Johann Wolfgang Sperber – Part Four: Heading to Fulton County and Glove Making

This is part four of a story about Johann Wolfgang Sperber immigrating to the United States. This part of the story discusses the possible influences that drew Johann Sperber to Fulton County, New York. We do not have direct evidence to explain why Johan Sperber ended up specifically in Gloversville, Fulton County, New York. However, we have indirect historical evidence that may offer clues as to why he ultimately chose Fulton county as his new home.


Six Part Story

The first of this story provides an overview of the family legacy John Sperber established in his new homeland, an historical background on where John was from in Baden, Germany, the influences on his migration to the United States, and the historical evidence of his departure and arrival to America.

The second part of John Sperber’s story describes his journey from Baden-Baden to Le Havre based on historical evidence and historical accounts.

The third part of the story assesses the three major inland pathways to European ports that John had options to consider. Since it is not absolutely certain the ship manifest list for the Germania reflect our John Sperber, I have provided historical background on the relative accessibility of the three major routes John may have taken to make his voyage to the United States. 

The fifth part of the story covers his travel to New York City and his options to travel to Gloversville, Fulton County, New York.

The sixth part of the story covers his establishing a new life and family in the Johnstown and Gloversville, New York area. This is the end of a rather long story that attempts to provide not only a discussion of the available ‘facts’ we have of Johann and his family but also provide a broader social and historical context in which he made this journey from Baden to New York state. Like a song, some of the ‘facts’ are a refrain from prior parts of the story.


Why did Johann Sperber end up in Fulton County, in New York state? I have addressed general aspects of this question in prior parts of this story. We can specifically look at this question in terms of three nested questions that start from a general question to a regional question and then to a specific geographical question.

The first question is why Johann landed in New York City. The second question is why did he head to the Mohawk valley. The third question is why did he specifically end up in the Gloversville – Johnstown area in Fulton County

Le Havre to New York City

Johann’s arrival in New York city is substantiated by information found on the Germania ship manifest . In previous parts to this story, it was also substantiated with historical facts that Germans from the Grand Duchy of Baden had a long history of migrating to the Mohawk valley in New York state. In addition, since 1830 New York city was “the gateway of the nation” for the vast majority of Germans immigrating to America.

New York City served as the gateway not only to the Empire State but to an entire region. Included in its hinterland was northern Ohio, which was mainly settled by the Erie canal and Great Lakes route… . [1]

“The most important ports of arrival in the United States were New York, from which the immigrants dispersed via Albany and Troy throughout the western part of the country, and Baltimore and New Orleans, from which they reached the Mississippi.” (emphasis added) [2]

“(New York city’s) connection with the interior was a prime cause of New York’s commercial supremacy,. … In the middle of the century Buffalo, Cleveland, and Milwaukee were the distributing points for those bound to the Northwest, and to reach these cities the Erie Canal and, after 1846, the railroad from New York to Buffalo were by far the quickest and the cheapest routes.[3]

Johann was one of many Germans who sailed to New York city in 1852. If we were to look at the place of origin of male individuals arriving in the United States the year Johann arrived (see table one), German males from the various German states represented one of the two largest groups to migrated to American in 1852. Men from Ireland and Germany represented almost three quarters of all males entering the United States in 1852.

Table One: Place of Birth of Males Arriving in the United States 1852

Place of BirthNumberPercentageCumulative
Percentage
Ireland8571536.636.6
German States84,20535.972.5
England17,3117.479.9
Scotland4,7332.081.9
France2,5711.183.0
Returning
Americans
23,0539.892.8
Other Countries16,8477.2
Total234,435100.0
Source: 1850 U.S. Census,Table LXXI – Nativities of Passengers Arriving in the United States, Year ending December 31, 1852, Nativities of passengers arriving in U.S. Year ending in 1852, Nativities of the Population of the United States, Births, Marriages, and Deaths, Classification of Ages, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1850/1850a/1850a-13.pdf

New York City to the Mohawk Valley

Why did Johann gravitate to the Mohawk valley rather than simply stay in New York city or migrate to Ohio or other locations in America? Johann’s journey to the Mohawk valley is perhaps due to the influences of the migration decisions of past generations and his contemporaries in Baden, the contours of transportation networks in New York state and the economic prospects of the time.

The Baden area, from where Johann lived, had a rich and long history of migration to the Mohawk valley in New York state. This intergenerational tradition reaches back into the late 1600s and 1700s. 

“In the eighteenth century, more than 100,000 migrants left the south-west German regions of the Electoral Palatinate, Kraichgau, Baden-Durlach, and Duchy of Württemberg, as well as neighbouring Alsace and the Swiss cantons, in order to cross the Atlantic.” (emphasis is mine) [4]

The Kraichgau region and Baden Durlach were areas in the eighteenth century where generations of the Fliegel and Sperber families possibly resided. Individuals from these areas along the Rhine River, migrated to the Mohawk valley in the 1700s. While the route getting to America may have been different, there may have been a strong likelihood to follow the ‘guiding star’ of tradition (oral or written) that lead him to the ‘Palatine’ area along the Mohawk River in New York state.

The inland flow and direction of migration patterns of German migration in New York state were largely determined by the natural topological contours of the state. The natural path between New York city and Albany and westward from Albany had been firmly established since the early 1700s, (see map one). The Hudson river valley provided a natural topographical pathway between New York city and the Albany – Schenectady area. The Mohawk River Valley, running east and west, cuts a natural path between the Catskill Mountains to the south and the Adirondack Mountains to the north.

