri, Chamavi, Tencteri, Sicambri, Chattuarii, etc.) who gradually coalesce into a Frankish identity along the Cologne–Rhineland frontier.
Their pre‑Toxandrian homeland is obscure; one late source (Zosimus) says they had previously lived outside the Empire and were pushed into Batavia by Saxons, but modern scholarship treats them more as a new confederate label for groups already along the lower Rhine than as a single ancient “tribe.” [55b]The name Ripuarii/Ribuarii is not definitively attested until the 7th–8th centuries, when it describes the Frankish population around Cologne and the lower/middle Rhineland; it is tied to a legal code (Lex Ribuaria) and a Merovingian regional category rather than to a clearly attested pre‑Merovingian “tribe.”
Evidence & TimingPre‑Merovingian documentation is relatively good: Roman historians mention Salii explicitly in the 4th century, in a context of imperial settlement and frontier defense; by the 5th century they form the backbone of the lower‑Rhine Frankish polity of Chlodio and then the Merovingians.Pre‑Merovingian evidence is indirect: Frankish groups are noted on the middle Rhine, but the specific label “Ripuarian” only surfaces clearly in Merovingian‑age legal and narrative sources; some scholars connect Jordanes’ Riparii at the Catalaunian Fields with them, but that identification is debated.
Frontier setting and Roman relationshipLower Rhine / North Sea Delta:
Strongly shaped by coastal defense politics, piracy, and Roman resettlement of Franks as laeti and foederati in depopulated frontier lands like Toxandria. Salian ethnogenesis is closely entangled with Roman military and agrarian policy on the lower Rhine limes border.
Middle Rhine / Cologne:
Shaped by long‑term contact between Roman Cologne and right‑bank Germanic groups, with a mix of raiding, recruitment, and gradual Frankish penetration onto the left bank, culminating in control of Cologne in the 5th century. Their emergence as a named group reflects Merovingian re‑organization of this older Rhineland frontier population.
Later legal–regional codificationLex Salica becomes the law code applied in much of northern Gaul between Loire and Silva Carbonaria, associated with the ruling Merovingian line of (ultimately) Salian background.Lex Ribuaria (c. 7th century) governs the Rhineland around Cologne and seems to build on, or parallel, the legal traditions also reflected in Lex Salica, but framed for a distinct Austrasian/Rhenish jurisdiction.

Illustration Eight: Frankish Expansion Between the Fourth and Ninth Centuries CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Maciamo Hay, A Brief History of the Franks, Eupedia, https://www.eupedia.com/europe/frankish_influence_modern_europe.shtml

Archaeologists Royens and Heeren provide a regional synthesis of archaeological and historical evidence from the Lower Rhine valley to illuminate how Roman and Frankish societies interacted and transformed during Late Antiquity. Their contention is the Franks are a Late Roman Era product. The Franks were not a long-standing ethnic group but rather a political-military formation emerging through Roman frontier interactions. Their rise was deeply entangled with Roman systems of payment, alliance, and warfare. By the fifth century, Frankish warlords had consolidated local power in former Roman territories, adopting Roman offices, titles, and material culture to legitimize their authority. [56]

These populations mixed with local survivors, forming a “hybrid Romano-Frankish frontier culture” rather than replacing the old one entirely. Archaeological evidence, such as distinct house types, weapon forms (like the francisca), and dress accessories, indicates the arrival of new population groups—likely from north of the Rhine (Elbe-Weser and Drenthe/Veluwe regions). The authors analyze a remarkable surge of gold hoard deposits found in the Lower Rhine area in the late fourth to fifth centuries. These hoard deposits are interpreted as payments to Frankish foederati, i.e., allied warbands employed by the Empire. Estimates suggest several thousand kilograms of gold circulated, showing substantial imperial investment in frontier diplomacy and defense. [57]

There is general agreement that gold circulation in Late Roman frontier regions was closely bound up with the military sphere as payment to soldiers and to leaders of federate war bands. The Late Roman gold influx into the Lower Rhine region reflects payments by the Roman authorities or usurpers to Frankish allies (foederati) in exchange for military support.  [58]

The temporal patterning of the gold influx also prompts some interesting observations. Four phases can be distinguished, based on the dating of the hoard finds (illustration nine) . We see a modest beginning in the third quarter of the 4th century, followed by a clear peak in the early 5th century. The number then falls again in the second quarter of the 5th century, before disappearing after a final hoard in c. 460 AD. Another interesting development is the spatial distribution of hoards over time. The earliest hoards are concentrated in the area east of the Rhine. In the early 5th century they went on to cover the area both east and west of the Lower Rhine.[59]

Illustration Nine: Distribution of Late Roman Gold Hoards

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 7 in Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren, Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 145, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

Royens and Heeren reject simple narratives of “Roman decline.” Instead, they emphasize continuity through transformation—the shift from Roman provincial society to early Frankish polities resulted from adaptive processes and mixed communities along the frontier. [60]

Archaeological evidence suggests that Frankish society underwent marked militarization and increasing social hierarchy during the Late Roman period. This process was driven by both conflict and cooperation with Rome. Access to Roman arms, fortifications, and wealth enhanced Frankish capacity for warfare and power brokerage, while the decline of centralized Roman authority created a vacuum for ambitious leaders to exploit. By the late fifth century, the Franks—especially under leaders such as Clovis—united previously disparate tribal groups to form the Merovingian dynasty, consolidating power in northern Gaul and moving towards the creation of a kingdom. [61]

Once established in former Roman Gaul, the Franks showed notable adaptability. They integrated aspects of Roman culture, language, law, and administrative practice, and adopted Christianity, which aided legitimization among local elites and the Church. Archaeological studies of burial practices, settlement patterns, and material culture reflect both continuity and innovation—a pragmatic retention of certain Roman traditions (e.g. urban lay-out, Christian sites) alongside distinctively Frankish elements (weapon graves, personal adornment styles). [62]

Early Medieval Frisians and Saxons

Along the terp and salt-marsh zone of the northern Netherlands, post‑Roman reoccupation and expansion during the fifth through seventh centuries is archaeologically associated with the emergence of a new Frisian kingdom or confederation. Linguistic and archaeological studies emphasize that these “new Frisians” drew on Anglo‑Saxon–like migrant groups and surviving coastal populations. They were not a simple continuation of the Roman-period Frisii tribe. [63]

These “new Frisians” descended largely from Saxon-, Angle- and Jute‑rich migrant streams mixed with remaining coastal populations, rather than directly from the Roman‑period Frisii. [64] As part of the the early Migration‑Period inflow into the northern Low Countries; many of the Angles and Jutes moved on to Britain as “Anglo‑Saxons”, but some remained within the coastal zone that became Frisia.

On the basis of settlement archaeology, archaeologist Jos Bazelmans argues that there was a marked break in habitation in the terp and marsh areas of present‑day Friesland between the later third and fifth centuries. This hiatus suggests that the Roman‑period Frisii of the northern Dutch coastal zone did not form a continuous, sedentary population that simply “became” the early‑medieval Frisians. The re‑occupation of the region in the fifth–sixth centuries is interpreted as involving new or restructured population groups, rather than the uninterrupted survival of a Roman‑era ethnic community. The mediaval Frisians were the result of a later, politically driven reuse of an old ethnonym by the Frankish elite, superimposed on a population that had undergone substantial demographic and cultural discontinuity. [65]

Bazelmans starts from two puzzles: the disappearance of the ethnonym ‘Frisii ‘from late Roman written sources after the third century, and its reappearance as Frisii/Frisones and Frisia in Merovingian and Carolingian texts from the sixth–seventh centuries onward. Bazelmans combines (1) archaeological settlement history in present‑day Friesland, (2) the textual tradition on the Frisiiand early‑medieval Frisians, and (3) comparative work on how imperial centers create and recycle ethnonyms on their frontiers.

Because the ethnonym disappears from the written record for roughly three centuries and then reappears attached to a reorganized coastal frontier, Bazelmans concludes that the name Frisia/Frisii was reintroduced from the outside, rather than preserved locally as an unbroken self‑designation. He suggests that Merovingian Frankish elites, drawing on the Roman ethnographic tradition, revived the old name for administrative and ideological purposes when integrating the coastal zone into a Frankish frontier system in the seventh century.

In this reading, the ethnonym “Frisians” is a product of imperial categorization. The Franks used the prestigious Roman repertoire of peoples at the North Sea coast to label and order frontier populations, thereby projecting Roman antiquity onto a new political geography. Dusting off and reusing the name Frisia could also have served practical purposes, for example in asserting claims over former Roman state land or legitimising Frankish authority in a region framed as an old Roman periphery.

Bazelmans’ main theoretical conclusion is that continuity of an ethnic name in texts does not necessarily imply continuity of population, culture, or self‑identification on the ground. The Frisian case shows how an old ethnonym can be revived after a demographic and textual gap, filled with new content, and then become internalized by later inhabitants to the point that it underpins strong regional and national narratives. For early‑medieval ethnicity, he urges treating ethnonyms as historically contingent labels embedded in power relations and Roman-Frankish discursive traditions, rather than as straightforward reflections of long‑lived “peoples.”

There is no wholesale refutation of Bazelmans arguments, but several scholars nuance or push back against specific parts of his model: the strength of the demographic “break,” the degree of Frankish top‑down control over the ethnonym, and whether “Frisian” is best read as primarily political rather than an ethnic entity. Some work on Frisian and Saxon “mirror histories” accepts the textual gap Bazelmans highlights but is more cautious about turning this into a hard population rupture, stressing that limited sources make any sharp discontinuity model fragile. Instead of a simple break and replacement, these authors emphasize overlapping coastal populations, flexible identities, and the possibility that at least some late Roman groups persisted under changing labels. [66]

IJssennagger‐Van der Pluijm explicitly cites Bazelmans’ view—that “Frisian” was re‑established by the Franks as a political term—but suggests an alternative reading in which Frisia is used “primarily as a geographical term” for a coastal zone, with Frisii/Frisones referring broadly to its inhabitants. This shifts the emphasis away from a purely invented, top‑down ethnic category toward a more open, regional label that could carry ethnic, political and geographical meanings simultaneously. [67]

Archaeological papers that were published in the same ‘Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity’ volume that includes Bazelman’s paper and later debates over ethnonyms stress that externally imposed labels are regularly appropriated and reworked “from below,” and some scholars think Bazelmans underplays this local agency in the early phases. On this view, even if the Frankish elite reintroduced the name from Roman tradition, coastal communities quickly began to fill “Frisian” with their own content, so the label cannot be treated as merely imperial shorthand or a passive political tag. [68]

Some historians and linguists are uneasy with treating “Frisian” mainly as a political category, arguing that law, language and mythic history in later Old Frisian texts reveal a strong sense of gens, or group identity, shaped by shared customs and a sacred past. From this angle, Bazelmans’ stress on power and discontinuity risks underestimating the emergence of a genuine ethnic self‑understanding by the High Middle Ages, even if the name’s reactivation was conditioned by Merovingian and Carolingian politics. [69]

The End of the Phlogenetic Gap: Profound Changes Along the Migratory Path

This multipart story focused on examining a range of methdologiclal, macro social-cultural and enviromental influences that may help explain or put into context the lack of identified subclades (YDNA genetic ancestors) in the migratory path of the Griffis genetic paternal line. The period of time for this phylogenetic gap is roughly between 3000 BC and 650 CE.

Based on historical and archaeological studies, migrating generations associated with the tail end of this gap, between 525 and 800 CE, from the Rhine-Meuse delta to the northern coastal areas of the Netherlands (Frisia), would have experienced a profound transformation in lifestyle, moving from a formerly Romanized, partly abandoned riverine landscape to a dynamic, maritime-oriented, and largely independent society.

In terms of the environment, the Rhine–Meuse zone offered relatively stable riverine landscapes with levees, older settlements, and a mix of arable fields, pastures, and woodland. Generations heading north would face a different enviroment. The northern coast (Frisia and adjacent marshlands) was a low, flat salt‑marsh environment facing the North Sea, with tidal creeks, peat, and frequent flooding, so settlements clustered on artificial dwelling mounds (terpen) or natural ridges. [70]

In terms of settlements and housing conditions, the late Roman and post‑Roman communities in the river area often occupied slightly higher sand ridges and former Roman‑era sites, with dispersed farmsteads that gradually coalesced into villages. In the north, migrants would adapt to terp‑based settlement: compact farm clusters on raised mounds, surrounded by open marsh pasture and drainage channels, with periodic rebuilding and heightening after floods. [71]

The nature of subsistence and the local economies were different given the projected migratory path. The Rhine–Meuse delta supported mixed farming (e.g. grain, cattle, pigs) and benefited from proximity to former Roman markets and transport along major rivers. On the northern coast, life was more strongly oriented to cattle raising on rich salt‑marsh pastures, peat and salt exploitation, and coastal/riverine trade. Harvests were higher than on sandy inland soils but depended on successful drainage and protection from the sea. From the seventh–eighth centuries, the Frisian coastal zone participated in a North Sea trade network linking Britain, Francia, and Scandinavia, so the migrants associated with the YDNA lineage may have been were drawn into longer‑distance commerce in wool, cattle, and crafted goods.[72]

Riverine life involved flood risk, but it was more localized and structured by known river channels and levees. On the coast, people faced storm surges, occasional catastrophic inundations, and brackish water, so flood anxiety and ritual or communal responses to the sea were central to experience. [73] Standing water, peat, and marshes increased exposure to fevers (often interpreted as malaria‑like “agues”) and nutritional stress when storms damaged pasture or salinized fields. [74]

In the fifth and sixth centuries the Rhine–Meuse region was a frontier zone influenced by the fading Roman limes and the expanding Frankish kingdoms, with emerging local elites tied to Frankish power structures. The northern coastal belt from the Scheldt to the Weser was identified in early medieval sources as “Frisia,” a patchwork of Frisian petty kingdoms and communities, only gradually drawn under Frankish control in the seventh–eighth centuries. [75]

People leaving the Rhine–Meuse zone would move from a landscape with lingering Roman material culture and early Frankish Christian influence toward a Frisian cultural sphere that remained predominantly pagan until missionary efforts intensified in the seveth–eighth centuries. Over generations, migrants could shift language and identity from more Frankish‑oriented dialects toward Frisian (part of the Anglo‑Frisian group), participating in shared styles of dress, burial, and craftsmanship that linked communities around the North Sea. [76] In the early Middle Ages, Christian influence spread earliest and most densely in the south of what is now the Netherlands, somewhat later and more unevenly in the central river area, and last and most sporadically in the northern coastal/Frisian zone. [77]

. . . And What about the Phylogenetic YDNA Gap?

A Y‑DNA phylogeny showing long internal branches with few subclades, similar to the lack of known identified haplogroups over a long perod of time, is most consistent with a small, relatively isolated male lineage that expanded slowly and experienced limited splitting. This phylogenetic pattern can conceivably fit a scenario of repeated but low‑level (localized migration and local patrilocality on the northern Dutch coast between 500 and 800 CE. [78]

Long branches with minimal subclade formation usually imply either: (1) a long period with low effective male population size (drift, bottleneck, founder effect), or (2) a long period with low mutation “visibility” (few lineages sampled, or technical/mutation‑rate issues), or both. [79] In demographic terms this often reflects a founding male, or very few males, whose patriline persists for many generations with little diversification, either because few male lines exist, many side‑branches go extinct, or later expansions are recent and not yet phylogenetically resolved. [80]

If a small group of related males moved from the Rhine–Meuse zone into one or more terp communities and then remained largely endogamous and patrilocal, their Y‑line could show a long, “thin” branch: one main stem, few long‑lived offshoots. [81] Archaeology suggests reoccupation and growth of some northern terps after an earlier decline, consistent with founder events at the ‘village level’. A few successful founding patrilines could dominate local Y‑DNA distribution, producing deep but sparsely subdivided branches in subsequent subclades or branches of the genetic tree. [82]

Imagine one or two brothers from the Rhine–Meuse area settle on a terp around 600 CE. Of perhaps there was a succession of a few generations that slowly moved north-westward to the northern coast during this time period. Over a couple of centuries their male descendants remain in the same marsh community or they migrate to the English Isle in the context of the growing maritime trade, while collateral lines frequently die out or are replaced, leaving a single, long main Y‑line with few enduring splits.

Migration here is likely repetitive and small‑scale (family‑level, chain migration) rather than massive, so each episode may add only a few males; many incoming lines will be lost by drift, disease, or social disadvantage, leaving only one or two that survive into the future. [83] Technically, long branches with few observed splits can also reflect undersampling of the lineage, uneven marker discovery, or branch‑length artefacts in current Y references, so some “missing” subclades might be methodological rather than historical. [84]

Perhaps this last paragraph succinctly captures why there is this 2,850 year gap or absence of documented YDNA haplogroups in the genetic YDNA paternal line leading up to the Most Recetn Common ancestor of haplogroup G-Z6748: small scale family level chain migration and methodological artifact.

Sources:

Feature Image: The left hand image is the scientific details for the estimated birth date for the most recent common ancestor associated with haplogroup G-Z6748. The right hand map is a map of Magna Frisia in Latin from Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frisia_716-la.svg. Magna Frisia (Greater Frisia) refers to an independent Frisian kingdom that existed in the coastal regions of the Netherlands and Germany from approximately 600–734 AD, during the Early Middle Ages. At its peak, it spanned from the Zwin near Bruges in Belgium to the Weser River in Germany. Perhaps the Most Recent Common Ancestor of G-Z6748 was born in Greater Frisia.

[1] Scientific Details for G-Z6748

Click for Larger View | Source: FamilyTreeDNA,Scientific Details on Haplogroup G-Z6748, https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/G-Z6748/scientific

[2] Estimating the precise birth year of ancient human remains using only haplogroups is highly difficult and generally not possible with high precision, often resulting in uncertainties of hundreds or thousands of years. While haplogroups can provide a general, deep ancestral timeframe (e.g., thousands of years ago), determining when a specific individual lived requires combining genetic data with other methods like radiocarbon dating.

Molecular Clock Variability: Haplogroup ages are estimated by counting SNP mutations (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms – the common variations in the DNA sequence) and assuming a constant rate. However, mutation rates can vary, leading to different estimations depending on the model.

Evolutionary Time vs. Genealogical Time: A haplogroup’s “formation” date (when the mutation first appeared) is not the same as the birth year of a specific person in that lineage. 

Factors Affecting Precision:

Haplogroup Resolution: High-resolution tests (e.g., Big Y) can narrow down a lineage to a few hundred years, but many standard tests only identify high-level, ancient branches (e.g., J-CTS5368, which is 19,000 years old).

Age of the Sample: The older the remains, the less accurate the specific birth year, while more recent remains (e.g., under 1,000 years) are easier to place if they belong to a well-defined, young branch.

Contamination and Quality: Ancient DNA often suffers from degradation or contamination, making it hard to identify specific, recent downstream SNPs, which limits accuracy. 

For genealogical purposes (e.g. the (last ~500 years), haplogroups are difficult to use for precise birth years on their own. For archaeology, they are useful for identifying ancestral, migration-based, and broadly defined, ancient timeframes. 

McDonald I. Improved Models of Coalescence Ages of Y-DNA Haplogroups. Genes (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;12(6):862. doi: 10.3390/genes12060862. PMID: 34200049; PMCID: PMC8228294, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8228294/

[3] The division of the Early Medieval era (roughly 500–1000 AD) into different “a,b,c, & d” periods or sub-phases (such as Early, Middle, and Late Saxon, or regional archaeological phases) exists because historians and archaeologists need to break down 500 years of complex, non-linear change into manageable, analytical units. Because historical, social, and cultural changes did not happen simultaneously across all of Europe, these subdivisions are necessary to reflect specific, localized developments. 

The lettered phases (A–D) in Pierik’s article are not necessaily an universal scheme for the Early Middle Ages. It belongs to specific regional or thematic chronology and each such system defines A–D differently by artefact style, burial practice, and absolute dates.

The four periods A–D are defined as successive blocks within the first millennium AD, distinguished mainly by dominant landscape processes, regional geomorphological configurations, and the intensity and form of human land use across the Dutch coastal plain, river area, and Pleistocene sands. Pierik’s four periods are defined by absolute calendar dates and shifts in population trends and human impact on geomorphology, following an established Early Medieval A–D scheme used in related archaeological work.

