Johann Wolfgang Sperber – Part Four: Heading to Fulton County and Glove Making

This is part four of a story about Johann Wolfgang Sperber immigrating to the United States. This part of the story discusses the possible influences that drew Johann Sperber to Fulton County, New York. We do not have direct evidence to explain why Johan Sperber ended up specifically in Gloversville, Fulton County, New York. However, we have indirect historical evidence that may offer clues as to why he ultimately chose Fulton county as his new home.


Six Part Story

The first of this story provides an overview of the family legacy John Sperber established in his new homeland, an historical background on where John was from in Baden, Germany, the influences on his migration to the United States, and the historical evidence of his departure and arrival to America.

The second part of John Sperber’s story describes his journey from Baden-Baden to Le Havre based on historical evidence and historical accounts.

The third part of the story assesses the three major inland pathways to European ports that John had options to consider. Since it is not absolutely certain the ship manifest list for the Germania reflect our John Sperber, I have provided historical background on the relative accessibility of the three major routes John may have taken to make his voyage to the United States. 

The fifth part of the story covers his travel to New York City and his options to travel to Gloversville, Fulton County, New York.

The sixth part of the story covers his establishing a new life and family in the Johnstown and Gloversville, New York area. This is the end of a rather long story that attempts to provide not only a discussion of the available ‘facts’ we have of Johann and his family but also provide a broader social and historical context in which he made this journey from Baden to New York state. Like a song, some of the ‘facts’ are a refrain from prior parts of the story.


Why did Johann Sperber end up in Fulton County, in New York state? I have addressed general aspects of this question in prior parts of this story. We can specifically look at this question in terms of three nested questions that start from a general question to a regional question and then to a specific geographical question.

The first question is why Johann landed in New York City. The second question is why did he head to the Mohawk valley. The third question is why did he specifically end up in the Gloversville – Johnstown area in Fulton County

Le Havre to New York City

Johann’s arrival in New York city is substantiated by information found on the Germania ship manifest . In previous parts to this story, it was also substantiated with historical facts that Germans from the Grand Duchy of Baden had a long history of migrating to the Mohawk valley in New York state. In addition, since 1830 New York city was “the gateway of the nation” for the vast majority of Germans immigrating to America.

New York City served as the gateway not only to the Empire State but to an entire region. Included in its hinterland was northern Ohio, which was mainly settled by the Erie canal and Great Lakes route… . [1]

“The most important ports of arrival in the United States were New York, from which the immigrants dispersed via Albany and Troy throughout the western part of the country, and Baltimore and New Orleans, from which they reached the Mississippi.” (emphasis added) [2]

“(New York city’s) connection with the interior was a prime cause of New York’s commercial supremacy,. … In the middle of the century Buffalo, Cleveland, and Milwaukee were the distributing points for those bound to the Northwest, and to reach these cities the Erie Canal and, after 1846, the railroad from New York to Buffalo were by far the quickest and the cheapest routes.[3]

Johann was one of many Germans who sailed to New York city in 1852. If we were to look at the place of origin of male individuals arriving in the United States the year Johann arrived (see table one), German males from the various German states represented one of the two largest groups to migrated to American in 1852. Men from Ireland and Germany represented almost three quarters of all males entering the United States in 1852.

Table One: Place of Birth of Males Arriving in the United States 1852

Place of BirthNumberPercentageCumulative
Percentage
Ireland8571536.636.6
German States84,20535.972.5
England17,3117.479.9
Scotland4,7332.081.9
France2,5711.183.0
Returning
Americans
23,0539.892.8
Other Countries16,8477.2
Total234,435100.0
Source: 1850 U.S. Census,Table LXXI – Nativities of Passengers Arriving in the United States, Year ending December 31, 1852, Nativities of passengers arriving in U.S. Year ending in 1852, Nativities of the Population of the United States, Births, Marriages, and Deaths, Classification of Ages, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1850/1850a/1850a-13.pdf

New York City to the Mohawk Valley

Why did Johann gravitate to the Mohawk valley rather than simply stay in New York city or migrate to Ohio or other locations in America? Johann’s journey to the Mohawk valley is perhaps due to the influences of the migration decisions of past generations and his contemporaries in Baden, the contours of transportation networks in New York state and the economic prospects of the time.

The Baden area, from where Johann lived, had a rich and long history of migration to the Mohawk valley in New York state. This intergenerational tradition reaches back into the late 1600s and 1700s. 

“In the eighteenth century, more than 100,000 migrants left the south-west German regions of the Electoral Palatinate, Kraichgau, Baden-Durlach, and Duchy of Württemberg, as well as neighbouring Alsace and the Swiss cantons, in order to cross the Atlantic.” (emphasis is mine) [4]

The Kraichgau region and Baden Durlach were areas in the eighteenth century where generations of the Fliegel and Sperber families possibly resided. Individuals from these areas along the Rhine River, migrated to the Mohawk valley in the 1700s. While the route getting to America may have been different, there may have been a strong likelihood to follow the ‘guiding star’ of tradition (oral or written) that lead him to the ‘Palatine’ area along the Mohawk River in New York state.

The inland flow and direction of migration patterns of German migration in New York state were largely determined by the natural topological contours of the state. The natural path between New York city and Albany and westward from Albany had been firmly established since the early 1700s, (see map one). The Hudson river valley provided a natural topographical pathway between New York city and the Albany – Schenectady area. The Mohawk River Valley, running east and west, cuts a natural path between the Catskill Mountains to the south and the Adirondack Mountains to the north.

Map One: Topological Map of New York State

Click for Larger View | Source: 3D render of a topographic map of New York. All source data is in the public domain. SRTM data courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey (https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/granules?p=C1000000240-LPDAAC_ECS&pg[0][v]=f&pg[0][gsk]=-start_date&q=srtm%201%20arc&tl=1640787673!3!!&m=11.7421875!-80.859375!2!1!0!0%2C2). Map rendered using QGIS and Blender software.

While a few rough roads existed, the Hudson and Mohawk Rivers were the primary transportation arteries in the 1700s. Along with the two waterways, major roads following the two rivers were established in the 1600s based on Indian pathways. They continued to be used and upgraded through the time that Johann arrived: the Albany Post Road and the Mohawk Turnpike. Another road that paralleled the Mohawk Turnpike was on the southern side of the Mohawk river. There was also the was the Great Western Turnpike. [5]

Map Two: Travel By Road: Albany Post Road & Mohawk Trail (Fulton County Highlighted)

Click for Larger View | Dilts, David, Map of the Albany Post Road from New York City to Albany, New York, and connecting migration routes, 24 June 2011, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/File:Albany_Post_Road_map.png

The Albany Post Road, also known as the “Queen’s Road,” and later the “King’s Road” existed since 1669. The road connected the colonial seaport of New York City (then called New Amsterdam) with the fur trading outpost, and, at that time, the second-largest city of Albany (Beverwijck). Each end of the road at New York City and Albany was a nexus of other significant migration routes. (see map two). The Albany Post Road followed along the east side of the Hudson River and was about 150 miles (241 km) long. However, in 1806 competing turnpike routes lessened the traffic on the old route. By 1850 railroads had made the Albany Post Road obsolete and stagecoach service stopped. [6]

“A private company built the Highlands Turnpike to the west, in more level country, and opened it in 1806. This diverted traffic away from the section north of Peekskill through Continental Village and past the lakes. Iron mining at Hopper Lake in the 1820s partially replaced it, and the stage route was not changed. The old road fell into further disuse when the turnpike became a public highway in 1833 and it was no longer needed as a shunpike. The completion of the Hudson River Railroad to Albany in 1850 made the road obsolete as a commercial and postal artery, and stage service ended.” [7]

As a main artery through the Mohawk Valley, the Mohawk Turnpike was critical in facilitating the massive westward migration of settlers in the early nineteenth century before canals and railroads took over the bulk of long-distance transportation. The turnpike ran about 95 miles from Schenectady to Rome, NY, paralleling the Mohawk River and providing an overland route through the Mohawk Valley. [8]

The turnpike developed from old Mohawk Indian trails and was also known as part of the Iroquois Trail that ran from Albany to Buffalo. Its improvement in the early 1800s made it the favored route for westward travel. In 1811, stagecoach lines ran day and night over the turnpike from Albany to Buffalo, completing the trip in just 3 days with frequent horse changes. This enabled more rapid migration. Traffic on the turnpike began to diminish after the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, but it continued to be used heavily in the winter months when the canal was closed. [9]

Map three illustrates the network of waterways from New York city to the Johnstown-Gloversville area (highlighted in yellow). From a transportation infrastructure perspective, Johann took the same route as did those from Baden before him. Except he had three avenues of travel: road, water and rail. Immigrants in the early 1800s would have traveled by steamboat up the Hudson River or traveled on roads along the river from New York City to Albany. By the 1830s-1850s, railroads and turnpikes became the preferred modes of travel as transportation infrastructure rapidly improved during the transportation revolution of the nineteenth century.

Once in the ‘capital city area’ of Albany, Schenectady, and Troy, the confluence of roadways heading north and south and west were critical in facilitating the massive westward migration of settlers in the early nineteenth century before canals and railroads took over the bulk of long-distance transportation. The improvements of the roadways enabled hundreds of thousands to more easily make the journey from the eastern seaboard into the Great Lakes region and beyond.

Map Three: The Hudson and Mohawk River Valleys Johnstown-Gloversville Area

Click for Larger View | Source: Greene, Nelson, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Volume I, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Page 19, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/maps/hudson_valley_map.html

The map: “Showing also the rivers of northeast New Jersey, which empty into the mouth of the Hudson, and towns over 50,000 on these streams. The mountains bordering the Hudson valley are also indicated. Only New York state towns having city charters, lying in the Hudson valley, the Mohawk being the chief tributary of the Hudson.[10]

The Origins of Fulton County

Map Four: Mohawk River and Settlements in 1777 – Tryon County, Province of New York

Click for Larger View
Source: Blown up section of Sauthier, Claude Joseph, Bernard Ratzer, and William Faden. A map of the Province of New-York, reduc’d from the large drawing of that Province, compiled from actual surveys by order of His Excellency William Tryon, Esqr., Captain General & Governor of the same, by Claude Joseph Sauthier; to which is added New-Jersey London, Wm. Faden, 1776. Map.

Prior to the eighteenth century, the lands that would become Fulton County were used by the Mohawk Indians as hunting and fishing grounds. In the early 1700s, the first European settlers, mostly German Palatines, started arriving and tilling the rich soil in the western regions. [11]

Map Five: Mohawk Indian Towns 1580 – 1779

Click for Larger View | Greene, Nelson, Chapter 103: Mohawk Manufacturing Statistics, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925 Volume 1 Page 140

Map Six: Tryon County (Highlighted) 1777

Click for Larger View | Source: Sauthier, Claude Joseph, Bernard Ratzer, and William Faden. A map of the Province of New-York, reduc’d from the large drawing of that Province, compiled from actual surveys by order of His Excellency William Tryon, Esqr., Captain General & Governor of the same, by Claude Joseph Sauthier; to which is added New-Jersey
. London, Wm. Faden, 1776. Map. https://www.loc.gov/item/74692643/

In 1753, the Kingsborough Patent [12] , containing parts of present-day Johnstown, Mayfield and Ephratah, was purchased by Sir William Johnson, a prominent British colonial official. It was originally part of Albany County, a county in the colonial province of New York in the British American colonies. In 1772, at Johnson’s urging, this area became part of the newly formed Tryon County, with Johnstown as the county seat. After the American Revolution, Tryon County was renamed Montgomery County in 1784. (See maps five and six). [13]

As western migration took place, this large Montgomery County soon became sub divided into new counties with their own county seats. In 1789, Ontario County was split off from Montgomery. The area of the new county was much larger than the present Ontario County, as it included the present Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, Genesee, Livingston, Monroe, Niagara, Orleans, Steuben, Wyoming, Yates, and part of Schuyler and Wayne counties. In 1791, Herkimer, Otsego, and Tioga counties were split off from Montgomery. In 1802, portions of Clinton, Herkimer, and Montgomery counties were combined to form St. Lawrence County. In 1816, Hamilton County was split off from Montgomery county.

The operation of the new Erie Canal and the building of new roads along the river attracted new settlements to the Mohawk Valley and population growth soared in that area of the county south and southwest of Johnstown.

Map Seven: Montgomery County 1829

Click for Larger View | Source: Bur, David H., Montgomery County, Atlas Map, New York: D.H.Burr, Page 17, 1829 https://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~20020~510016:Map-of-the-County-of-Montgomery—B#

Because of this shift in the population center, the people in the Mohawk Valley area petitioned the New York State Legislature to have the county seat of Montgomery County transferred to Fonda, New York  This was approved in 1836.

The relocation of the county seat from Johnstown to Fonda created a groundswell of resentment from citizens living in Johnstown area and on the north side of the Mohawk river. A petition was made to the New York Legislature to have the county divided into two counties. On April 18, 1838, this request was approved and the northern half of the divided county was named Fulton County after Robert Fulton of steamship and Erie Canal fame and Johnstown once again became a county seat. [14]

Map seven depicts the town boundaries within Fulton county after the split. The county was composed of nine towns: Stratford, Oppenheim, Carugao, Ephrayah, Blecker, Johnstown, Mayfield, North Ampton, Broadalbin and Perth.

Map Seven: Fulton County New York

Click for Larger View | Nichols, B, H.B. Stanahan, W.A. Sherman, H. Loomer, P.A. Cunningham and S.W. Fosdick, Atlas of Montgomery and Fulton counties, New York, NewYork: J.Jay Stranahan & Beach Nichols, 1868, https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47e3-6ef0-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99

Heading to the Gloversville – Johnstown Area

The third leg of the journey, Johann Sperber’s decision to migrate specifically to Fulton County, is an open research question. It is a question that may never have a definitive answer.

One general observation is that Johann’s intended destination may have been one of the major settlement areas of the Palatine area and not necessarily Fulton county. As indicated above, the historical subdivisions of Montgomery county resulted in a number of different counties. Johann may have been focused on getting to a particular town or general area rather than a particular county.

There are plausible explanations of why he settled in the Gloversville-Johnstown area. Johann may have had contacts that settled in what was now called Fulton county. The Fulton County area may have offered economic opportunities among the towns and cities within the old ‘Palatine” area along the Mohawk River. The lingering question is what did this particular area have that was different from other towns along the river that also experienced growth and opportunity.

The 1850s saw the Mohawk Valley transitioning to a manufacturing based economy enabled by transportation developments, while still maintaining agricultural roots especially in the dairy industry. The Erie Canal, completed in 1825, facilitated the development of large villages in the Mohawk Valley and provided a means to transport goods east and west. (see map eight) [15]

Map Eight: The Erie Canal and the New York Barge Canal System

Click for Larger View | Source: Finch, Roy, The Story of the New York State Canals, https://www.canals.ny.gov/history/finch_history.pdf

“The Erie Canal had a tremendous impact on the economic growth of the Albany area and points further west. The first railroad in the ‘Capital Region’ ironically was built as a way to circumvent the slow down of barge traffic at Cohoes Falls. It was among the first railroads in the country and helped herald in a new age of transportation. Soon after the success of this early pioneer line, other railroads soon followed and the Capital District became a hotbed of economic growth and a leader in railroad transportation.” [16]

There were 29 railroads in New York already built or under construction by 1850. Troy and Schenectady became a hub for the emerging railway system in New York state. Within the ‘Capital region’ railroads such as the Mohawk & Hudson Railroad (1831), Troy and Greenbush Railroad (1845), Utica and Schenectady Railroad (1833), Syracuse and Utica Railroad (1839) ,the Rensselaer and Saratoga Railroad (1836), and Saratoga and Schenectady Railroad (1832) enabled further industrial growth and movement of people. [17]

The Hudson River Railroad connected New York city to the ‘Capital Region’ (New York to Greenbush, now renamed Rensselaer, opposite Albany). It was opened a year prior to Johann’s arrival in 1851. The Troy and Greenbush Railroad became part of this greater Hudson River Railroad in 1851.

As reflected in map nine, Johann had many options to travel up to the Capital area and through the Mohawk valley area. One observation to note is the absence of a connected rail line to Johnstown from the Utica and Schenectady Rail Line that followed the contour of the Mohawk River in the 1850s. Compared to the other towns and cities in the Mohawk Valley, Johnstown was not directly on the bank of the Mohawk River. Depending on what side of the Mohawk River one traveled on, traveling to Johnstown could be accomplished by taking the road north from Fultonville to Johnstown (if you were on the south side of the river). If you were traveling west from the Capital area on the north side of the river, you could take the road or train to Fonda and then the road north from Fonda to Johnstown, which is only abut five miles. 