Map One: Topological Map of New York State

Click for Larger View | Source: 3D render of a topographic map of New York. All source data is in the public domain. SRTM data courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey (https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/search/granules?p=C1000000240-LPDAAC_ECS&pg[0][v]=f&pg[0][gsk]=-start_date&q=srtm%201%20arc&tl=1640787673!3!!&m=11.7421875!-80.859375!2!1!0!0%2C2). Map rendered using QGIS and Blender software.

While a few rough roads existed, the Hudson and Mohawk Rivers were the primary transportation arteries in the 1700s. Along with the two waterways, major roads following the two rivers were established in the 1600s based on Indian pathways. They continued to be used and upgraded through the time that Johann arrived: the Albany Post Road and the Mohawk Turnpike. Another road that paralleled the Mohawk Turnpike was on the southern side of the Mohawk river. There was also the was the Great Western Turnpike. [5]

Map Two: Travel By Road: Albany Post Road & Mohawk Trail (Fulton County Highlighted)

Click for Larger View | Dilts, David, Map of the Albany Post Road from New York City to Albany, New York, and connecting migration routes, 24 June 2011, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/File:Albany_Post_Road_map.png

The Albany Post Road, also known as the “Queen’s Road,” and later the “King’s Road” existed since 1669. The road connected the colonial seaport of New York City (then called New Amsterdam) with the fur trading outpost, and, at that time, the second-largest city of Albany (Beverwijck). Each end of the road at New York City and Albany was a nexus of other significant migration routes. (see map two). The Albany Post Road followed along the east side of the Hudson River and was about 150 miles (241 km) long. However, in 1806 competing turnpike routes lessened the traffic on the old route. By 1850 railroads had made the Albany Post Road obsolete and stagecoach service stopped. [6]

“A private company built the Highlands Turnpike to the west, in more level country, and opened it in 1806. This diverted traffic away from the section north of Peekskill through Continental Village and past the lakes. Iron mining at Hopper Lake in the 1820s partially replaced it, and the stage route was not changed. The old road fell into further disuse when the turnpike became a public highway in 1833 and it was no longer needed as a shunpike. The completion of the Hudson River Railroad to Albany in 1850 made the road obsolete as a commercial and postal artery, and stage service ended.” [7]

As a main artery through the Mohawk Valley, the Mohawk Turnpike was critical in facilitating the massive westward migration of settlers in the early nineteenth century before canals and railroads took over the bulk of long-distance transportation. The turnpike ran about 95 miles from Schenectady to Rome, NY, paralleling the Mohawk River and providing an overland route through the Mohawk Valley. [8]

The turnpike developed from old Mohawk Indian trails and was also known as part of the Iroquois Trail that ran from Albany to Buffalo. Its improvement in the early 1800s made it the favored route for westward travel. In 1811, stagecoach lines ran day and night over the turnpike from Albany to Buffalo, completing the trip in just 3 days with frequent horse changes. This enabled more rapid migration. Traffic on the turnpike began to diminish after the opening of the Erie Canal in 1825, but it continued to be used heavily in the winter months when the canal was closed. [9]

Map three illustrates the network of waterways from New York city to the Johnstown-Gloversville area (highlighted in yellow). From a transportation infrastructure perspective, Johann took the same route as did those from Baden before him. Except he had three avenues of travel: road, water and rail. Immigrants in the early 1800s would have traveled by steamboat up the Hudson River or traveled on roads along the river from New York City to Albany. By the 1830s-1850s, railroads and turnpikes became the preferred modes of travel as transportation infrastructure rapidly improved during the transportation revolution of the nineteenth century.

Once in the ‘capital city area’ of Albany, Schenectady, and Troy, the confluence of roadways heading north and south and west were critical in facilitating the massive westward migration of settlers in the early nineteenth century before canals and railroads took over the bulk of long-distance transportation. The improvements of the roadways enabled hundreds of thousands to more easily make the journey from the eastern seaboard into the Great Lakes region and beyond.

Map Three: The Hudson and Mohawk River Valleys Johnstown-Gloversville Area

Click for Larger View | Source: Greene, Nelson, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Volume I, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Page 19, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/maps/hudson_valley_map.html

The map: “Showing also the rivers of northeast New Jersey, which empty into the mouth of the Hudson, and towns over 50,000 on these streams. The mountains bordering the Hudson valley are also indicated. Only New York state towns having city charters, lying in the Hudson valley, the Mohawk being the chief tributary of the Hudson.[10]

The Origins of Fulton County

Map Four: Mohawk River and Settlements in 1777 – Tryon County, Province of New York

Click for Larger View
Source: Blown up section of Sauthier, Claude Joseph, Bernard Ratzer, and William Faden. A map of the Province of New-York, reduc’d from the large drawing of that Province, compiled from actual surveys by order of His Excellency William Tryon, Esqr., Captain General & Governor of the same, by Claude Joseph Sauthier; to which is added New-Jersey London, Wm. Faden, 1776. Map.