See:

Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

Pierk, H.J. and Rowin J. van Lanen, Roman and early-medieval habitation patterns in a delta landscape: The link between settlement elevation and landscape dynamics, Quaternary International xxx (2017) 1e14, https://www.academia.edu/34741833/Pierik_and_Van_Lanen_2017_Roman_and_early_medieval_habitation_patterns_in_a_delta_landscape_The_link_between_settlement_elevation_and_landscape_dynamics

[4] History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Low Countries, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 29 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Countries

Kooijmans, Leendert P. Louwe, Kieft, C. van de, Blockmans, Wim. “history of the Low Countries”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 29 Jul. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-the-Low-Countries-prehistoric-times-to-1579-2157575

Bavuso, I. (2021)  Balance of power across the Channel: reassessing Frankish hegemony in southern England (sixth–early seventh century). Early Medieval Europe,  29:  283–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/emed.12481

Wallace-Hadrill, John Michael, Heather, Peter John, Bayley, Charles Calvert, Berentsen, William H., Turner, Henry Ashby, Sheehan, James J., Hamerow, Theodore S., Duggan, Lawrence G., Elkins, Thomas Henry, Geary, Patrick J., Leyser, K.J., Strauss, Gerald, Kirby, George Hall, Schleunes, Karl A., Barkin, Kenneth. “Germany”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 27 Jan. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany .

Fierman, Roberrt, Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Nineth Centruty AD, in Edited by John Hines, Nelleke IJssennagger-van der Pluijm (eds), Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Boydell & Brewer; 2021. 223-248., https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf

Beyen, Marnix, A Tribal Trinity: The Rise and Fall of the Franks, the Frisians and the Saxons in the Historical Consciousness of the Netherlands since 1850 , European History Quarterly30(4), 2000, 493-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/026569140003000402 (Original work published 2000) https://library.fes.de/libalt/journals/swetsfulltext/8798011.pdf

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Reimersa, Franz, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Frisia Coast Trail Blog, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Lyra Mapping, The history of the Netherlands, every year, 2017, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUWqYaEm4h8

Click for Larger View | Source: Schuffelen, Marco, Historical Maps of The Netherlands (“Holland”), Holland Timeline, (Maps of Netherlands 300 AD and 100 AD), 2009, https://www.heardutchhere.net/NLtimeline.html

Schuffelen, Marco, Historical Maps of The Netherlands (“Holland”), Holland Timeline, (Maps of Netherlands 300 AD and 100 AD), 2009, https://www.heardutchhere.net/NLtimeline.html

Ealdlar, Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[6] History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

[7] van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

van Lanen, Rowin J., and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune, eds, Across Medieval Europe: Old Paradigmsand New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Lieden: Sidestone Press, 2019, 113- 134, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

[8] van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

van Lanen, Rowin J., and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune, eds, Across Medieval Europe: Old Paradigmsand New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Lieden: Sidestone Press, 2019, 113- 134, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

[9] van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

van Lanen, Rowin J., and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune, eds, Across Medieval Europe: Old Paradigmsand New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Lieden: Sidestone Press, 2019, 113- 134, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

[10] Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Post-Roman population dynamics in the Rhine- Meuse delta (the Netherlands). RURALIA XII Conference, 11th-17th September, Kilkenny (Ireland), https://www.academia.edu/34604939/Post_Roman_population_dynamics_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_RURALIA_XII_Conference_11th_17th_September_Kilkenny_Ireland_

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline. Reconstructing and validating (post-) Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA 8 (2018) ISSN: 2039-7895 (pp. 189-218), https://www.postclassical.it/PCA_Vol.8_files/PCA8_Groenewoudt-VanLanen.pdf

[11] Pierik, Harm Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

[12] Pierik, Harm Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

[13] Pierik, Harm Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline. Reconstructing and validating (post-) Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA 8 (2018) ISSN: 2039-7895 (pp. 189-218), https://www.postclassical.it/PCA_Vol.8_files/PCA8_Groenewoudt-VanLanen.pdf

[14] Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Post-Roman population dynamics in the Rhine- Meuse delta (the Netherlands). RURALIA XII Conference, 11th-17th September, Kilkenny (Ireland), https://www.academia.edu/34604939/Post_Roman_population_dynamics_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_RURALIA_XII_Conference_11th_17th_September_Kilkenny_Ireland_

van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

[15] van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi:10.1017/njg.2020.12, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/revealing-the-past-through-modelling-reflections-on-connectivity-habitation-and-persistence-in-the-dutch-delta-during-the-1st-millennium-ad/717D79192E8EDD6B90D58B060117EB1B

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Post-Roman population dynamics in the Rhine- Meuse delta (the Netherlands). RURALIA XII Conference, 11th-17th September, Kilkenny (Ireland), https://www.academia.edu/34604939/Post_Roman_population_dynamics_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_RURALIA_XII_Conference_11th_17th_September_Kilkenny_Ireland_

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Pierik, Harm Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

[16] The Merovingian dynasty was the ruling family of the Franks from around the middle of the fifth century until Pepin the Short in 751. They first appear as “Kings of the Franks” in the Roman army of northern Gaul. By 509 they had united all the Franks and northern Gallo-Romans under their rule. They conquered most of Gaul, defeating the Visigoths (507) and the Burgundians (534), and also extended their rule into Raetia (537). In Germania, the Alemanni, Bavarii and Saxons accepted their lordship. The Merovingian realm was the largest and most powerful of the states of western Europe following the breakup of the empire.

Merovingian dynasty, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merovingian_dynasty

See also: Britannica Editors. “Merovingian dynasty”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 11 Jul. 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Merovingian-dynasty

[17] The phrase “power-blocks in the Netherlands” (in the context of Frisians and Saxons) is used by Odile Flierman in her chapter “Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD.” In that piece she speaks of “several regional or even supra‑regional power‑blocks in the Netherlands c. AD 600,” into which the Frisian elites fit, so in the current historiography of early medieval Frisia she perhaps is effectively the originator and main user of this specific formulation.

” . . .(I)t can be said that the timing of the reappearance of the Frisian name in the written sources does not appear random. It coincides, at least approximately, with the rise of several regional or even supra-regional power-blocks in the Netherlands c. AD 600, who had not just each other to contend with, but would soon also enter into prolonged competition with their Frankish neighbours.

Quote on page 227: Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021: 223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[18] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[19] Reimersa, Franz, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Frisia Coast Trail Blog, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Frisian Kingdom, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian_Kingdom

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

[20] Frisii, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisii

[21] Anglo-Saxon settlement in the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_settlement_in_the_Netherlands

[22] Frisii, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisii

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[23] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Blockmans, Wim, Kooijmans, Leendert P. Louwe, Kieft, C. van de. “history of the Low Countries”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 29 Jul. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-the-Low-Countries-prehistoric-times-to-1579-2157575

[24] Anglo-Saxon settlement in the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_settlement_in_the_Netherlands

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[25] Ijssennagger-van der Pluijm N, Hines J, Wood I. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages: An Archaeoethnological Perspective. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:1-12, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages-an-archaeoethnological-perspective/07A47ECEA40037B87EE255A2421C5632

Scheringa, Jelmer, Frisians, Franks and their supposed disputes over seventh century Dorestad, Lecture held at a Research-meeting of the Amsterdam Archaeological Century, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam, February 8, 2011, https://www.academia.edu/2780006/Frisians_Franks_and_their_supposed_disputes_over_seventh_century_Dorestad

IJssennagger, N. L. 2017. Central because Liminal: Frisia in a Viking Age North Sea World . Introduction Chapter 1, [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/49801402/Chapter_1.pdf

Lebecq, Stéphane The Frisian trade in the Dark Ages; a Frisian or a Frankish/Frisian trade? In: Carmiggelt, A.,(ed). Rotterdam Papers VII, 1992, pp. 7-15, https://www.scribd.com/doc/6919218/Lebecq-The-Frisian-trade-in-the-Dark-Ages

[26] Jellema, Dirk. “Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages.” Speculum, vol. 30, no. 1, 1955, pp. 15–36. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2850035

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

[27] Faber, Hans, The Batwing Doors of Dorestad. A Two-Way Gateway of Trade and Power, 26 Oct 2020, Frisia Coast Trial Blog, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2020/10/26/dorestat/

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[28] IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, Hines J, Wood I. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages: An Archaeoethnological Perspective. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:1-12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages-an-archaeoethnological-perspective/07A47ECEA40037B87EE255A2421C5632

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

Low Countries, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 29 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Countries

IJssennagger, Nelleke L. “Between Frankish and Viking: Frisia and Frisians in the Viking Age.” Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 9 (2013): 69–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45020171

History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 January 2026,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

Blockmans, Wim, Kieft, C. van de, Kooijmans, Leendert P. Louwe. “history of the Low Countries”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 29 Jul. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-the-Low-Countries-prehistoric-times-to-1579-2157575

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Bavuso, Irene, Balance of power across the Channel: reassessing Frankish hegemony in southern England (sixth–early seventh century), Early Medieval Europe, Volume 29, Issue3, August 2021, Pages 283-304, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12481

Barkin, Kenneth, Schleunes, Karl A., Berentsen, William H., Strauss, Gerald, Geary, Patrick J., Leyser, K.J., Wallace-Hadrill, John Michael, Heather, Peter John, Bayley, Charles Calvert, Sheehan, James J., Duggan, Lawrence G., Turner, Henry Ashby, Kirby, George Hall, Hamerow, Theodore S., Elkins, Thomas Henry. “Germany”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 31 Jan. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany

[29] Scheringa, Jelmer, Frisians, Franks and their supposed disputes over seventh century Dorestad, Lecture held at a Research-meeting of the Amsterdam Archaeological Century, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam, February 8, 2011, https://www.academia.edu/2780006/Frisians_Franks_and_their_supposed_disputes_over_seventh_century_Dorestad

Dorestadt, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 December 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorestad

[30] W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

Lebecq, Stéphane The Frisian trade in the Dark Ages; a Frisian or a Frankish/Frisian trade? In: Carmiggelt, A.,(ed). Rotterdam Papers VII, 1992, pp. 7-15, https://www.scribd.com/doc/6919218/Lebecq-The-Frisian-trade-in-the-Dark-Ages

[31] IJssennagger, Nelleke L. “Between Frankish and Viking: Frisia and Frisians in the Viking Age.” Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 9 (2013): 69–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45020171

Schleunes, Karl A., Hamerow, Theodore S., Duggan, Lawrence G., Sheehan, James J., Heather, Peter John, Kirby, George Hall, Wallace-Hadrill, John Michael, Leyser, K.J., Bayley, Charles Calvert, Elkins, Thomas Henry, Geary, Patrick J., Berentsen, William H., Strauss, Gerald, Turner, Henry Ashby, Barkin, Kenneth. “Germany”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 31 Jan. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany

Low Countries, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 29 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Countries

[32] IJssennagger, Nelleke L. “Between Frankish and Viking: Frisia and Frisians in the Viking Age.” Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 9 (2013): 69–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45020171

Bravuso, Irene, Balance of power across the Channel: reassessing Frankish hegemony in southern England (sixth–early seventh century), Volume29, Issue3, August 2021, Pages 283-304, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12481

[33] Migration Period, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

[34] Migration Period, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

[35] Nieuwhof, Annet, Anglo-Saxon immigration or continuity? Ezinge and the coastal area of the northern Netherlands in the Migration Period, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 5, 2013/03/01, 53-83, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273449636_Anglo-Saxon_immigration_or_continuity_Ezinge_and_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_in_the_Migration_Period

History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 January 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273449636_Anglo-Saxon_immigration_or_continuity_Ezinge_and_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_in_the_Migration_Period

Migration Period, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

[36] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[37] History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

[38] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Bert J. Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, pages 113-134, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune (eds) Settlement Change Across Medieval Europe Old Paradigms and New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Sidestone Press, Leiden, 2019, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Maurice T.M. de Kleijn , Marjolein T.I.J. Gouw-Bouman & Harm Jan Pierik, Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw, 97 – 1–2 , 45–68, 2018, https://www.academia.edu/97223602/Exploring_Roman_and_early_medieval_habitation_of_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_modelling_large_scale_demographic_changes_and_corresponding_land_use_impact

[39] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Bert J. Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, pages 113-134, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune (eds) Settlement Change Across Medieval Europe Old Paradigms and New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Sidestone Press, Leiden, 2019, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

Groenewoudt, Bert J. and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline. Reconstructing and validating (post-) Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA Post – Classical Archaeologies PCA, 8 (2018) ISSN: 2039-7895 (pp. 189-218), https://www.postclassical.it/PCA_Vol.8_files/PCA8_Groenewoudt-VanLanen.pdf

[40] Ethnogenesis, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnogenesis

[41] T.M. Weik. 2014. The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis. Annual Review Anthropology. 43:291-305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025920

[42] Hu, Di, Approaches to the Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Past and Emergent Perspectives, Dec 2013, Journal of Archaeological Research 21(4), 371-402 , DOI:10.1007/s10814-013-9066-0, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257578031_Approaches_to_the_Archaeology_of_Ethnogenesis_Past_and_Emergent_Perspectives

Voss, Barbara, What’s New? Rethinking ethnogenesis in the Archaeologiy of Colonialism, American Antiquity, 80(4), 2015, pp. 655–670, https://www.itzaarchaeology.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Voss_B._L._2015._Whats-New-Rethinking-Ethnogenesis.pdf

[43] Ton Derks and Nico Roymans, Introduction, in in Ton Derks & Nico Roymans, eds, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity The Role of Power and Tradition in Antiquity, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2009, Page 1, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/35248/1/340082.pdf

[44] Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, May 22, 202, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Saxons, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxons

Franks, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franks

Frisii, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisii

Anglo-Saxons, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 7 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[45] Republic of Amsterdam Radio, Illuminating the Dark Ages with Monks, Migrations and Merovingians, 8 February 2021, The Low Countries, https://www.the-low-countries.com/article/illuminating-the-dark-ages/

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

[46] Frisian–Frankish wars, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

Saxons, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxons

[47] Faber, Hans, A Frontier Known as Watery Mess: the Coast of Flander, 9 Aug 2021, Frisia Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/the-frontier-known-as-watery-mess-the-coast-of-flanders

[48] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[49] Deckers, Pieterjan & Dries Tys, Early medieval communities around the North Sea: a ‘maritime culture’?, Rica Annaert, Tinne Jacobs, Ingrid In ’t Ven & Steffi Coppens, eds, ACE Conference of Brussels: The Very beginning of Europe? Early Medieval Migration and Colonization, 2012, 81-88, https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/RELM/7/RELM007-001.pdf

[50] Foederati were non-Roman tribes or groups that entered into a treaty (foedus) with the Roman Empire, providing military service in exchange for land, payment, or protection. Initially used as allies to protect borders, their reliance grew during the late Western Empire, eventually contributing to its instability. They served as mercenary allies, often maintaining their own leaders, to defend the Empire against other barbarians.

Foederati, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 28 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foederati

[51] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 135, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

Franks, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franks

Mark, Harrison, Franks, 20 Mar 2023, World History Encyclopedia, https://www.worldhistory.org/Franks/

Mark, Harrison, The Franks and the Shaping of Europe in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds, 22 Feb 2024, Brewminate, https://brewminate.com/the-franks-and-the-shaping-of-europe-in-the-ancient-and-medieval-worlds/

Hay, Maciamo, A Brief History of the Franks, Eupedia, https://www.eupedia.com/europe/frankish_influence_modern_europe.shtml

[52] Netherlands in the Roman era, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 22 September 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Roman_era

[53] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 135, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[54] Lendering, Jona, Franks, Last Modified on 13 October 2020, Articles on Ancient History, Livius.org, https://www.livius.org/articles/people/franks/

Ripuarian Franks, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 9 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripuarian_Franks

Salian Franks, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salian_Franks

[55] Ammianus Marcellinus, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 6 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus

Lendering, Jona, Franks, Last Modified on 13 October 2020, Articles on Ancient History, Livius.org, https://www.livius.org/articles/people/franks/

Ripuarian Franks, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 9 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripuarian_Franks

Salian Franks, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salian_Franks

Hay, Maciamo, A Brief History of the Franks, Eupedia, https://www.eupedia.com/europe/frankish_influence_modern_europe.shtml

Mark, Harrison, Franks, 20 Mar 2023, World History Encyclopedia, https://www.worldhistory.org/Franks/

Mark, Harrison, The Franks and the Shaping of Europe in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds, 22 Feb 2024, Brewminate, https://brewminate.com/the-franks-and-the-shaping-of-europe-in-the-ancient-and-medieval-worlds/

Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 135, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

Ripuarian Franks, Jatland, This page was last edited on 4 October 2022, https://www.jatland.com/home/Ripuarian_Franks

Netherlands in the Roman Era, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Roman_era

[55a] Ammianus Marcellinus references the Salian Franks in his historical work, 
Res Gestae (often referred to as Rerum Gestarum Libri XXXI), specifically in Book XVII. See https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Ammian/17*.html

[55b] The late fifth/early sixth-century Greek historian Zosimus is the sole source for the account that the Salian Franks originated outside the Roman Empire, were expelled from their homeland by Saxons, and subsequently settled in Batavia (an island in the Rhine delta) prior to 357 AD. Zosimus describes them as a people detached from the Franks.

See: Lendering, Jona, Zosimus, New History 3.06, 11 October 2020, Livius, https://www.livius.org/sources/content/zosimus/zosimus-new-history-3/zosimus-new-history-3.06/

[56] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 133-156 https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[57] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, , 133-156, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[58] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 141, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[59] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 145-146, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[60] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 133-156, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[61] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 133-156, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[62] Hay, Maciamo, A Brief History of the Franks, Eupedia, https://www.eupedia.com/europe/frankish_influence_modern_europe.shtml

Joachim Henning, ed, Post-Roman Towns, Trade and Settlement in Europe and Byzantium, Vol 1 The Heirs of the Roman West, Walter de Gruyter, New York, 2007, 1- 40, https://www.academia.edu/846386/_Early_European_towns_The_development_of_the_economy_in_the_Frankish_realm_between_dynamism_and_deceleration_AD_500_1100_in_Joachim_Henning_ed_Post_Roman_Towns_Trade_and_Settlement_in_Europe_and_Byzantium_vol_1_The_Heirs_of_the_Roman_West_Berlin_New_York_De_Gruyter_2007_pp_3_40

Vanthemsche G, De Peuter R. The Era of the Frankish Kingdoms: (Fifth–Tenth Centuries). In: A Concise History of Belgium. Cambridge Concise Histories. Cambridge University Press; 2023:43-72, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/concise-history-of-belgium/era-of-the-frankish-kingdoms/D711BBA9C7EB51FB70443D9C691B16BF

Reynolds, Burnam W., Franks and the Holy Roman Empire, 2023, EBSCO, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/franks-and-holy-roman-empire

Dierkens, Alain and Patrick Périn, The 5th Century advance of the Franks in Belgica II: history and archaeology, 165- 193, in E. Taayke, J.H. Looijenga, O.H. Harsema and H.R. Reinders, eds, Essays on thee Early Franks, Barkhuis, 2003, https://www.academia.edu/21039688/The_5th_c_Advance_of_the_Franks_in_Belgica_II 

Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 135, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[63] Frisii, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisii

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

People of the North Sea, 7 August 2019, Doug’s Archaeology, https://dougsarchaeology.wordpress.com/2019/08/07/people-of-the-north-sea/

Nieuwhof, Annet, Anglo-Saxon immigration or continuity? Ezinge and the coastal area of the northern Netherlands in the Migration Period, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 5, 2013/03/01, 53-83, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273449636_Anglo-Saxon_immigration_or_continuity_Ezinge_and_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_in_the_Migration_Period

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[64] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

History of the Netherlands, Wikipeda, This page was last edited on 4 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[65] Bazelmans, Jos , The early-medieval use of ethnic names from classical antiquity. The case of the Frisians, 321 – 338, in Ton Derks & Nico Roymans, eds, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity The Role of Power and Tradition in Antiquity, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2009, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/35248/1/340082.pdf

Ton Derks and Nico Roymans, Introduction, in in Ton Derks & Nico Roymans, eds, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity The Role of Power and Tradition in Antiquity, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2009, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/35248/1/340082.pdf

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[66] Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf ; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[67] IJssennagger, N. L., Central because Liminal: Frisia in a Viking Age North Sea World . [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 2017, https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/49801404/Chapter_2.pdf

[68] Coloru, Omar, A Review of Ton Derks, Nico Roymans, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity: The Role of Power and Tradition. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies 13. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2009, Bryn Mawr Classical Review BMCR 2009.07.71, https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009.07.71/

Ton Derks and Nico Roymans, Introduction, in in Ton Derks & Nico Roymans, eds, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity The Role of Power and Tradition in Antiquity, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2009, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/35248/1/340082.pdf

[69] Bremmer, R. H. Taking stock of Old Frisian studies 1992-2021. Us Wurk. Tydskrift Foar Frisistyk, 70(1-2), 1-28. 2021, doi:10.21827/5fb7c91ed9fba,

Frans Riemersma, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Sep 1, 2018, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail Blog,https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[70] Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

[71] Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

[72] Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, May 22, 202, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Deckers, Pieterjan & Dries Tys, Early medieval communities around the North Sea: a ‘maritime culture’? , in Rica Annaert, Tinne Jacobs, Ingrid In ’t Ven & Steffi Coppens, eds, ACE Conference of Brussels: The Very beginning of Europe? Early Medieval Migration and Colonization, 2012, 81-88, https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/RELM/7/RELM007-001.pdf

[73] Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

[74] There is extensive documentation, particularly within environmental history and paleoclimatology, that the period between 500 and 800 CE (the Early Middle Ages/Late Antiquity) in Europe was marked by increased rainfall, widespread flooding, and the creation of standing water/marshes, which caused significant increases in malaria-like “agues” and severe nutritional stress due to agricultural damage.