Map Nine: Water, Road and Rail Connections in the Capital Area and Mohawk Valley 1850

Click for Larger View | This is a portion of an 1847 map that also appears in Williams, Wellington, Map 19, Appleton’s northern and eastern traveller’s guide: with new and authentic maps, illustrating those divisions of the country. Forming, likewise, a complete guide to the middle states, Canada, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. Illustrated with numerous maps and plans of cities, engraved on steel and several wood engravings, New York: D. Appleton & Co. 1855,  https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b263188&seq=251

By the 1850s, the Mohawk valley had a significant manufacturing presence, with industries such as textiles, furniture, heavy machinery, and lumber. Specific examples include the the emerging Remington Arms company in Herkimer County which was a major employer, and textile mills in Utica. Specific industries emerged in certain areas, such as glove and leather manufacturing starting in Fulton County. Smaller towns specialized in certain products, such as food packing in Canajoharie, knit goods in Fort Plain and St. Johnsville, and felt shoes in Dolgeville. Overall, the period saw a diversification of manufacturing, the rise and fall of certain industries like dairy and textiles, the emergence of new industries enabled by technological developments, and the growth of factories as major employers. [18]

Map Ten – The Mohawk Valley [19]

Map ten depicts the Mohawk valley and the six New York state counties that are part of ‘the valley’. The map shows all places that had over 200 in population in 1920 as well as smaller places that had historic significance. It should be noted the map shows a rail connection between Fonda and Johnstown that did not exist when Johann Sperber was migrating to Johnstown. 

Two years prior to Johann’s arrival in the United States, of the six counties in the Mohawk valley, Fulton county was second smallest county based on population size in 1850. (see table two). Oneida county was the largest of the Mohawk valley counties, constituting 41 percent of the total Mohawk valley population. Oneida’s size was attributable to the presence of two towns: Utica and Rome.

Both cities were located along major transportation routes. Utica was situated on a shallow spot of the Mohawk River, while Rome was positioned at an important early land bridge between main waterways. Both cities flourished as canal towns, with the flow of raw materials, finished goods and settlers. [20]

This made them key points for the movement of people and goods. Utica underwent significant industrial growth in the mid-1800s, becoming a major center for manufacturing, especially in the textile industry. It was known as the “Manchester of America” for its booming textile mills[21]

Table Two: Population of the Six Counties of the Mohawk Valley 1850

CountyPopulationPercentage of
Mohawk Valley
Oneida99,56640.9 %
Herkimer38,24415.7 %
Schoharie33,58413.8 %
Montgomery31,99213.1 %
Fulton20,1718.3 %
Schenectady20,0548.2 %
Total243,611100.0 %
Source: 1850 U.S. Census, New York, Table II – Population by Subdivision of Counties, 
https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1850/1850a/1850a-22.pdf

Table three provides examples of principal industries in which the majority of the wage earners of the valley were engaged prior to and up to when Johann Sperber migrated to the area. Grist mills, saw mills, tanneries, blacksmith shops, fulling and carding mills, and asheries were built at nearly all Mohawk valley centers in the settlement period, from 1813 to 1852, the year Johann arrived.

Table Three: Principal Industries in Mohawk Valley Counties 1813-1852

DateDescription of Manufacturing DevelopmentCounty
1813Pottery Works started in RomeOneida
1820Manufacture of plows began in Utica.Oneida
1822Ephraim Hart foundry started in Utica.Oneida
1823Grist mill and an iron foundry opened in Utica.Oeida
1823Worthington hat factory opened in Rome.Oneida
1826Pottery works opened in Utica.Oneida
1839Harry Burrell of Salisbury makes first shipment of cheese to England.Herkimer
1831Remington opens forge for manufacture of gun barrels and firearms in Ilion.Herkimer
1832Manufacture of knit goods began in Cohoes.Schenectady
1836Manufacture of axes and other edge tools began in Cohoes.Schenectady
1836Manufacture of ready-made clothing began in Utica.Oneida
1836Manufacture of cotton cloth (white goods) introduced in Cohoes, Harmony Mills Company.Schenectady
1840Threshing machine invented by George Westinghouse, ,Central Bridge.Schoharie
1840Manufacture of ingrain carpets began in Amsterdam.Montgomery
1842Manufacture of woolen goods began in Little Falls.Herkimer
1842Stove and furnace manufacture began in Utica.Oneida
1842Carpet mill at Hagamans rmoved to Amsterdam.Montgomery
1844Manufacture of matches started in Frankfort.Herkimer
1845Manufacture of yarn begun in Little Falls.Herkimer
1845Manufacture of railroad steam locomotives began in Schenectady.Schenectady
1846First kid glove factory of Johnstown established. Gloves continued to be made in the homes of Johnstown and Gloversville.Fulton
1847Manufacture of woolens began in Utica.Oneida
1848Manufacture of linseed oil began in Amsterdam.Montgomery
1848Manufacture of linseed oil begun at Amsterdam.Montgomery
1848Manufacture of cotton cloth (white goods) began in Utica.Oneida
1850First solid steel gun barrel made in the Remington works at Ilion.Herkimer
1851Manufacture of locomotive headlights started int Utica.Oneida
1852Iron works started at Utica.Oneida
Source: Greene, Nelson, Chapter 102: The Birth and Development of Mohawk Valley Inventions and Manufacturing Industries,History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614- 925, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Pages 1481 – 1501, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/102.html also https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89077224962&view=1up&seq=11

“(E)ven in cities with large numbers of unskilled German workers, substantial numbers of skilled Germans tended to dominate the same trades (especially clothing, shoe, and furniture making). … (S)killed German-American artisans and workers either migrated to and stayed in the major manufacturing centers where there was employment for their skills or they settled in smaller centers to the extent that there was employment available in their trades.” [22]

Despite other Mohawk valley counties that were larger and perhaps had larger sized employers in various manufacturing industries, Johann ended up in Gloversville, Fulton county. The key question is what drew Johann to the Johnstown – Gloversville area. Did he have contacts in the area? Did he have experience with glove making? Why did he end up working in the glove making business?

“The Littauer Laying Off Room” – An older John Sperber in the Middle Foreground with Arms Folded circa 1890s

Source: Family Archives | Click for Larger View

Based on family photographs and information in state and Federal census enumerations, we do know Johann Sperber was a glove maker between 1860 and 1900 when he established roots and raised a family in Fulton County, New York area. However, it is not known if:

  • he was drawn to the Glove trade because of prior work experience or knowledge of glove making in the Baden-Baden area;
  • he was aware of leather and glove making jobs through knowledge from correspondence from immigrants that settled in Fulton county;
  • he obtained information or work experience once he landed and visited “Little Germany” in New York City on the Glove making trade in Fulton county;
  • he had friends or acquaintances that migrated earlier to Fulton county; or
  • he simply went to Fulton county based on other reasons and found a paying job in the burgeoning glove making market in Gloversville and Johnstown.

Leather Tanning and Leather Products in New York City

If Johan was ‘introduced’ to glove making shortly after he landed in Little Germany, New York City, it is not known how many German immigrants were possibly employed as glove makers in Little Germany in the mid 1850s. New York City likely had some small-scale glove making operations but they were associated with custom work and repairing. [23]

Map Eleven: Manhattan in Late 1700’sNew York Made and Swamp Land

Click for Larger View | Source: D.T. Valentine, D.T., Manual of the Corporation of the City, for 1856, New York: McSpedon & Baker, 1856, New York Plan of the City of New York Made and Swamp Land. Plan of the city of New York : showing the made and swamp land. 

While related, leather tanning and glove making are two distinct work processes and associated with different skill sets and occupations. The leather tanning industry had a long history in lower Manhattan. However, the industry was devoted to boot and shoe making and not glove making. Moreover, the areas conducive to leather tanning were originally near marsh and swamp land. (see map ten)

“New York City had its own leather tannery district called ‘the swamp’. During the colonial period, tanners plied their trade along Ferry, Frankfort, Gold Jacob, and Spruce Sts. in Manhattan’s swamp. The also made leather along the margins of Collect Pond. … Manhattan’s Swamp became the financial hub of the American leather industry. Tanners-turned merchants contracted with tanners through New York State, Pennsylvania and beyond to tan hides the merchants owned and to return the leather to New York City for sale.” [24]

In the early colonial days of New Amsterdam in the 1600s, much of Lower Manhattan consisted of swamps, streams, and wetlands. Tanneries were some of the first industries to be established around the swamps, such as the Collect Pond. Over the centuries, roughly eighty-five percent of Manhattan’s coastal wetlands and virtually all of its freshwater wetlands were lost as the island was developed. From the late 1600s through the early 1800s, Manhattan’s shoreline gradually expanded into the East River through deliberate landfilling. [25]

Maps from the 1600s through the 1700s show how the original coastline of Lower Manhattan, which corresponded to present-day Pearl Street, was extended several blocks into the East River, turning former swamps and wetlands into new made land. Much of the swamp land in Manhattan was eventually drained and filled, as reflected in maps eleven and twelve.

Map Twelve: Growth of Manhattan Island

Click for Larger View | Source: Wallace,McHarg, Roberts and Todd, Whittlesey, Conklin and Rossant; Voorhees & Associates, Growth of Manhattan Island, 1650-1980,The Lower Manhattan Plan, CapitalProject ES-1,June 1, 1966,Page 27, 
https://ia804709.us.archive.org/6/items/lowermanhattanpl00wall/lowermanhattanpl00wall.pdf

Impact of 1811 Commissioners’ Plan – New York City

Many of the tannery businesses that existed before Johann Sperber’s arrival to America also were affected by the implementation of the 1811 Commissioners’ Plan which reduced the acreage of swamp and marsh land.

“What made the grid plan, formally called the Commissioners’ Map and Survey of Manhattan Island, so farsighted was that in 1811 a vast majority of New York City’s population lived below what became Houston Street — tellingly named North Street then. … Yet while largely exempting the existing village of Greenwich, the visionary commissioners imposed their 2,000-block matrix on the forests, farms, salt marshes, country estates and common lands that extended north for nearly eight miles to what would become 155th Street, and expanded the city’s plotted land area by nearly fivefold.” [26]


Video: The Evolution of Manhattan 1811 – 1857

Source: A segment of Zhang, Myles, The New York City Evolution Animation, Youtube, To see the entire video, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6U7YFPrz6Y . The animation illustrates the development of NYC’s street grid and infrastructure systems from 1609 to the present-day, using geo-referenced road network data and historic maps. The short film, link above, presents a series of “cartographic snapshots” of NYC’s built-up urban area at intervals of every 20-30 years history.

The 1811 Commissioners’ plan not only impacted the tanning industry, it had had an impact on all facets of urban life and growth in Manhattan. The area where many Germans settled in Manhattan between 1830 and 1860, Little Germany, was affected by the planned northward growth of New York, as informed by the Commissioners’ plan.

Map Thirteen: 1811 Commissions’ Plan and its Impact on the Growth of Little Germany

Click for Larger View | Screenshot and adaptation of Zhang, Myles, The New York City Evolution Animation, Youtube, To see the entire video, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6U7YFPrz6Y .

The Commissioners’ plan established Manhattan’s iconic rectangular street grid from Houston Street to 155th Street. It had a profound influence on the growth of Manhattan’s population. The Commissioners’ Plan provided a framework for Manhattan to grow from a city of 100,000 in 1811 to over 10 times that a century later. The grid was a catalyst for the real estate development, housing construction, and neighborhood formation that enabled Manhattan to absorb wave after wave of new residents in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. [27]

Glove Making in Upstate New York

The historical evidence suggests glove manufacturing in the early to mid-1800s was concentrated further upstate in Fulton County which became the undisputed center of the American glove making industry in the nineteenth and first third of the twentieth centuries. [28]

The rise of glove manufacturing from its humble origins in the early 1800s to a booming industry by the turn of the 20th century was the primary driver of Gloversville and Johnstown’s growth and prosperity for over one hundred and fifty years. It provided employment for a significant portion of the population, spurred development of supporting industries, and shaped the economic and social fabric of the community, establishing Fulton county as a major manufacturing center.

Johann Sperber may have obtained information on the economic experiences and opportunities in the Gloversville and Johnstown areas before he departed from Baden. He may have heard or read about these opportunities in letters from immigrants who started new lives in Fulton county.

Initially, most of Fulton county’s German population were descendants of Palatines who settled in the Mohawk Valley in the 1700s. Some of their descendants moved into Gloversville and Johnstown in the 1840s and 1850s to find work in the glove industry. [29]

“Fulton County became a polyglot community. Palatines from Germany had joined the Scots and English in early days , working as farmers through the county. In the early nineteenth century, English, Scots, and later a few French-trained glove makers made their way to the area along with New England Yankees. They were joined by a new wave of Germans, some trained as glovers and tanners … . “ [30]

“… (G)loves and mittens were first manufactured in the United States in what is now Fulton county. As the industry became of commercial importance the number of families that depended upon it for a livelihood increased, until nearly every man, woman, and child in the surrounding country became proficient in the making of some special part of the glove or mitten. Foreign cutters coming to this country naturally settled in Fulton county.” [31]

Influence of an Agricultural and Artisanal Background

It might not have been a ‘long stretch’ for Johann to consider working in various trades when he came to America. It is possible that Johann was familiar with or aware of other trades, such as glove making or textile production when he was in Baden.

As previously mentioned, Johann indicated to the Germania ship captain that his occupation in Baden was a cultivator, a farmer. Being a farmer may conjure various meanings of what is it to be a farmer. Being a farmer in Baden in the 1800s was different than a farmer in the United States.

Blow Up of “Johann Sperber” – Germania Ship Manifest June 14 1852 Page 6 Line 13

Click for Larger View

Baden in the 1800s was a region of agricultural villages rather than scattered agricultural farmsteads that consisted of large tracts of land. The tracts of land for farmers in Baden were typically smaller than those found in America. While there was likely some variation, the typical Baden farm in the 1800s was quite small by American standards, averaging only around 8 hectares or 20 acres or less in size. The small scale farming suited the hilly terrain and fragmented land ownership patterns that existed in Baden during this period of the nineteenth century. [32]

In the early nineteenth century, Baden was a margraviate with an area of only about 1,300 square miles and a population of 210,000. The small population and territory likely contributed to the prevalence of small farms. The practice of partible inheritance, where land was divided equally among heirs, was prevalent in Baden during the nineteenth century. This led to the fragmentation of farm holdings into smaller parcels over generations.

The small farm sizes sometimes became problematic, as some farm sizes had become so small that they no longer could support a family in the 1830s-1840s. The growth of cottage industries and manufacturing in some areas of Baden provided alternative livelihoods, possibly reducing pressure to subdivide farms in those localities. But agriculture remained the main occupation for most. [33]

Agriculture was closely intertwined with artisanal trades. [34] Farmers often supplemented their income with home based cottage industry trades such as handloom linen or wool production. Based on data in 1861, Baden was second in the entire Zollverein (Confederation of German states) in the number of master weavers, with 54 per 10,000 inhabitants. [35]

The structure of the working environment of the glove making industry in Fulton county was vaguely similar to the proto-industrial work patterns in the western and central German states in the nineteenth century.. Proto-industrial work patterns involved the expansion of small-scale, home-based manufacturing of goods like textiles, ironware, pottery, and other products by peasant families. This cottage industry production was done alongside traditional agricultural work.

Glove making in Fulton county was similar to the proto-industrial patterns in Germany in terms of the ability to work from home or have a small shop behind the house. A major exception was that it was a primary occupation and not a supplemental work activity to agricultural pursuits. Workers could live a life solely on the wages of leather work, tanning or glove making in America while working from home.

“From the 1860s to as late as the 1930s, a man cutting gloves at home, with a wife and one other female relative to sew, constituted a glove shop. Their products were made under contract for larger shops or combined with the gloves of several small shops with sales handled by a common agent. Few of these shops advertised or are counted in the Census; almost none show up in the city directories.” [36]

Gloves and the Glove Trade in Europe

Glove Making

Click for Larger View |
Source: This part of an illustration of the various facets of glove making by Fredrick Remington, for an article in the Harper’s Bazar: Glove Making in Fulton County, Harper’s Bazaar, Volume XX, Number 21, May 21, 1887, New York: Hearst Corporation, http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=hearth4732809_1454_021#page/10/mode/1up

“(I)f an old adage is to be believed, for it used to be said : a glove to be good three realms must have contributed to it, Spain to prepare the skin, France to cut it, and England to sew it.” [37]

While glove making was not a major occupation, trade or craft, it had its roots in France, England, Germany, Spain and other countries.

“Gloving … enjoys an established claim to rank among the oldest of handicraft industries, and although machinery now enters very largely into all operations which the making of gloves involves, there are yet some processes calling for the exercise of mental intuition in association with manipulative expertness rather than for what one may term mere mechanical dexterity. Such is particularly true of glove-cutting.” [38]

Guilds for glove makers emerged in Europe as early as the 11th century. While the exact origins are unclear, there is evidence of glove makers’ guilds existing in major European cities like Paris from the eleventh century onward and with the London guild being formally established by the mid-fourteenth century.