Prior to the eighteenth century, the lands that would become Fulton County were used by the Mohawk Indians as hunting and fishing grounds. In the early 1700s, the first European settlers, mostly German Palatines, started arriving and tilling the rich soil in the western regions. [11]

Map Five: Mohawk Indian Towns 1580 – 1779

Click for Larger View | Greene, Nelson, Chapter 103: Mohawk Manufacturing Statistics, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925 Volume 1 Page 140

Map Six: Tryon County (Highlighted) 1777

Click for Larger View | Source: Sauthier, Claude Joseph, Bernard Ratzer, and William Faden. A map of the Province of New-York, reduc’d from the large drawing of that Province, compiled from actual surveys by order of His Excellency William Tryon, Esqr., Captain General & Governor of the same, by Claude Joseph Sauthier; to which is added New-Jersey
. London, Wm. Faden, 1776. Map. https://www.loc.gov/item/74692643/

In 1753, the Kingsborough Patent [12] , containing parts of present-day Johnstown, Mayfield and Ephratah, was purchased by Sir William Johnson, a prominent British colonial official. It was originally part of Albany County, a county in the colonial province of New York in the British American colonies. In 1772, at Johnson’s urging, this area became part of the newly formed Tryon County, with Johnstown as the county seat. After the American Revolution, Tryon County was renamed Montgomery County in 1784. (See maps five and six). [13]

As western migration took place, this large Montgomery County soon became sub divided into new counties with their own county seats. In 1789, Ontario County was split off from Montgomery. The area of the new county was much larger than the present Ontario County, as it included the present Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua, Erie, Genesee, Livingston, Monroe, Niagara, Orleans, Steuben, Wyoming, Yates, and part of Schuyler and Wayne counties. In 1791, Herkimer, Otsego, and Tioga counties were split off from Montgomery. In 1802, portions of Clinton, Herkimer, and Montgomery counties were combined to form St. Lawrence County. In 1816, Hamilton County was split off from Montgomery county.

The operation of the new Erie Canal and the building of new roads along the river attracted new settlements to the Mohawk Valley and population growth soared in that area of the county south and southwest of Johnstown.

Map Seven: Montgomery County 1829

Click for Larger View | Source: Bur, David H., Montgomery County, Atlas Map, New York: D.H.Burr, Page 17, 1829 https://www.davidrumsey.com/luna/servlet/detail/RUMSEY~8~1~20020~510016:Map-of-the-County-of-Montgomery—B#

Because of this shift in the population center, the people in the Mohawk Valley area petitioned the New York State Legislature to have the county seat of Montgomery County transferred to Fonda, New York  This was approved in 1836.

The relocation of the county seat from Johnstown to Fonda created a groundswell of resentment from citizens living in Johnstown area and on the north side of the Mohawk river. A petition was made to the New York Legislature to have the county divided into two counties. On April 18, 1838, this request was approved and the northern half of the divided county was named Fulton County after Robert Fulton of steamship and Erie Canal fame and Johnstown once again became a county seat. [14]

Map seven depicts the town boundaries within Fulton county after the split. The county was composed of nine towns: Stratford, Oppenheim, Carugao, Ephrayah, Blecker, Johnstown, Mayfield, North Ampton, Broadalbin and Perth.

Map Seven: Fulton County New York

Click for Larger View | Nichols, B, H.B. Stanahan, W.A. Sherman, H. Loomer, P.A. Cunningham and S.W. Fosdick, Atlas of Montgomery and Fulton counties, New York, NewYork: J.Jay Stranahan & Beach Nichols, 1868, https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47e3-6ef0-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99

Heading to the Gloversville – Johnstown Area

The third leg of the journey, Johann Sperber’s decision to migrate specifically to Fulton County, is an open research question. It is a question that may never have a definitive answer.

One general observation is that Johann’s intended destination may have been one of the major settlement areas of the Palatine area and not necessarily Fulton county. As indicated above, the historical subdivisions of Montgomery county resulted in a number of different counties. Johann may have been focused on getting to a particular town or general area rather than a particular county.

There are plausible explanations of why he settled in the Gloversville-Johnstown area. Johann may have had contacts that settled in what was now called Fulton county. The Fulton County area may have offered economic opportunities among the towns and cities within the old ‘Palatine” area along the Mohawk River. The lingering question is what did this particular area have that was different from other towns along the river that also experienced growth and opportunity.

The 1850s saw the Mohawk Valley transitioning to a manufacturing based economy enabled by transportation developments, while still maintaining agricultural roots especially in the dairy industry. The Erie Canal, completed in 1825, facilitated the development of large villages in the Mohawk Valley and provided a means to transport goods east and west. (see map eight) [15]

Map Eight: The Erie Canal and the New York Barge Canal System

Click for Larger View | Source: Finch, Roy, The Story of the New York State Canals, https://www.canals.ny.gov/history/finch_history.pdf

“The Erie Canal had a tremendous impact on the economic growth of the Albany area and points further west. The first railroad in the ‘Capital Region’ ironically was built as a way to circumvent the slow down of barge traffic at Cohoes Falls. It was among the first railroads in the country and helped herald in a new age of transportation. Soon after the success of this early pioneer line, other railroads soon followed and the Capital District became a hotbed of economic growth and a leader in railroad transportation.” [16]

There were 29 railroads in New York already built or under construction by 1850. Troy and Schenectady became a hub for the emerging railway system in New York state. Within the ‘Capital region’ railroads such as the Mohawk & Hudson Railroad (1831), Troy and Greenbush Railroad (1845), Utica and Schenectady Railroad (1833), Syracuse and Utica Railroad (1839) ,the Rensselaer and Saratoga Railroad (1836), and Saratoga and Schenectady Railroad (1832) enabled further industrial growth and movement of people. [17]

The Hudson River Railroad connected New York city to the ‘Capital Region’ (New York to Greenbush, now renamed Rensselaer, opposite Albany). It was opened a year prior to Johann’s arrival in 1851. The Troy and Greenbush Railroad became part of this greater Hudson River Railroad in 1851.