The late 6th and 7th centuries followed a more humid period that began in the 4th century, which, combined with cooler temperatures, increased environmental, and social stress. This increased humidity created, or restored, large marshlands and fostered conditions for mosquitoes, leading to the resurgence of “agues” (fever/malaria).

The increased humidity resulted in severe flooding and storms, particularly in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe, which damaged pastures, destroyed crops, and salinized coastal soils. This led to a “critical extra stress” on vulnerable populations.

Mordechai, L and M. Eisenberg, T.P. Newfield, A. Izdebski, J.E. Kay, H. Poinar, The Justinianic Plague: An inconsequential pandemic?, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116 (51) 25546-25554, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903797116 (2019).

Harper, Kyle, How Climate Change and Plague Helped Bring Down the Roman Empire, 19 Dec 2017, Smithsonian Magazine, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-climate-change-and-disease-helped-fall-rome-180967591/

 Jongman, W. M., Jacobs, J. P. A. M., & Klein Goldewijk, G. M. (2019). Health and wealth in the Roman Empire. Economics & Human Biology, 34 , 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2019.01.005

[75] McDaniel, Ryan David, Decline and Fall? The Institutional History of Post- Imperial Western Europe, AD 400-800, 27 Aug 2012, University of New Mexico, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds/52/; https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hist_etds

Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

[76] McDaniel, Ryan David, Decline and Fall? The Institutional History of Post- Imperial Western Europe, AD 400-800, 27 Aug 2012, University of New Mexico, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds/52/; https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hist_etds

Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Deckers, Pieterjan & Dries Tys, Early medieval communities around the North Sea: a ‘maritime culture’?, Rica Annaert, Tinne Jacobs, Ingrid In ’t Ven & Steffi Coppens, eds, ACE Conference of Brussels: The Very beginning of Europe? Early Medieval Migration and Colonization, 2012, 81-88, https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/RELM/7/RELM007-001.pdf

Reimersa, Franz, Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, May 22, 202, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[77] South: Early and Stable Christian Core

  • By the 4th century there was already a Christian community and episcopal center at Tongeren–Maastricht, with Bishop Servatius traditionally dying and being buried in Maastricht around 384.
  • Through the early medieval period, areas south of the Meuse (roughly today’s Limburg and adjacent Brabant) belonged to the Tongeren–Maastricht–Liège diocese, so Christian institutions, churches and later abbeys such as Rolduc and Susteren formed a continuous, dominant presence there.
  • After Clovis’ baptism around 500, Frankish royal support reinforced Christianity in this southern zone, so by the 7th century it was effectively integrated into the Frankish Christian world with high rates of formal Christianization compared to the rest of the Low Countries.

Central River Area: 7th–8th Century Mission Zone:

  • The Rhine–Meuse river zone around Utrecht and later Dorestad shifted from a late Roman frontier into a missionary frontier; Frankish troops took Utrecht around 630 and King Dagobert I founded a church there, marking the area as a base for northern missions.
  • Anglo‑Saxon missionaries such as Willibrord arrived at Utrecht in 690, using it as an episcopal and monastic centre to convert neighbouring Frisian and Frankish populations in the central Netherlands.
  • Christian influence here grew significantly in the 7th–8th centuries but remained contested during periods of Frisian political control, as shown by episodes like Frisian king Radbod’s destruction of the church at Utrecht; only with Carolingian consolidation in the later 8th century does Christianization become more secure and widespread in this middle zone.

North (Broad Frisia): Slow, Fragmentary, and Late:

  • Only after Charlemagne’s subjugation of the Frisians and Saxons in the late 8th century did the region become “officially Christian,” and even then, sources note that remnants of paganism persisted in Friesland into the later Middle Ages, indicating a relatively low and slow rate of effective Christian influence compared to southern and central regions.
  • The northern coastal region (broad Frisia from Noord‑Holland through Friesland and Groningen) retained strong pre‑Christian religious traditions well into the 8th and even 9th centuries, despite early missionary attempts by figures like Amandus, Willibrord, and Boniface.
  • Frankish and Anglo‑Saxon missions repeatedly met resistance; Frisian rulers such as Radbod are described explicitly as defenders of pagan practice, and Boniface’s martyrdom near Dokkum in 754 underscores the limited penetration of Christianity there at that time.

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian. 

History of religion in the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_religion_in_the_Netherlands

Oosterhoff, Frederika G., Willibrord – The ‘Apostle of Frisia’, 1990, https://www.christianstudylibrary.org/article/willibrord-apostle-frisia

Selderhuis, Herman J., ed, Handbook of Dutch History, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen, 2014, https://www.isdistribution.com/DocumentRender.aspx?aId=49333&asId=2

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

Riemersma, Frans Liudger, the First Frisian Apostle, 18 October 2020, Frisian Coast Trail, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2020/10/18/liudger-the-first-frisian-apostle/

[78] J. Chiaroni,  P.A. Underhill,  & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, Y chromosome diversity, human expansion, drift, and cultural evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (48) 20174-20179, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910803106 

Karmin M, Saag L, Vicente M, Wilson Sayres MA, Järve M, Talas UG, Rootsi S, Ilumäe AM, Mägi R, Mitt M, Pagani L, Puurand T, Faltyskova Z, Clemente F, Cardona A, Metspalu E, Sahakyan H, Yunusbayev B, Hudjashov G, DeGiorgio M, Loogväli EL, Eichstaedt C, Eelmets M, Chaubey G, Tambets K, Litvinov S, Mormina M, Xue Y, Ayub Q, Zoraqi G, Korneliussen TS, Akhatova F, Lachance J, Tishkoff S, Momynaliev K, Ricaut FX, Kusuma P, Razafindrazaka H, Pierron D, Cox MP, Sultana GN, Willerslev R, Muller C, Westaway M, Lambert D, Skaro V, Kovačevic L, Turdikulova S, Dalimova D, Khusainova R, Trofimova N, Akhmetova V, Khidiyatova I, Lichman DV, Isakova J, Pocheshkhova E, Sabitov Z, Barashkov NA, Nymadawa P, Mihailov E, Seng JW, Evseeva I, Migliano AB, Abdullah S, Andriadze G, Primorac D, Atramentova L, Utevska O, Yepiskoposyan L, Marjanovic D, Kushniarevich A, Behar DM, Gilissen C, Vissers L, Veltman JA, Balanovska E, Derenko M, Malyarchuk B, Metspalu A, Fedorova S, Eriksson A, Manica A, Mendez FL, Karafet TM, Veeramah KR, Bradman N, Hammer MF, Osipova LP, Balanovsky O, Khusnutdinova EK, Johnsen K, Remm M, Thomas MG, Tyler-Smith C, Underhill PA, Willerslev E, Nielsen R, Metspalu M, Villems R, Kivisild T. A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):459-66. doi: 10.1101/gr.186684.114. Epub 2015 Mar 13. PMID: 25770088; PMCID: PMC4381518. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381518/

Allison E. Mann, Eyðfinn Magnussen, Christopher R. Tillquist, Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands, preprint August 28, 2024, bioRxiv 2024.08.27.601563; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563v1.full

Altena, E., Smeding, R., van der Gaag, K.J. et al. The dutch Y-chromosome from the early middle ages to present day. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 17, 116 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-025-02224-4

Swiel Y, Kelso J, Peyrégne S. Resolving the source of branch length variation in the Y chromosome phylogeny. Genome Biol. 2025 Jan 6;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03468-4. PMID: 39762943; PMCID: PMC11702058. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702058/

[79] Allison E. Mann, Eyðfinn Magnussen, Christopher R. Tillquist, Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands, preprint August 28, 2024, bioRxiv 2024.08.27.601563; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563v1.full

Karmin M, Saag L, et al, A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):459-66. doi: 10.1101/gr.186684.114. Epub 2015 Mar 13. PMID: 25770088; PMCID: PMC4381518. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381518/

J. Chiaroni,  P.A. Underhill,  & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, Y chromosome diversity, human expansion, drift, and cultural evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (48) 20174-20179, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910803106 

Swiel Y, Kelso J, Peyrégne S. Resolving the source of branch length variation in the Y chromosome phylogeny. Genome Biol. 2025 Jan 6;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03468-4. PMID: 39762943; PMCID: PMC11702058. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702058/

[80] Adamov D, Ponomarev G, Evsyukov I, Zhabagin M, Belenikin M, Antonenko A, et al. Phylogeography and Microevolution of Y-Chromosome Haplogroup N-B482: Ancient Diffusion and Modern Relicts. Nature Anthropology 20253, 10017. https://doi.org/10.70322/natanthropol.2025.10017

Galton–Watson process, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galton–Watson_process

Karmin M, Saag L, et al., A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):459-66. doi: 10.1101/gr.186684.114. Epub 2015 Mar 13. PMID: 25770088; PMCID: PMC4381518. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381518/

J. Chiaroni,  P.A. Underhill,  & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, Y chromosome diversity, human expansion, drift, and cultural evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (48) 20174-20179, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910803106

[81] Altena, E., Smeding, R., van der Gaag, K.J. et al. The dutch Y-chromosome from the early middle ages to present day. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 17, 116 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-025-02224-4

A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348)

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Post-Roman population dynamics in the Rhine- Meuse delta (the Netherlands). RURALIA XII Conference, 11th-17th September, Kilkenny (Ireland), https://www.academia.edu/34604939/Post_Roman_population_dynamics_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_RURALIA_XII_Conference_11th_17th_September_Kilkenny_Ireland_

[82] A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348)\

Allison E. Mann, Eyðfinn Magnussen, Christopher R. Tillquist, Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands, preprint August 28, 2024, bioRxiv 2024.08.27.601563; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563v1.full

Faber, Hans, Have a Frisians Cocktail! A Rich Composition, 25 Dec 2015, Frisia Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/12/25/untitled

[83] J. Chiaroni,  P.A. Underhill,  & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, Y chromosome diversity, human expansion, drift, and cultural evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (48) 20174-20179, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910803106

Allison E. Mann, Eyðfinn Magnussen, Christopher R. Tillquist, Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands, preprint August 28, 2024, bioRxiv 2024.08.27.601563; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563v1.full

Adamov D, Ponomarev G, Evsyukov I, Zhabagin M, Belenikin M, Antonenko A, et al. Phylogeography and Microevolution of Y-Chromosome Haplogroup N-B482: Ancient Diffusion and Modern Relicts. Nature Anthropology 20253, 10017. https://doi.org/10.70322/natanthropol.2025.10017

[84] Swiel Y, Kelso J, Peyrégne S. Resolving the source of branch length variation in the Y chromosome phylogeny. Genome Biol. 2025 Jan 6;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03468-4. PMID: 39762943; PMCID: PMC11702058. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702058/

Zehra Köksal, Annina Preussner, Jaakko Leinonen, Taru Tukiainen, Introducing the Y-chromosomal Ancestral-like Reference Sequence—Improving the Capture of Human Evolutionary Information, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 42, Issue 10, October 2025, msaf222, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf222

Puurand T, Möls M, Kaplinski L, Maal K, Krjutskov K, Salumets A, Kivisild T, Remm M. Y-mer: a k-mer based method for determining human Y chromosome haplogroups from ultra-low sequencing depth data. Genome Biol. 2025 Aug 12;26(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03714-3. PMID: 40797266; PMCID: PMC12341214. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12341214/

Pille Hallast, Peter Ebert, Mark Loftus, Feyza Yilmaz, Peter A. Audano, Glennis A.Logsdon, Marc Jan Bonder, Weichen Zhou, Wolfram Höps, Kwondo Kim, Chong Li, Philip Dishuck, David Porubsky, Fotios Tsetsos, Jee Young Kwon, Qihui Zhu, Katherine M. Munson, Patrick Hasenfeld, William T. Harvey, Alexandra P. Lewis, Jennifer Kordosky, Kendra Hoekzema, The Human Genome Structural Variation Consortium (HGSVC), Jan O. Korbel, Chris Tyler-Smith, Evan E. Eichler, Xinghua Shi, Christine R. Beck, TobiasMarschall, Miriam K. Konkel, Charles Lee, Assembly of 43 diverse human Y chromosomes reveals extensive complexity and variation, bioRxiv 2022.12.01.518658; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.01.518658

Hallast, P., Ebert, P., Loftus, M. et al. Assembly of 43 human Y chromosomes reveals extensive complexity and variation. Nature 621, 355–364 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06425-6

The Ancestor of Haplogroup G-Z6748, the Terps, Transport Corridors and Landscape Archaeology – Part Eight

This is the eighth part of long story about a 2,850 year gap or absence of documented YDNA haplogroups in the Griff(is)(es)(ith) genetic YDNA paternal line. Various aspects of this gap have been discussed in the prior seven parts of the story. The gap started with the most common recent ancestor associated with haplogroup G-FGC7516 who was born around 2200 BCE. The next documented genetic ancestor in the Griff(is)(es)(ith) YDNA line is an ancestor associated with the G-Z6748 haplogroup. This gap of undocumented YDNA ancestors represents about 95 generations. It is a relatively big gap that spans a migratory path in a period of wide ranging changes in the environment as well as the social fabric of the landscape in northwestern Europe.

This part of the multi-part story (the eighth part) and the next part (the ninth and final part) focuses on a discussion about the ancestor associated with the G-Z6748 haplogroup and the undocumented generations that may have lived immediately before or after his life.

Specifically this part of the story focuses on the environmental influences and possible soecific migratory paths that might be associated with the generations on the tail end of this phylogenetic gap. The final, ninth part of the story focuses on the possible indigenous socio-cultural groups that might have been associated with these YDNA generations.

As discussed in part six of this story, the estimated possible migratory paths of the approximately 95 undocumented generations that are associated with this phylogenetic gap significantly widens as each successive generation approached and passed through the area that is presently known as the Rhine Meuse delta region. The eventual endpoint of this migratory path is where and when the ancestor associated with haplogroup G-Z6748 may have lived.

The possible migratory paths of the Griff(is)(es)(ith) YDNA genetic line were Influenced in varying degrees by the geographical and environmental influences impacting changes in the Rhine, Meuse, and other river watershed areas. As generations of the Griff(is)(es)(ith) YDNA lineage migrated northwestward through the lower Rhine and delta region, the marine activity on the north and west coastline and the changing terrain of the peat lowlands, increasingly played an influencing role on their migratory route.

In the late Roman and medieval periods, large parts of the western and northern Netherlands were covered by extensive peat bogs that changed over time. Research increasingly shows that major geographical changes (e.g., changing river courses, an increase of flooded areas and wet areas) occurred during the transition from the late-Roman (around 270 to 450 CE) to early-medieval periods (roughly 450 to 1050 CE). [1] Coinciding with these landscape changes, archaeological evidence in the modrn day Netherlands area points to a severe demographic decline as well as changes in settlement patterns and land use during this period. [2]

The first millennium AD encompasses the Roman period (12 BC to AD 450) and the Early Middle Ages (AD 450 to 1050). In the Netherlands, this millennium saw population growth, steep decline and subsequent revival. In addition, many changes occurred in the physical landscape, marking a transition from a mainly natural prehistorical lowland landscape to an increasingly human-affected landscape.

From the late 3rd century AD, . . . depopulation occurred, coinciding with the collapse of the Western Roman Empire and the large-scale migration of tribes throughout NW Europe. This period has traditionally been referred to as the ‘Dark Ages’ . This term on the one hand refers to a period of cultural decline and disorder, and on the other hand it is used for periods in general from which little information is available.[3]

The Historical and Geographical Context of the Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA) of Haplogroup G-Z6748

As depicted in illustration one, it is estimated that the ancestor that marks the endpoint of this phylogenetic gap, a male descendant who represents the G-Z6748 haplogroup, was born around 668 CE. There is a 95 percent chance of certainty that he was born within a roughly six hundred year time span, 380 CE to 908 CE. There is a 68 percent chance that he was born between 524 CE and 792 CE, roughly a 275 year range (see illustration two). [4]

Illustration One: Scientific Details of the G-Z6748 Haplogroup

Click for Larger View | Source: FamilyTreeDNA,Scientific Details on Haplogroup G-Z6748, https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/G-Z6748/scientific

Harm Jan Pierik, a geographer who studies the geology and landscape evolution of the lowland areas, provides an informative illustration that situates two paleogeographical maps in a timeline based on five different time axes: general archaeological time periods, socio-cultural time periods, reforestation and deforestation cycles, climatic periods and geomorphological changes between 100 BCE and 1200 CE (see illustration two).

Illustration Two: Palaeogeographical maps of 100 CE and 800 CE of Netherlands

Click for larger View | Source: Fig. 2. Palaeogeographical maps of (A) AD 100 and (B) AD 800 in Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human – landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

This illustration provides a wealth of summary and graphic information on the Netherlands in the first millennium CE. The Dutch landscape shifted from mostly natural to an heavily human-altered environment. Changes, however, varied by region due to the nature of the local geography and people’s actions like farming, draining land, and cutting peat for building supplies and fire. Humans slowly weakened landscapes through everyday land use, until big events like storms tipped them into lasting new shapes—worst in peat coasts, milder in rivers and sands areas. By 1000 CE, people had unintentionally remade the Netherlands’ lowlands.

If we assume that the most recent common ancestor of haplogroup G-Z-6748 was born roughly between 525 and 800 CE (within the 68 percent statistical confidence interval reflected in illustration one), we can get an inkling of the general historical context and the physical circumstances he as well as immediate preceding generations experienced when they lived. Illustration three highlights when the Most Recent Common Ancestor (MRCA) of G-Z6748 and immediate generations lived in context of the five time lines found in Harm Jan Pierik’s illustration.

Illustration Three: Most Recent Common Ancestor of G-Z6748 and Five Time Periods

Click for larger View | Source: Part of Fig. 2. Palaeogeographical maps of (A) AD 100 and (B) AD 800 in Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human – landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

The ancestor lived in what is known as ‘period B’ of the early medieval archaeoogical period. This early medieval period (roughly the fifth through tenth centuries) in Europe, is called the “Dark Ages” and saw the fall of Rome, migrations of various indigenous groups (referred to as ‘the Migration Period [5] ), and the formation of new kingdoms like Frankish Merovingians in the mid to south region, the Frisians in the north and Anglo-Saxons in England. [6] It was a period characterized by fragmented power, cultural shifts, and the rise of Christianity, with later centuries showing increasing stability and development before the High Middle Ages. [7]

Another rendition of the five time lines in context of when the MRCA of G-Z6748 lived is provided in illustration four below. Illustration four is from a study by Rowin J. van Lanen who presents the combined results of several mutlidisciplinary studies, including Pierik’s, that developed landscape-archaeological models of this time period. These models spatially analyze natural and cultural dynamics in five manifestations: route networks, long-distance transport corridors, settlement patterns, palaeodemographics and land-use systems. Van Lenen’s summary study basically ‘repackages’ Pierik’s illusration into a slightly different graphic portrayal. [8]

Illustration Four: The MRCA of G-Z6748 in Context of Cultural and Natural Dynamics During the First Millennium AD

Click for Larger View | Source: Modified version of Figure 2 in R.J. van Lanen. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 99, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2020.12

Similar to illustration three, van Lanen’s depiction of the time period suggests that the MRCA of G-Z6748 lived during a period when there was low population density during the Merovingian era that witnessed a period of reforestation. He also lived in the Dark Ages Cold Period (DACP) was a time of widespread cold, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, roughly from AD 400 to 765 CE, following the Roman Warm Period and overlapping with the Late Antique Little Ice Age (LALIA) around AD 536-660 AD. This cold period was likely triggered by massive volcanic eruptions and low solar activity. [9]

During this period of time, generations of ancesters preceding the MRCA of haplogroup G-Z6748 may have lived in the central area of the lowlands. It is also possible that the MRCA of G-Z6748 migrated to the northern area where remnants of his YDNA have been reportedly located. Depending on the rate and course of migration, preceding generations may have lived in the coastal areas of the central delta and river watershed areas of the Meuse and Rhine Rivers.