The first Glovers’ Guild in Britain was established at Perth. The Perth glovers received a charter in 1165. Worchester, England established a glove making guild in 1571. The glovers of Grenoble, renowned for their glove making, organized themselves into Corporation des Gantiers in 1691. Nicot and Montpelier, France also had a long history of glove making. These guilds became increasingly prominent in the following centuries as the glove industry expanded. [39]

At the turn of the 1700s many of the trained glove makers from Grenoble and other towns of France, such as Blois, Vendome, and Grasse, migrated to Germany, Holland, and other countries due to religious persecution. They brought their glove making skills to other countires. In addition, protestant benefactors who supported the glove making industry brought their capital to these countries. [40] “Many of those who served their apprenticeship in Grenoble, and the master glovers holding the secrets of her art, probably became rivals, in other lands, of the city they once called their own.” [41]

“In the early part of the seventeenth century the manufacturers of gloves reached Germany, being brought there by French refugees from Grenoble, who introduced the art to Erlangen, Haberstadt, and Magdeburg.” [42]

Map fourteen gives sense of where the Grenoble refugee glove makers relocated in the German states. The map does not depict the political boundaries in the early seventeenth century. It is a 1850 map that depicts the locations of where the Glove makers from Grenoble relocated in Germany in relation to where Johann’s family from Baden. It gives a geographical sense of where the Grenoble refugees relocated.

Map Fourteen: Locations of French Refugees from Grenoble in German States [43]

Click for Larger View

In the seventeenth century, Paris and Grenoble enjoyed a monopoly of the glove markets in Europe. During the eighteenth century, however, these cities began to cope with Germany, Italy, Austria, and Russia in glove making. [44] 

Tariffs and other trade practices, as early as the mid 1400s, impacted the growth and contraction of the glove making industry through the centuries. Commercial rivalries between various European countries and technological changes in the glove making process in the 1800s resulted in glovers migrating to the United States. In 1825, the lifting of the ban on the importation of French gloves into England had devastating economic effects on the glove makers in England and Ireland. Major glove making centers in Worcester, Woodstock, York, Hexham, Leominster, Yeovil, Limerick, Dublin, Cork, were decimated. [45]

Some say the word “glove” comes from the German Handschuh, meaning “hand-shoe”. [46] While there may be some merit to this view of the English derivation of the word, glove making did not originate in Germany. Nevertheless, the tanning of leather and glove making was not a foreign work process in Germany or to Germans.

Glove Making in America and the European Influence

Leather tanning became a prominent local industry in the area that became Fulton county due to the purity and abundance of water and the availability of hemlock bark as a source of tannin. [47]

“Unlike tanning in other regions of New York State, this was not hemlock bark tanning of cowhides for shoes and boots, but deer-skin tanning using other organic materials and manufacturing into gloves and clothing. It began with the first glove and mitten shops in Johnstown in 1808 and in what became Gloversville in 1810. “ [48]

The European influence of glove making and leather tanning in the area purportedly began with Sir William Johnson bringing 60 tanners and glove makers from Perth in Scotland in 1760. 

“The manufacture of gloves and mittens in the United States dates from about the year 1760, when Sir William Johnson, chief agent of King George with the North American Indians, brought over from Scotland many families as settlers on his grants. Several families came from Perthshire and settled in the eastern part of what is now Fulton county, N. Y., calling the town Perth. Many of these settlers had been glove makers and members of the glove guild in Scotland, and brought with them glove patterns and the proper needles and threads for glove making.” [49]

There are some who argue that Johnson’s bringing glove makers from Scotland is a myth. “In 1895, the local newspaper was exuberantly extolled the town’s growth and industry in a historical review celebrating the centennial of the town’s founding. …The paper, following earlier historians, …erred in stating that Johnson brought the first glovemakers. No trained glovemakers arrived until well after his death… .” [50]

Notwithstanding the facts on both sides of the argument, immigrants of Scottish origin have been documented in living in Perth, New York. It is possible they had knowledge of glove making. Whether they had brought with them glove patterns and the proper needles and threads for glove making is an open question. [51]

As reflected in map fifteen, an area north of Johnstown had a settlement called Kingsboro. Before the Revolutionary War, it was at the crossroads where settlers traded with farmers in Broadalbin and Mayfield. Kingsboro was populated by immigrants from Perthshire Scotland who brought their leather making skills to America. As mentioned when discussing glove making in Europe, Perthshire had a long tradition of glove making.

Map Fifteen: Locations of Broadalbin, Mayfield Village, Perth, Kingsborough, Gloversville and Johnstown

Click for Larger View | Source: A portion of the map created by Nichols, B, H.B. Stanahan, W.A. Sherman, H. Loomer, P.A. Cunningham and S.W. Fosdick, Atlas of Montgomery and Fulton counties, New York, NewYork: J.Jay Stranahan & Beach Nichols, 1868, https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47e3-6ef0-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99

There were a number of documented European immigrants who settled in Gloversville and Johnstown in the mid nineteenth century came from glove making centers in Europe, bringing their skills and traditions with them. Several European countries had significant influence on the glove making industry in Fulton County, New York

“The first trained leatherworkers to come from France were two brothers, Lucien and Theophilus Bertrand. They arrived from Millau around 1840. They began tanning kidskins (the skins of young goats) in Johnstown.  This may have marked the beginning of the production of finer grades of men’s gloves. “ [52]

“The Bertrands’ glove shop was the first of five manufacturing concerns established by trained French glovemen in Johnstown before the Civil War. The others were established by LouisJeannisson, Ferdinand Vassier, Jean Joseph Riton from Strasburg (his sons Charles J. and Eugene later formed the Riton Brothers glove concern), and by the father of Emile Julien. ” [53]

In Fulton County, New York, the leather tanning and glove making industries were growing in the 1840s and 1850s. Low overhead encouraged the proliferation of small glove making shops. They were as productive as the larger sized shops. For the small amount of funds required to set up a shop, the risk and investment resided in the purchase of leather. [54]

The 1840s marked the beginning of specialization in the industry. Separate parts of shops were established to accommodate the division of leather-making and glove-making operations. During the 1840s, as glovemen built separate structures for glove making and tanning or dressing of skins, these buildings became known as glove shops or a skin mill. [55]

However, despite the emerging specialization of leather tanning and glove making and the specialization of various roles of the glove making process (as depicted in the illustration at the top of this story), the smallest shops continued to be attached to the owners’ homes, as did most of those who produced leather and not gloves. The tradition of one manufacturer dressing deerskins and producing gloves continued through the next three decades along with the trend toward specialization an larger glove making firms.

“By 1850, the products of the industry had begun to change. Finer grades of men’s gloves were produced by the Bertrands with their imported kidskins. In the decade before 1860, others began to import kidskins for gloves, but the sturdy work gloves remained the bulk of the production along with deerskin mittens.” [56]

No longer were most of the gloves designed for ‘rough’ work, glove makers started to produce fine dress gloves for gentlemen and women. For example, Harry S. Cole, a glover who had worked for two prestigious firms in London, Fownes and Dents, came to Gloversville in 1857 to produce fine gloves made of calf skin. . [57]

“As the industry became of commercial importance the number of families that depended upon it for a livelihood increased, until nearly every man, woman, and child in the surrounding country became proficient in the making of some special part of the glove or mitten. Foreign cutters coming to this country naturally settled in Fulton county.” (Emphasis is mine) [58]

As indicated in table four, when Johan Sperber arrived in the Johnstown – Gloversville area in the mid 1800’s, he witnessed an area that had explosive growth which was largely attributed to glove making. The population in the county as well as the Johnstown – Gloversville area witnessed substantial growth between 1840 and 1880. The two towns increased in population in forty years by two hundred percent.

Depending on when Johan arrived in the area, Gloversville and Johnstown increased in size by a whopping 29 percent between 1850 and 1855; and by 11 percent between 1855 and 1860. Fulton county in general also witnessed substantial growth between 1850 and 1855. After the Civil War, Johnstown and Gloversville also experienced twenty percent population increases between 1865 and 1875.

Table Four: Population Size of Johnstown – Gloversville, NY

YearPopulation of
Johnstown –
Gloversville
Percent
Change
Population of
Fulton County
Percent
Change
Johnstown-
Gloversville
as % of
Fulton County
18405,40918,049
18506,13113.3 %20,17110.5 %30.4 %
18557,91229.0 %23,28413.4 %34.0 %
18608,81111.0 %24,1623.6 %36.5 %
18659,80511.0 %24,5121.4 %40.0 %
187012,27320.1 %27,0649.4 %45.3 %
187515,68921.8 %30,15510.3 %52.0 %
188016,6265.6 %30,9852.7 %53.7 %
1840 –
1880
207.4 %71.6 %
Sources: U.S. Federal Census and New York State Census.

“Gloversville and Kingsboro remained part of the Town of Johnstown and census records lumped the two together until the 1880 Census, giving the appearance that Johnston was the more important.” [59]

Chart one depicts the change rates found in table four. The chart visually depicts the similarity of the population changes between the Johnstown and Gloversville area and the entire county. Both areas experienced similar ups and downs but the magnitude of change was greater for the Johnstown and Gloversville area.

Chart One: Population Change Rates for the Johnstown-Gloversville Area and Fulton County Between 1840 and 1880

Click for Larger View

It is impossible to present comparative statistics on the glove making industry until the 1900 U.S. Federal census. Unfortunately, this hampers our understanding of Johann’s experiences when he started his family in the late 1850s and established a home in the 1860s. While the Civil War years were static with a sharp reduction of in new glove shops and a retrenchment of existing shops as people left to serve in the military, the war effort required the production of gloves.

Moreover, it is important to note that the reporting of ‘glove manufacturers’ was severely undercounted by due to the definition of manufacturing establishments and the nature of the work process and industry. [60]

Documenting the number of glove making establishments are probably undercounted and possibly misleading. It was observed in 1900 that “a great majority of the persons employed in this industry are pieceworkers ... . The making (of gloves) by “home workers” is an important and interesting phase o:f their manufacture, and since the inception of the industry much of the glove making· has been done at the homes of families, the members of which were unable, on account of various household duties, to take employment in a factory. Many of the large glove and mitten manufacturers of Gloversville and Johnstown, N. Y., employ delivery teams to distribute and collect the work of the home.” [61]

New York state and specifically Fulton county was the center of the glove making industry in America, starting in the early 1800s through the early 1900s. For example, New York state represented sixty-four percent of the total number of glove making establishments in 1900.

“In 1901, gloves were manufactured in 27 states, but, outside of Fulton county, N. Y., the product was mostly of the coarser and cheaper grades, as it is impossible to· induce the expert labor to emigrate to another section of the country.” [62]

Table five below provides quantitative data on the dominance of Gloversville and Johnstown, Fulton County and New York state on the production of gloves in 1900. For example, eighty-eight percent of all reported glove manufacturers were in New York state. Roughly seventy percent of all capital invested, wages, and workers were in New York state. Almost sixty percent of the products were also from New York state. Fulton country represented sixty percent of all glover workers in the nation. Gloversville represented sixty percent of all glove works in the nation and sixty-five percent of all glove workers within Fulton county. 

Table Five: Comparative Summary of Statistics for Glove Making Enterprises in Futlon County, New York State and the United States: 1900

AreaNo. of
Establish-
ments
Capital
Invested
WagesAve. No.
Wage
Earners
Dozens
of pairs
of gloves
U.S. Total3819,004,4274,151,12614,1802,895,661
New York State2486,219,6472,723,7029,9071,721,831
% of U.S.88.369.165.670.059.5
Fulton County1665,517,8502, 381,1607,9311,484,579
% of U.S.43.661.357.460.051.3
Gloversville1013,660,3831,695,0355,183925,440
% of county60.866.371.265.462.3
Johnstown491,686,604580,1462,316398,657
% of county29.530.624.429.226.9
Outside of cities16170,863105,979432160,482
% of county9.63.14.55.510.8
Source: Hunt, Arthur, Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Selected statistics derived from Table 11 on Page 10  https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

Although the manufacture of gloves was of commercial importance since the early 1800s, the 1850 census was the first time where statistics were available on glove making firms for analysis. Table six bellow provides a high level view of the size of the glove making industry in the United States for the last half of the nineteenth century. The increase between 1860 and 1870 was attributable to the demand for gloves during the Civil War.

Table Six: Glove Making Establishments in the United States 1850 – 1900 [63]

Census YearNumber of
Glove Making
Establishments
Percent
Increase
1850110
186012614.5
187022175.4
188030035.7
18902248.0
190039722.5

The ability to drill down into the data is limited. Data for the earlier census years was not as detailed as found in the 1900 U.S. census. While the data is fifty years after Johan’s arrival to the United States, it is interesting to note that of the total number of glove making ‘establishments’ reported in 1900 is rather small compared to other categories of manufacturing.

Of the 397 establishments making gloves in 1900, 222 of the ‘establishments’, or 56 per cent, were operated by individuals. The remaining· 125 were what we commonly think of as commercial establishments. They were limited partnerships or incorporated companies. Also 96 percent of the establishments in 1900 were producers of leather gloves.

It is noteworthy that “over 60 per cent of the glove and mitten establishments of Fulton county were located in Gloversville. This localization of the industry is not due to economic conditions, such as low price of coal or to advantageous freight rates, but it may be attributed to the nature of the industry itself, and to the circumstances connected with its inception in the United States. …”As the industry became of commercial importance the number of families that depended upon it for a livelihood increased, until nearly every man, woman, and child in the surrounding country became proficient in the making of some special part of the glove or mitten. Foreign cutters coming to this country naturally settled in Fulton county.” (Emphasis is mine), [64]

So Why Did Johan Sperber End His Journey in Gloversville?

There were a number of possible influences that led Johann Sperber to the Gloversville, New York area. An overarching migratory influence was knowledge of past generations from his home area in Baden that came to the Mohawk Valley. This influence may have provided a general vague influence of where to go in America. He may have had contemporary personal contacts that came to the Mohawk Valley, providing information on employment opportunities.

Johann may have stopped and stayed in New York City when getting off the boat. He may have stayed in Little Germany to get his bearings, earn some money, and gain a better understanding of job prospects in the Mohawk Valley. He may have learned on the economic prospects of the glove making trade while in New York City.

While many towns and cities along the Mohawk Valley offered economic opportunities, many of those opportunities were in emerging industries in manufacturing. Johann may have been drawn to the working arrangements associated with the glove making practices in Gloversville. The glove making industry retained a semblance of the characteristics of cottage industries in Baden. [65]

“What is particularly remarkable is that even during its height, the manufacture of gloves never became one of mass production. The creation of each pair of leather gloves was the work of an individual craftsman. “The Glove Cutter” was personally responsible for the quality of his product. A middle management level was never developed in the glove industry. Each owner of any one of dozens of glove companies, both large and small, had a personal relationship with his “cutters” and sewers or “makers”. Quality was a matter of personal pride.” [66]

“What is amazing is the number of men who set up glove shops and skin mills. This great number of entrepreneurs distinguishes glove-making throughout its entire tenure in Fulton county. Large shops arose, and they, too, were numerous, but no single man or family ever dominated local industry. 

“The smallest shops continued to be attached to the owners’ homes, as did most of those who produced leather and not gloves. However, the tradition of one manufacturer dressing deerskins and producing gloves continued through the next three decades along with the trend toward specialization.” [67]

Perhaps Johann was attracted to Gloversville due to tradition, to the economic prospects of the future in glove making and to the comfort of past experiences and working relationships that were reminiscent of the homeland. [68]

Sources

Feature Photograph: This is ‘rearrangement’ of an illustration of the various facets of glove making that was done by Fredrick Remington, for an article in the Harper’s Bazar: Glove Making in Fulton County, Harper’s Bazaar, Volume XX, Number 21, May 21, 1887, New York: Hearst Corporation, http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=hearth4732809_1454_021#page/10/mode/1up

Frederic Sackrider Remington (1857-1926) was a painter, illustrator, and sculptor who specialized in depicting the Old West. Frederic Remington and his wife Eva Adele Canton were both born in Canton, New York. Eva grew up in Gloversville and the couple got married after Eva’s father finally accepted Frederic’s second request for her hand in marriage in Gloversville on October 1st, 1884. Aside from his paintings, Remington also produced more than 3,000 drawings, 22 bronze sculptures, a Broadway play, and more than 100 articles. 

Nicole Todd, Love Stories: Frederic and Eva Remington, 14 Feb 2017,Buffalo Bill Center of the West, https://centerofthewest.org/2017/02/14/love-stories-frederic-eva-remington/

Frederic Remington, Timeline, Carter Museum, https://www.cartermuseum.org/artists/frederic-remington/frederic-remington-timeline

Remington also completed a drawing of the tanning process. See “A Day in the Tannery”, Harper’s Weekly, January 25, 1890, Vol 34, No. 1727, New York: Harbor & Bros., P72 & 74 https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015011446161&view=1up&seq=92


[1] Kamphoefner, Walter D., The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987, Page 81

Two years prior to Johann’s arrival, in 1850, New York State had the largest ‘base’ of first generation Germans reported by the Federal census. This reflected the effects of German migration in the prior twenty years. Ohio was closely behind New York state. This reflected the migration patterns from New York city up the Hudson river and across the state to Buffalo and onward to the great lakes region.