As reflected in map nine, Johann had many options to travel up to the Capital area and through the Mohawk valley area. One observation to note is the absence of a connected rail line to Johnstown from the Utica and Schenectady Rail Line that followed the contour of the Mohawk River in the 1850s. Compared to the other towns and cities in the Mohawk Valley, Johnstown was not directly on the bank of the Mohawk River. Depending on what side of the Mohawk River one traveled on, traveling to Johnstown could be accomplished by taking the road north from Fultonville to Johnstown (if you were on the south side of the river). If you were traveling west from the Capital area on the north side of the river, you could take the road or train to Fonda and then the road north from Fonda to Johnstown, which is only abut five miles. 

Map Nine: Water, Road and Rail Connections in the Capital Area and Mohawk Valley 1850

Click for Larger View | This is a portion of an 1847 map that also appears in Williams, Wellington, Map 19, Appleton’s northern and eastern traveller’s guide: with new and authentic maps, illustrating those divisions of the country. Forming, likewise, a complete guide to the middle states, Canada, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. Illustrated with numerous maps and plans of cities, engraved on steel and several wood engravings, New York: D. Appleton & Co. 1855,  https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b263188&seq=251

By the 1850s, the Mohawk valley had a significant manufacturing presence, with industries such as textiles, furniture, heavy machinery, and lumber. Specific examples include the the emerging Remington Arms company in Herkimer County which was a major employer, and textile mills in Utica. Specific industries emerged in certain areas, such as glove and leather manufacturing starting in Fulton County. Smaller towns specialized in certain products, such as food packing in Canajoharie, knit goods in Fort Plain and St. Johnsville, and felt shoes in Dolgeville. Overall, the period saw a diversification of manufacturing, the rise and fall of certain industries like dairy and textiles, the emergence of new industries enabled by technological developments, and the growth of factories as major employers. [18]

Map Ten – The Mohawk Valley [19]

Map ten depicts the Mohawk valley and the six New York state counties that are part of ‘the valley’. The map shows all places that had over 200 in population in 1920 as well as smaller places that had historic significance. It should be noted the map shows a rail connection between Fonda and Johnstown that did not exist when Johann Sperber was migrating to Johnstown. 

Two years prior to Johann’s arrival in the United States, of the six counties in the Mohawk valley, Fulton county was second smallest county based on population size in 1850. (see table two). Oneida county was the largest of the Mohawk valley counties, constituting 41 percent of the total Mohawk valley population. Oneida’s size was attributable to the presence of two towns: Utica and Rome.

Both cities were located along major transportation routes. Utica was situated on a shallow spot of the Mohawk River, while Rome was positioned at an important early land bridge between main waterways. Both cities flourished as canal towns, with the flow of raw materials, finished goods and settlers. [20]

This made them key points for the movement of people and goods. Utica underwent significant industrial growth in the mid-1800s, becoming a major center for manufacturing, especially in the textile industry. It was known as the “Manchester of America” for its booming textile mills[21]

Table Two: Population of the Six Counties of the Mohawk Valley 1850

CountyPopulationPercentage of
Mohawk Valley
Oneida99,56640.9 %
Herkimer38,24415.7 %
Schoharie33,58413.8 %
Montgomery31,99213.1 %
Fulton20,1718.3 %
Schenectady20,0548.2 %
Total243,611100.0 %
Source: 1850 U.S. Census, New York, Table II – Population by Subdivision of Counties, 
https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1850/1850a/1850a-22.pdf

Table three provides examples of principal industries in which the majority of the wage earners of the valley were engaged prior to and up to when Johann Sperber migrated to the area. Grist mills, saw mills, tanneries, blacksmith shops, fulling and carding mills, and asheries were built at nearly all Mohawk valley centers in the settlement period, from 1813 to 1852, the year Johann arrived.

Table Three: Principal Industries in Mohawk Valley Counties 1813-1852

DateDescription of Manufacturing DevelopmentCounty
1813Pottery Works started in RomeOneida
1820Manufacture of plows began in Utica.Oneida
1822Ephraim Hart foundry started in Utica.Oneida
1823Grist mill and an iron foundry opened in Utica.Oeida
1823Worthington hat factory opened in Rome.Oneida
1826Pottery works opened in Utica.Oneida
1839Harry Burrell of Salisbury makes first shipment of cheese to England.Herkimer
1831Remington opens forge for manufacture of gun barrels and firearms in Ilion.Herkimer
1832Manufacture of knit goods began in Cohoes.Schenectady
1836Manufacture of axes and other edge tools began in Cohoes.Schenectady
1836Manufacture of ready-made clothing began in Utica.Oneida
1836Manufacture of cotton cloth (white goods) introduced in Cohoes, Harmony Mills Company.Schenectady
1840Threshing machine invented by George Westinghouse, ,Central Bridge.Schoharie
1840Manufacture of ingrain carpets began in Amsterdam.Montgomery
1842Manufacture of woolen goods began in Little Falls.Herkimer
1842Stove and furnace manufacture began in Utica.Oneida
1842Carpet mill at Hagamans rmoved to Amsterdam.Montgomery
1844Manufacture of matches started in Frankfort.Herkimer
1845Manufacture of yarn begun in Little Falls.Herkimer
1845Manufacture of railroad steam locomotives began in Schenectady.Schenectady
1846First kid glove factory of Johnstown established. Gloves continued to be made in the homes of Johnstown and Gloversville.Fulton
1847Manufacture of woolens began in Utica.Oneida
1848Manufacture of linseed oil began in Amsterdam.Montgomery
1848Manufacture of linseed oil begun at Amsterdam.Montgomery
1848Manufacture of cotton cloth (white goods) began in Utica.Oneida
1850First solid steel gun barrel made in the Remington works at Ilion.Herkimer
1851Manufacture of locomotive headlights started int Utica.Oneida
1852Iron works started at Utica.Oneida
Source: Greene, Nelson, Chapter 102: The Birth and Development of Mohawk Valley Inventions and Manufacturing Industries,History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614- 925, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Pages 1481 – 1501, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/102.html also https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89077224962&view=1up&seq=11