“Life Experiences” of MRCA of G-Z6748 and Ancestors Living Between 525 and 800 CE

As mentioned there is a 68 percent chance that the MRCA of G-Z6748 was born between 524 CE and 792 CE. This time span of roughly a 275 years represents about 8 generations of YDNA ancesors, one of which represents the MRCA of G-6748. Using this time span, we can recreate a general protrayal of what these generations experienced based on the time line conditions referenced in illustrations three and four and depending on the geographical location of where they might have lived along the migratory path. 

An individual living in the northern coastal Netherlands area between 525 and 800 CE

An individual in the northern Netherlands between 525 and 800 CE would have lived in small, kin-based rural communities in a wet, tidally influenced landscape, with a mixed farming economy and gradually increasing integration into wider Frisian and Frankish trade networks and political structures of emerging elites. Social life was structured around extended households, local assemblies and daily existence was closely shaped by flooding, salt-marsh grazing, and modest climatic variability in the late Holocene North Sea environment. [10]

Much of the northern coastal zone (Friesland, Groningen, north Noord-Holland) consisted of low salt marshes, tidal creeks, and peat hinterlands, with settlements concentrated on artificial dwelling mounds (called terpen/wierden) rising above flood level.​ Periodic storm surges and high tides inundated surrounding fields and pastures, depositing fertile silt but also posing recurrent risks to people and livestock.​ The climate in the North Sea region showed phases of increased wetness without the sustained warmth of the later Medieval Climate Anomaly. Inhabitants experienced a cool-temperate, often damp and windy regime with notable year-to-year variability. [11]

The core economic experience was mixed farming, with a strong emphasis on cattle and sheep grazing the salt marshes, supplemented by arable plots on slightly higher or reclaimed ground.​ Daily labor included tending livestock, managing manure and fodder on restricted dry surfaces, maintaining paths and small embankments, and exploiting marine resources such as fish and perhaps shellfish from creeks and tidal flats.​ From the later sixth to seventh centuries, coastal communities increasingly tapped into regional exchange networks. Some Frisians gained reputations as merchants and mariners moving goods along the North Sea, though most rural inhabitants remained primarily local farmers with occasional surplus from their labor entering trade. [12]

Politically, the region was characterized by early medieval Frisia: a patchwork of local communities and elites along the North Sea coast, described in later written sources as forming a Frisian “kingdom,” but likely experienced locally as a network of kin groups, chiefs, and regional leaders rather than a centralized state.​ Social life was organized around extended households and free farming families, with local assemblies and customary law; later codified as Lex Frisionum under Frankish rule, this legal culture emphasized fines, compensation, and gradations of social status.​ From the seventh to eighth centuries, Frankish expansion brought military pressure and eventual incorporation of much of Frisia into the Carolingian realm, so inhabitants would increasingly encounter Frankish officials, tribute demands, and shifting allegiances of local elites, even as everyday village life remained relatively continuous. [13]

In the earlier part of this period, religious life centered on local pagan cults and rituals, with sanctuaries and offerings embedded in the landscape. Christian missionaries began to work in Frisian territory from the late seventh century onward.​ Over the eighth century, conversion progressed unevenly. Some communities saw churches established on or beside terpen, while others likely maintained older practices for longer, producing a mixed religious experience with new rites layered onto existing customs. [14]

“Frisian” identity in these centuries was situational and relational, emerging in contacts with Franks, Saxons, and North Sea partners. For most individuals, identity would have been anchored first in kin, settlement, and local region, with broader ethnic labels activated in specific legal, military, or trading contexts. [15]

An individual living in the central delta and river watershed area of the Meuse and Rhine Rivers Between 525 and 800 CE

The daily existence of an individual living in the central delta and river watershed area of the Rhine and Meuse rivers was shaped by mixed farming in a wet, flood‑prone delta landscape. They may have witnessed periodic political and military disruptions over control of the Rhine–Meuse system and a slow Christianization that overlaid older regional cults. The central area (roughly the Rhine–Meuse–Waal–IJssel river district around Utrecht, Nijmegen, and the lower Rhine branches) was a low delta with natural levees, crevasse splays, peat bogs, and backswamps. People concentrated on the slightly higher, drier alluvial ridges along the main channels. [16]

Flooding was a recurring fact of life: around the fifth to sixth centuries. The Waal river branch became more dominant, bringing higher and more frequent floods in parts of the delta, though protective natural levees made the landscape relatively resilient compared to more exposed coastal zones.​ For inhabitants, this meant managing arable strips and meadows on limited high ground, coping with occasional inundations and sedimentation, and negotiating access to extensive wetland resources (peat, reeds, fishing, fowling) in surrounding lowlands. [17]

Settlement focused on small farm clusters and villages strung along levees and sand ridges, often reusing or near former Roman sites. Early medieval farms at places like De Geer or near Roomburg show continuity and adaptation of earlier settlement structures in the river landscape. [18] Households practiced mixed farming (cattle, sheep, some pigs and horses, with cereals and other crops on better-drained plots), with daily work dominated by tending stock, maintaining fields and drainage, cutting peat or sods, and using the rivers as movement corridors.

Compared to the terp coast, inhabitants here had more direct contact with inland and southern regions through river traffic. Even ordinary villagers would periodically encounter non‑local goods, styles, and people via markets and itinerant traders. [19]

Politically, this was a contested geographical zone: during parts of the seventh century, Frisian rulers extended power into the central river area, while Merovingian and later Carolingian Frankish kings held key strongholds and centers farther south and east.​Dorestad, near modern Wijk bij Duurstede, grew into a major trading emporium along the Rhine–Lek fork, so people in its hinterland experienced increased demand for surplus produce, craft goods, and transport services, as well as exposure to coinage and long‑distance merchants.​The Frisian–Frankish wars in the seventh to eighth centuries, focused on control of the Rhine delta and brought episodes of campaigning, shifting overlordship, and, for some communities, tribute or military obligations, even if actual battles occurred only intermittently in any given locality. [20]

The central river region retained deep cultural memories of earlier Batavian and Roman cult sites. Early medieval sources and archaeology indicate regional cult places and sacred landscapes persisting into the first Christian centuries.​ Christianization advanced here earlier and more densely than in the northern coastal zone. Utrecht, built on a former Roman fort, became a missionary center, and churches and cemeteries appeared along the river routes from the seventh century onward. For individuals, this likely meant living through a gradual shift from cremation or traditional burial rites to inhumation in Christian graveyards, new ritual calendars, and the growing authority of priests and ecclesiastical institutions layered onto existing kin and local structures. [21]

The Rhine–Meuse corridor linked the North Sea and Zuiderzee routes with central and southern Frankish regions, so central Netherlands inhabitants were embedded in larger regional exchange systems that carried wine, pottery, textiles, slaves, and other goods.​ Over the seventh to eighth centuries, Frankish consolidation and the rise of emporia-like Dorestad drew the area more firmly into the Carolingian world, creating opportunities in trade and craft but also greater exposure to taxation, tolls, and elite power struggles. [22]

The enviromental impacts in the coastal, river delta, and sandy uplands areas

From 500 to 900 CE the northern Netherlands shifted from a largely open peat–marsh and barrier-island coast with dispersed terp settlements to a more fragmented, wetter and increasingly human‑engineered tidal landscape with expanding salt marsh ridges, drowned peat interiors, and more structured terp rows and ‘proto‑dike’ systems. The key processes were gradual: relative sea‑level rise, peat subsidence and erosion, salt‑marsh progradation along the Wadden Sea, and locally intensive reclamation and drainage that both created and destroyed land. [23]

In the coastal lowlands, peat bogs were drained for farming and fuel, causing them to sink and become vulnerable to sea floods from storms. Once saltwater rushed in, it carved channels and piled up mud, turning huge bog areas into salty tidal flats that stayed that way for centuries, making much of the land unlivable. [24]

In the river delta areas of the Meuse and Rhine rivers, deforestation upstream dumped more dirt into rivers like the Rhine and Meuse, while sinking peat downstream helped new river branches form and steal water from old ones. People kept living on higher riverbanks despite more floods, adapting by moving uphill, but the area stayed mostly farmable without total collapse. [25]

In the sandy uplands of the northern coast, sands stayed stable overall, with only small patches blowing around near villages due to tree-cutting and overfarming, especially after 900 CE as population grew. Unlike wetter areas, these ‘hills’ bounced back easily from human changes in land management. [26]

The Migratory Path to the Most Recent Common Ancestor of Haplogroup G-Z6748

This mutli-part story relies on the estimated migratory path of the Griff(is)(es)(ith) genetic paternal ancestors. This estimated path was created through the use of the FamilyTreeDNA’s online GlobeTrekker program. The ‘on-the-fly’ map generation program is an innovative, interactive phylogeographic feature within the Discover™ platform that visualizes ancestral Y-DNA migration routes. 

GlobeTrekker identifies each designated ancestral haplogroup’s probable position and then connects them backward in time, using ‘cost-efficient‘ routes. These ‘most likely’ or ‘cost-efficient’ routes are estimated within corridor paths or bands, capturing the uncertainty inherent in reconstructing prehistorical movement based on environmental and genetic data. The visible ‘corridor bands’ in GlobeTrekker are explicitly tied to ‘likelihood percentages‘. [27]

If we reduce the visual presence of corridor bands as well as the contrasting colors in the GlobeTrekker interactive map and leave only the estimated migratory path, you obtain a map reflected in illustration five below. The migratory line is the reflection of a ‘minimum-cost path’ within those migratory confidence bands.

Illustration Five: Estimated Migratory Path to Ancestor Associated with Haplogroup G-Z6748

Click for Larger View | Source: Migration Route to ancestral haplogroup G-Y132505 from G-Z67487, GlobeTrekker, FamilyTreeDNA, accessed 4 Dec 2025

What is noteworthy, when looking at the above map, is the approximate location of where the ancestor of haplogroup G-Z6748 may have lived based on the estimates derived from the Globetrekker program.. The outline of the north coast in illustration four represents the current contours of the northern coast of the Netherlands. The island just north of the Netherlands coastline is Texel Island. It is an island that is part of the West Frisian Islands, a chain of barrier islands in the North Sea. Texel is the largest of the Frisian Islands, including, Vlieland, Terschelling, Ameland, and Schiermonnikoog. [28]

If we compare the GlobeTrekker map in illustration five with palaeogeographical maps between 50 CE and 1460 CE (see maps A, B, and C, in illustration six below), it is evident that the coastal and deltaic plains during the time of this migration witnessed profound ecological changes. The modern day Texal area was attached to the mainland and was charactacterized by having high dunes surrounded by low dunes, beach ridges and valleys in 50 CE and 750 CE. By 1450 CE, the land has been separated and is an island.

Illustration Six: The Changing Landscape of the Netherlands Between 50 CE and 1450 CE in Comparison with the Migratory Paith of the Griff(is)(es)(ith) YDNA LIne

Click for Larger View | Source: The three maps are modified versions of Fig. 4. Palaeogeographical maps of the Holocene development of the Dutch coastal and deltaic plain in T. de Haasa,b, H.J. Pierika, A.J.F. van der Spek, K.M. Cohen, B. van Maanen, M.G. Kleinhans, Holocene evolution of tidal systems in The Netherlands: Effects of rivers, coastal boundary conditions, eco-engineering species, inherited relief and human interference Earth-Science Reviews 177 (2018) 139–163.

Texel became a distinct island from the North Holland mainland after this ancestor’s existence in 1170 CE due to the devastating All Saints’ Flood. The flood was the result of a massive storm surge that inundated the land, separating it and creating the island’s current form. Before this event, Texel was connected to the mainland. The floodwaters carved channels that isolated it permanently (see illustration seven). [29]

Illustration Seven: Texal Island and the West Frisian Islands

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 1 in P.C. Vos & E. Knol, Holocene landscape reconstruction of the Wadden Sea area between Marsdiep and Weser,Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw| 94 – 2, 157–183, 2015, https://njgjournal.nl/index.php/njg/article/view/11860/18365

Based on the estimated ‘cost-efficient’ migratory route generated by GlobeTrekker calculations, it is possible that the ancestors of haplogrup G-Z6748 may have migrated to the northwestern point of what we call modern day Netherlands utilizing water and land routes that were used in the Roman and early medieval eras. Illustration eight depicts the general migratory route in context of the paleogeographical characteristics of the environment around 800 CE. It is possible the ancestors of G-Z6748 may have migrated north-westward via water routes, and to a lessor extent roadways, through areas that witnessed environmental changes, such as increased deforestation and geomorphological change in the northern coastal areas. [30]

Illustration Eight: Palaeogeographical Map 800 CE

Cick for Larger View | Source: Modification of Fig. 1 Main landscape changes in the first millennium AD in T. de Haasa,b, H.J. Pierika, A.J.F. van der Spek, K.M. Cohen, B. van Maanen, M.G. Kleinhans, Holocene evolution of tidal systems in The Netherlands: Effects of rivers, coastal boundary conditions, eco-engineering species, inherited relief and human interference Earth-Science Reviews 177 (2018) 139–163.

In the Rhine-Meuse delta, major geomorphological changes [31] occurred during the late Roman Era and the Early Medieval Period. Generations prior to when the most recent common ancestor of G-Z6748 may have migrated along and through the Meuse Rhine watershed area during this time period of geographical change

The Rhine-Meuse delta area was characterized by a relatively high flooding frequency. For example, research conducted by Esther Jansma reconstructs a dense, year‑by‑year history of floods and related hydrological crises in the northwest European Lowlands (mainly the Netherlands) in the first milenium CE. Her research shows that large floods were clustered in particular centuries rather than evenly distributed. These events coincided with major shifts in settlement patterns and river dynamics. [32]

Jansma’s study identifies about 160 to 170 hydrological “events” (floods, prolonged wet episodes) between in the first millenium, of which roughly 20 to 25 qualify as ‘major flooding events’ defined as greater than or equal to 50‑year recurrence‑interval events.​ One third of all major events fell between roughly 185 to 282 CE. Another pronounced cluster occurs in the later sixth and early seventh century, with the event in 602 CE emerging as the single most severe flood of the millennium in the Dutch dataset. The migratory path of YDNA ancestors of G-Z6748 may have been impacted by both of these two clusters of flooding. [33]

Texal, the Terps and the North Coast – The Possible Home of Generations Associated with Haplogroup G-Z6748

From the later third to fourth century through about 800 CE, the northern Netherlands (roughly Friesland, Groningen, northern Drenthe, north Noord-Holland) was occupied first by remnant and returning Frisian/Chauci-related groups. By the seventh to eighth centuries the area is described in Frankish sources as Frisian territory or a Frisian “kingdom.” (More on ‘the Frisian identity’ is discussed in the ninth and final part of this story. ) [34]

The coastal area of the northern Netherlands where the most recent common ancestor of haplogroup G-Z6748 and related generations may have lived is known as the terp region. It was a region where early inhabitants built artificial mounds called terps (or wierden) on natural salt marshes to survive frequent floods from the rising sea and storm surges, creating a unique landscape of mounds scattered across flat, fertile clay plains. (see illustration nine). This ancient flood protection system allowed permanent settlement from around 600 BCE onwards in an otherwise inhospitable tidal zone. [35]

Illustration Nine: Artistic reconstruction of an early medieval terp settlement 

Click for Larger View | Source: Terps: Ancient Dwelling Mounds of the North Sea Coast, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/terps

Initially, a terp might be just large enough for a single farmhouse (house terp), but over time these mounds could be expanded and merged. As population grew, families would enlarge the terp or cluster multiple mounds together, eventually forming a larger village terp hosting several households.[36]

Illustration ten provides a paleogeographical map of the Texal Island area around 800 CE. This time period was probably after the time when the ancestor of G-Z6748 lived. If we compare this map with map C in illustration five or the map in illustration two, the area where this ancestor may have lived may have been separated by a channel or series of channels from the mainland.

Illustration Ten: The Texal Area around 800 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 10 in P.C. Vos & E. Knol, Holocene landscape reconstruction of the Wadden Sea area between Marsdiep and Weser, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw| 94 – 2, 157–183, 2015, https://njgjournal.nl/index.php/njg/article/view/11860/18365

In the post-Roman and early medieval period, the terp zone was a low, tidally influenced salt-marsh landscape punctuated by densely occupied artificial mounds that concentrated settlement, livestock and infrastructure above the flood level while exploiting the surrounding grazing marshes and creeks. Those mounds grew into complex village platforms within a dynamic coastal system of progradation [37], erosion and episodic abandonment. [38]

The broader terp area consisted of wide, regularly inundated salt-marshes intersected by tidal creeks and channels, with only slight natural levees or sandy ridges offering higher ground. Sea-level fluctuations and storm surges repeatedly reworked these marshes, creating phases of marsh formation, local drowning of the land and sediment build-up that conditioned where terps could be founded and expanded (see illustration eleven). [39]

Illiustration Eleven: Schematic Representation of the Development of a Terp

Click for Larger View | Source: Fig. 1.2. Schematic representation of the development of a terp, in D. Postma , Salt Marsh Architecture, Catalogue, technology and typological development of early medieval turf buildings in the northern coastal area of the Netherlands, Masters Thesis University of Groningen, 2010, https://www.waddenacademie.nl/fileadmin/inhoud/pdf/06-wadweten/Scripties/D._Postma_-_scriptieverkl.pdf

Description of Illustration Ten: 1. First occupation phase on levee (or marsh bar). 2. Formation of house terpen through the accumulation of refuse and intentional raising. 3. Agglomeration of (nuclear) terpen into a larger village terp. 4. Expansion of the terp comes to an end as the salt marsh is dyked in.

From the Iron Age through the early Middle Ages, farms and later villages were raised on fully artificial mounds (terpen / wierden / warften), constructed from clay, sods and refuse to sit just above typical high-tide and surge levels.​ By the early medieval period individual house-terps (10 to 20 meters across) and larger village-terps (several hectares) formed archipelagos of habitation “islands” within the marsh, often enlarged in phases as population and flood risk increased.

Terp habitation in the regions of the western Netherlands occurred only on a small scale; early terps in this area did not develop into the large dwelling mounds that we know from the northern coastal area. Despite obvious similarities in the Holocene development of the southern North-Sea coastal areas, there are considerable differences between underlying geological characteristics of the western Netherlands on the one hand, and the northern Netherlands and northwestern Germany on the other hand. A large part of the western Netherlands is sheltered by a coastal barrier dune system, whereas the more northerly coastal areas of the Netherlands and Germany were an open salt marsh landscape, an intertidal area of the Wadden Sea, prior to the large-scale medieval dike building. ” [40] (See illustration twelve.)