As the quote from Kamphoefner indicates, New York City was the gateway to America and the Erie canal and developing railways in New York facilitated migration to Ohio, Indiana and Illinois and Wisconsin.

Similar to New York State, Pennsylvania, particularly Philadelphia and its outlying areas, also had a long history of German migration in the 1700s and 1800s. Germans sailing to New Orleans settled in Lousiana.

Foreign Born in Germany by State 1850

State
Rank
(Territory)
StateForeign Born
German
Percentage
of Total in
United States
Cumulative
Pecentage
1New York118,39820.720.7
2Ohio111,25719.440.1
3Pennsylvania78,59213.753.8
4Missouri44,3537.761.5
5Illinois38,1606.768.2
6Maryland26,9364.772.9
7Indiana25,5844.577.4
8Louisiana17,5073.180.5
9Kentucky13,6972.482.9
10New Jersey10,6861.984.8
11-32Remaining states88,05515.3
(4)Territories5611.0
Total 573,225100.00*
May not add up to 100 percent due to rounding error. Source: 1850 U.S. Census, Table XV. – Nativities of the Population of the United States – Place of Birth – Foreign, Nativities of the Population of the United States, Births, Marriages, and Deaths, Classification of Ages,  Page xxxvi, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1850/1850a/1850a-06.pdf

[2] Ira Glazier, Ed., Germans to America Series II: Lists of Passengers Arriving at U.S. ports in the 1840s, Volume 6 April 1848 – October 1848, Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, Inc 2003, Page xiv Page xiv

[3] Page, Thomas W. “The Transportation of Immigrants and Reception Arrangements in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 19, no. 9, 1911, pp. 736. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1820349

[4] James Boyd, The Rhine Exodus of 1816/1817 within the Developing German Atlantic World, The Historical Journal, vol. 59, no. 1, 2016, page 102. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/24809839

[5] The Great Western Turnpike ran along the south side of the Mohawk River, while the Mohawk Turnpike ran along the north side. In modern times, NY Route 5 follows the path of the old Mohawk Turnpike along the northern bank of the Mohawk River, while NY Route 5S follows the path of the old Great Western Turnpike along the southern bank.

Green, Nelson, ed, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614-1925, Chapter 101: The Mohawk Turnpike and Valley Highway System, Chicago: S.J. Clark Pub. Co., 1925, PP 1465 – 1480, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/101.html

Green, Nelson, The Old Mohawk Turnpike Book, Fort Plain: Nelson Green, 1924, https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Old_Mohawk_Turnpike_Book/fT9KAAAAMAAJ?hl=en

Mohawk or Iroquois Trail, FamilySearch Wiki, FamilySearch,This page was last edited on 24 October 2023, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Mohawk_or_Iroquois_Trail

[6] Albany Post Road, Research Wiki, This page was last edited on 5 December 2022, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Albany_Post_Road

Dollarhide, William, Map Guide to American Routes, 1735-1815, Utah: AGLL, Inc, 1997,Pages 2-4 & 7

Albany Post Road, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 20 February 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albany_Post_Road

Old Albany Post Road, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Albany_Post_Road

At the time of his arrival to New York City, it was possible to utilize rail service from New York City to Albany New York.

Capsule History of the Old Albany-New York Post Road, Old Road Society of Philipstown. Retrieved 23 May 2024, http://www.oldrdsoc.org/orshist.htm

A Short History of of the Origin and Development of the Public Works Concept in the State of New York, New York Public Works, 1965, Page 7, https://www.dot.ny.gov/programs/dot-40th-anniversary/repository/A%20Short%20History.pdf

List of turnpikes in New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_turnpikes_in_New_York

New York Turnpikes, Research Wiki, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/New_York_Turnpikes

[7] Old Albany Post Road, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Albany_Post_Road

[8] History of Albany, New York (1784–1860), Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 24 August 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Albany,_New_York_%281784–1860%29

[9] Green, Nelson, ed, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614-1925, Chapter 101: The Mohawk Turnpike and Valley Highway System, Chicago: S.J. Clark Pub. Co., 1925, PP 1465 – 1480, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/101.html

Green, Nelson, The Old Mohawk Turnpike Book, Fort Plain: Nelson Green, 1924, https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Old_Mohawk_Turnpike_Book/fT9KAAAAMAAJ?hl=en

[10] Map and description of map from:

Greene, Nelson, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Volume I, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Page 19, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/maps/hudson_valley_map.html

[11] Loveday Jr.,William G. The Evolution of a County, Fulton County New York, Page Accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/evolution-county

[12] The Kingsborough Patent was a land grant in colonial New York during the 18th century. The patent contained parts of the current towns of Johnstown, Mayfield, and Ephratah in present-day Fulton County, New York, including the cities of Johnstown and Gloversville.

Map of Kingsborough, comprehending the Patents of James Stewart and A. Stevens. Map #72, New York State Archives, Digital Collections, https://digitalcollections.archives.nysed.gov/index.php/Detail/objects/36596

Thomas Cowperthwait & Co., A New Map of Germany, 1850, American made map of Germany, published in Philadelphia for the New Universal Atlas of the World of 1852,   https://nwcartographic.com/products/1850-a-new-map-of-germany?variant=675778261

History of Fulton County, Fulton County New York, Page accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/brief-history-fulton-county

Fulton County, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_County,_New_York

[13] History of Fulton County, Fulton County New York, Page accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/brief-history-fulton-county

[14] Loveday Jr.,William G. The Evolution of a County, Fulton County New York, Page Accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/evolution-county

History of Fulton County, Fulton County New York, Page accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/brief-history-fulton-county

Fulton County, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_County,_New_York

Montgomery County, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_County,_New_York

Tryon County, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tryon_County,_New_York

Lisa Slaski, Lisa,History, Fulton County MyGenWeb,  https://fulton.nygenweb.net/history/index.html

Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “Fulton”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 Aug. 2023, https://www.britannica.com/place/Fulton-county-New-York 

[15] Canal History, New York State, https://www.canals.ny.gov/history/history.html

Finch, Roy, The Story of the New York State Canals, https://www.canals.ny.gov/history/finch_history.pdf

Canal History, New York State, https://www.canals.ny.gov/history/history.html

Klein, Christopher, 8 Ways the Erie Canal changed America, July 19, 2016, updated Oct 25, 2023, History, https://www.history.com/news/8-ways-the-erie-canal-changed-america

North, Edward P. “The Erie Canal and Transportation.” The North American Review, vol. 170, no. 518, 1900, pp. 121–33. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25104942

Bahret, James L. “Growth of New York and Suburbs Since 1790.” The Scientific Monthly, vol. 11, no. 5, 1920, pp. 404–18. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/6415

Erie Canal, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_Canal

Keene, Michael, The Psychic Highway: How the Erie Canal Changed America. Fredericksburg, Va.: Willow Manor Publishing 2016

[16] The Growth of Railroads in the Capital District, https://vizettes.com/kt/rr/cd-rr-history/index.htm

[17] Drake, Ira S, and Cowperthwait & Co Thomas. Mitchell’s new traveller’s guide through the United States, showing the rail roads, canals, stage roads &c. with distances from place to place. Philadelphia, Thomas, Cowperthwait & Co., 1853, created 1848. Map. https://www.loc.gov/item/gm70005367/ 

Drake, Ira S., Mitchell’s new traveller’s guide through the United States, showing the rail roads, canals, stage roads &c. with distances from place to place, Philadelphia, Thomas, Cowperthwait & Co., published 1853, created 1848.

Albany and Schenectady Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 13 December 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albany_and_Schenectady_Railroad.  The railroad was incorporated on April 17, 1826, as the Mohawk & Hudson Company and opened for public service on August 9, 1831. On April 19, 1847, the company name was changed to the Albany & Schenectady Railroad. The railroad was consolidated into the New York Central Railroad on May 17, 1853.

Saratoga and Schenectady Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 11 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saratoga_and_Schenectady_Railroad. The line was opened from Schenectady to Ballston Spa on July 12, 1832, and extended to Saratoga Springs in 1833 for a total of 20.8 miles (33.5 km). 

Troy & Schenectady Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_%26_Schenectady_Railroad The building of the road began in 1841, and trains began running from Schenectady to Troy, New York in the fall of 1841 (21.0 miles)

Rensselaer and Saratoga Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 7 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rensselaer_and_Saratoga_Railroad. It completed 25.2 miles (40.6 km) between Troy and Ballston Spa on March 19, 1836.

Troy and Boston Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 7 November 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_and_Boston_Railroad. (1852)It completed a railroad from Troy, New York to the Vermont state line (35 miles) in 1852.

Boston and Albany Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 17 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_and_Albany_Railroad

Palmer, Richard, Three Rivers Hudson~Mohawk~Schoharie, http://threerivershms.com/utica-schenRR.htm

Greene, Nelson, ed, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614-1925 Volume II, Chapter 87: History of the New York Central Railroad and Other Valley Lines, Chicago: S.J. Clark Pub. Co. 1925, PP 1288-1306, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/087.html

Larkin, F. Daniel, Historical Context: The Railroads and New York’s Canals, Consider the Source New York, Page accessed May, 3, 2024, https://considerthesourceny.org/using-primary-sources/erie-canal-new-yorks-gift-nation/chapter-9-other-new-york-canals/historical-context-railroads-and-new-yorks-canals

[18] Greene, Nelson, Chapter 103: Mohawk Manufacturing Statistics, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Pages 1502 – 1504, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/103.html also https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89077224962&view=1up&seq=11

Grist mills, saw mills, tanneries, blacksmith shops, fulling and carding mills, asheries, etc., were built at nearly all Valley centers, in the settlement period, from 1661 to 1800. The following are examples of principal industries, in which the great majority of the wage earners of the valley were engaged prior to and up to when Johann Sperber migrated to the area.

See also:

Utica, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 15 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utica,_New_York

Johnstown, New York, Wikipeadia, This page was last edited on 5 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnstown,_New_York

Gloversville, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloversville,_New_York

Utica, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 15 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utica,_New_York

Amsterdam, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 15 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amsterdam,_New_York

Little Falls, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Falls,_New_York

[19]  Greene, Nelson, Chapter 103: Mohawk Manufacturing Statistics, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Volume II, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Page 20

[20] Utica, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utica,_New_York

Koch, Daniel,  Land of the Oneidas: Central New York State and the Creation of America, From Prehistory to the Present. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2023

Rome, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome,_New_York

[21] Utica, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utica,_New_York

[22] Nadel, Stanley, Little Germany: Ethnicity, Religion, and Class in New York City 1845-80, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1990, Page 64

[23] Hunt, Arthur L., Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Data from Table One, Page 10. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

F. W. Beers, F.W. , History of Montgomery and Fulton counties, N.Y. : with illustrations and portraits of old pioneers and prominent residents, New York : F.W. Beers & co., 1878, Pa https://archive.org/details/historyofmontgom00beer/page/n459/mode/2up

Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999

Gloversville, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 May 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloversville,_New_York#:~:text=The%20city%20would%20become%20the,official%20name%20of%20the%20community.

Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

Washington Frothingham, History of Fulton County : embracing early discoveries, the advance of civilization, the labors and triumphs of Sir William Johnson, the inception and development of the glove industry; with town and local records, also military achievements of Fulton county patriots, Syracuse, N.Y. : D. Mason, 1892, Chapter XVI, The Glove Industry, Pages 154 – 170 https://archive.org/details/cu31924083983951/page/n173/mode/2up

[24] Eisenstadt, Peter, ed, , Tanning Industry, The Encyclopedia of New York State, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2005, Page 1526 – 1527

[25] Schifman, Joathan, Water, Water Everywhere, and Not a Drop to Drink, Smithsonian Magazine, Nov 25 2019, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-new-york-city-found-clean-water-180973571/

Great Swamp (New York), Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 25 October 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Swamp_%28New_York%29 

Young, Michelle, Fun Maps: The Slips and Swamps of Early NYC, untapped new york, https://untappedcities.com/2015/08/20/fun-maps-the-slips-and-swamps-of-early-nyc/

Johnson, Amy, The Saw-Kill and the Making of Dutch Colonial Manhattan, Sawkill Lumber Co. ,https://www.sawkill.nyc/history-new-york-city/

History of Manhattan, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 10 April 2024, History_of_Manhattan

Norcross, Frank W., A History of the New York Swamp, New York: The Chiswick Press, 1901, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/98/A_history_of_the_New_York_Swamp_%28IA_cu31924030127181%29.pdf

Urbanus, Jason, New York’s Original Seaport, Archaelogy Magazine, Sep / Oct 2015, https://archaeology.org/issues/online/collection/new-york-original-seaport/

[26] Roberts, Sam, 200th Birthday for the Map That Made New York, Mar 20, 2011, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/nyregion/21grid.html

[27] Gannon, Devin, On this day in 1811, the Manhattan Street Grid became official, Mar 22 2017, 6sqft, https://www.6sqft.com/204-years-ago-today-the-manhattan-street-grid-became-official/

Commissioner’s Plan of 1811, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissioners%27_Plan_of_1811

The 1811 Plan, The Greatest Grid: The Master Plan of Manhattan 1811 – Now, Museum of the City of New York,  https://thegreatestgrid.mcny.org/greatest-grid/making-the-plan 

Yu, Kerry, The Greatest Grid: History of the Mater Plan of Manhattan, Feb 7, 2019, Information Visualization, Student Work at the School of Information, Pratt Institute, https://studentwork.prattsi.org/infovis/labs/the-greatest-grid-history-of-the-master-plan-of-manhattan/

McQuilkin, Alexander,  The Rise and Fall of Manhattan’s Density, Urban Omnibus, Pblication of the Architectual League of New York, https://urbanomnibus.net/2014/10/the-rise-and-fall-of-manhattans-density/

Howe, Richard, Notes On The Commissioners’ Future City, Nov 9, 2013, The Gothan Center for New York City. History, https://www.gothamcenter.org/blog/notes-on-the-commissioners-future-city

Roberts, Sam, 200th Birthday for the Map That Made New York, Mar 20, 2011, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/nyregion/21grid.html

Jaffe, Eric, Nov 21, 2011, A Visual History of Manhattan’s Grid, Bloomberg, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-11-21/a-visual-history-of-manhattan-s-grid

Panero, James,The Greatness of the Grid, Mar 23, 2012, City Journal, https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-greatness-of-the-grid

Kimmelman, Michael, The Grid at 200: Lines That Shaped Manhattan, Jan 2 2012, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/03/arts/design/manhattan-street-grid-at-museum-of-city-of-new-york.html

Barr, Jason and Gerard Koeppel, The Manhattan Street Grid Plan: Misconceptions And Corrections, Dec 4 2016, The Gothan Center for New York City History, https://www.gothamcenter.org/blog/gridplanmain

Holloway, Marguerite, How Manhattan Got Its Street Grid, Feb 15, 2013, Scientific American, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-manhattan-got-its-street-grid/

Wright, Artis Q., Designing the City of New York: The Commissioners’ Plan of 1811, New York Public Library Blog, Jul 3 2010,  https://www.nypl.org/blog/2010/07/30/designing-city-new-york-commissioners-plan-1811

[28] Barbara McMartin and W. Alec Reid, The Glove Cities, Caroga, NY: Lake View Press, 1999 Page 74

[29] Barbara McMartin and W. Alec Reid, The Glove Cities, Caroga, NY: Lake View Press, 1999 Page 8

[30] Barbara McMartin and W. Alec Reid, The Glove Cities, Caroga, NY: Lake View Press, 1999 Page 2

[31] Hunt, Arthur, Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Page 10  https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

[32] Grand Duchy of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 25 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Baden

Lambert, Audrey M. “Farm Consolidation in Western Europe.” Geography, vol. 48, no. 1, 1963, pp. 31–48. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40565503

Wegge SA. Inheritance Institutions and Landholding Inequality in Nineteenth-Century Germany: Evidence from Hesse-Cassel Villages and Towns. The Journal of Economic History. 2021;81(3):909-942. doi:10.1017/S0022050721000358 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/abs/inheritance-institutions-and-landholding-inequality-in-nineteenthcentury-germany-evidence-from-hessecassel-villages-and-towns/C0994C948FC04D3C2CB4B1B967078AA3

[33] Cottage industries is akin to what many historical researchers call Proto-industry. Proto-industry refers to the widespread growth of rural handicraft production for external markets that occurred in many parts of Europe between the 16th and 19th centuries, prior to and during the early phases of the Industrial Revolution. It involved the expansion of small-scale, home-based manufacturing of goods like textiles, ironware, pottery, etc. by peasant families. This cottage industry production was done alongside traditional agricultural work. Proto-industry arose in many parts of Europe including England, France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Belgium/Netherlands. Historians like Franklin Mendels coined the term “proto-industrialization” to describe this phenomenon. 