“(E)ven in cities with large numbers of unskilled German workers, substantial numbers of skilled Germans tended to dominate the same trades (especially clothing, shoe, and furniture making). … (S)killed German-American artisans and workers either migrated to and stayed in the major manufacturing centers where there was employment for their skills or they settled in smaller centers to the extent that there was employment available in their trades.” [22]

Despite other Mohawk valley counties that were larger and perhaps had larger sized employers in various manufacturing industries, Johann ended up in Gloversville, Fulton county. The key question is what drew Johann to the Johnstown – Gloversville area. Did he have contacts in the area? Did he have experience with glove making? Why did he end up working in the glove making business?

“The Littauer Laying Off Room” – An older John Sperber in the Middle Foreground with Arms Folded circa 1890s

Source: Family Archives | Click for Larger View

Based on family photographs and information in state and Federal census enumerations, we do know Johann Sperber was a glove maker between 1860 and 1900 when he established roots and raised a family in Fulton County, New York area. However, it is not known if:

  • he was drawn to the Glove trade because of prior work experience or knowledge of glove making in the Baden-Baden area;
  • he was aware of leather and glove making jobs through knowledge from correspondence from immigrants that settled in Fulton county;
  • he obtained information or work experience once he landed and visited “Little Germany” in New York City on the Glove making trade in Fulton county;
  • he had friends or acquaintances that migrated earlier to Fulton county; or
  • he simply went to Fulton county based on other reasons and found a paying job in the burgeoning glove making market in Gloversville and Johnstown.

Leather Tanning and Leather Products in New York City

If Johan was ‘introduced’ to glove making shortly after he landed in Little Germany, New York City, it is not known how many German immigrants were possibly employed as glove makers in Little Germany in the mid 1850s. New York City likely had some small-scale glove making operations but they were associated with custom work and repairing. [23]

Map Eleven: Manhattan in Late 1700’sNew York Made and Swamp Land

Click for Larger View | Source: D.T. Valentine, D.T., Manual of the Corporation of the City, for 1856, New York: McSpedon & Baker, 1856, New York Plan of the City of New York Made and Swamp Land. Plan of the city of New York : showing the made and swamp land. 

While related, leather tanning and glove making are two distinct work processes and associated with different skill sets and occupations. The leather tanning industry had a long history in lower Manhattan. However, the industry was devoted to boot and shoe making and not glove making. Moreover, the areas conducive to leather tanning were originally near marsh and swamp land. (see map ten)

“New York City had its own leather tannery district called ‘the swamp’. During the colonial period, tanners plied their trade along Ferry, Frankfort, Gold Jacob, and Spruce Sts. in Manhattan’s swamp. The also made leather along the margins of Collect Pond. … Manhattan’s Swamp became the financial hub of the American leather industry. Tanners-turned merchants contracted with tanners through New York State, Pennsylvania and beyond to tan hides the merchants owned and to return the leather to New York City for sale.” [24]

In the early colonial days of New Amsterdam in the 1600s, much of Lower Manhattan consisted of swamps, streams, and wetlands. Tanneries were some of the first industries to be established around the swamps, such as the Collect Pond. Over the centuries, roughly eighty-five percent of Manhattan’s coastal wetlands and virtually all of its freshwater wetlands were lost as the island was developed. From the late 1600s through the early 1800s, Manhattan’s shoreline gradually expanded into the East River through deliberate landfilling. [25]

Maps from the 1600s through the 1700s show how the original coastline of Lower Manhattan, which corresponded to present-day Pearl Street, was extended several blocks into the East River, turning former swamps and wetlands into new made land. Much of the swamp land in Manhattan was eventually drained and filled, as reflected in maps eleven and twelve.

Map Twelve: Growth of Manhattan Island

Click for Larger View | Source: Wallace,McHarg, Roberts and Todd, Whittlesey, Conklin and Rossant; Voorhees & Associates, Growth of Manhattan Island, 1650-1980,The Lower Manhattan Plan, CapitalProject ES-1,June 1, 1966,Page 27, 
https://ia804709.us.archive.org/6/items/lowermanhattanpl00wall/lowermanhattanpl00wall.pdf

Impact of 1811 Commissioners’ Plan – New York City

Many of the tannery businesses that existed before Johann Sperber’s arrival to America also were affected by the implementation of the 1811 Commissioners’ Plan which reduced the acreage of swamp and marsh land.