Illustration Twelve: Discovered Archaeological Sites of Terps in the Wadden Sea Area Based on Archaeological Time Period

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 1 in A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348

The surrounding marshes provided highly productive grazing for cattle, sheep and horses, so terp communities practiced a mixed agro‑pastoral lifestyle with livestock on the low ground and arable plots and buildings concentrated on the mound tops and shoulders (see illustration thirteen). Excavations show the integration of the terp dwellings into wider economic networks. Roman and later imported goods, as well as isotope evidence of marine-influenced diets, indicate exchange and use of both marine and terrestrial resources. [41]

Illustration Thirteen: Digital 3D Reconstruction of the Mound Landscape

Click for Larger View | Source: Ulco Glimmerveen, 3D renders, Art & Illustration, https://gallery.ulco-art.nl/?page_id=162 . See also, Boeles en Van Giffen Speech or profile paper about mounds, Education,https://terpenonderzoek.nl/education/?lang=en

Between the third and fifth centuries many western terps were thinned out or abandoned, while some eastern terp settlements persisted, reflecting combined environmental stress and shifting socio‑political networks across the North Sea zone (see illustration eleven). Early medieval reoccupation and enlargement of terps, together with new mound building further east and south, created a renewed settlement system that reused earlier structures while adapting layout (larger communal platforms, churches, consolidated farmsteads) to changing social organization. [42]

Terpen typically had linear, lane‑based farm arrangements on a raised platform, with three‑aisled byre‑houses (longhouses) laid out in rows or clusters, often evolving over time from dispersed farmsteads to more nucleated village plans (see ilustration twelve). House plans themselves were usually elongated, tripartite buildings where humans and livestock shared one structure in zoned compartments along a central aisle. [43]

Early terpen often began as one or a few farms on a small, roughly oval or irregular mound, with buildings aligned along the mound’s long axis and oriented to exploit prevailing winds and access to creeks.​ As terpen were enlarged, houses, outbuildings and paths formed more structured layouts: parallel building rows, narrow lanes and yard spaces on the crown and shoulders of the mound, sometimes creating a ring‑like or fan‑shaped pattern around a central open area (see illustration ten). [44]

Between 400 and 800 CE, terp settlements shifted from a phase of contraction and partial abandonment to renewed occupation, enlargement and into more complex village terpen, part of an increasingly more complex Frisian coastal social organizational structure (see table one). Over these four centuries, the settlement pattern, internal layout, social role and regional extent of terpen all changed in step with demographic recovery, environmental opportunities and emerging power structures in the region. [45]

Table One: Terp settlements in the Northern Frisian Area Between 400 – 800 CE

Time PeriodDescription of Terp Settlements
4th–5th centuries: contraction and gapsCeramic sequences and mound stratigraphy [46] indicate that many Frisian terpen in the northern coastal area were abandoned or only sparsely occupied by the 4th century, creating a notable habitation gap after the later Roman period.

In some areas new groups later reoccupied deserted mounds, suggesting discontinuity in local communities even where the same physical terpen were reused.
[47]

Frisian longhouses were three‑aisled buildings, usually 12 to 20 meters long and about 5 to 6 meters wide in the early medieval period, divided lengthwise by two internal post‑rows that carried the roof.​ The internal organization of the house consisted of a residential end (living and sleeping area), a central working or entrance zone with hearth(s), and a byre section for cattle and other stock at the opposite end, all aligned in a single linear plan. [48]
6th–7th centuries: reoccupation and growthFrom around 400–600, occupation continues on selected terpen and new small house‑mounds appear, marking a gradual repopulation of the salt‑marsh zone rather than an immediate return to dense pre‑Roman patterns.

As population and herds increased, individual house terpen were enlarged or physically merged, beginning the process by which scattered farms coalesced into larger village terpen. [49]
7th–8th centuries: nucleated village terpenBy the later 7th and 8th centuries, parts of Frisia show a dense network of occupied terpen—up to roughly 1500 mounds—forming a highly structured coastal settlement system tied to maritime and riverine routes.

Internal layouts become more nucleated: longhouses, ancillary buildings and lanes cluster on shared platforms, and some terpen acquire central functions (elite residences, craft zones, later churches) rather than being purely agrarian farm‑islands. [50]

Terps functioned as ‘nodal points’ linked by seasonal trackways on the marsh, small landing places on creeks and, in some areas, raised routes that later underpinned early medieval road systems. [51] The pattern is best characterised as a multi-centered coastal landscape: multiple terp clusters aligned along former creek systems and lagoon rims, tying maritime access, inland peatlands and higher Pleistocene sands into an highly adapted landscape. [52]

Excavations on Texel (e.g. Den Burg [53]) show early medieval occupation with long continuity of terp‑based and salt‑marsh settlement traditions, but the coastal band between Kennemerland and Westfriesland, including Texel, shows archaeological indications of demographic decline around the fourth century and renewed, denser occupation from the sixth to seventh centuries. For the broader northern Netherlands coast, recent ceramic and settlement analyses indicate relatively thin, scattered habitation in the fifth century, followed by clearer Merovingian‑period rural settlement networks embedded in marsh and tidal landscapes from roughly 600 CE onwards. [54]

The Nature of Road and Waterway Travel Routes that Influenced Migratory Conditions Between 400 and 800 CE

Between 400 and 800 CE the Meuse–Rhine watershed and the coastal Netherlands areas saw a shift from a largely routeless, wetland landscape with localized tracks to a strongly river‑dominated long‑distance network in which fluvial and maritime routes carried the bulk of interregional traffic. Land routes relied on persistent sandy‐ridge paths and levee routes rather than on anything like the earlier Roman road system. [55]

Water-related routes must have been limited to past rivers, inland seas, and shorelines. Land routes show more divers (sic) patterns for these two periods, with large parts of the southern and eastern Netherlands appearing to have been either highly or reasonably accessible. Here sandy ridges constituted corridors through marshy parts of the landscape. [56]

The lowlands of the Rhine–Meuse delta and the northern Netherlands remained highly dynamic, with channel shifts, peat expansion and erosion shaping where routes could exist at all.​ Travel networks in this period depended on a mosaic of higher sandy coversands, levees and older beach ridges which provided dry corridors in an otherwise marshy or peat‑dominated terrain. [57]

” (P)eople living here were strongly dependent on local rivers and streams for transport (water-related routes). An interesting exception are the coastal dunes along the North Sea. Both in A.D. 100 and 800, these dunes provided an accessible north–south land connection. The importance of this connection in the Roman period is underpinned by the occurrence of Roman coastal defenses in these areas.[58]

Formal, stone‑paved Roman roads in the Dutch sector of the limes fell out of regular use after the third to fourth centuries. There is no evidence for a comparable engineered road network in the fifth to seventh centuries.​ Studies of “landscape prerequisites” and route persistence over time suggests that early‑medieval long‑distance paths, where present, hugged sandy ridges and river levees, forming ‘loose corridors’ or ‘route zones’ rather than ‘single fixed roads’. These lines of movement later underlie parts of the documented medieval route skeleton.​ [59]

Roads can be defined as narrow, fixed communication and transport lines connecting different places, whereas routes have been characterized as broad and vaguely delimited zones of communication and transport. Almost all Roman and early-medieval routes were unpaved and hence not rigidly anchored in space. Route zones are spatial zones in which, often unpaved, bundles of tracks, paths or roads are located. These zones formed as a result of travellers frequently shifting to adjacent lanes because of e.g. weather conditions or general wear of the carved-in tracks. Although the general orientation of past roads and routes were similar, route networks spatially were more dynamic and therefore they should be regarded as corridors rather than as single lines.[60]

As indicated in part seven of this story, the Roman state and military investments led to a dramatic rise in road and waterway connectivity. This is aparent in the middle to upper Rhine river areas. The construction of Roman roads, waterways, and quays greatly increased mobility and integration, particularly from the middle of the second century onward. However, as one traveled northward toward the lower Rhine and Delta areas and northward, it is apparent that there were fewer roads connecting cities, towns and forts with the rural areas (see illustration nineteen in part seven of this story).

During the RP (Roman Period) an extensive route network developed, connecting many parts of present-day Europe. However in the Netherlands stone-paved Roman roads such as those present in southern Europe are non-existent including the Oude Rijn (The Old Rhine) . . . , was unpaved and consisted of a slightly raised central body hardened with gravel and often encased in wood, flanked by (drainage) ditches. With the exception of this road, built in AD 100 and rebuilt in AD 125, in the Netherlands there is little evidence for the existence of roads dating to the first millennium AD.[61]

Rivers, estuaries, and inland waterways such as the Rhine–Meuse system functioned as the main long‑distance transport infrastructure, with rivers offering both opportunities and constraints. They greatly facilitated bulk and high‑volume traffic while making some terrestrial crossings difficult.​ From the sixth century onward, northern branches of the Rhine in the Netherlands regained geographical importance for transportation, setting the stage for intensified Merovingian river trade and North Sea connections.​ By the later seventh to eighth centuries, settlements along the Rhine operated within an extensive exchange network. [62]

Along the northern coast (Frisia sensu lato, from Zeeland/North Holland into Groningen and north‑west Germany), terps and levees framed a string of landing places connected by shallow coastal waterways and tidal channels rather than by continuous built roads. Between the 6th and 8th centuries, Frisian communities developed a maritime commercial system whose backbone was seaborne transport and river mouths, tying the coastal Netherlands to England, the Frankish hinterland and up to the Weser–Elbe region. Environmental studies of the Coastal Frisia area and the north seaways indicate ongoing peatland expansion and marine ingressions in parts of the northern Netherlands between about 700 and 1000 CE, which would have both opened and closed local navigable routes and forced shifts in settlement and paths inland. [63]

From the mid‑seventh century, Dorestad at the Rhine bifurcation of the river branches Kromme Rijn and Lek emerged as a major emporium whose position on a high natural levee along a relatively stable Rhine branch offered sheltered harboring and direct access to both inland and North Sea traffic.​ Dendrochronological and archaeological work shows that Dorestad and earlier coastal sites such as Oegstgeest formed part of a long‑distance network moving timber and other bulk goods along the Rhine–Meuse axis, with riverine transport clearly dominant for heavy cargo.​ New water routes via branches like the Waal and IJssel gradually shifted the main axes of trade in the late eighth to ninth centuries. In the 400–800 CE time window, river corridors in the Meuse–Rhine basin and coastal inlets were already the critical structuring elements of transport routes and communication, far outweighing any surviving terrestrial “road” infrastructure. [64]

Landscape Archaeological Modeling

The ability to reduce this wide range of possible northward migratory paths is strengthened through the use of results from a growing corpus of interdisciplinary archaeological research that identifies general enduring historical route networks or ‘transport corridors‘. These transport corridors can be viewed as a key to understanding large-scale settlement patterns, possible migratory pattterns, and transportation networks.

This general research approach, refered to as ‘landscape and settlement archaeology‘, presents a general theoretical and methodological perspective in archaeology. This research approach utilizes a number of interdisciplinary methodologies that combine historical environmental and archaeological data with the aim to reconstruct probable routes, called movement zones or corridors (see illustration fourteen in the sidebar discussion). [65]

The research from the landscape archaeological perspective provides historical data to uniquely refine and add geographical and historical context to the estimated genetic migratory path derived from the FamilyTreeDNA Globetrekker program. The Globetrekker program provides a statistically smoothed, large‑scale reconstruction of estimated patrilineal migration paths, while landscape archaeological work on connectivity, historically persistent places, and movement corridors can supply the fine‑grained, time‑specific spatial frameworks needed to interpret those migratory paths in real historical landscapes. Used together, they let you move from an abstract Y‑DNA trajectory to concrete hypotheses about which river valleys, trackways, hubs, and settlement zones specific lineages likely used or avoided in particular periods (see sidebar discussion on Landscape and Settlement Archaeology). [66]

The aim of these studies is to bridge gaps between historical and natural science based approaches in studies of the human past through joint research between archaeologists, historians and geoscientists. They are often framed explicitly as contributions to a broader “landscape‑archaeological” and “connectivity/persistence” program for the Dutch delta in the first millennium CE. [67]

Early medieval land and water transport in the Low Countries emerges from this work as dense, highly structured, and remarkably persistent over the first millennium CE, yet constantly re-routed within a dynamic fluvial landscape and shifting political economy. Together these studies show that a limited set of “movement corridors” along levees and navigable channels dominated connectivity from the Roman period into the Early Middle Ages, with most routes continuing in use for centuries and strongly shaping later medieval and even modern infrastructure. [68]

Landscape and Settlement Archaeology

Landscape archaeology can be defined as the interdisciplinary investigation of the long-term relation ship between people and their environment.

Probably the greatest benefit of a landscape – archaeological approach is the way it shifts the focus from a “single-site” perspective to much larger areas that are more closely matched to the physical scale at which human societies operate. Such an approach is in evitably multidisciplinary.

‘Landscape’ within this context is defined at a basic level, being “an area, as perceived by people, whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors.” [69]

Illustration Fourteen: Flowchart of route-persistence calculations

Click for Larger view | Source: Figure 3 in Rowin J. van Lanen, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Theo Spek & Esther Jansma, Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands, Archaeol Anthropol Sci (2018) 10:1037–1052

Their work focuses on how environmental factors (like the changing river network) and cultural factors influenced the orientation and use of persistent water and land travel routes or corridors over time.

These researchers utilize a research approach that integrates layers of archaeological settlement data, geomorphological maps, soil and groundwater data and tree ring data within Geographic Information Systems (GIS) models, to understand the long-distance transport routes and their dynamics during the first millennium CE in the Dutch river delta (see illustration two).

This interdisciplinary approach produces predictive models to reconstruct past movement corridors and assess their persistence through time. Route persistence is studied to explain long‑term settlement foci, land‑use patterns, and “persistent places” in cultural landscapes.

Their research uses high‑resolution palaeogeography, geomorphology, soils, elevation and groundwater reconstructions to map where overland movement was physically feasible in different periods. The landscape is treated as a ‘friction surface’ to predict probable corridors rather than single “roads”. They then combine these models with archaeological proxies (settlements, burial grounds, stray finds, shipwrecks, known roads) and dendroarchaeological timber provenance to validate and refine reconstructed networks and identify long‑distance transport zones. [70]

Modelling from these stduies shows that Roman and early medieval transport relied on intertwined road, track and waterway systems, concentrating movement in relatively narrow route zones that together cover just over ten percent of the Dutch surface but contain roughly three quarters or more of known first‑millennium infrastructural and isolated finds. When Roman and early medieval models are compared, around two‑thirds of the reconstructed corridors persist across the entire first millennium CE, and later early‑modern road networks cluster very strongly on these same long‑lived routes, indicating deep historical stability in movement patterns. [71]

The work underlines that Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt lowland rivers were simultaneously prime highways and major constraints. They offered efficient long‑distance water transport but forced terrestrial routes onto specific levee ridges, crevasse splays and sandy outcrops where flooding risk and groundwater conditions allowed year‑round passage. In delta settings minor avulsions and channel shifts might displace paths locally, yet the overall orientation of corridors and the nodal position of certain confluences and crossings remained stable over centuries. [72]

Collectively, these studies argue that the end of Roman rule did not produce a collapse of connectivity in the Low Country. Instead, networks were reorganized within the same physical framework, with many corridors continuing to channel local, regional and long‑distance movement into the Carolingian period. This long‑term route persistence helps explain the endurance of certain settlement locations and the later emergence of medieval towns along these corridors. It demonstrates that any interpretation of early medieval economic or political change in the lowlands must take seriously the constraining and enabling role of the inherited route system and deltaic landscape.

Globetrekker Migratory Paths and Route Persistence in Landscape Archaeology

The methodogical underpinnings of a cost-efficient migratory path associated with the Globetrekker platform is similar to the concept of route persistence found in these paleogeographical studies of the medieval lowlands. Route persistence is defined as the spatial correlation between route sections across different historical periods. It refers to the long-term use of specific movement corridors or locations, not necessarily continuous use, but rather the tendency for routes to reappear in the same general area over centuries (see sidebar discussion). [73]

This concept ‘route persistence’ is used to investigate the stability of historical ‘transport networks’ and the dynamic interaction between human activity (cultural dynamics) and natural landscape changes over time. Route persistence is studied to explain long‑term settlement locations, land‑use patterns, and “persistent places” in cultural landscapes.

The studies use high‑resolution palaeogeography, geomorphology, soils, elevation and groundwater reconstructions to map where overland movement was physically feasible in different periods, treating the landscape as a ‘friction surface’ to predict probable corridors rather than single “roads”. They then combine these models with archaeological proxies (settlements, burial grounds, stray finds, shipwrecks, known roads) and dendroarchaeological timber provenance to validate and refine reconstructed networks and identify long‑distance transport zones.

Network friction is described as the variable that determines regional accessibility based on local and surrounding landscape factors and that locates transport obstacles and possible movement corridors . Through a network-friction analysis, potential movement corridors are determined. [74]

The Key Aspects of ‘Route Persistence’ in Landscape Archaeological Paleogeographic Studies

Spatial Correlation: Persistence is calculated by determining the degree to which route networks from one era (e.g., Roman period) overlap with those from a later era (e.g., Early Middle Ages) using spatial analysis techniques like GIS (Geographic Information Systems).

“Persistent Places”: The term draws on the concept of “persistent places,” locations that were “never” completely abandoned but survived in collective memory or as logical paths dictated by the physical landscape.

Landscape Influence: In dynamic lowland environments such as the Netherlands, the orientation of routes was highly impacted by natural landscape features. Features like rivers, peat marshes, and levees created natural movement corridors, and routes often persisted in these accessible areas unless major landscape changes (like severe flooding or coastline shifts) occurred. Route persistence is framed as part of regional landscape evolution and human–environment interaction.

Dynamic vs. Fixed Routes: Medieval land routes in lowlands were often unpaved “route zones” rather than fixed, narrow roads. Travelers frequently shifted between parallel tracks within a wider corridor due to seasonal conditions (e.g., moisture, wear and tear), contributing to the idea of a persistent corridor rather than a single, rigid line.

Quantifying Stability: Researchers quantify route persistence (as a percentage of overlap) to understand the relative roles of environmental and cultural factors in shaping the landscape over time. For example, studies have shown a high degree of persistence between Roman and early medieval route networks in the Netherlands, indicating the significant influence of the stable environmental conditions of the time. [75]

Possible Migratory Paths for Ancestors of G-Z6748

An interesting 2015 article by Rowin van Lanen, Menne Kosian, Bert Groenewoudt, and Esther Jansma argues that Roman and early-medieval route networks in the Netherlands can be effectively reconstructed by modelling how key landscape characteristics —especially water, peat, and levees—constrained and channelled the movement on land and water around  100 AD and 800 AD . [76] The study’s main goal is to identify landscape prerequisites for route orientation by using spatial modelling of modern and palaeogeographical data for around these two time perods. The researchers calculate network-friction values for different terrain types and hydrological features, producing maps of likely ‘movement corridors’ and incorporating archaeological data on known routes and sites to be integrated and tested against these models.

In this lowland setting, water bodies, peat zones, and river levees emerge as the dominant landscape characteristics structuring where routes could plausibly run, with substantial contrasts between relatively dry Pleistocene sands [77] and wet coastal and deltaic lowlands. The lower western Netherlands is almost impassable in this time period, implying that inhabitants must have relied predominantly on rivers and streams for transport, while levees and better-drained interfluves acted as preferred terrestrial corridors elsewhere.

As depictived in illustration fifteen below, the research by van Lanen and associates show areas that were inaccessible (in red), moderately accessible (in yellow) and accessible (in green) by land.. Based on this integrated method, geoscientific and archaeological data were used to reconstruct Roman and earlymedieval land and water routes.

Illustration Fifteen: Route networks (land and water) overlaid on network-friction maps of the Netherlands: 100 and 800 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 1 Route networks (land and water) overlaid on network-friction maps of the Netherlands: AD 100 and 800 in van Lanen, R.J., Groenewoudt, B.J., Spek, T. et al. Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 10, 1037–1052 (2018). Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability

Research models show that Roman and early medieval transport relied on intertwined road, track and waterway systems, concentrating movement in relatively narrow route zones that together cover just over ten percent of the Dutch surface but contain roughly three quarters or more of known first‑millennium infrastructural and isolated archaeological finds. When Roman and early medieval models are compared, around two‑thirds of the reconstructed corridors persist across the entire first millennium AD, and later early‑modern road networks cluster very strongly on these same long‑lived routes, indicating deep historical stability in movement patterns. [78]

The research underlines that Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt lowland rivers were simultaneously prime highways and major constraints. They offered efficient long‑distance water transport but forced terrestrial routes onto specific levee ridges, crevasse splays and sandy outcrops where flooding risk and groundwater conditions allowed year‑round passage. In delta settings this created a ‘braided but structured mosaic’ in which minor avulsions and channel shifts might displace paths locally, yet the overall orientation of corridors and the nodal position of certain confluences and crossings remained stable over centuries. [79]

In another research study, using dendrochronological provenancing of oak timbers (see side bar dicsussion), Jansma, Van Lanen and colleagues reconstruct shifting regional timber flows linking the Netherlands to the German Rhineland, Ardennes–Meuse basin and Scheldt region, and then overlay these with the route models to infer likely long‑distance transport routes. The timber data show changing “frequent‑travel zones” through the first millennium. The Roman‑period flows heavily Rhine‑oriented, with later early medieval phases indicating re‑routed connections and renewed river trade—yet these shifts still track the same core movement corridors identified by the landscape based models.