Mendels, Franklin F. “Proto-Industrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process.” The Journal of Economic History, vol. 32, no. 1, 1972, pp. 241–61. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2117187

Proto-industrialization, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-industrialization

Ogilvie, Sheilagh (1996). European proto-industrialization : an introductory handbook. Sheilagh C. Ogilvie, Markus Cerman. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 227–239

Ogilvie, Sheilagh, protoindustrialization, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition, 2008 Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume, https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/people-files/faculty/sco2/full-texts/Ogilvie-2008-Proto-industrialization-published.pdf

See also:

Kamphoefner, Walter D., The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987, Chapter 1: At the Crossroads of Economic Development 12 -40

Grand Duchy of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 25 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Baden

Gehrmann, Rolf. “Denomination and Number of Children: The Case of Rural Baden, 18th/19th Century.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, vol. 42, no. 2 (160), 2017, pp. 92–113. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/44234954

Barels. Charlotte, Simon Jager, Natalie Obergrube, Long-Term Effects of Equal Sharing: Evidence from Inheritance Rules for Land, May 2022, https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/InheritanceInequality_BJO.pdf

[34] Kamphoefner, Walter D., The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987, Page 81

[35] Kamphoefner, Walter D., The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987, Page 28 – 29

[36] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 27

[37] Ellis, B. Eldred, Gloves and the Glove Trade, London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd, 1921 , Page 71 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Gloves_and_the_glove_trade_%28IA_glovesglovetrade00elli%29.pdf

[38] Ellis, B. Eldred, Gloves and the Glove Trade, London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd, 1921 , Page 5-7, 71, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Gloves_and_the_glove_trade_%28IA_glovesglovetrade00elli%29.pdf

[39] Smith Willard M., Gloves Past and Present, New York: The Sherwood Press, Inc., 1917, Pages 42, 54-55, 58-59

Worshipful Company of Glovers, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worshipful_Company_of_Glovers

Hunt, Arthur, Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Page 14  https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

[40] The revocation of the Edict of Nantes was an edict signed by King Louis XIV of France in October 1685, known as the Edict of Fontainebleau, which ended religious tolerance for Protestants (Huguenots) in France. The revocation ended a long period of limited religious tolerance in France and led to renewed persecution of Protestants, the destruction of their institutions, and a massive refugee crisis as Huguenots fled into exile.

Edict of Nantes, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 28 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Nantes

Edict of Fontainebleau, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 29 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Fontainebleau

Davis, Stephen M., Louis XIV and the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes World History Encyclopedia, 26 July 2022, https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2046/louis-xiv-and-the-revocation-of-the-edict-of-nante/#google_vignette

[41] Smith Willard M., Gloves Past and Present, New York: The Sherwood Press, Inc., 1917, Pages 45

[42] Frothington, Washington, History of Fulton County : embracing early discoveries, the advance of civilization, the labors and triumphs of Sir William Johnson, the inception and development of the glove industry; with town and local records, also military achievements of Fulton county patriots, Syracuse D. Mason & Co. 1892, Page 155, https://archive.org/details/cu31924083983951/page/n7/mode/2up

[43] The map is an 1850 map that depicts the locations of where the Glove makers from Grenoble relocated in Germany. Thomas Cowperthwait & Co., A New Map of Germany, 1850, American made map of Germany, published in Philadelphia for the New Universal Atlas of the World of 1852,   https://nwcartographic.com/products/1850-a-new-map-of-germany?variant=675778261

[44] Smith, Gloves Past and Present, Page 64

[45] Smith, Gloves Past and Present, Page 58-65

[46] The History of Glovers, Rhanders, https://rhanders.com/blogs/heritage-timeline/the-history-of-gloves

“English word glove comes from Proto-Germanic *lōfô, Proto-Germanic ga-, and later Proto-Germanic galōfô (Glove.)”

Glove etymology, Cooljugator, https://cooljugator.com/etymology/en/glove#

“Old English glof “glove, covering for the hand having separate sheaths for the fingers,” also “palm of the hand,” from Proto-Germanic galofo “covering for the hand” (source also of Old Norse glofi), probably from ga- collective prefix + *lofi “hand” (source also of Old Norse lofi, Middle English love, Gothic lofa “

Glove, Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com/word/glove

Redwood, Mike, Timeline for gloves, https://www.mikeredwood.com/all-about-gloves/timeline-for-gloves/ 

Redwood, Mike, Gloves and Glove-Making, Kindle Edition, Shire Publications, 2016

[47] Morrison, James, City Historian, City of Gloversville, Page accessed Jan 18, 2024, https://cityofgloversville.com/residents/city-historian/

Canhan, Hugh O., Hemlock and Hide: The Tanback Industry in Old New York, Summer 2011, Northern Woodlands, https://northernwoodlands.org/articles/article/hemlock-and-hide-the-tanbark-industry-in-old-new-york

Padmin, W., Fulton County, Then and Now, Jan 22, 2021, Fulton County Center for Regional Growth   (CRG), https://www.fccrg.org/then-now/ 

Houghton, George C., Leather, Tanned, Curried, and Finished, Census Bulletin, No 195, June 18, 1902, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1902, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/195-manufactures-leather-tanned-curried-and-finisehd.pdf

Elizabeth R. Hosterman and Robert B. Hobbs, Leather Gloves: General Information, Oct 11 1948, Letter Curcular LC921, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/LC/nbslettercircular921.pdf

[48] Eisenstadt, Peter, ed, , Tanning and Glove Making, Fulton County, The Encyclopedia of New York State, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2005, Page 611

[49] Hunt, Arthur, Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Selected statistics derived from Table 11 on Page 15  https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

“Journal of the Society for Arts, Vol. 50, No. 2598.” The Journal of the Society of Arts, vol. 50, no. 2598, 1902, pp. 812-813. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41335655

[50] Barbara McMartin does not cite the referenced newspaper. The local newspaper may have been The Johnstown Daily Republican, 19 Oct 1895, Illustrated Supplement, Johnstown and Interesting HistoryPages 9 – 24.

Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 8

[51] For an alternative explanation of the origin of glove making in Fulton county, see: F. W. Beers, F.W. , History of Montgomery and Fulton counties, N.Y. : with illustrations and portraits of old pioneers and prominent residents, New York : F.W. Beers & co., 1878, Pa https://archive.org/details/historyofmontgom00beer/page/n459/mode/2up, Page 175

[52] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 15

[53] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 16

[54] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 18

[55] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 15

[56] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 19

[57] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 25

[58] Hunt, Arthur L., Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Data from Table One, Page 10. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

[59] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 10 

[60] The definition of manufacturing establishments expanded from 1850 to 1900 to capture the shift from shop and household manufacturing to centralized factory production. By 1900, the Census distinguished between larger factories and smaller shop-based manufacturing, with factories representing the bulk of output.

“In the statistics of manufactures, the establishment is taken as the basic unit, as the individual is taken in population, or the farm in agriculture.

1. Definition.-The term “establishment” as employed at this census is defined as representing one or more mills owned or controlled by one individual, firm, or corporation, located either in the same city or town, or in the same county, and engaged in the same industry. “

1900 U.S. Federal Census, Chapter II. Summary and Analysis of Results,  Page lxii , https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/volume-7/volume-7-p3.pdf

[61] Hunt, Arthur L., Census Bulletin No. 175, Page 5

[62] Hunt, Arthur L., Census Bulletin No. 175, Page 11

[63] Hunt, Arthur L., Census Bulletin No. 175, Table 11, Page 10.

[64] Hunt, Arthur L., Census Bulletin No. 175, Page 10

[65] A study of German immigration to Bucks county in the same time period that Johann Sperber immigrated to Gloversville, New York addresses similar issues raised in this story of immigrating to America. Similar to Johann’s experience, the vast majority of these immigrants that moved to Nockamixon Township in Bucks County, Pennsylvania in the 1830s – 1850s came from the Upper Rhine region, and a majority of those came from Baden. Furthermore, most of the Badener were from specific areas of the Grand Duchy of Baden. Chain migration, now recognized as normative in migration history, largely accounted for the clustering of these newcomers in America. 

A major source of employment in Nockamixon Township was canal waterway work. It seems odd that the Nockamixon Township German settlers’ major entrée into the local workforce was canal work, which seemingly neither required Old World craft skills nor appeared readily compatible with farming.

“The larger reason for the Rhinelanders’ heavy concentration in canal work echoes the experience of so many immigrants in all eras: it provided an available niche.”

“While boating clearly constituted the dominant occupational opportunity for Rhinelanders in this area, the local economy also offered some of the newcomers opportunities in skilled labor commensurate with their Old World trades. Nockamixon Township provided a favorable environment because at midcentury it retained much of its preindustrial character. “

Hueston, Robert F., The Assimilation of German Immigrants into a Pennsylvania German Township, 1840–1900, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. CXXXIII, No. 1 ( January 2009), Pages 59 – 87, Two quotes – Page 66

[66] Morrison, James, City Historian, City of Gloversville, http://cityofgloversville.com/residents/city-historian/

[67] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 16

[68] “The Auswanderer went to America less to build something new than to regain and conserve something old, which they remembered or thought they did … .”

Walker, Mack, Germany and the Emigration 1816 – 1885, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964, Page 69 https://archive.org/details/germanyemigratio0000walk/page/68/mode/2up


Auswandererkarten or German Emigration Maps

There was a point in my long and focused research to document the immigration of our German ancestors that I came upon a map in my research. The map is 49 x 65 centimeters or about 19.3 x 25.5 inches in size.

The map was created in the early 1850s and, it contained a wealth of information about major German immigration routes to America. The map documented inland European travel routes to specific intercontinental ports of departure to the United States. The map also documented various inland routes from American ports to various cities in America. The map also provided information on the main routes for immigrants traveling in North America, measured in miles and the estimated time and cost of travel.

The map graphically portrayed the German immigrant experience in the mid 1800s in one page. It captured the gist of what I had documented through many hours of research. It was one of those moments that you look at the map and say to yourself, “Why didn’t I find this map before I started this research journey?“. While my research substantiated and explained in more detail what was depicted in the map, having the map at the beginning of the research process would have provided a great starting point.

The map is the “Auswanderer-Karte und Wegweiser nach Nordamerika” (Emigrant Map and Guide to North America), published in Stuttgart in 1852-1853 by Gotthelf Zimmermann. [1]

Map One: Zimmermann’s Emigrant Map & Guide to North America

See also a 1970 x 1478 pixel sized version of the map.

The Significance of Auswandererkarten

Auswandererkarten, or German emigration maps in the mid 1800s offered detailed information about migrating to the United States. Special maps like the 1853 “Emigrant Map and Guide to North America” were published in Germany to aid emigrants, providing detailed travel information on routes, ports, and settlements in the United States.

Emigration maps were published as separate items for guidance, advertised in German newspapers and were published as part of emigrant guides and handbooks. These maps, together with the weekly posting of departing ship schedules in German newspapers satisfied the needs of a growing market of German emigrants heading to the United States in the 1830s through 1850s.

The emigration maps provide a wealth of information, graphically depicting the predominate immigration routes in the mid 1800s. The routes are based on the transportation networks (e.g. road, canal, and rail) and major ports of departure and ports of entry that existed at the time. They capture an historical and visual snapshot of the development of the transcontinental transportation network that Germans utilized in the mid 1800s to immigrate to the United States. [2]

Here are some key details and general observations about these emigration maps :

  • They provided information for Germans planning to emigrate to the United States and other parts of North America, showing specific routes, travel times, ports of arrival, and potential settlement locations.
  • The maps were at times part of written travel guides with practical advice for emigrants on the journey, arrival ports, transportation options, costs, and life in America.
  • They were published by book publishers, map makers, emigration societies and travel agencies catering to the large numbers of Germans emigrating in the nineteenth century.
  • By depicting the routes, travel information and settlement locations, these maps provide a reflection of where Germans migrated to specific areas in North America.
  • From an historical perspective, these maps reflected the current outlines of the transportation infrastructure in Europe and the United States.
  • The maps provide a prescient graphic outline of the immigration patterns of where Germans eventually settled in the United States.

The Relationship of Emigrant Maps and Migration Patterns

These emigration maps did not cause massive upswings of Germans immigrating to the United States. Nor did they have a significant influence on the migration and settlement patterns of German immigrants in America. [3] This line of reasoning is akin to saying that since fireman are always around fires, they cause fires. To mix metaphors, it is a bit of the tail wagging the dog.

In a book, ‘A History of American in 100 Maps’, Susan Schulten chose this map as one of the hundrend influential maps of the United States. “The maps in this volume were made in vastly different contexts. Yet when considered together, they underscore the persuasive power of cartography.” [4]

Schulten points out that richly colored map was part of the large corpus of immigrant literature associated with the immigrant expansion of the United States in the mid 1800s.

“At first glance, it shows prospective emigrants a range of destinations that awaited them … . But a closer look shows not only patterns of immigration but also the more fundamental dynamics that contributed to the Civil War.”

“… (W)hile this map was designed for one purpose, it inadvertently reveals a much larger set of forces that increasingly differentiated the slave-based agricultural economy of the South from the free-market wage economy in the North. And by guiding immigrants to the latter, the map actually helps us understand the way that immigration was both a cause and consequence of that growing regional distinction, which ultimately led to the sectional crisis.” [5]

I believe the above quote correctly points to ‘a larger set of forces‘ that influenced German migration in the antebellum United States. The map also reflects the imbalance of the growth of the transportation infrastructure between the northern and southern states in the mid 1800s.

Whether the map and other emigrant maps played an influential role in guiding immigrants to the north is subject to debate. The above quote does not imply this map or German immigrants had a fundamental role in the emerging differences between the north and the south. Schulten’s observations point to the map’s reflection of the current state of affairs in the mid 1800s.

Based on various historical studies of immigrant letters and chain migration, maps and other forms of publications did not necessarily play an active, casual, or dominant role in directing immigrants to particular areas of the United States or actively guide or steer immigrants to the northeast and mid-west regions of the antebellum period. Maps of the 1850s were the reflection of the regionalized industrial growth in the United States. [6]

Whether one does immigration history by the numbers or by the letters, the results show a striking congruence. The decision to emigrate was very much a bottom-up decision. Private sources of information, above all immigrant letters, were much more influential than any public sources, be they guidebooks or state immigration agencies, in determining immigrants’ destinations. [7]

While opposition to slavery was widespread among nineteenth century German immigrants and many were active abolitionists, their attitudes were complex and varied by individual, class and circumstance. Views on the issue of slavery were not a major cause of migratory patterns. [8]

Illustration One: A Spurious Correlation: Emigration Maps and German Immigration Trends and Migratory Patterns

Click for Larger View

The views or conclusions about the influence of maps and publications on immigrant patterns are examples of what I believe to be a spurious correlation between the existence of emigration maps and migration trends and patterns. In this instance, a spurious correlation gives the false appearance of a causal relationship between two variables (e.g. maps and German emigration), when in reality the association is due to both variables being influenced by a number of other factors (e.g. push and pull migration factors, chain migration patterns, transportation infrastructure development in Europe and America, the refinement of packet ships and their schedules, etc). Identifying spurious correlations requires a careful analysis of the evidence and teasing out the effects of potential confounding variables.

Emigrant maps, in general, were specific tools to facilitate an emigrant’s journey. They did not necessarily promote or determine an emigrant’s path. However, like maps in the twentieth century, I would imagine maps in the mid 1800s in Germany may have sparked ideas of adventure or bolster decisions to make decisive moves to America in the minds of some. For the most part, they were an aid in helping immigrants that had already made their minds up in emigrating to a specific area or region of the United States.

In a society dominated by small towns and villages, horizons were narrow, local sentiments strong and information passed between generations and those you knew. The decisions made by German emigrants were not made in a vacuum. Local and regional socio-economic and political factors created a set of unique ‘push’ factors for them to consider emigrating from their homeland.

Their subsequent journey to America was also influenced by information they may have garnered from local community members who had descendants who migrated to America in the late 1700’s and early 1800’s. Travel agents and brokers, and German publications, such as maps, also provided to some degree information that may have facilitated their decisions to emigrate and guided their specific paths to their destinations..

As stated in prior stories, the areas in Germany where our relatives migrated from had a long tradition of migrating to America. Their specific route getting to America was different from the Baden emigrants in the 1700s and early 1800s. However, there may have been a strong likelihood that they followed the guidance from past generations from their local communities to settle in places that prior generations had settled or use those places as starting points to go further. Even without specific contacts, they may had at least a general idea of settling in the ‘Palatine area’ along the Mohawk River in New York state where past generations originally settled.