“What made the grid plan, formally called the Commissioners’ Map and Survey of Manhattan Island, so farsighted was that in 1811 a vast majority of New York City’s population lived below what became Houston Street — tellingly named North Street then. … Yet while largely exempting the existing village of Greenwich, the visionary commissioners imposed their 2,000-block matrix on the forests, farms, salt marshes, country estates and common lands that extended north for nearly eight miles to what would become 155th Street, and expanded the city’s plotted land area by nearly fivefold.” [26]


Video: The Evolution of Manhattan 1811 – 1857

Source: A segment of Zhang, Myles, The New York City Evolution Animation, Youtube, To see the entire video, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6U7YFPrz6Y . The animation illustrates the development of NYC’s street grid and infrastructure systems from 1609 to the present-day, using geo-referenced road network data and historic maps. The short film, link above, presents a series of “cartographic snapshots” of NYC’s built-up urban area at intervals of every 20-30 years history.

The 1811 Commissioners’ plan not only impacted the tanning industry, it had had an impact on all facets of urban life and growth in Manhattan. The area where many Germans settled in Manhattan between 1830 and 1860, Little Germany, was affected by the planned northward growth of New York, as informed by the Commissioners’ plan.

Map Thirteen: 1811 Commissions’ Plan and its Impact on the Growth of Little Germany

Click for Larger View | Screenshot and adaptation of Zhang, Myles, The New York City Evolution Animation, Youtube, To see the entire video, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6U7YFPrz6Y .

The Commissioners’ plan established Manhattan’s iconic rectangular street grid from Houston Street to 155th Street. It had a profound influence on the growth of Manhattan’s population. The Commissioners’ Plan provided a framework for Manhattan to grow from a city of 100,000 in 1811 to over 10 times that a century later. The grid was a catalyst for the real estate development, housing construction, and neighborhood formation that enabled Manhattan to absorb wave after wave of new residents in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. [27]

Glove Making in Upstate New York

The historical evidence suggests glove manufacturing in the early to mid-1800s was concentrated further upstate in Fulton County which became the undisputed center of the American glove making industry in the nineteenth and first third of the twentieth centuries. [28]

The rise of glove manufacturing from its humble origins in the early 1800s to a booming industry by the turn of the 20th century was the primary driver of Gloversville and Johnstown’s growth and prosperity for over one hundred and fifty years. It provided employment for a significant portion of the population, spurred development of supporting industries, and shaped the economic and social fabric of the community, establishing Fulton county as a major manufacturing center.

Johann Sperber may have obtained information on the economic experiences and opportunities in the Gloversville and Johnstown areas before he departed from Baden. He may have heard or read about these opportunities in letters from immigrants who started new lives in Fulton county.

Initially, most of Fulton county’s German population were descendants of Palatines who settled in the Mohawk Valley in the 1700s. Some of their descendants moved into Gloversville and Johnstown in the 1840s and 1850s to find work in the glove industry. [29]

“Fulton County became a polyglot community. Palatines from Germany had joined the Scots and English in early days , working as farmers through the county. In the early nineteenth century, English, Scots, and later a few French-trained glove makers made their way to the area along with New England Yankees. They were joined by a new wave of Germans, some trained as glovers and tanners … . “ [30]

“… (G)loves and mittens were first manufactured in the United States in what is now Fulton county. As the industry became of commercial importance the number of families that depended upon it for a livelihood increased, until nearly every man, woman, and child in the surrounding country became proficient in the making of some special part of the glove or mitten. Foreign cutters coming to this country naturally settled in Fulton county.” [31]

Influence of an Agricultural and Artisanal Background

It might not have been a ‘long stretch’ for Johann to consider working in various trades when he came to America. It is possible that Johann was familiar with or aware of other trades, such as glove making or textile production when he was in Baden.

As previously mentioned, Johann indicated to the Germania ship captain that his occupation in Baden was a cultivator, a farmer. Being a farmer may conjure various meanings of what is it to be a farmer. Being a farmer in Baden in the 1800s was different than a farmer in the United States.

Blow Up of “Johann Sperber” – Germania Ship Manifest June 14 1852 Page 6 Line 13

Click for Larger View

Baden in the 1800s was a region of agricultural villages rather than scattered agricultural farmsteads that consisted of large tracts of land. The tracts of land for farmers in Baden were typically smaller than those found in America. While there was likely some variation, the typical Baden farm in the 1800s was quite small by American standards, averaging only around 8 hectares or 20 acres or less in size. The small scale farming suited the hilly terrain and fragmented land ownership patterns that existed in Baden during this period of the nineteenth century. [32]

In the early nineteenth century, Baden was a margraviate with an area of only about 1,300 square miles and a population of 210,000. The small population and territory likely contributed to the prevalence of small farms. The practice of partible inheritance, where land was divided equally among heirs, was prevalent in Baden during the nineteenth century. This led to the fragmentation of farm holdings into smaller parcels over generations.

The small farm sizes sometimes became problematic, as some farm sizes had become so small that they no longer could support a family in the 1830s-1840s. The growth of cottage industries and manufacturing in some areas of Baden provided alternative livelihoods, possibly reducing pressure to subdivide farms in those localities. But agriculture remained the main occupation for most. [33]

Agriculture was closely intertwined with artisanal trades. [34] Farmers often supplemented their income with home based cottage industry trades such as handloom linen or wool production. Based on data in 1861, Baden was second in the entire Zollverein (Confederation of German states) in the number of master weavers, with 54 per 10,000 inhabitants. [35]

The structure of the working environment of the glove making industry in Fulton county was vaguely similar to the proto-industrial work patterns in the western and central German states in the nineteenth century.. Proto-industrial work patterns involved the expansion of small-scale, home-based manufacturing of goods like textiles, ironware, pottery, and other products by peasant families. This cottage industry production was done alongside traditional agricultural work.