Esther Jansma , Rowin Van Lanen and Harm Jan Pierik, have provided a short journal contribution that focuses on the Low Countries, specifically the Dutch river delta, and integrates fluvial history with archaeological evidence to reconstruct transport routes over the first millennium CE. The authors identify major river branches and channels that were navigable or strategically important at different times, showing that shifts in discharge and avulsion altered which routes were most suitable for long‑distance movement.​ They highlight that the delta landscape, with its alluvial ridges and natural levees, offered persistent corridors for habitation and movement, even as flooding frequency and local conditions changed.

Dendrochronological Provenancing

Dendrochronological provenancing uses tree-ring analysis (dendrochronology) to determine the geographical origin (provenance) of wood in historical artifacts, buildings, or artworks, not just their age. By matching the unique patterns of wide and narrow rings (influenced by local climate) from an unknown sample to established regional chronologies, researchers identify the source area, often combining ring-width data with chemical analysis (like Sr isotopes) for greater accuracy, especially for timber from complex areas like shipwrecks or Roman structures. [80]

Archaeological remnants of movable wooden objects are well suited for reconstructing past spatial connections because of the following characteristics:

• swift transport and direct application (construction timber);

• river-bound distribution (shipwrecks);

• direct geographical links with the economic hinterland (barrels); and

• high dating precision through dendrochronology.

Absolutely dated dendrochronological time series derived from such objects can be regarded as an integrator of environmental and cultural information, since archaeological wood is the residue of both the site conditions that governed annual tree growth and human activity such as the felling, transport and application of these trees. [81]

Jansma and associates indicate that during this time period several new river branches formed. As a result economic activity shifted from the central and western parts of the delta to the east (see illustrations sixteen and seventeen).

Illustration Sixteen: Long-distance transport routes in the Netherlands during the Roman Period

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 1 Long-distance transport routes in the Netherlands during the Roman Period. Background: map showing the Roman coast line in Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lane, and Harm Jan Pierik, Traveling through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeological Reconstruction of River Development and Long-Distance connections in the Netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39

Illustration Seventeen: Long-distance transport routes in the Netherlands during the Early Middle Ages

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 2 Long-distance transport routes in the Netherlands during the Early Middle Ages. Background: map showing the early medieval coast line in Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lane, and Harm Jan Pierik, Traveling through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeological Reconstruction of River Development and Long-Distance connections in the Netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39

In view of the ‘cost-efficient’ migratory path for the Griff(is)(es)(ith) YDNA line generated by the Globetrekker program (illustration five above), one can add historical context to the migratory path using the results of the study by Jansma and associates (illustration seventeen). It is possible that ancestors of the MCRA of haplogroup G-Z6748 migrated through the changing delta and watershed landscape and utilized what is refered to as the north south corridor to migrate northward via water routes (see illustration eighteen).

Illustration Eighteen: Estimated Migratory Path of G-Z6748 Ancestors Based on Long Distance Alluvial – Water Transport Routes in Early Middle Ages

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 2 Long-distance transport routes in the Netherlands during the Early Middle Ages, in Esther Jansma, Rowin J. Van Lane, and Harm Jan Pierik, Traveling through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeological Reconstruction of River Development and Long-Distance connections in the Netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39

The corridor runs roughly north–south across the central–eastern delta (Veluwe/IJssel–Nijmegen–Maas zone), exploiting relatively high, well‑drained ridges and fossil levees that remained passable under rising groundwater and increased flooding. The corridor acted as a backbone between upstream Rhine–Meuse reaches and more northerly and easterly areas, integrating riverine shipping with overland traffic and channelling timber and other bulk goods into and out of the delta.

The north–south corridor is presented as a long‑lived, high‑priority axis of movement that linked the central Rhine–Meuse delta to inland regions and helped maintain regional connectivity despite major changes in river courses and periods of flooding. The corridor exemplifies how terrestrial corridors on elevated levees and higher ground between two rivers stabilize the transport system when fluvial routes shifted or became less reliable.

Landscape archaeological modelling work cited alongside Jansma et al. shows that this north–south zone is one of the most persistent movement corridors: a high proportion of Roman routes in this band were reused or re‑established in early medieval and later networks, and it envelops several later historic towns (e.g. Arnhem, Deventer, Nijmegen). The corridor demonstrates that long‑distance exchange in the first millennium AD depended less on any single river branch and more on a composite system in which enduring overland corridors like this one absorbed and redirected flows when channels avulsed, thereby dampening the impact of environmental instability on migration, trade and communication. [82]

Sources:

Feature Image: The banner depicts the complementary nature of melding the methodologies of the FamilyTreeDNA Globetrekker program with graphic results from the Landscape Archaeological tradition for graphically portraying the migratory path to the ancestor of haplogroup G-6848. The left hand image is a map of the estimated migratory path of ancestors of the Most Recent Ancestor of G-Z6748. The middle images are the scientific details for the estimated birth date for the most recent common ancestor associated with haplogroup G-Z6748. The right hand map depicts a specific migratory path of ancestors of the Most Recent Ancestor of G-Z6748 based on persistent long-distance transport routes in the Netherlands during the Roman period and Early Middle Ages.

[1] See for example:

Cheyette, F. L. , The disappearance of the ancient landscape and the climatic anomaly of the early Middle Ages: A question to be pursued. Early Medieval Europe, 16(2), 2008, 127–165. https://www.academia.edu/395947/The_Disappearance_of_the_Ancient_Landscape_and_the_Climatic_Anomaly_of_the_Early_Middle_Ages_a_Question_to_Be_Pursued

Rowin J van Lanen and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, in Niall Brady & Claudia Theune, eds, Settlement Change Across Medieval Europe: Old paradigms and New Vistas, , 2019, Ruralia XII, Leiden; Sidestone, 2019, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

Groenewoudt, Bert, Diverging decline. Reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), European Journal of Postclassical Archaeologies (PCA), vol 8, 2018, 189-218, https://www.academia.edu/37462618/Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post_Roman_population_trends_AD_0_1000_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_

Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

Pierik, Harm Jan, and Rowin J. van Lanen. “Roman and early-medieval habitation patterns in a delta landscape: The link between settlement elevation and landscape dynamics.” Quaternary International 501 (2019): 379-392. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618216313453

[2] Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

See the section “The Late-Roman Social and Demographic Collapse” in part seven of this story, The Turbulent Roman Era – The Griff(is)(es)(ith) Y-DNA Phylogenetic Gap Associated with the Meuse and Rhine River Watershed – Part Seven, November 30, 2025, Griffis Family Blog.

de Bruin, Jasper, Connectivity in the south-western part of the Netherlands during the Roman period (AD 0-350), Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, 43/44, 145 – 157, https://www.academia.edu/30199226/Connectivity_in_the_south_western_part_of_the_Netherlands_during_the_Roman_period_AD_0_350_?email_work_card=view-paper

Kluiving, Sjoerd, Mass migration through soil exhaustion: Transformation of habitation patterns in the southern Netherlands (1000 BC–500AD), Catena (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.12.015 , https://www.academia.edu/20652957/Mass_migration_through_soil_exhaustion_Transformation_of_habitation_patterns_in_the_southern_Netherlands_1000_BC_500AD_?email_work_card=view-paper

[3] Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

[4] FamilyTreeDNA’s “Scientific Details” confidence intervals for haplogroups are derived from their Time to Most Recent Common Ancestor (TMRCA) modeling, which combines the observed genetic variation on each branch with calibrated mutation rates and then summarizes the resulting age uncertainty as statistical intervals. For each haplogroup branch, FTDNA measures its “stem length” in mutations (primarily SNPs, with STRs integrated for very young lineages) and relates this to time using a mutation rate model.

The basic relationship for the mutation rate model is T = D /(2μ), where T is the TMRCA, D is the genetic distance (number of differences between descendants), and μ is the mutation rate. This relationship is statistically ‘refined’ across the whole tree using methods such as linear regression, mean path lengths, maximum likelihood, or relaxed molecular clocks.

Rather than reporting only a single age (“Mean”), FTDNA fits a probability distribution for the branch age that accounts for stochastic mutation processes, rate variation among stems, and tree structure. 

The confidence interval (CI) shown in Scientific Details is the time range that contains a chosen proportion of that distribution (for example, 68%, 95%, or 99% of the total probability), so the narrow, dark band is a higher‑probability, tighter interval and the lighter, wider band is a lower‑probability but more inclusive range.

On a Discover haplogroup page, the Age Estimate section lists a mean age plus one or more CIs; the legend notes that “CI is the Confidence Interval for a given time range and Mean is the average age estimate,” making clear that the interval is a probabilistic range around the model’s best estimate. 

The same underlying methodology is applied across the Y haplotree, with parameters tuned and periodically updated as tree structure, calibration points (including well‑dated historical lineages and selected ancient DNA samples), and rate models are refined. When the algorithm is updated, both the point estimates and their confidence intervals for affected branches can shift.

See: Scientific Details: A Deeper Dive Into Age Estimates, 19, Sep 2022, FTDNA Blog, https://blog.familytreedna.com/tmrca-age-estimates-scientific-details/

[5] The Migration Period (c. 300–700 AD) was a pivotal era in European history, also known as the Barbarian Invasions, characterized by large-scale movements of Germanic, Slavic, and other peoples into and across the declining Western Roman Empire, leading to its collapse, the formation of new post-Roman kingdoms, and shaping modern European cultures and identities. Triggered by factors like Hunnic pressure, climate change, and Roman internal struggles, groups like the Goths, Franks, Vandals, and Slavs settled former Roman territories, transitioning Europe from Late Antiquity into the Early Middle Ages.

Migration Period, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 19 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

[6] After the Roman withdrawal, the main “indigenous” power blocs in the lands of the modern Netherlands are usually identified as Franks in the south, Frisians along the coastal north, and Saxon-identified groups in the east, with all three the result of early medieval ethnogenesis rather than direct continuation of Roman-period tribes. Archaeology and anthropology also stress strong regional continuity from late Roman provincial and “native” communities, so these labels mask a heterogeneous population incorporating Batavian, Cananefatian, Chamavian and other pre-Roman/Roman-period groups.

Political Map of Europe, 651 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Modified version of map by Richard Ishida, Historical map of Europe in 651 CE, 2016, Wikimedia Commons,https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:651_CE,_Europe.svg

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[7] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

[8] van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 99, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2020.12

[9] Helama, Samuli and P. Jones, Keith Briffa, Keith, Dark Ages Cold Period: A literature review and directions for future research, February 2017, The Holocene 27(10): 095968361769389, DO – 10.1177/0959683617693898,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314130365_Dark_Ages_Cold_Period_A_literature_review_and_directions_for_future_research

[10] Knol, Egge, ‘Living Near the Sea: The Organisation of Frisia in Early Medieval Times’, in Jayne Carroll, Andrew Reynolds, and Barbara Yorke (eds), Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Proceedings of the British Academy (London
, 2019; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 21 May 2020), https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266588.003.0017 

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Terps: Ancient Dwelling Mounds of the North Sea Coast, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/terps

Scheurle, Carolyn, Climate development and its effect on the North Sea environment, PhD Dissertation, University of Bremen 2004, https://d-nb.info/975465481/34

[11] The Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA), also known as the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) or Optimum, was a natural, regional climate event (roughly 900-1300 CE) marked by warmer temperatures

Knol, Egge, ‘Living Near the Sea: The Organisation of Frisia in Early Medieval Times’, in Jayne Carroll, Andrew Reynolds, and Barbara Yorke (eds), Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Proceedings of the British Academy (London
, 2019; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 21 May 2020), https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266588.003.0017,

Terps: Ancient Dwelling Mounds of the North Sea Coast, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/terps

Weather in History 500 to 750AD, weatherwebdotnet, Accesssed 12 Dec 2025, https://premium.weatherweb.net/weather-in-history-500-to-750ad/

Medieval Warm peiod, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 29 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period

[12]  Knol E, Ijssennagger N. Palaeogeography and People: Historical Frisians in an archaeological light. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:5-24. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/palaeogeography-and-people-historical-frisians-in-an-archaeological-light/CA5BEE0DAC45640D30C3E40FBDC11C49

Terps: Ancient Dwelling Mounds of the North Sea Coast, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/terps

Faber, Hans, A Frontier Known as Watery Mess: the Coast of Flanders, 8 Aug 2021, Frisia Coast Trail Blog, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2021/08/08/the-frontier-collectively-known-as-watery-mess-the-coast-flanders/

[13] Knol E, Ijssennagger N. Palaeogeography and People: Historical Frisians in an archaeological light. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:5-24. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/palaeogeography-and-people-historical-frisians-in-an-archaeological-light/CA5BEE0DAC45640D30C3E40FBDC11C49

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Ogden, Frank, Frankish Law and the Wergeld in the Early Middle Ages, 9 Nov 2020, Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Studies Program, https://sites.owu.edu/trident/2020/11/09/frankish-law-and-the-wergeld-in-the-early-middle-ages-by-drake-ogden/

Germanic Law, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_law

Loveluck C. Context. In: Northwest Europe in the Early Middle Ages, c.AD 600–1150: A Comparative Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2013:1-30. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/northwest-europe-in-the-early-middle-ages-cad-6001150/context/EF9A12D59EB8F07015B489604E75D998

[14] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[15] Nicolay, J.A.W. & Nieuwhof, A. “Immobile farmers? The geographical mobility and cultural identity of early medieval Frisians.” Medieval Settlement Research, 2018, 33: 21-31

Knol E, Ijssennagger N. Palaeogeography and People: Historical Frisians in an archaeological light. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:5-24. https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/palaeogeography-and-people-historical-frisians-in-an-archaeological-light/CA5BEE0DAC45640D30C3E40FBDC11C49

[16] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2021;100:e11. doi:10.1017/njg.2021.8 , https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/landscape-changes-and-humanlandscape-interaction-during-the-first-millennium-ad-in-the-netherlands/3664067EC3153C9C9B99EBB4871CB770

[17] Harm Jan Pierik, Rowin J. van Lanen, Roman and early-medieval habitation patterns in a delta landscape: The link between settlement elevation and landscape dynamics, Quaternary International, Volume 501, Part B, 2019, Pages 379-392, ISSN 1040-6182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.010 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216313453 )

Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2021;100:e11. doi:10.1017/njg.2021.8 , https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/landscape-changes-and-humanlandscape-interaction-during-the-first-millennium-ad-in-the-netherlands/3664067EC3153C9C9B99EBB4871CB770

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[18] Early medieval farms like those near Roomburg and at De Geer in the Rhine delta were small, subsistence focused agricultural settlements with rectangular longhouses, barns, and outbuildings, often clustered in small groups (farmsteads) utilizing the fertile but flood-prone river landscape, with some (like Koudekerk near Roomburg) potentially part of larger estates, showing adaptation from Roman patterns to more localized, community based farming, relying on mixed farming and local resources for survival. 

Key Characteristics:

  • Location and Landscape: Situated on levees or higher ground within the dynamic Rhine-Meuse delta, often bisected by old river channels (crevasses) used for drainage, with settlements like De Geer and Koudekerk showing this adaptation.
  • Farm Layout: Comprised of rectangular longhouses (around 6x20m) for living and animals, plus other structures like storage buildings, hen houses, and possibly pit houses, forming distinct farmsteads.
  • Economic Focus: Primarily subsistence-oriented, focusing on local food production, using basic agricultural technology (animal traction and ploughs were known) and mixed farming (crops, livestock).
  • Community Structure: Often small clusters of farmsteads, possibly forming small villages, with a communal, practical layout rather than planned towns.
  • Relation to Larger Systems: Certain farm sites like Koudekerk near Roomburg might have been part of larger estates (like Holtlant) or functioned as toll points for the Carolingian realm, indicating some integration into broader economies.
  • Continuity and Change: Farms showed continuity from Late Roman times in habitation patterns, but shifted towards smaller, more permanent settlements compared to the earlier dispersed Roman villas, with increased focus on local, intensive farming practices over time. 

See:

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2021;100:e11. doi:10.1017/njg.2021.8 , https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/landscape-changes-and-humanlandscape-interaction-during-the-first-millennium-ad-in-the-netherlands/3664067EC3153C9C9B99EBB4871CB770

[19] See:

Harm Jan Pierik, Rowin J. van Lanen, Roman and early-medieval habitation patterns in a delta landscape: The link between settlement elevation and landscape dynamics, Quaternary International, Volume 501, Part B, 2019, Pages 379-392, ISSN 1040-6182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.010 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216313453 )

Kosian, Menne and Henk Weerts, Rowin Van Lanen, Jaap Evert Abrahamse, The City and the River. The early medieval Emporium (trade centre) of Dorestad; integrating physical geography with archaeological data in changing environments, International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, Vienna, 2012, https://chnt.at/wp-content/uploads/eBook_CHNT17_Kosian.pdf

van Dinter, Marieke, Living along the Limes Landscape and settlement in the Lower Rhine Delta during Roman and Early Medieval times, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 135, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_times

[20] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Faber, Hans, The Batwing Doors of Dorestad. A Two-Way Gateway of Trade and Power, 16 Oct 2020, Frisia Coast Trail Blog, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2020/10/26/dorestat/

Kosian, Menne and Henk Weerts, Rowin Van Lanen, Jaap Evert Abrahamse, The City and the River. The early medieval Emporium (trade centre) of Dorestad; integrating physical geography with archaeological data in changing environments, International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, Vienna, 2012, https://chnt.at/wp-content/uploads/eBook_CHNT17_Kosian.pdf

[21] Faber, Hans, Well, the Thing Is …, 5 Sep 2021, Frisia Trail Coast Blog, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/the-thing-is

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[22] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Kosian, Menne and Henk Weerts, Rowin Van Lanen, Jaap Evert Abrahamse, The City and the River. The early medieval Emporium (trade centre) of Dorestad; integrating physical geography with archaeological data in changing environments, International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, Vienna, 2012, https://chnt.at/wp-content/uploads/eBook_CHNT17_Kosian.pdf

Faber, Hans, The Batwing Doors of Dorestad. A Two-Way Gateway of Trade and Power, 16 Oct 2020, Frisia Coast Trail Blog, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2020/10/26/dorestat/

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

[23] Pierik HJ. , Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

P.C. Vos & E. Knol, Holocene landscape reconstruction of the Wadden Sea area between Marsdiep and Weser, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw ,94 – 2, 157–183, 2015, https://www.waddenacademie.nl/fileadmin/inhoud/pdf/03-Thema_s/Geowetenschap/vos_knol.pdf

Kaspers, Angelique, From sherds to settlement patterns – new insights into the habitation history of the coastal area of the northern Netherlands during the Merovingian and Carolingian periods (AD 400-900) based on field surveys and older collections research, Settlement and Coastal Research in the Southern North Sea Region (SCN), 46, 115-189, Rahden/Westf, 2023, https://www.academia.edu/123867114/From_sherds_to_settlement_patterns_new_insights_into_the_habitation_history_of_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_during_the_Merovingian_and_Carolingian_periods_AD_400_900_based_on_field_surveys_and_older_collections_research

Hines, John, and Nelleke IJssennagger-van der Pluijm, editors. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. NED-New edition, Boydell & Brewer, 2021. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv199tj69

H.J. Pierika, K.M. Cohena,, P.C. Vos, A.J.F. van der Spekd, E. Stouthamer, Late Holocene coastal-plain evolution of the Netherlands: the role of natural preconditions in human-induced sea ingressions, Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 128 (2017) 180–197, https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/348622/late.pdf

[24] Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

[25] Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

[26] Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

[27] The GlobeTrekker computer program integrates genetic, geological, and anthropological evidence to reconstruct global paternal migration histories. It visualizes how each YDNA haplogroup, down to an individual’s terminal SNP, fits within humanity’s evolving distribution through Ice Age sea-levels, population dispersals, and environmental corridors.