Regardless of the relative influence that emigrant maps may have had on emigration patterns, Zimmerman’s emigrant map provides an amazing, graphic snapshot of possible German migratory patterns in the mid 1800s. It is a great 1850s version of the contemporary travel map of the twentieth century.

(O)ld maps are valuable as both records and agents of history. Across five centuries, artifacts such as these have guided exploration, conquest, and settlement but also politics, commerce, science, medicine, education, bureaucracy, reform, and entertainment. Whether made for military strategy or moral reform, to encourage settlement or investigate disease, maps both reflect and mediate change. They tell us what people knew, what they thought they knew, what they hoped for, and what they feared. They invest information with meaning by translating it into visual form, thereby reflecting decisions about how the world ought to be seen. They capture the irreducible complexity and contingency of the past. Above all, they remind us that the past is not just a chronological story, but a spatial one as well.” [9]

Advertisements for the Auswanderer-Karte und Wegweiser nach Nordamerika

The “Auswanderer-Karte und Wegweiser nach Nordamerika” (Emigrant Map and Guide to North America) was published in Stuttgart, which was located in the Kingdom of Württemberg, around 1852. This is around the time that ancestors of the Griffis family emigrated from Baden. This is the year that John Speber departed from Le Havre to New York. It is five years after Catherine Fliegel departed from Le Havre for the port of New York city. It is three years before the remainder of the Fliegel family embarked from Le Havre to New York City.

The map was published by J.B. Metzler. The J.B. Metzler publishing house was one of he oldest publishing houses in Gemany. It was founded in Stuttgart in 1682 by August Metzler. [10] Metzler advertised the emigration map in German papers and offered special rates for bulk orders by emigration agents. [11]

While the map is often referenced as the ‘1853 German Map’, its existence is documented prior to 1853. For example, the pamphlet or map is referenced in an advertisement in the newspaper Leipziger Freitag in September 1852 [12]

Advertisement for Zimmermann’s Map in the Leipziger Zeitung, September 1852

The advertisement states:

“Mesler in Stuttgart has just published: Gotthel Zimmermann’s emigrant map and guide to North America”

Emigrant Map and Directions to North America, containing the European ports of departure, the routes that the ships follow at sea, the disembarkation points in North America, the land and water routes from the disembarkation points to the interior of America, the distances of the main American towns and cities (Hauptorte) from one another in German hours, and the cost of the trip on the main routes in guilder and thaler. Presented in an easy to understand form for everyone, especially emigrating artisans and farmers.

Cartonized 7 1/2 Silver Groschen

“This large map, printed in 3 colors, is distinguished above all by its cheap price, clarity and basics, so that it is easier to read in Latin script for the less inclined, all frames are given in German print.”

Another example of an advertisement for the map was found in the newspaper, Kempter Zeitung, in March 1854. [13]

Advertisement for Zimmermann’s Map in the Kempter Zeitung, Mar 12 1854

The following is a translation of the advertisement.

“Zimmerman, Emigrant Map and Guide to North America in which the European ports of departure, the landing places in North America, the land and waterways from these landing places to the interior of America, the distances of the main places in America from each other according to German hours, the of the main routes in Rhenish guilders and in prussian thaler are presented in an easily understandable way. Fourth edition. In case. Price 24 fr.”

The map was listed in a German book bibliography, Allgemeines Deutsches Bücher-Lexikon, as late as 1858. The Allgemeines Deutsches Bücher-Lexikon was a comprehensive German book lexicon or bibliography published in the 19th century. [14] The map was advertised in German newspapers and sold in multiple editions through the late 1850s, indicating demand for such emigration maps.

The Audience and Marketing of the Map

The map was intended for a specific audience: Germans who had an interest or plans for immigrating to America. The introduction of the Map, found in the lower right corner of the map states:

“Emigrant Map and Directions to North America, containing the European ports of departure, the routes that the ships follow at sea, the disembarkation points in North America, the land and water routes from the disembarkation points to the interior of America, the distances of the main American towns and cities [main places] from one another in German hours, and the cost of the trip on the main routes in guilder and thaler. Presented in an easy to understand form for everyone, especially emigrating artisans and farmers.”

“Gotthelf Zimmermann. Second Edition”

“North (Nord) America” in Fraktur Calligraphy

With the exception of the title of the map (which appears to use Textra print [15] ), the map is using Fraktur typeface which was a common typeface of the day. Fraktur type was used for printing in Germany throughout the nineteenth century. Frakur typeface became the most common German blackletter typeface from the mid-16th century until the early 20th century. [16] As the description of the map states: the map ispresented in an easy to understand form for everyone, especially emigrating artisans and farmers“.

The map was intended to be published to fit on one piece of paper. The goal obviously was to fit both northern Europe and the United States and related information on the face of one piece of paper. The ability to fit this geographical space onto one page necessitated the need to take liberties on the accuracy of scale. This is explicitly mentioned in a note that was placed in the middle of the Atlantic ocean near Spain. The European countries and the American states are also not to scale on the map.

Annotation In-Between the Two Continents on the Map [17]

“The distance between Europe and America is relatively far greater than could be shown in the drawing. To save space, the two parts of the world had to be brought together here.”

Information on Travel Distance and Cost

In the upper left hand corner of the map, traditional Fraktur German typography identifies cities and towns, and the distance and travel cost from each of the ports along the Atlantic coast to the interior towns and cities. Cost is provided in guilders, kreuzers and silver groschen. [18]

Illustration Two: Travel Time and Cost of Travel in the Zimmermann Map

Click for Larger View

An Example of a Baden Kreuzer

Six Kreuzers – Lepold I, Issued by the Grand Duchy of Baden (1830-1852) Source: 6 Kreuzers – Leopold I, Numista, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces36798.html

Comparative Time Table of Time 1868 [19]

Click for Larger View

(F)or example, when it was noon in New York, it was 11:10 in Indianapolis, 11:19 in Cincinnati, 11:24 in Columbus, 11:30 in Cleveland, 11:36 in Pittsburgh, 11:56 in Philadelphia, and 12:12 in Boston—that is to say, local time was defined relative to the sun at midday.”[20]

It is not known what “nach deutschen Stunden“, by German hours, means in the context of Zimmermann’s calculation of the amount of time to travel between designated cities. It is not known if ‘German time’ implies the use of a standardized base for computing time for the figures found in the map. This could be possible since time was not standardized in the United States.

The growth of railroads in the 1800s exposed the problems with every locality having its own solar time, and drove the adoption of standardized time zones that enabled more efficient train scheduling and safer operations. But this transition occurred gradually over many decades. In the early-to-mid 1800s, each town kept its own local time, usually based on “solar time” where noon was when the sun was highest in the sky. This meant adjacent towns could have slightly different local times. Railroads initially had to deal with this patchwork of local times when scheduling trains. [21]

The map lists twenty-one combinations of trips and their distances from major United States cities. For example Part I lists routes from New York to various inland destinations.

Click for Larger View

The following is a rough translation of the estimated time in hours it took to travel between New York City and the various destination points.

Click for Larger View

It is not clear what mode of transportation was used to calculate the estimated number of hours to travel to each of these various places. I am assuming many of the above travel routes between New York and the various places listed were based on travel by water.

Comparing the estimated time for travel in the Zimmermann map with American travel guides published around the same time period suggests the ‘Zimmermann travel’ was based on travel on canals, rivers, or lakes.

This is obviously the case traveling to “Albany on the Hudson River” (nach Albany auf hudsonfluss). For example, the Zimmerman map indicates the trip between New York city and Albany was estimated to be 65 hours in 1853 (perhaps based on data earlier than 1853 since that was the publication date). An 1851 travel publication indicated a train ride from New York to Albany took 10 hours (see below)

Travel on the Housatonic Railroad between New York City and Albany 1848 [22]

Hudson river days boats were also available in 1851 (see below). [23] Whether German immigrants utilized these boats or other slower vessels to travel further inland in New York state is not certain.

Hudson River Day Boats to Albany

Click for Larger View

Major Land Routes in Europe Portrayed in the Map

The ‘1853’ map was the second edition of Zimmermann’s map. As such it purportedly represents knowledge of the transportation networks in Europe and the United States around that time.

There is no explicit legend defining what the red lines denote or mean in the map. It is not known if the red routes on the map are intended solely to denote railways or routes that include roadways and railways. Canals and rivers are in blue or grey (depending on what version of the map you are viewing).

Map Two: Highlighted Possible Immigration Routes for John Sperber in 1852 on the ‘1853’ Zimmemann Map

Based on an historical analysis of German migration, we know that the red routes in the map signify popular routes that German emigrants had taken to major European ports of departure for America between 1830 to the 1860s and perhaps onward. However, based on the historical development of French and German railway networks around 1850-1852, I believe the red routes on the map signify routes that include a combination of road and railway travel not just rail travel. (See map two)

As indicated in a prior stories, a great great grandfather of mine, John Sperber, immigrated to America from Baden-Baden, Grand Duchy of Baden which is close to and on the other side of the Rhine River to Strasbourg, France. Based on historical evidence, I believe he traveled from Baden-Baden to Le Havre France and departed in 1852 to New York City. At the time of his journey the railway lines between Paris and Strasbourg were not complete. (See map three below)

If John traveled by railway, his options were limited. The rail line between Paris and Strasbourg was built and operated by the Compagnie du chemin de fer de Paris à Strasbourg, which later became part of the Chemins de fer de l’Est This railway line between Paris and Strasbourg was complete after John arrived to the United States in 1852. It was not available for him when he emigrated to the United States.

The first section of the French railway line between Le Havre and Strasbourg was opened in 1849. This first section connected Paris to Châlons-sur-Marne (see map three below). In 1850 a line from Nancy to Frouard and a line from Châlons to Vitry-le-François were completed. In the following year, a line from Vitry-le-François to Commercy as well as a line from Sarrebourg to Strasbourg were completed. Finally, in 1852, the year John Sperber emigrated, the sections between Commercy and Frouard, and the line between Nancy and Sarrebourg were opened. The 1852 sections were probably open after John’s voyage in June 1852.  [24]

During this period, railway technology and infrastructure were rapidly developing. The rapid development had its impact on the production of maps. It has been observed that for American maps “even the most accurately drawn map which spent a month or two in production might miss more new railroad mileage during these years than had existed in the entire country in the 1830s or early 1840s. Some mapmakers tried to anticipate this fluidity by building their expectations for expansion into their maps, only to see those plans unrealized as funding fell through or construction was temporarily halted.” [25] I imagine this was an issue faced by the German and French map makers as well.

As reflected in map three, I have modified and removed from the original source map all of the rail lines that were built between 1850 and 1856. You can see of illustrative purposes, however, remnants of removed lines for the railways completed in this six year period. John Sperber may not have been able to travel by rail between Strasbourg, Nancy and Vitry-le-François. Even if they were able to travel by train, his journey would have been interrupted and punctuated with the need to travel by roadways where the train line was under construction. [26]

Map Three: French Railway System 1842 – 1850

Many of the major contemporary road arteries in France follow the routes of royal postal roads that were originally built in the 1700s. The French postal roads of the 1700s were innovative in their design and construction. Many of the these postal routes survived and became the major roadways in France. In fact, all of the roadways in the along the route from Strasbourg to Le Havre in 1853 are part of the old postal route system.

Map four below depicts the postal roads in northern France that linked major towns and cities in France in 1833. The creation of the map is the result of analyzing the changes over time of the expansion of postal routes in France through time. I have highlighted the postal roads that followed the possible route that John Sperber had taken to reach the post of Le Havre.

Based on the above analysis, I believe the Zimmermann ‘red route’ between Strasbourg and Le Havre merely denotes a popular route to Le havre that included roadway and railway, depending on when one traveled across northern France.

Map Four: French Postal Roads and Main Cities and Towns in 1833 and the Highlighted Possible Route of John Sperber from Strasbourg to Le Havre [27]

Click for Larger View

Between 1850 and 1853, the Baden to Bremen route probably was an effective alternative route for John Sperber’s consideration or others from the Grand Duchy of Baden. Bremen could have been reached by roadways from Baden. Bremen could also be reached through the use of a combination of train (Baden Main Line), waterway (the Rhine River to Cologne) and then rail via Hanover and Bremen. (See map five)

Map Five: Major Interior Rivers Served By Steam Transportation & Rail Lines to Docks of Bremen and Hamburg, 1847 [28]

Click for Larger View

Map six below is a portion of Zimmermann’s map that shows the same route that is reflected in map five.

Map Six: Portion of Zimmerman Map Showing Route from Baden-Baden to Bremen and Hamburg

Based on historical evidence on the development of German railways in the 1840s and 1850s, it is reasonable to assume that the red travel paths in the Zimmermann map for this particular “Baden to Bremen” route denote rail lines connected with waterways .

Depending on the specific popular routes in the Zimmermann map, the red lines may denote railways or roadways. Nonetheless, the emigrant map serves its purpose of providing a simplified depiction of the major routes to outgoing European ports.

Major Inland Routes in America Portrayed in the Map

The first thing that comes to mind when viewing the American cities and towns in Zimmermann’s map is why some of these locations were chosen and not others. Many of the cities in the map were obvious choices given German immigration patterns since the early 1800s.

“The sheer volume of detailed information in the map … raises the question of how the mapmaker assembled it. What advertising and promotional materials could he draw on? Newspapers? Firsthand reports from sales agents or people who had already emigrated? Related guidebooks or maps? Train and ship schedules? In any case, the information conveyed by this map was part of a broader ecosystem of knowledge of varying reliability bound up with the experiences and agency of those who had made or would make the journey.” [29]

Zimmermann may have obtained information for his map from various sources. He may have utilized the information contained in other German emigration maps, newspapers, and popular German travel and immigration books as a reflection of accumulated knowledge of migration. Information on travel schedules and major shipping routes were readily available in German newsprint.

Zimmermann may have also relied on pocket travel guides that were published in America. Many guides contained multiple large scale maps. These travel guides and maps often provided detailed depictions of travel routes, such as bridges and tunnels that are not easily seen on other, larger maps.

“Probably the best (American) nineteenth century railroad maps were those which appeared in “pocket” travel guides. Appearing first in the 1840s, some were published monthly; others, semi-annually or annually, often under slightly changed names. … Each went through many editions.” [30]

The Zimmermann map highlighted the major American port cities of the mid 1800s like New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Baltimore and New Orleans. New York was major port of entry during the time period.

“Her connection with the interior was a prime cause of New York’s commercial supremacy, and the two together account for the growing favor shown her by immigrants. In the middle of the century Buffalo, Cleveland, and Milwaukee were the distributing points for those bound to the Northwest, and to reach these cities the Erie Canal and, after 1846, the railroad from New York to Buffalo were by far the quickest and the cheapest routes. For those bound to the Middle West, Wheeling, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, and St. Louis were the distributing points; and for reaching them New York offerred facilities as good as those from Philadelphia and better than those from Boston or Baltimore. New Orleans was favorably situated for such as were bound for the Mississippi Valley and she did receive a considerable number of immigrants; but the voyage was two or three weeks longer than to New York, the ships sailing thither from Europe were inferior, the journey up the Mississippi to St. Louis was unpleasant, dangerous, and little shorter than from New York, and above all, the dread of yellow fever and other maladies common among strangers in a southern climate combined to deter most Europeans from choosing that route.” [31]

The Zimmermann map also identifies inland cities in the midwest that were popular destinations for German immigrants. In the nineteenth century, German immigrants settled in Midwest, where land was available. Cities along the Great Lakes, the Ohio River, and the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers attracted a large German element. The Midwestern cities of Cleveland, Cincinnati, Fort Wayne, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, St. Louis, Chicago were favored destinations of German immigrants. The Northern Kentucky and Louisville area along the Ohio River were also a popular destinations.  Dubuque and Davenport, Iowa and Omaha, Nebraska, were also areas where Germans settled.  By 1850 there were 5,000 Germans in Ann Arbor, Michigan. [32]

The presence of smaller cities and towns on the Zimmermann map are a bit puzzling, perhaps due to my lack of knowledge of the history of the towns. Smaller inland towns like Guilford and Hanover in New Hampshire; Montpellier in Vermont; and the Maine towns of Portland, Waterville, Augusta and Paris are identified along red routes on the map. Perhaps these towns were noted on the map based on reports from earlier German migrants, earlier settlements or efforts by land developers to attract settlers. [33]

It is interesting to compare Zimmermann’s simplified, elegant emigrant map with a more detailed American map that shows canals, railroads, telegraph lines and principal stage routes. [34] If compare the transportation networks that existed in 1850 (see map seven) with the simplified ‘1853’ Zimmermann emigrant map (see map eight), one can see the transportation links with the above mentioned towns and cities in Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. All of these towns had rail connections.

Map Seven: Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine 1850 [35]

Map seven depicts railways, roadways, and waterways. As evident in the 1850 map, the towns highlighted in Zimmermann’s map are linked to other towns through railways, waterways and roadways.