Glove making in Fulton county was similar to the proto-industrial patterns in Germany in terms of the ability to work from home or have a small shop behind the house. A major exception was that it was a primary occupation and not a supplemental work activity to agricultural pursuits. Workers could live a life solely on the wages of leather work, tanning or glove making in America while working from home.

“From the 1860s to as late as the 1930s, a man cutting gloves at home, with a wife and one other female relative to sew, constituted a glove shop. Their products were made under contract for larger shops or combined with the gloves of several small shops with sales handled by a common agent. Few of these shops advertised or are counted in the Census; almost none show up in the city directories.” [36]

Gloves and the Glove Trade in Europe

Glove Making

Click for Larger View |
Source: This part of an illustration of the various facets of glove making by Fredrick Remington, for an article in the Harper’s Bazar: Glove Making in Fulton County, Harper’s Bazaar, Volume XX, Number 21, May 21, 1887, New York: Hearst Corporation, http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=hearth4732809_1454_021#page/10/mode/1up

“(I)f an old adage is to be believed, for it used to be said : a glove to be good three realms must have contributed to it, Spain to prepare the skin, France to cut it, and England to sew it.” [37]

While glove making was not a major occupation, trade or craft, it had its roots in France, England, Germany, Spain and other countries.

“Gloving … enjoys an established claim to rank among the oldest of handicraft industries, and although machinery now enters very largely into all operations which the making of gloves involves, there are yet some processes calling for the exercise of mental intuition in association with manipulative expertness rather than for what one may term mere mechanical dexterity. Such is particularly true of glove-cutting.” [38]

Guilds for glove makers emerged in Europe as early as the 11th century. While the exact origins are unclear, there is evidence of glove makers’ guilds existing in major European cities like Paris from the eleventh century onward and with the London guild being formally established by the mid-fourteenth century.

The first Glovers’ Guild in Britain was established at Perth. The Perth glovers received a charter in 1165. Worchester, England established a glove making guild in 1571. The glovers of Grenoble, renowned for their glove making, organized themselves into Corporation des Gantiers in 1691. Nicot and Montpelier, France also had a long history of glove making. These guilds became increasingly prominent in the following centuries as the glove industry expanded. [39]

At the turn of the 1700s many of the trained glove makers from Grenoble and other towns of France, such as Blois, Vendome, and Grasse, migrated to Germany, Holland, and other countries due to religious persecution. They brought their glove making skills to other countires. In addition, protestant benefactors who supported the glove making industry brought their capital to these countries. [40] “Many of those who served their apprenticeship in Grenoble, and the master glovers holding the secrets of her art, probably became rivals, in other lands, of the city they once called their own.” [41]

“In the early part of the seventeenth century the manufacturers of gloves reached Germany, being brought there by French refugees from Grenoble, who introduced the art to Erlangen, Haberstadt, and Magdeburg.” [42]

Map fourteen gives sense of where the Grenoble refugee glove makers relocated in the German states. The map does not depict the political boundaries in the early seventeenth century. It is a 1850 map that depicts the locations of where the Glove makers from Grenoble relocated in Germany in relation to where Johann’s family from Baden. It gives a geographical sense of where the Grenoble refugees relocated.

Map Fourteen: Locations of French Refugees from Grenoble in German States [43]

Click for Larger View

In the seventeenth century, Paris and Grenoble enjoyed a monopoly of the glove markets in Europe. During the eighteenth century, however, these cities began to cope with Germany, Italy, Austria, and Russia in glove making. [44] 

Tariffs and other trade practices, as early as the mid 1400s, impacted the growth and contraction of the glove making industry through the centuries. Commercial rivalries between various European countries and technological changes in the glove making process in the 1800s resulted in glovers migrating to the United States. In 1825, the lifting of the ban on the importation of French gloves into England had devastating economic effects on the glove makers in England and Ireland. Major glove making centers in Worcester, Woodstock, York, Hexham, Leominster, Yeovil, Limerick, Dublin, Cork, were decimated. [45]

Some say the word “glove” comes from the German Handschuh, meaning “hand-shoe”. [46] While there may be some merit to this view of the English derivation of the word, glove making did not originate in Germany. Nevertheless, the tanning of leather and glove making was not a foreign work process in Germany or to Germans.

Glove Making in America and the European Influence

Leather tanning became a prominent local industry in the area that became Fulton county due to the purity and abundance of water and the availability of hemlock bark as a source of tannin. [47]

“Unlike tanning in other regions of New York State, this was not hemlock bark tanning of cowhides for shoes and boots, but deer-skin tanning using other organic materials and manufacturing into gloves and clothing. It began with the first glove and mitten shops in Johnstown in 1808 and in what became Gloversville in 1810. “ [48]

The European influence of glove making and leather tanning in the area purportedly began with Sir William Johnson bringing 60 tanners and glove makers from Perth in Scotland in 1760. 