In FamilyTreeDNA’s GlobeTrekker system, corridor paths represent least-cost migration corridors (LCCs) — probabilistic zones indicating the most likely routes Y-DNA lineages followed between ancestral haplogroup locations.  GlobeTrekker identifies each ancestral haplogroup’s probable position and then connects them using these cost-efficient routes that consider:

  • Past topography and sea levels, including exposed Ice Age land bridges and glacial boundaries.;
  • Slope steepness (to avoid rugged terrain);
  • Distance to land (favoring coastlines); and, if appropriate,
  • Ocean current direction and strength (penalizing movement against currents).

The corridor paths serve as migration ‘confidence envelopes’, capturing the uncertainty inherent in reconstructing prehistorical movement based on environmental and genetic data. They combine data from Big Y testers, ancient DNA, and ecogeographic models to show how and where paternal lineages likely spread worldwide over tens of millennia. The visible “corridor bands” in GlobeTrekker are explicitly tied to likelihood percentages, but the single thin line itself is just the minimum-cost path within those bands rather than a separately quantified probability.

See:

Vilar, Miguel, Join us on this extraordinary voyage through time and genetics, where every strand of DNA is a thread in the tapestry of human history, FTDNA Blog, 26 Sep 2023, https://blog.familytreedna.com/globetrekker-history/

Maier, Paul, Globetrekker, Part 2: Advancing the Science of Phylogeography, 15 Aug, 2023, https://blog.familytreedna.com/globetrekker-analysis/

[28] Texel, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texel

List of Islands of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 1 August 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_islands_of_the_Netherlands

[29] The creation of Texel, Texel, https://www.texel.net/en/about-texel/history/the-creation-of-texel/

Texel, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texel

[30] Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8 ; for access to the article: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351236350_Landscape_changes_and_human-landscape_interaction_during_the_first_millennium_AD_in_the_Netherlands

[31] “Geomorphological” relates to geomorphology, the scientific study of landforms, their origins, evolution, and the processes (like erosion, weathering, tectonics) that shape them, aiming to understand why landscapes look the way they do and how they change over time due to natural forces and human activity. It’s a core part of physical geography, using field observation, modeling, and technology to analyze features from river valleys and coastlines to mountain ranges. 

Geomophology, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomorphology

[32] Jansma, Esther, Hydrological disasters in the NW-European Lowlands during the first millennium AD: a dendrochronological reconstruction, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 99, e11. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/njg.2020.10 https://www.academia.edu/44188764/Jansma_E_2020_Hydrological_disasters_in_the_NW_European_Lowlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_a_dendrochronological_reconstruction

For another study that focuses on the Rhine River flooding, see:

Toonen, W.H.J., Donders, T.H., Van der Meulen, B., Cohen, K.M. and Prins, M.A. 2013. A composite Holocene palaeoflood chronology of the Lower Rhine. In W.H.J Toonen (ed.), A Holocene Flood Record of the Lower Rhine, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 41: 137–150.

[33] Jansma, Esther, Hydrological disasters in the NW-European Lowlands during the first millennium AD: a dendrochronological reconstruction, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 99, e11. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/njg.2020.10 https://www.academia.edu/44188764/Jansma_E_2020_Hydrological_disasters_in_the_NW_European_Lowlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_a_dendrochronological_reconstruction

[34] Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 29 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248, https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf

[35] Terp, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 17 August 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terp

A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348 )

[36] Terps: Ancient Dwelling Mounds of the North Sea Coast, no date, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/terps

See also:

Nicolay, J.A.W. & Nieuwhof, A. (2018). “Immobile farmers? The geographical mobility and cultural identity of early medieval Frisians.” Medieval Settlement Research, 33: 21-31,

Nieuwhof, Annet, Discontinuity in the Northern-Netherlands coastal area at the end of the Roman Period, in: Transformations in North-Western Europe (AD 300-1000) Proceedings of the 60th Sachsen symposion 19.-23. September 2009 Maastricht”, Hanover: Die Publishing Company, 2011, https://www.academia.edu/1449600/Discontinuity_in_the_Northern_Netherlands_coastal_area_at_the_end_of_the_Roman_Period

[37] Progradation is the geological process where a landform, like a river delta, beach, or alluvial fan, builds outward into a body of water (seaward or basinward) due to continuous sediment accumulation, causing the shoreline to advance, often linked to sea-level fall or high sediment supply.

Progradation, Wikipeida, This page was last edited on 14 August 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progradation

[38] Terps: Ancient Dwelling Mounds of the North Sea Coast, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/terps

A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348 )

J. Bazelmans Joseph and D. Meier, A. Nieuwhof, T. Spekc, P. Vos, Understanding the cultural historical value of the Wadden Sea region. The co-evolution of environment and society in the Wadden Sea area in the Holocene up until early modern times (11,700 BCe1800 AD): An outline,  Ocean & Coastal Management 68 (2012) 114-126, https://www.waddenacademie.nl/fileadmin/inhoud/pdf/04-bibliotheek/Themanummer_OCMA/11_Understanding_the_cultural_historical_value_of_the_Wadden_Sea_region_OCMA.pdf

Knol, Egge, ‘Living Near the Sea: The Organisation of Frisia in Early Medieval Times’, in Jayne Carroll, Andrew Reynolds, and Barbara Yorke (eds), Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Proceedings of the British Academy (London
, 2019; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 21 May 2020), https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266588.003.0017

[39] A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348 )

Reiß, A., Hadler, H., Wilken, D., Majchczack, B. S., Blankenfeldt, R., Bäumler, S., Ickerodt, U., Klooß, S., Willershäuser, T., Rabbel, W., and Vött, A.: The Trendermarsch sunken in the Wadden Sea (North Frisia, Germany) – reconstructing a drowned medieval cultural landscape with geoarchaeological and geophysical investigations, E&G Quaternary Sci. J., 74, 37–57, https://doi.org/10.5194/egqsj-74-37-2025 , 2025. See additional link https://egqsj.copernicus.org/articles/74/37/2025/

Bakker, M., The Nature and Dynamics of Pre-Roman Iron Age and Roman Iron Age Reclamation Settlements in the (Former) Peat and Clay-On-Peat Area of Friesland (The Netherlands). Journal of Wetland Archaeology22(1–2), 2022, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14732971.2022.2061783

[40] A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348 )

See also:

Faber, Hans, Between Leffinge and Misthusum—Understanding the Basics of Terps, 29 Sep 2024, Frisia Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/between-leffinge-and-misthusum-understanding-the-basics-of-terps

Knol, Egge, ‘Living Near the Sea: The Organisation of Frisia in Early Medieval Times’, in Jayne Carroll, Andrew Reynolds, and Barbara Yorke (eds), Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Proceedings of the British Academy (London
, 2019; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 21 May 2020), https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266588.003.0017

Ellen McManus, Janet Montgomery, Jane Evans, Angela Lamb, Rhea Brettelld, Johan Jelsmae, ‘To the land or to the sea’: diet and mobility in early medieval Frisia, https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/504785/1/McManus%20et%20al%20-%20Oosterbeintum_final.pdf

Bakker, M., The Nature and Dynamics of Pre-Roman Iron Age and Roman Iron Age Reclamation Settlements in the (Former) Peat and Clay-On-Peat Area of Friesland (The Netherlands). Journal of Wetland Archaeology22(1–2), 2022, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14732971.2022.2061783

[41] Knol, Egge, ‘Living Near the Sea: The Organisation of Frisia in Early Medieval Times’, in Jayne Carroll, Andrew Reynolds, and Barbara Yorke (eds), Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Proceedings of the British Academy (London
, 2019; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 21 May 2020), https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266588.003.0017

[42] Knol, Egge, ‘Living Near the Sea: The Organisation of Frisia in Early Medieval Times’, in Jayne Carroll, Andrew Reynolds, and Barbara Yorke (eds), Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Proceedings of the British Academy (London
, 2019; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 21 May 2020), https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266588.003.0017

People of the North Sea, 7 Aug 2017, Doug’s Archaeology, https://dougsarchaeology.wordpress.com/2019/08/07/people-of-the-north-sea/

Nieuwhof, Annet,Saxon immigration or continuity? Ezinge and the coastal area of the northern Netherlands in the Migration Period, Journeal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 5-1 (March) 2013, 53 – 83, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273449636_Anglo-Saxon_immigration_or_continuity_Ezinge_and_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_in_the_Migration_Period

Ellen McManus, Janet Montgomery, Jane Evans, Angela Lamb, Rhea Brettelld, Johan Jelsmae, ‘To the land or to the sea’: diet and mobility in early medieval Frisia, https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/504785/1/McManus%20et%20al%20-%20Oosterbeintum_final.pdf

Terps: Ancient Dwelling Mounds of the North Sea Coast, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/terps

Bakker, M., The Nature and Dynamics of Pre-Roman Iron Age and Roman Iron Age Reclamation Settlements in the (Former) Peat and Clay-On-Peat Area of Friesland (The Netherlands). Journal of Wetland Archaeology22(1–2), 2022, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14732971.2022.2061783

Reiß, A., Hadler, H., Wilken, D., Majchczack, B. S., Blankenfeldt, R., Bäumler, S., Ickerodt, U., Klooß, S., Willershäuser, T., Rabbel, W., and Vött, A.: The Trendermarsch sunken in the Wadden Sea (North Frisia, Germany) – reconstructing a drowned medieval cultural landscape with geoarchaeological and geophysical investigations, E&G Quaternary Sci. J., 74, 37–57, https://doi.org/10.5194/egqsj-74-37-2025 , 2025. See additional link https://egqsj.copernicus.org/articles/74/37/2025/

[43] Postma, D., Salt Marsh Architecture, Catalogue, technology and typological development of early medieval turf buildings in the northern coastal area of the Netherlands,  Masters Thesis University of Groningen, 2010, https://www.waddenacademie.nl/fileadmin/inhoud/pdf/06-wadweten/Scripties/D._Postma_-_scriptieverkl.pdf

Gerrets, Danny, Continuous development in house-type and settlement structure in Drenthe, Ruralia Památky archeologické – Supplementum 5, Praha 1996, http://ruralia2.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Danny-Gerrets.pdf

Nieuwhof, Annet, Ezinge revisited. The ancient roots of a terp settlement: Volume 1: Excavation – Environment and Economy – Catalogue of Plans and Finds, Gronongen: Univesrity of Groningen / Groningen Institute of Archaeology and Barkhuis Publishing, 2020, https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/ezinge-revisited-the-ancient-roots-of-a-terp-settlement-volume-1-/

A. Nieuwhof, Annet and M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management 2019, doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331477789_Adapting_to_the_sea_Human_habitation_in_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_before_medieval_dike_building_Preprint

Old Frisian Longhouse, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 7 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Frisian_longhouse

Nieuwhof, Annet, Creating a home. Ritual practice in a terp settlement in the northern Netherlands, Beiträge zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte Mitteleuropas 95, 95 – 109, https://www.academia.edu/44905134/Creating_a_home_Ritual_practice_in_a_terp_settlement_in_the_northern_Netherlands

[44] Nieuwhof, Annet, Creating a home. Ritual practice in a terp settlement in the northern Netherlands, Beiträge zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte Mitteleuropas 95, 95 – 109, https://www.academia.edu/44905134/Creating_a_home_Ritual_practice_in_a_terp_settlement_in_the_northern_Netherlands

Faber, Hans, Between Leffinge and Misthusum—Understanding the Basics of Terps, 29 Sep 2024,Frisia Coast Trail Blog, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/between-leffinge-and-misthusum-understanding-the-basics-of-terps

Niewhof, Annet, Ezinge revisited. The ancient roots of a terp settlement: Volume 1: Excavation – Environment and Economy – Catalogue of Plans and Finds, Groningen Archaeological Studies, 37, University of Groningen/Groningen Institute of Archaeology and Barkhuis Publishing, Oct 2020, https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/ezinge-revisited-the-ancient-roots-of-a-terp-settlement-volume-1-/

[45] Carroll, Jayne, Andrew Reynolds and Barbara York, eds. Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages. Vol. 224. The British Academy, 2019. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.31732145

Nieuwhof, Annet, Anglo-Saxon immigration or continuity? Ezinge and the coastal area of the northern Netherlands in the Migration Period, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries 4-2 (April 2013), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/text-idxaa82.html

Angelique Kaspers, Gilles J. de Langen and Johan A. W. Nicolay, From sherds to settlement patterns – new insights into the habitation history of the coastal area of the northern Netherlands during the Merovingian and Carolingian periods (AD 400-900) based on field surveys and older collections research, Settlement and Coastal Research in the Southern North Sea Region (SCN), 46, 115-189, Rahden/Westf. 2023, https://www.academia.edu/123867114/From_sherds_to_settlement_patterns_new_insights_into_the_habitation_history_of_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_during_the_Merovingian_and_Carolingian_periods_AD_400_900_based_on_field_surveys_and_older_collections_research

Knol E. For Daily Use and Special Moments: Material Culture in Frisia, AD 400–1000. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:13-44, https://www.academia.edu/123867114/From_sherds_to_settlement_patterns_new_insights_into_the_habitation_history_of_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_during_the_Merovingian_and_Carolingian_periods_AD_400_900_based_on_field_surveys_and_older_collections_research

[46] In archaeology, stratigraphy is the study of layers (strata) of soil and debris that build up over time, allowing archaeologists to establish a chronological sequence of events at a site. It relies on the Law of Superposition, which states that deeper layers are older than those above them, helping reconstruct the site’s history, understand past activities, and date artifacts relative to each other, much like layers in a cake or lasagna.

Stratigraphy (archaeology), Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 October 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratigraphy_(archaeology)

[47] Nieuwhof, Annet, Anglo-Saxon immigration or continuity? Ezinge and the coastal area of the northern Netherlands in the Migration Period, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries 4-2 (April 2013), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/text-idxaa82.html

Kaspers, Angelique and Gilles J. de Langen and Johan A. W. Nicolay, From sherds to settlement patterns – new insights into the habitation history of the coastal area of the northern Netherlands during the Merovingian and Carolingian periods (AD 400-900) based on field surveys and older collections research, Settlement and Coastal Research in the Southern North Sea Region (SCN), 46, 115-189, Rahden/Westf. 2023, https://www.academia.edu/123867114/From_sherds_to_settlement_patterns_new_insights_into_the_habitation_history_of_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_during_the_Merovingian_and_Carolingian_periods_AD_400_900_based_on_field_surveys_and_older_collections_research

Nieuwhof A. The Frisians and their Pottery: Social Relations before and after the Fourth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:45-78, https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/frisians-and-their-pottery-social-relations-before-and-after-the-fourth-century-ad/49D9B6667528E049632B1978BCB811F5

[48] Postma, D., Salt Marsh Architecture, Catalogue, technology and typological development of early medieval turf buildings in the northern coastal area of the Netherlands,  Masters Thesis University of Groningen, 2010, https://www.waddenacademie.nl/fileadmin/inhoud/pdf/06-wadweten/Scripties/D._Postma_-_scriptieverkl.pdf

Gerrets, Danny, Continuous development in house-type and settlement structure in Drenthe, Ruralia Památky archeologické – Supplementum 5, Praha 1996, http://ruralia2.ff.cuni.cz/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Danny-Gerrets.pdf

Nieuwhof, Annet, Ezinge revisited. The ancient roots of a terp settlement: Volume 1: Excavation – Environment and Economy – Catalogue of Plans and Finds, Gronongen: Univesrity of Groningen / Groningen Institute of Archaeology and Barkhuis Publishing, 2020, https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/ezinge-revisited-the-ancient-roots-of-a-terp-settlement-volume-1-/

Old Frisian Longhouse, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 7 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Frisian_longhouse

Nieuwhof, Annet, Creating a home. Ritual practice in a terp settlement in the northern Netherlands, Beiträge zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte Mitteleuropas 95, 95 – 109, https://www.academia.edu/44905134/Creating_a_home_Ritual_practice_in_a_terp_settlement_in_the_northern_Netherlands

[49] Kaspers, Angelique and Gilles J. de Langen and Johan A. W. Nicolay, From sherds to settlement patterns – new insights into the habitation history of the coastal area of the northern Netherlands during the Merovingian and Carolingian periods (AD 400-900) based on field surveys and older collections research, Settlement and Coastal Research in the Southern North Sea Region (SCN), 46, 115-189, Rahden/Westf. 2023,

Boeles en Van Giffen Speech or profile paper about mounds, Education, Vereniging voor Terpenonderzoek, https://terpenonderzoek.nl/education/?lang=en

[50] Knol, Egge, ‘Living Near the Sea: The Organisation of Frisia in Early Medieval Times’, in Jayne Carroll, Andrew Reynolds, and Barbara Yorke (eds), Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Proceedings of the British Academy (London,  2019; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 21 May 2020), https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266588.003.0017

Carroll, Jayne, Andrew Reynolds amd Barbara Yorke, eds. Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages. Vol. 224. The British Academy, 2019. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jj.31732145

[51] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348 )

Knol, Egge, ‘Living Near the Sea: The Organisation of Frisia in Early Medieval Times’, in Jayne Carroll, Andrew Reynolds, and Barbara Yorke (eds), Power and Place in Europe in the Early Middle Ages, Proceedings of the British Academy (London
, 2019; online edn, British Academy Scholarship Online, 21 May 2020), https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197266588.003.0017

[52] Bakker, M. , The Nature and Dynamics of Pre-Roman Iron Age and Roman Iron Age Reclamation Settlements in the (Former) Peat and Clay-On-Peat Area of Friesland (The Netherlands). Journal of Wetland Archaeology22(1–2), 2022, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14732971.2022.2061783

van Popta, Y. T., Cohen, K. M., Vos, P. C., & Spek, Th. (2020). Reconstructing medieval eroded landscapes of the north-eastern Zuyder Zee (the Netherlands): a refined palaeogeographical time series of the Noordoostpolder between a.d. 1100 and 1400. Landscape History41(2), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01433768.2020.1835180

A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348 )

[53] D. Postma , Salt Marsh Architecture, Catalogue, technology and typological development of early medieval turf buildings in the northern coastal area of the Netherlands, Masters Thesis University of Groningen, 2010, https://www.waddenacademie.nl/fileadmin/inhoud/pdf/06-wadweten/Scripties/D._Postma_-_scriptieverkl.pdf

[54] A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348 )

Bakker, M. , The Nature and Dynamics of Pre-Roman Iron Age and Roman Iron Age Reclamation Settlements in the (Former) Peat and Clay-On-Peat Area of Friesland (The Netherlands). Journal of Wetland Archaeology22(1–2), 2022, 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/14732971.2022.2061783

[55] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

Van Lanen, R.J., Jansma, E., Van Doesburg, J., Groenewoudt, B.J., Roman and early-medieval long-distance transport routes in north-western Europe: modelling frequent-travel zones using a dendroarchaeological approach. J. Archaeol. Sci. 73, 120e137. 2016, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440316300978

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[56] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

[57] Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Esther Jansma, Jan van Doesburg, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Roman and early-medieval long-distance transport routes in north-western Europe: Modelling frequent-travel zones using a dendroarchaeological approach , Journal of Archaeological Science, 73, Sep 2016, 120- 137, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440316300978

R.J. Lanen, M. Kosian, B.J. Groenewoudt, E. Jansma, Geoarchaeology: An international Journal (30), 200-222(2015): Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands pp. 200 – 222, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

[58] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

[59] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lanen and Harm Jan Pierk, Traveling Through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeogical Reconstruction of River Development and Long Distance Connections in the netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39, https://www.academia.edu/35074210/Jansma_E_R_J_Van_Lanen_and_H_J_Pierik_2017_Travelling_through_a_river_delta_a_landscape_archaeological_reconstruction_of_river_development_and_long_distance_connections_in_the_Netherlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_Medieval_Settlement_Research_32_35_39

Van Lanen, R.J., Kosian, M.C., Groenewoudt, B.J., Spek, T., Jansma, E., 2016b. Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability during the last two millennia: a case study from The Netherlands. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sciences 1e16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310757823_Route_persistence_Modelling_and_quantifying_historical_route-network_stability_from_the_Roman_period_to_early-modern_times_AD_100-1600_a_case_study_from_the_Netherlands

[60] Rowin J. van Lanen, Rowin J. and Harm Jan Pierik, Calculating connectivity patterns in delta landscapes: Modelling Roman and early-medieval route networks and their stability in dynamic lowlands, Quaternary International, Volume 501, Part B, 2019, Pages 393-412,
ISSN 1040-6182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.009 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216313519 )

[61] Quote:

Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lanen, and Harm Jan Pierik, Traveling through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeological Reconstruction of River Development and Long-Distance connections in the Netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39, https://www.academia.edu/35074210/Jansma_E_R_J_Van_Lanen_and_H_J_Pierik_2017_Travelling_through_a_river_delta_a_landscape_archaeological_reconstruction_of_river_development_and_long_distance_connections_in_the_Netherlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_Medieval_Settlement_Research_32_35_39

The quote references the “old Rhine’. “In ancient times, it was the lower part of the main River Rhine, which forked at the Betuwe into a northern branch, the Rhine, and a southern branch, the Waal. The Oude Rijn was then much wider than it is now, and tidal. During the Roman occupation, the river formed part of the northern border of the Empire. In medieval times, the River Lek became the main outlet for the Rhine, and the Oude Rijn silted up.