Map Eight: Portion of Zimmermann’s Emigrant Map: Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine

Screenshot

Similar to my conclusion regarding what the red lines denote for travel paths on the European continent, I believe the red lines depicting travel routes to inland cities in the United States also represent ‘popular routes’ that are a combination of roadways, railways and waterways.

Comparing Transportation Networks in the 1953 Zimmermann Map and German Population Density in 1870

While this map was designed for the purpose of providing guidance to German immigrants for planning travel to the United States, it provided a ‘snapshot’ of the current state of affairs for German émigrés that traveled to America.

Railroads and waterways, natural and man made, had a significant influence on German immigration and settlement patterns in the United States during the 19th century. In the 1700s and early 1800s, a majority of German immigrants settled in cities and rural areas near the major ports on the eastern seacoast roadways and waterways increased their travel inward on the American continent. [36]

In the central part of America, many German immigrants initially settled in cities along major waterways like the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers, as these provided transportation routes into the frontier. Towns with large German populations developed along the Missouri River in the early to mid-1800s. [37]

The opening of the Ohio & Erie Canal in the 1830s attracted more German immigrants to settle in Cleveland and other cities in Ohio. Canals in general improved transportation and opened up new areas for settlement before railroads became dominant. [38]

Railroad construction in the mid to late 1800s enabled German immigrants to travel further inland to establish new settlements, especially in the Midwest. Many Germans worked as laborers to build the railroads. As railroads expanded, new waves of German immigrants arrived and often settled in areas that already had established German communities. However, the core areas of German settlement did not significantly expand, with the exception of a few new settlements along railroad lines in the 1870s-1880s. [39]

Railroads played a key role in the rapid growth of cities like Chicago, St. Louis and Milwaukee which developed large German populations in the late nineteenth century. There was a “German triangle” in the Midwest connected by rail between New York, Minneapolis, St. Louis and Baltimore where there was a concentration of German settlement.

While this pamphlet-sized map was designed for the purpose of providing guidance for planning travel to the United States, it provided a prescient future view of settlement patterns for subsequent generations of German-Americans. The significant influence on the history of American transportation networks on nineteenth century German immigration and settlement patterns is apparent if we compare Zimmermann’s map with density settlement patterns of Germans in 1870.


Title Page of 1870 CensusThe Statistics of the United States

Click for Larger View

“The 1870 census provided the nation with an astounding array of graphic and cartographic depictions of its state of geographic knowledge.” [40] A national atlas produced by the U.S. government was first realized in the Statistical Atlas issued by the Bureau of the Census with the 1870 census. The U.S. census had been transformed from a massive tabulating project to assist in apportioning Congressional representation among the states to a quantitative scientific accounting of numerous aspects of the nation’s many human geographies.

“Members of the fledgling American Geographical Society and American Statistical Society, including the geographer Daniel C. Gilman of Yale University, Samuel B. Ruggles of the American Geographical Society, and Edward Jarvis of the American Statistical Association, had attended meetings of the International Statistical Institute in Europe where new ideas concerning the graphic presentation of information were regularly discussed.” [41]

The 1870 census and its supplemental publications introduced more sophisticated capabilities for visualizing quantitative information, both graphically in charts and cartographically in thematic maps. The Census Office issued its first 1870 census thematic maps in its final reports, just before publishing the Statistical Atlas. These reports included a total of some twenty-six thematic maps.  [42] The atlas appeared as a complete volume in 1874.


Map nine is from the Ninth U.S. Census. It indicates the density of people of German descent living in the eastern half of the United States in 1870, twenty years after the publication of Zimmermann’s map. The 1870 U.S. Census map provides the population density patterns of people of German descent in the eastern portion of the United States. The U.S. Census map indicates that individuals of German descent are largely found along and above the Missouri and Ohio Rivers in the mid-west. The Mason-Dixon line appears to be an imaginary line for Germans settling in the United States. Individual of German descent are found in New York, Pennsylvania, parts of Massachusetts and Connecticut, the Great Lakes region above the Ohio River and along the Missouri River.

Map Nine: Density of German Population in U.S. in 1870

Click for Larger View | Source: A. de Witzleben, German Population 9th Census, Page 325, in Francis A Walker, Superintendent of Census, Ninth census – Volume I,  The Statistics of the Population of the United States, Washington, Government Printing Office, 1872,  Page 325, https://www.google.com/books/edition/Ninth_Census_volumes/0ngZm56S-7sC?hl=en&gbpv=1

It is interesting to compare the density patterns of the German population in 1870 with the transportation routes depicted in Zimmermann’s map. I abstracted the transportation routes of the Northeastern United States from the Zimmermann map and I tried to overlay both maps. The latitudinal and longitudinal scales of each map are different. I was unsuccessful in modifying the dimensions of each map to make them conform and consequently was unable to overlay both maps to provide a visual comparison. The image below graphically shows what I was attempting.

Illustration Three: Attempted Overlay of Zimmermann’s Map with 1870 U.S. Census Density Map of German Population

Click for Larger View

Despite my failure to meld and overlay both maps, if both maps are closely examined (maps ten and eleven), you can see that Germans ultimately settled along major transportation networks that existed in the 1850’s. Zimmermann’s map depicted the major transportation arteries to cities in the United States at this time. I have taken the northeastern portions of each map for comparison. In map eleven, I have highlighted in yellow the major routes in Zimmermann’s map that correspond with dense areas of German population in 1870.

Map Ten: Density of German Population in 1870 in North East and North Central United States

Click for Larger View

Map Eleven: Transportation Netweks Abstracted from Zimmermann’s Emigrant Map

The rapid development of rail lines and the pre-existing river transportation networks enabled and encouraged German immigrants to spread westward from initial entry points on the East Coast, concentrating in the Midwest and the Plains states that became the “German belt” in the 19th century. [43] The transportation infrastructure had a fundamental effect on the settlement patterns and density of German immigrant communities. [44]

German immigrants often traveled inland to the Midwest after arriving at ports like New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and New Orleans. They also to a lessor extent used the Mississippi, Ohio, and Missouri river systems to reach areas in the “German triangle” between Cincinnati, Milwaukee, and St. Louis where many of them settled. [45]

The expansion of railroads in the mid-1800s enabled German immigrants to more easily travel west from the East Coast to settle in the Midwest and establish farms. States in the “German belt” stretching from Pennsylvania to Oregon saw high concentrations of German settlement.

Cities along major waterways like the Great Lakes, Ohio River, and Mississippi River, such as Milwaukee, Cincinnati, St. Louis, and Chicago, became centers of large German-American populations in the 1800s. Access to both rail and water transportation supported rapid growth and industrialization in these areas.

A Map to Guide and a Map to Predict

Zimmermann’s map was a simple map that contained a wide range of information for German emigrants making their journey to America. While it served a very useful purpose in the 1850s, his map reflected the current outlines of the transportation infrastructure in Europe and the United States. It also provided a glimpse of the emerging graphic outline of the immigration patterns of where Germans and their families eventually settled in the United States.

Maps “record efforts to make sense of the world in physical terms. They capture what people knew, what they thought they knew, what they hoped for, and what they feared. They invest information with meaning by translating it into visual form, and in so doing reveal decisions about how the world ought to be seen. Above all, they demonstrate that the past was not just a chronological story but a spatial one as well. ” [46]

Sources

Feature banner: The banner is an amalgam of parts of the 1852-1853 immigration map that is discussed in the story.

Source: Gotthelf Zimmermann, Auswanderer-Karte und Wegweiser nach Nordamerika, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler’schen Buchh., 1853), Library of Congress Geography and Map Division, Washington, DC, http://www.loc.gov/resource/g3701e.ct000244

[1] Zimmermann, Gotthelf. Auswanderer-Karte und Wegweiser nach Nordamerika. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler’schen Buchh, 1853. Map. https://www.loc.gov/item/98687132/

[2] Ronald Grim discusses Grim, Ronald, Mapping Migration andSettlement, The Newberry, https://mappingmovement.newberry.org/mapping-migration/

For an interesting perspective on cartography andAmerican history, see: Mapping Movement, The Newberry, https://mappingmovement.newberry.org

[3] For example, a February 2024 Reddit discussion thread, titled “A German map of American ports and major cities, intended for use by travelers and immigrants to the United States, circa 1853. The German immigration wave to the US soared to then-record numbers around this time”, implies that the map had a substantial correlation with German migration to the United States. https://www.reddit.com/r/TheWayWeWere/comments/1ajwfvd/a_german_map_of_american_ports_and_major_cities/

Danzer, Gerald A. Danzer with James Akerman, American Railroad Maps, 1828 – 1876, The Newberry, https://mappingmovement.newberry.org/american-railroad-maps-1828-1876/

[4] Susan Schulten, A History of America in 100 Maps, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018, Page 9

[5] Schulten, Susan, How Maps Reveal, and Conceal, History, Progress: A Blog for American History, https://www.oah.org/process-blog/schulten-maps/

See also:

Susan Schulten, A History of America in 100 Maps, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018, Pages 138 – 239

[6] Kamphoefner, Walter D. “Immigrant Epistolary and Epistemology: On the Motivators and Mentality of Nineteenth-Century German Immigrants.” Journal of American Ethnic History, vol. 28, no. 3, 2009, pp. 34–54. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40543427

For a general review of research on German emigration and immigration, see Helbich, Wolfgang. “German Research on German Migration to the United States.” Amerikastudien / American Studies, vol. 54, no. 3, 2009, pp. 383–404. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41158447

See also:

Félix Krawatzek and Gwendolyn Sasse, Integration and Identities: The Effects of Time, Migrant Networks, and Political Crises on Germans in the United States. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 60(4), June 2018, 1029-1065. doi:10.1017/S0010417518000373 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/comparative-studies-in-society-and-history/article/abs/integration-and-identities-the-effects-of-time-migrant-networks-and-political-crises-on-germans-in-the-united-states/A5B951CA7AEB2C2C33958799C40FDDA2

See also other work of Krawatzek and Sasse where they developed a computer-aided textual analysis of about 6,000 letters sent between the US and Germany between 1830 and 1970. Their contents allowed the researchers to trace how migrants’ identities and transnational ties changed over the decades.  

Félix Krawatzek and Gwendolyn Sasse, Writing home: how German immigrants found their place in the US, February 18, 20016, The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/writing-home-how-german-immigrants-found-their-place-in-the-us-53342

Félix Krawatzek, Gwendolyn Sasse, The simultaneity of feeling German and being American: Analyzing 150 years of private migrant correspondence, Migration Studies, Volume 8, Issue 2, June 2020, Pages 161–188  https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mny014

Félix Krawatzek and Gwendolyn Sasse, Deciphering Migrants’ Letters, November 28, 2018, comparative Studies in Society and History, https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/cssh/tag/krawatzek/

Walter D. Kamphoefner, Wolfgang Helbich, et al., Editors., News from the Land of Freedom: German Immigrants Write Home (Documents in American Social History) : Cornell University Press, 1991.

Karl Dargel, Tyler Hoerr, Petar Milijic,  Economic Migration: Tracing Chain Migration through Migrant Letters in an Economic Framework, Global Histories, Special Issue (Feb 2019) Pages 19 -30

Moltmann, Günter. “Migrations from Germany to North America: New Perspectives.” Reviews in American History, vol. 14, no. 4, 1986, pp. 580–96. JSTORhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2702202 Accessed 26 Sept. 2023.

Helbich, Wolfgang. “German Research on German Migration to the United States.” Amerikastudien / American Studies, vol. 54, no. 3, 2009, pp. 383–404. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/41158447Accessed 26 Sept. 2023.

[7] Kamphoefner, Walter D. “Immigrant Epistolary and Epistemology: On the Motivators and Mentality of Nineteenth-Century German Immigrants.” Journal of American Ethnic History, vol. 28, no. 3, 2009, pp. 48. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40543427

[8] Barkin, Kenneth. “Ordinary Germans, Slavery, and the U.S. Civil War.” The Journal of African American History, vol. 93, no. 1, 2008, pp. 70–79. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20064257

Raphael-Hernandez, H., & Wiegmink, P. (2017). German entanglements in transatlantic slavery: An introduction. Atlantic Studies14(4), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2017.1366009

Anderson, Kristen Layne, Abolitionizing Missouri: German Immigrants and Racial Ideology in Nineteenth-Century America (Antislavery, Abolition, and the Atlantic World),Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Press, 2016

Efford, Alison Clark, “German Immigrants and the Arc of Reconstruction Citizenship in the United States, 1865-1877” (2010). Hist or y F aculty Research and Publications. 285.
https://epublications.marquette.edu/hist_fac/285

Biesele, Rudolph, German Attitude Toward the Civil War, Sep 1, 1995, Texas State Historical Association, https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/german-attitude-toward-the-civil-war

[9] Schulten, Susan, How Maps Reveal, and Conceal, History, Progress: A Blog for American History, https://www.oah.org/process-blog/schulten-maps/

[10] J.B. Metzler, Wikipedia, Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am 18. März 2024, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.B._Metzler

“Der J.B. Metzler Verlag ist ein traditionsreicher geisteswissenschaftlicher Verlag. Gegründet 1682, ist er einer der ältesten Verlage Deutschlands überhaupt. Verlagsort ist Stuttgart.”

The J.B. Metzler Verlag is a traditional humanities publisher. Founded in 1682, it is one of the oldest publishing houses in Germany. Publishing place is Stuttgart.

J.B. Metzle Publishing Website , https://www.metzlerverlag.de/der-verlag/verlagsprofil

[11] This is pointed out by Mark R. Stoneman in “An 1853 Map for German-Speaking Emigrants,” Migrant Knowledge, January 30, 2022, https://migrantknowledge.org/2022/01/30/an-1853-map-for-german-speaking-emigrants/

[12] Leipziger Zeitung, No. 218, Friday, September 10, 1852  Page 4329. https://www.google.com/books/edition/_/iPxjAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA4329&dq=%22Auswanderer-Karte+und+Wegweiser+nach+Nordamerika%22

[13] Kempter Zeitung, Mar 12 1854, No. 62   Page 254 , https://www.google.com/books/edition/Kemptner_Zeitung/ScVDAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=kemptner%20zeitung%201854&pg=PA254&printsec=frontcover

[14] This is pointed out by Mark R. Stoneman in “An 1853 Map for German-Speaking Emigrants,” Migrant Knowledge, January 30, 2022, https://migrantknowledge.org/2022/01/30/an-1853-map-for-german-speaking-emigrants/

Heinsius, W. (1858). Allgemeines Bücher-Lexikon oder vollständiges alphabetisches Verzeichnis aller … erschienenen Bücher, welche in Deutschland und in den durch Sprache und Literatur damit verwandten Ländern gedruckt worden sind. Germany: Brockhaus. Volume 12 https://www.google.com/books/edition/Allgemeines_Bücher_Lexikon_oder_vollst/4G6LLUh1isUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Auswanderer-Karte+und+Wegweiser+nach+Nordamerika%22&pg=PA519&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=%22Auswanderer-Karte%20und%20Wegweiser%20nach%20Nordamerika%22&f=false

[15] Textualis, also known as textura or Gothic bookhand, was the most formal and calligraphic form of blackletter script, widely used for book production in Western Europe from the 12th to 15th centuries. Textualis was most widely used in France, the Low Countries, England, and Germany.

Blackletter, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 30 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackletter

[16] Fraktur, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraktur

Draper, Kelly, Fraktur Basics, Aug 17, Backlog Achivists and Historians, https://www.backlog-archivists.com/blog/fraktur

The History of Old German Cursive Alphabet and typefaces, German Girl in America Blog, https://germangirlinamerica.com/old-german-cursive-alphabet-and-typefaces/

German Fraktur Alphabet

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is fraktur-alhabet-718x1024.jpg
Click for Larger View | Source: Old German Fraktur Letter Key, Resource: Dowloads, Project Ancestry,  https://www.projectancestry.com/downloads

Fraktur, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraktur

[17] “Die Entfernung zwischen Europa und Amerika ist im Berhältnisz weit gröszer, als durch die Zeichnung dargestellt werden konnte. Wegen Raumersparnisz muszten hier die beiden Welttheille zusammegerückt werden.”

[18] “Rheinisch” means “Rhenish” and refers to the Rhineland area. So “Kreuzer rheinisch” specifies Kreuzer coins minted and used in the Rhineland currency system. In the Rhineland region of Germany, 1 Gulden was typically equal to 60 Kreuzer. In the 18th century, common larger denominations included the Reichsthaler (worth 90 Kreuzer rheinisch), the Gulden (60 Kreuzer rheinisch), and the Batzen (4 Kreuzer rheinisch).

The following provides a brief discussion of the currencies mentioned in the map.