Oude Rijn (Utrecht and South Holland), Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 September 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oude_Rijn_(Utrecht_and_South_Holland)

[62] W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Esther Jansma, Jan van Doesburg, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Roman and early-medieval long-distance transport routes in north-western Europe: Modelling frequent-travel zones using a dendroarchaeological approach , Journal of Archaeological Science, 73, Sep 2016, 120- 137, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440316300978

van Lanen, Rowin J.  and Jaap Evert Abrahamse, The City and the River. The early medieval Emporium (trade centre) of Dorestad; integrating physical geography with archaeological data in changing environments, in Wolfgang Börner, Susanne Uhlirz, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies 2012 , https://www.academia.edu/5851685/The_City_and_the_River_The_early_medieval_Emporium_trade_centre_of_Dorestad_integrating_physical_geography_with_archaeological_data_in_changing_environments

[63] Hines, John, and Nelleke IJssennagger, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. NED-New edition. Boydell & Brewer, 2017. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7722/j.ctt1t6p55t

Pierik, Ham Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

Flierman, Robert, Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth century AD, 223 – 247, Chapter 8 in: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer, Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021, https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

Tys, Dries, ‘Maritime and River Traders, Landing Places, and Emporia Ports in the Merovingian Period in and Around the Low Countries’, in Bonnie Effros, and Isabel Moreira (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the Merovingian World (2020; online edn, Oxford Academic, 8 Oct. 2020), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190234188.013.26

[64] Dorestad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 December 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorestad

van Lanen, Rowin J.  and Jaap Evert Abrahamse, The City and the River. The early medieval Emporium (trade centre) of Dorestad; integrating physical geography with archaeological data in changing environments, in Wolfgang Börner, Susanne Uhlirz, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies 2012 , https://www.academia.edu/5851685/The_City_and_the_River_The_early_medieval_Emporium_trade_centre_of_Dorestad_integrating_physical_geography_with_archaeological_data_in_changing_environments

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Esther Jansma, Jan van Doesburg, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Roman and early-medieval long-distance transport routes in north-western Europe: Modelling frequent-travel zones using a dendroarchaeological approach , Journal of Archaeological Science, 73, Sep 2016, 120- 137, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440316300978

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[65] See for example:

Rowin J. van Lanen, Rowin J. and Harm Jan Pierik, Calculating connectivity patterns in delta landscapes: Modelling Roman and early-medieval route networks and their stability in dynamic lowlands, Quaternary International, Volume 501, Part B, 2019, Pages 393-412,
ISSN 1040-6182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.009 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216313519 )

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lanen and Harm Jan Pierk, Traveling Through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeogical Reconstruction of River Development and Long Distance Connections in the Netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39, https://www.academia.edu/35074210/Jansma_E_R_J_Van_Lanen_and_H_J_Pierik_2017_Travelling_through_a_river_delta_a_landscape_archaeological_reconstruction_of_river_development_and_long_distance_connections_in_the_Netherlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_Medieval_Settlement_Research_32_35_39

Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

Roymans, N., & Gerritsen, F.A. (2002). Landscape, ecology and mentalities: a long-term perspective on developments in the Meuse-Demer-Scheldt region. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 68, 257–287

[66] The idea of couching the results of mapping specific ‘cost-efficient’ migration routes of specific YDNA lineages created by Globetrekker in the context of land archaeological models of general land and water transport route zones, movemement paths and persistence places is similar to a suggested research approach for landscape genomics and genetics.

An editorial by Samuel Cushman and other research associates frames landscape genomics as an expansion of landscape genetics made possible by next generation sequencing (NGS) methods, and concludes that progress hinges on integrating large genomic datasets with spatial modeling and experimental work in hypothesis‑driven, collaborative projects. The article’s main goal is to outline conceptual and practical steps for moving from traditional landscape genetics (e.g. tens of microsatellites, population‑level sampling) to landscape genomics (e.g. thousands of genome‑wide markers from NGS) in a spatially explicit framework.

See: Cushman SA, Shirk AJ, Howe GT, Murphy MA, Dyer RJ, Joost S. Editorial: The Least Cost Path From Landscape Genetics to Landscape Genomics: Challenges and Opportunities to Explore NGS Data in a Spatially Explicit Context. Front Genet. 2018 Jun 19;9:215. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00215. PMID: 29971091; PMCID: PMC6018102 (PubMed) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6018102/

[67] Jansma et. al. and Van Lanen et. al. discuss the interdisciplinary nature of this research:

Jansma, E., Gouw-Bouman, M., Van Lanen, R., Pierik, H.J., Cohen, K., Groenewoudt, B., Hoek, W., Stouthamer, E., & Middelkoop, H., The dark age of the lowlands in an interdisciplinary light: People, landscape and climate in the Netherlands between AD 300–1000. European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies (PCA 4), 2014, 471–476. ISSN: 2039–7895, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265096511_The_Dark_Age_of_the_Lowlands_in_an_interdisciplinary_light_people_landscape_and_climate_in_The_Netherlands_between_AD_300_and_1000

Van Lanen , Rowin J. and Esther Jansma, and Menne Kosian, Finding a way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An international Journal (30), 200-222. https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

[68] See for example:

Jansma, E., Gouw-Bouman, M., Van Lanen, R., Pierik, H.J., Cohen, K., Groenewoudt, B., Hoek, W., Stouthamer, E., & Middelkoop, H., The dark age of the lowlands in an interdisciplinary light: People, landscape and climate in the Netherlands between AD 300–1000. European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies (PCA 4), 2014, 471–476. ISSN: 2039–7895, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265096511_The_Dark_Age_of_the_Lowlands_in_an_interdisciplinary_light_people_landscape_and_climate_in_The_Netherlands_between_AD_300_and_1000

Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lanen and Harm Jan Pierk, Traveling Through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeogical Reconstruction of River Development and Long Distance Connections in the Netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39, https://www.academia.edu/35074210/Jansma_E_R_J_Van_Lanen_and_H_J_Pierik_2017_Travelling_through_a_river_delta_a_landscape_archaeological_reconstruction_of_river_development_and_long_distance_connections_in_the_Netherlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_Medieval_Settlement_Research_32_35_39

Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

Roymans, N., & Gerritsen, F.A. (2002). Landscape, ecology and mentalities: a long-term perspective on developments in the Meuse-Demer-Scheldt region. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 68, 257–287

Stouthamer, E., & Berendsen, H.J.A., Factors controlling the Holocene avulsion history of the Rhine–Meuse Delta (the Netherlands). Journal of Sedimentary Research, 70(5), 2000, 1051–1064.

van Dinter, Marieke and Kim M. Cohen, Wim Z. Hoek, Esther Stouthamer, Esther Jansma , Hans Middelkoop, Late Holocene lowland fluvial archives and geoarchaeology: Utrecht’s case study of Rhine river abandonment under Roman and Medieval settlement, Quaternary Science Reviews (2017) 1-39, https://www.academia.edu/31299345/Late_Holocene_lowland_fluvial_archives_and_geoarchaeology_Utrechts_case_study_of_Rhine_river_abandonment_under_Roman_and_Medieval_settlement?email_work_card=view-paper

Van Lanen , Rowin J. and Esther Jansma, and Menne Kosian, Finding a way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An international Journal (30), 200-222. https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

Van Lanen , Rowin J. and  Bert J. Groenewoudt , Theo Spek, Esther Jansma, Route Persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands, Archaeol Anthropol Sci (2018) 10:1037–1052, DOI 10.1007/s12520-016-0431-z , https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310757823_Route_persistence_Modelling_and_quantifying_historical_route-network_stability_from_the_Roman_period_to_early-modern_times_AD_100-1600_a_case_study_from_the_Netherlands

Van Lanen, R.J., Kosian, M.C., Groenewoudt, B.J., Spek, T., Jansma, E., Best travel options: modelling Roman and early-medieval routes in The Netherlands using a multi-proxy approach. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 3 (JASR), 144e159., 2015

Van Lanen, Rowin J. and Harm Jan Pierik, Calculating connectivity patterns in delta landscapes: Modelling Roman and early-medieval route networks and their stability in dynamic lowlands, Quaternary International, Volume 501, Part B, 20 January 2019, Pages 393-412, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1040618216313519?via%3Dihub ; also https://www.academia.edu/34741700/Van_Lanen_and_Pierik_2017_Calculating_connectivity_patterns_in_delta_landscapes_Modelling_Roman_and_early_medieval_route_networks_and_their_stability_in_dynamic_lowlands?email_work_card=view-paper

Van Lanen, R.J., Jansma, E., Van Doesburg, J., Groenewoudt, B.J., Roman and early-medieval long-distance transport routes in north-western Europe: modelling frequent-travel zones using a dendroarchaeological approach. J. Archaeol. Sci. 73, 120e137. 2016, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0305440316300978

Verhagen, P., Brughmans, T., Nuninger, L., & Bertoncello, F. , The long and winding road: Combining least cost  paths and network analysis techniques for settlement  location analysis and predictive modelling. In G. Earl, T.  Sly, A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, C. Papadopoulos, I.  Romanowska, & D. Wheatley (Eds.), Archaeology in the  digital era. Papers from the 40th Annual Conference of  Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in  Archaeology (CAA) (Southampton, March 26–29, 2013,  pp. 357–366)

Verhagen, J.W.H.P., Case Studies in Archaeological Predictive Modelling. PhD thesis. Leiden University, Archaeological Studies Leiden University (ASLU) 14, Leiden University Press, Leiden. 2007

Verhagen, J.W.H.P., Whitley, T.G., Integrating archaeological theory and predictive modeling: a live report from the scene. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 19, 49e100. 2011

Vos , Peter C,  Origin of the Dutch Coastal landscape; Long term landscape evolution to the Netherlands during the Holocene, described and visualized in national regional and local palaeographical map series, PhD Thesis Utrecht University, Utrecht, 2015,  https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/315553

[69] Van Lanen et. al. provide basic definitions associated with this research:

Van Lanen , Rowin J. and Esther Jansma, and Menne Kosian, Finding a way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An international Journal (30), 200-222. https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

See also:

Van Lanen, R.J., Kosian, M.C., Groenewoudt, B.J., Spek, T., Jansma, E., 2016b. Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability during the last two millennia: a case study from The Netherlands. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sciences 1e16. https://link.springer.com/journal/12520/onlineFirst/page/3 .

van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi:10.1017/njg.2020.12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0431-z

van Rowin J. and Lanen, Harm Jan Pierik, Calculating connectivity patterns in delta landscapes: Modelling Roman and early-medieval route networks and their stability in dynamic lowlands, Quaternary International, Volume 501, Part B, 2019, Pages 393-412, ISSN 1040-6182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.009 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216313519 )

[70] See for example:

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, and Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 30 (2015) 200–222, https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/258920868/Geoarchaeology_-_2015_-_Lanen__Finding_a_Way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the.pdf

van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi:10.1017/njg.2020.12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0431-z

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Harm Jan Pierik, Calculating connectivity patterns in delta landscapes: Modelling Roman and early-medieval route networks and their stability in dynamic lowlands, Quaternary International, Volume 501, Part B, 2019, Pages 393-412, ISSN 1040-6182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.009 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216313519 )

Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lanen and Harm Jan Pierk, Traveling Through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeogical Reconstruction of River Development and Long Distance Connections in the netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39, https://www.academia.edu/35074210/Jansma_E_R_J_Van_Lanen_and_H_J_Pierik_2017_Travelling_through_a_river_delta_a_landscape_archaeological_reconstruction_of_river_development_and_long_distance_connections_in_the_Netherlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_Medieval_Settlement_Research_32_35_39

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Esther Jansma, Jan van Doesburg, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Roman and early-medieval long-distance transport routes in north-western Europe: Modelling frequent-travel zones using a dendroarchaeological approach,
Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 73, 2016, Pages 120-137, ISSN 0305-4403,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.07.010 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440316300978 )

[71] van Lanen, R. J., Groenewoudt, B., Spek, T., & Jansma, E.. Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10 (5), 2018, 1037–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0431-z , https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/63407562/Lanen2018_Article_RoutePersistenceModellingAndQu.pdf

R.J. van Lanen. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 99, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2020.12

[72] van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi:10.1017/njg.2020.12 , https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/revealing-the-past-through-modelling-reflections-on-connectivity-habitation-and-persistence-in-the-dutch-delta-during-the-1st-millennium-ad/717D79192E8EDD6B90D58B060117EB1B

Rowin J. van Lanen, Esther Jansma, Jan van Doesburg, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Roman and early-medieval long-distance transport routes in north-western Europe: Modelling frequent-travel zones using a dendroarchaeological approach, Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 73, 2016, Pages 120-137, ISSN 0305-4403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2016.07.010 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440316300978 )

Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lanen and Harm Jan Pierk, Traveling Through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeogical Reconstruction of River Development and Long Distance Connections in the netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39, https://www.academia.edu/35074210/Jansma_E_R_J_Van_Lanen_and_H_J_Pierik_2017_Travelling_through_a_river_delta_a_landscape_archaeological_reconstruction_of_river_development_and_long_distance_connections_in_the_Netherlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_Medieval_Settlement_Research_32_35_39

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Harm Jan Pierik, Calculating connectivity patterns in delta landscapes: Modelling Roman and early-medieval route networks and their stability in dynamic lowlands, Quaternary International,
Volume 501, Part B, 2019, Pages 393-412, ISSN 1040-6182,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.009 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216313519 )

[73] van Lanen,Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, and Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, quote Page 2, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands

van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi:10.1017/njg.2020.12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0431-z

van Lanen, R.J., Groenewoudt, B.J., Spek, T. et al. Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 10, 1037–1052 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0431-z

[74] van Lanen,Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, and Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, quote Page 2, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands

[75] van Lanen, R.J., Groenewoudt, B.J., Spek, T. et al. Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 10, 1037–1052 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0431-z

Rowin J. van Lanen, Harm Jan Pierik, Calculating connectivity patterns in delta landscapes: Modelling Roman and early-medieval route networks and their stability in dynamic lowlands, Quaternary International, Volume 501, Part B, 2019, Pages 393-412, ISSN 1040-6182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.009 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040618216313519 )

[76] van Lanen, R.J., Groenewoudt, B.J., Spek, T. et al. Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 10, 1037–1052 (2018). Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability

[77] Ai-Ping Fan, A.J. (Tom) van Loon, Ren-Chao Yang, The control of Pleistocene palaeogeography on the distribution of sandy patches in a silty Holocene lagoon (central Netherlands), Journal of Palaeogeography, Volume 11, Issue 4, 2022, Pages 565-583, ISSN 2095-3836, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jop.2022.08.003 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095383622000852 )

Groenewoudt, Bert J., An exhausted landscape. Medieval use of moors, mires and commons in the Eastern Netherlands, In : Medieval Rural Settlement in Marginal Landscapes (pp.149-180), 2009/01/01, SN – 978-2-503-52746-8 10.1484/M.RURALIA-EB.3.1169, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299929968_An_exhausted_landscape_Medieval_use_of_moors_mires_and_commons_in_the_Eastern_Netherlands

[78] van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi:10.1017/njg.2020.12, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/revealing-the-past-through-modelling-reflections-on-connectivity-habitation-and-persistence-in-the-dutch-delta-during-the-1st-millennium-ad/717D79192E8EDD6B90D58B060117EB1B

van Lanen, R. J., Groenewoudt, B., Spek, T., & Jansma, Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route-network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10 (5), 2018, 1037–1052., https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-016-0431-z

[79] Jansma, Esther and Rowin J. Van Lanen and Harm Jan Pierk, Traveling Through a River Delta: A Landscape Archaeogical Reconstruction of River Development and Long Distance Connections in the netherlands During the First Millennium AD, Medieval Settlement Research 32 (2017), 35–39, https://www.academia.edu/35074210/Jansma_E_R_J_Van_Lanen_and_H_J_Pierik_2017_Travelling_through_a_river_delta_a_landscape_archaeological_reconstruction_of_river_development_and_long_distance_connections_in_the_Netherlands_during_the_first_millennium_AD_Medieval_Settlement_Research_32_35_39

van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi: 10.1017/njg.2020.12 , https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347351166_Revealing_the_past_through_modelling_Reflections_on_connectivity_habitation_and_persistence_in_the_Dutch_Delta_during_the_1st_millennium_AD

Van Lanen, R.J., Groenewoudt, B.J., Spek, T. and Jansma, E. 2016b. Route persistence. Modelling and quantifying historical route network stability from the Roman period to early-modern times (AD 100–1600): a case study from the Netherlands, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences: 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310757823_Route_persistence_Modelling_and_quantifying_historical_route-network_stability_from_the_Roman_period_to_early-modern_times_AD_100-1600_a_case_study_from_the_Netherlands

[80] Dendrochronology, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 19 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendrochronology

Jansma, E., Haneca, K. and Kosian, M. 2014b. A dendrochronological reassessment of three Roman vessels from Utrecht (the Netherlands): evidence of inland navigation between the lower- Scheldt region in Gallia Belgica and the limes of Germania inferior, Journal of Archaeological Science 50: 484–496, https://www.academia.edu/26380316/A_dendrochronological_reassessment_of_three_Roman_boats_from_Utrecht_the_Netherlands_evidence_of_inland_navigation_between_the_Scheldt_region_in_Gallia_Belgica_and_the_limes_of_Germania_inferior

Blakemore, Erin,, How are tree rings used to help date an archaeological site?, National Geographic, 8 Jul 2019, https://www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/article/how-tree-rings-date-archaeological-site?loggedin=true&rnd=1768417166750

Kristof Haneca, Katarina Čufar, Hans Beeckman, Oaks, tree-rings and wooden cultural heritage: a review of the main characteristics and applications of oak dendrochronology in Europe, Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 36, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-11, ISSN 0305-4403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.07.005 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440308001660 )

Visser, Ronald M. “Dendrochronological provenance patterns. Network analysis of tree-ring material reveals spatial and economic relations of roman timber in the continental north-western provinces.” Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology 4.1 2021. https://journal.caa-international.org/articles/10.5334/jcaa.79

Martin Bridge, Locating the origins of wood resources: a review of dendroprovenancing, Journal of Archaeological Science, Volume 39, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2828-2834,
ISSN 0305-4403, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.028 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440312001483 )

[81] Jansma, E., Haneca, K. and Kosian, M. 2014b. A dendrochronological reassessment of three Roman vessels from Utrecht (the Netherlands): evidence of inland navigation between the lower- Scheldt region in Gallia Belgica and the limes of Germania inferior, Journal of Archaeological Science 50: 484–496, https://www.academia.edu/26380316/A_dendrochronological_reassessment_of_three_Roman_boats_from_Utrecht_the_Netherlands_evidence_of_inland_navigation_between_the_Scheldt_region_in_Gallia_Belgica_and_the_limes_of_Germania_inferior

[82] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Menne C. Kosian, Bert J. Groenewoudt, Esther Jansma, Finding a Way: Modeling Landscape Prerequisites for Roman and Early-Medieval Routes in the Netherlands, Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 00 (2015) 1–23, https://doi.org/10.1002/GEA.21510, https://www.academia.edu/11879781/Van_Lanen_et_al_2015_Finding_a_way_Modeling_Landscape_Prerequisites_for_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_Routes_in_the_Netherlands?email_work_card=title

van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi:10.1017/njg.2020.12