“From 1837: the Prussia-led Zollverein customs union led to a more vigorous transition into the Prussian currency standard, with North German thalers being replaced by lower-valued Prussian thalers worth 14 to a Cologne Mark of fine silver (or 16.704 g), and with each thaler now divided into 30 silbergroschen. The Prussian thaler was also fixed at 134 South German gulden.”

Thaler, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 February 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thaler

The Rhenish kreuzer was a common small silver coin used for centuries in the Rhineland and nearby regions of Germany, with its value defined relative to larger units like the albus, groschen, and gulden. The kreuzer’s role was as a convenient everyday coin for smaller transactions.

The Taler – the Trade Currency of the 16th Century, Money Museum, https://moneymuseum.com/pdf/yesterday/05_Modern_Times/01%2804%29%20The%20Taler%20the%20Trade%20Currency%20of%20the%2016th%20Century.pdf

Albus (coin), Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 10 November 2023  , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albus_%28coin%29

South German gulden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 August 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_German_gulden

Medieval Currencies, Money Museum, https://www.moneymuseum.com/pdf/yesterday/04_Middle_Ages/19%20Medieval%20Currencies.pdf

“In the German-speaking world, the groschen was usually worth 12 pfennigs … The later  Kreuzer, a coin worth 4 pfennigs arose from the linguistic abbreviation of the small Kreuzgroschen.”

Groschen, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 6 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groschen

[19] Comparative-Time Table, Showing the Time at the Principal Cities of the United States, compared with Noon at Washington, D. C., 1868, Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum, http://cprr.org/Museum/Ephemera/Comparative_TT_1868.html

[20] Atack, Jeremy & Bateman, Fred & Margo, Robert. The Transportation Revolution Revisited: Towards a New Mapping of America’s Transportation Network in the 19th Century. Uploaded 12 Jan 2015, preliminary paper, ResearchGate,  Footnote 27, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Railroad-Network-in-1850-1860-1870-and-1880-Mapped-Against-1860_fig3_267239718

[21] The major railroads took it upon themselves to solve the problems caused by the jumble of local times. By collectively adopting a standard time zone system in 1883, they paved the way for the nationwide standardization of time.

Time Zone, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_zone

Railway Time, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 January 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railway_time

History of Time in the United States, This page was last edited on 6 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_time_in_the_United_States

Barass, Karen, Time Zone Origins, Infoplease, Aug 24, 2020, https://www.infoplease.com/calendars/history/time-zone-origins

Standardizing time: Railways and electric telegraph, 4 Oct 2018, sciencemuseum.org,

When the Standardization of Time Advanced in America, Dec 19, 2016, Smithsonian, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonian-institution/how-standardization-time-changed-american-society-180961503/

Buckle, Ann, Why Do We have Time Zones, timeanddate, https://www.timeanddate.com/time/time-zones-history.html

[22] Disturnell, John, Disturnell’s railroad, steamboat and telegraph book being a guide through the United States and Canada : also giving the ocean steam packet arrangements, telegraph lines and charges, list of hotels, &c. : with a map of the United States and Canada showing all the canals, railroads, &c, July 1851, New York: J. Disturnell, Page 43, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/100280015/Home

For a fairly complete list of John Distunrell’s books, see: Online Books by John Disturnell, https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupname?key=Disturnell%2C%20John%2C%201801%2D1877

[23] Ibid, Page One

[24] Paris-Est–Strasbourg-Ville railway, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 June 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris-Est–Strasbourg-Ville_railway

Direction Générale des Ponts et Chaussées et des Chemins de Fer, Statistique centrale des chemins de fer. Chemins de fer français. Situation au 31 décembre 1869 (in French). Paris: Ministère des Travaux Publics, 1869, pp. 146–160

[25] Atack, Jeremy & Bateman, Fred & Margo, Robert. The Transportation Revolution Revisited: Towards a New Mapping of America’s Transportation Network in the 19th Century. Uploaded 12 Jan 2015, preliminary paper, ResearchGate,  Page 15, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Railroad-Network-in-1850-1860-1870-and-1880-Mapped-Against-1860_fig3_267239718

[26] Modified version of Map originally from ULamm, France1860railways.png, 24 Aug 2009, Wikimedia Commons, This page was last edited on 8 June 2022 , https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:France1860railways.png

[27] The map is a portion of the map: Figure 3-bis: Postal roads and main cities and towns in 1833 in Verdier, Micolas and Anne Bretagnolle. Expanding the Network of Postal Routes in France 1708-1833. histoire des réseaux postaux en Europe du XVIIIe au XXIe siècle, May 2007, Paris, France. pp.159 – 175. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00144669/document

[28] Boyd, James D., An Investigation into the Structural Causes of German-American Mass Migration in the Nineteenth Century, Submitted for the award of PhD, History, Cardiff University 2013, Page 123 https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/47612/1/2013boydjdphd.pdf

[29] Mark R. Stoneman, “An 1853 Map for German-Speaking Emigrants,” Migrant Knowledge, January 30, 2022, https://migrantknowledge.org/2022/01/30/an-1853-map-for-german-speaking-emigrants/

[30] Atack, Jeremy & Bateman, Fred & Margo, Robert. The Transportation Revolution Revisited: Towards a New Mapping of America’s Transportation Network in the 19th Century. Uploaded 12 Jan 2015, preliminary paper, ResearchGate, Page 20  https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Railroad-Network-in-1850-1860-1870-and-1880-Mapped-Against-1860_fig3_267239718

[31] Page, Thomas W. “The Transportation of Immigrants and Reception Arrangements in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 19, no. 9, 1911, pp. 736. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1820349

[32] German Americans, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 17 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Americans

[33] Maine nor New Hampshire were top destinations. There were a couple notable German immigrant communities established there by the mid-1800s, especially in Waldoboro, Maine which retained its German heritage. Between 1740 and 1753, approximately 1,500 Germans immigrated to what was then known as Broad Bay Plantation (now Waldoboro, Maine). They were recruited by Samuel Waldo with promises of land, funding, and freedom.

By the mid-1800s, Waldoboro was one of the only two named German settlements in Maine according to Traugott Bromme’s emigrant guidebook, the other being Biddeford. In addition to Waldoboro, some other Maine towns were named after German hometowns by early settlers, such as Hanover, Bremen, and Dresden.

German Jews also immigrated to Maine, arriving in Bangor as early as 1829 and establishing the Bangor Hebrew Center in 1839. The Congregation Ahawas Achim was founded there in 1849.

Bland, L., Traugott Bromme and the State of Maine, Maine History, Jan 1 2015, Volume 49, Number ! The Maine Melting Pot, Page 102 – 112, https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1126&context=mainehistoryjournal

The Germans of Waldoboro, Meander Maine, https://meandermaine.com/tale/the-germans-of-waldoboro/

German Americans, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 17 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Americans

Welcome to Documenting Maine Jewry, a collaborative history and genealogy of Maine’s vibrant Jewish communities, https://mainejews.org

Maine Historical Society, Copy of a plan of lands on the west side of Madomack River, Waldoboro, 1774, Maine Memory Network, https://www.mainememory.net/record/102767

400 Years Waldo Patent and German immigrants, Maine Memory Network, https://www.mainememory.net/sitebuilder/site/2623/slideshow/1635/display?format=list&prev_object=page&prev_object_id=4227&use_mmn=1

Thompson, Garret W., The Germans in Maine (Waldoboro’, Lincoln County, Maine), http://files.usgwarchives.net/me/lincoln/waldoboro/settlers/german/sj5p140.txt

[34] Disturnell’s New Map of the United States and Canada Showing all the Canals, Rails Roads, Telegraph Lines and principal Stage Routes, Drawn by Henry A Burr, New York: J. Disturnell, 1850, Online Library of Congress: https://www.loc.gov/item/98685344/

Disturnell’s 1850 Map

[35] The map is a blown up portion of “Disturnell’s New Map of the United States and Canada” that focuses on Vermont, New Hampshire, and Maine. I have added the legend from the original map to provide an idea of what each of the types of lines represent. I have also indicated where each of the towns that Zimmermann identified in his map are located on Disturnell’s map.

Other American Maps that can be used to provide comparisons with Zimmermann’s map are mentioned below. Distunell’s map, however, is a excellent map to utilize since it portrays road, rail and waterways.:

Historic Railroad Map Of The Northeastern United States – 1853 https://www.worldmapsonline.com/historic-railroad-map-of-the-northeastern-united-states-1853

Goldthwait, J. H., Railroad map of New England & eastern New York complied from the most authentic sources, Boston : Redding & Co. ; New York : Clark, Austin & Co., 1849, Library of Congress, Library of Congress Control Number 98688377, https://lccn.loc.gov/98688377

Snow & Wilder, Hitchcock, DeWitt C., Map of railways in New England and part of New York; Boston, [1847] engraved by D. C. Hitchcock for the Pathfinder Railway Guide, Library of Congress Control Number 98688376, Library of Congress, https://lccn.loc.gov/98688376

[36] Rudolph Vecoli, European Americans: From Immigrants to Ethnics, Section I : Immigrants, Ethnics, Americans, Cleveland Ethnic Heritage Studies, Press Books, Cleveland State University 1976. https://pressbooks.ulib.csuohio.edu/ethnicity/chapter/european-americans-from-immigrants-to-ethnics/

James Boyd in his Introduction to his PhD Dissertation , The Limits to Structural Explanation, provides a good overview of the historical approaches that have been used for explaining German migration to America, see: 

James D. Boyd, An Investigation into the Structural Causes of German-American Mass Migration in the Nineteenth Century, Submitted for the award of PhD, History, Cardiff University 2013, https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/47612/1/2013boydjdphd.pdf

Helbich, Wolfgang. “German Research on German Migration to the United States.” Amerikastudien / American Studies, vol. 54, no. 3, 2009, pp. 383–404. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/41158447

Günter Moltmann, “Migrations from Germany to North America: New Perspectives.” Reviews in American History, vol. 14, no. 4, 1986, pp. 580–96. JSTORhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2702202

Marianne S. Wokeck, Trade in Strangers: The Beginnings of Mass Migration to North America, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999

Häberlein, Mark. “German Migrants in Colonial Pennsylvania: Resources, Opportunities, and Experience.” The William and Mary Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 3, 1993, pp. 555–74. JSTORhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2947366

Philip Otterness, Becoming German, The 1709 Palatine Migration to New York, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004

Donna Merwick, Possessing Albany, 1630-1710: The Dutch and English Experiences, Cambridge, 1990

Thomas Burke, Mohawk Frontier: The Dutch Community of Schenectady, New York 1660-1710, Ithaca, 1991, Page 213

Natalie Zemon Dennis, Cultivating a Landscape of Peace: Iroquois-European Encounters in the Seventeenth-century America, Ithaca, 1993

Francis Jennings, Ambiguous Iroquois Empire, New York, 1984

The Palatine Germans, The National Park Service, Updated October 8, 2022 https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/the-palatine-germans.htm

Aaron Spencer Fogleman, Hopeful Journeys: German Immigration, Settlement and Political Culture in Colonial America, 1717-1775, Philadelphia: University of pennsylvania Press 1996

Philip Otterness, Becoming German, The 1709 Palatine Migration to New York,Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004

Cobb, Sanford Hoadley. The Story of the Palatines: An Episode in Colonial History. United Kingdom, G. P. Putnam’s sons, 1897. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Story_of_the_Palatines/eUgjAAAAMAAJ?hl=en

Brink, Benjamin Myer. “The Palatine Settlements” Proceedings of the New York State Historical Association, vol. 11, 1912, pp. 136–43. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42889955. Accessed 27 May 2023.

Ellsworth, Wolcott Webster. “The Palatines in the Mohawk Valley.” Proceedings of the New York State Historical Association, vol. 14, 1915, pp. 295–311. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42890044. Accessed 27 May 2023.

Diefendorf, Mary Riggs. The Historic Mohawk. United Kingdom, Putnam, 1910. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Historic_Mohawk/ziIVAAAAYAAJ?hl=en

Benton, Nathaniel Soley. A History of Herkimer County: Including the Upper Mohawk Valley, from the Earliest Period to the Present Time ; with a Brief Notice of the Iroquois Indians, the Early German Tribes, the Palatine Immigrations Into the Colony of New York, and Biographical Sketches of the Palatine Families, the Patentees of Burnetsfield in the Year 1725 ; and Also Biographical Notices of the Most Prominent Public Men of the County ; with Important Statistical Information. United States, J. Munsell, 1856. https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_History_of_Herkimer_County/G1IOAAAAIAAJ?hl=en

[37] Burnett and Ken Luebbering, German Settlement in Missouri: New Land, Old Ways, Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1996

[38] Hungerford, Edward. “Early railroads of New York” New York History, vol. 13, no. 1, 1932, pp. 75–89. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24469729 

Ellis, David Maldwyn, “Rivalry between the New York central and the Erie Canal” New York History, vol. 29, no. 3, 1948, pp. 268–300. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43460288 

Rapp, Marvin A., “New York’s Trade on the Great Lakes, 1800 -1840.” New York History, vol. 39, no. 1, 1958, pp. 22–33. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23153562 

Fairlie, John A. “The New York Canals.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 14, no. 2, 1900, pp. 212–39. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1883769 

North, Edward P. “The Erie Canal and Transportation.” The North American Review, vol. 170, no. 518, 1900, pp. 121–33. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25104942 

Whitford, Noble E. “Effects of the Erie Canal on New York History.” The Quarterly Journal of the New York State Historical Association, vol. 7, no. 2, 1926, pp. 84–95. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43566182 

Jackson, Harry F., “The Erie Canal.” Scholar in the Wilderness: Francis Adrian Van Der Kemp, Syracuse University Press, 1963, pp. 268–82. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv64h7kc.25 

Shaw, Ronald E. “Canals in the Early Republic: A Review of Recent Literature.” Journal of the Early Republic, vol. 4, no. 2, 1984, pp. 117–42. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3122718

Burd, Camden. “A New, Historic Canal: The Making of an Erie Canal Heritage Landscape.” IA. The Journal of the Society for Industrial Archeology, vol. 42, no. 2, 2016, pp. 23–34. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26643089

[39] Gerlach, Russel, The German Presence in the Ozarks, OzarksWatch, Vol III, No.1, Summer 1989, https://thelibrary.org/lochist/periodicals/ozarkswatch/ow301h.htm Page, Thomas W. “The Transportation of Immigrants and Reception Arrangements in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 19, no. 9, 1911, pp. 736. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/1820349 .

Reinhard Wittmann, Ein Verlag und seine Geschichte: Dreihundert Jahre J. B. Metzler Stuttgart (Stuttgart: J. B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1982), 411. 

Dolindel, Sonja, , Off to New York ! A story of immigration in the 19th century in pictures, 16.12.2021, Kultur und Wissen online, Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek, https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/content/blog/ab-nach-new-york-eine-geschichte-der-auswanderung-im-19-jahrhundert-bildern?lang=en

Zimmermann, Gotthelf. Auswanderer-Karte und Wegweiser nach Nordamerika. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler’schen Buchh, 1853. Map. https://www.loc.gov/item/98687132/ 

[40] Dahmann, Donald C., Presenting the Nation’s Cultural Geography, General Maps Collection, Articles and Essays, Nationals Atlases. Library of Congress, https://web.archive.org/web/20201109045038/https://www.loc.gov/collections/general-maps/articles-and-essays/national-atlases/presenting-the-nations-cultural-georgraphy/

[41] Ibid, Dahmann, Donald C., Presenting the Nation’s Cultural Geography

[42] A. de Witzleben, German Population 9th Census, Page 325, in Francis A Walker, Superintendent of Census, Ninth census – Volume I,  The Statistics of the Population of the United States, Washington, Government Printing Office, 1872 https://www.google.com/books/edition/Ninth_Census_volumes/0ngZm56S-7sC?hl=en&gbpv=1

For a 1890 version, see: Gannett, Henry, 50. Density of Distribution of the Natives of the Germanic Nations, Plate 20, Statistical atlas of the United States, based upon the results of the eleventh census, United States. Census office. 11th census, 1890 https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3701gm.gct00010/?sp=40

[43] The “German belt” refers to the region of the United States where large numbers of German immigrants settled in the 19th century, especially from the 1840s to early 1900s. This area stretched from Pennsylvania across the Midwest to the Great Plains states. It included states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Kansas, and parts of the Dakotas. The highest concentrations were in the Upper Midwest.

[44] Midwestern United States, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 15 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midwestern_United_States

[45] Kamphoefner, Walter, The German Component to American Industrialization, Jan 27, 2014, Immigrant Entrepreneurship: 1720 to the Present, , German Historical Institute, http://www.immigrantentrepreneurship.org/entries/the-german-component-to-american-industrialization/

Bergquist, James M. “German Communities in American Cities: An Interpretation of the Nineteenth-Century Experience.” Journal of American Ethnic History, vol. 4, no. 1, 1984, pp. 9–30. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/27500350

[46] Schulten, Susan ,A History of America in 100 Maps, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018, Page 8