“The manufacture of gloves and mittens in the United States dates from about the year 1760, when Sir William Johnson, chief agent of King George with the North American Indians, brought over from Scotland many families as settlers on his grants. Several families came from Perthshire and settled in the eastern part of what is now Fulton county, N. Y., calling the town Perth. Many of these settlers had been glove makers and members of the glove guild in Scotland, and brought with them glove patterns and the proper needles and threads for glove making.” [49]

There are some who argue that Johnson’s bringing glove makers from Scotland is a myth. “In 1895, the local newspaper was exuberantly extolled the town’s growth and industry in a historical review celebrating the centennial of the town’s founding. …The paper, following earlier historians, …erred in stating that Johnson brought the first glovemakers. No trained glovemakers arrived until well after his death… .” [50]

Notwithstanding the facts on both sides of the argument, immigrants of Scottish origin have been documented in living in Perth, New York. It is possible they had knowledge of glove making. Whether they had brought with them glove patterns and the proper needles and threads for glove making is an open question. [51]

As reflected in map fifteen, an area north of Johnstown had a settlement called Kingsboro. Before the Revolutionary War, it was at the crossroads where settlers traded with farmers in Broadalbin and Mayfield. Kingsboro was populated by immigrants from Perthshire Scotland who brought their leather making skills to America. As mentioned when discussing glove making in Europe, Perthshire had a long tradition of glove making.

Map Fifteen: Locations of Broadalbin, Mayfield Village, Perth, Kingsborough, Gloversville and Johnstown

Click for Larger View | Source: A portion of the map created by Nichols, B, H.B. Stanahan, W.A. Sherman, H. Loomer, P.A. Cunningham and S.W. Fosdick, Atlas of Montgomery and Fulton counties, New York, NewYork: J.Jay Stranahan & Beach Nichols, 1868, https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47e3-6ef0-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99

There were a number of documented European immigrants who settled in Gloversville and Johnstown in the mid nineteenth century came from glove making centers in Europe, bringing their skills and traditions with them. Several European countries had significant influence on the glove making industry in Fulton County, New York

“The first trained leatherworkers to come from France were two brothers, Lucien and Theophilus Bertrand. They arrived from Millau around 1840. They began tanning kidskins (the skins of young goats) in Johnstown.  This may have marked the beginning of the production of finer grades of men’s gloves. “ [52]

“The Bertrands’ glove shop was the first of five manufacturing concerns established by trained French glovemen in Johnstown before the Civil War. The others were established by LouisJeannisson, Ferdinand Vassier, Jean Joseph Riton from Strasburg (his sons Charles J. and Eugene later formed the Riton Brothers glove concern), and by the father of Emile Julien. ” [53]

In Fulton County, New York, the leather tanning and glove making industries were growing in the 1840s and 1850s. Low overhead encouraged the proliferation of small glove making shops. They were as productive as the larger sized shops. For the small amount of funds required to set up a shop, the risk and investment resided in the purchase of leather. [54]

The 1840s marked the beginning of specialization in the industry. Separate parts of shops were established to accommodate the division of leather-making and glove-making operations. During the 1840s, as glovemen built separate structures for glove making and tanning or dressing of skins, these buildings became known as glove shops or a skin mill. [55]

However, despite the emerging specialization of leather tanning and glove making and the specialization of various roles of the glove making process (as depicted in the illustration at the top of this story), the smallest shops continued to be attached to the owners’ homes, as did most of those who produced leather and not gloves. The tradition of one manufacturer dressing deerskins and producing gloves continued through the next three decades along with the trend toward specialization an larger glove making firms.

“By 1850, the products of the industry had begun to change. Finer grades of men’s gloves were produced by the Bertrands with their imported kidskins. In the decade before 1860, others began to import kidskins for gloves, but the sturdy work gloves remained the bulk of the production along with deerskin mittens.” [56]

No longer were most of the gloves designed for ‘rough’ work, glove makers started to produce fine dress gloves for gentlemen and women. For example, Harry S. Cole, a glover who had worked for two prestigious firms in London, Fownes and Dents, came to Gloversville in 1857 to produce fine gloves made of calf skin. . [57]

“As the industry became of commercial importance the number of families that depended upon it for a livelihood increased, until nearly every man, woman, and child in the surrounding country became proficient in the making of some special part of the glove or mitten. Foreign cutters coming to this country naturally settled in Fulton county.” (Emphasis is mine) [58]

As indicated in table four, when Johan Sperber arrived in the Johnstown – Gloversville area in the mid 1800’s, he witnessed an area that had explosive growth which was largely attributed to glove making. The population in the county as well as the Johnstown – Gloversville area witnessed substantial growth between 1840 and 1880. The two towns increased in population in forty years by two hundred percent.

Depending on when Johan arrived in the area, Gloversville and Johnstown increased in size by a whopping 29 percent between 1850 and 1855; and by 11 percent between 1855 and 1860. Fulton county in general also witnessed substantial growth between 1850 and 1855. After the Civil War, Johnstown and Gloversville also experienced twenty percent population increases between 1865 and 1875.

Table Four: Population Size of Johnstown – Gloversville, NY

YearPopulation of
Johnstown –
Gloversville
Percent
Change
Population of
Fulton County
Percent
Change
Johnstown-
Gloversville
as % of
Fulton County
18405,40918,049
18506,13113.3 %20,17110.5 %30.4 %
18557,91229.0 %23,28413.4 %34.0 %
18608,81111.0 %24,1623.6 %36.5 %
18659,80511.0 %24,5121.4 %40.0 %
187012,27320.1 %27,0649.4 %45.3 %
187515,68921.8 %30,15510.3 %52.0 %
188016,6265.6 %30,9852.7 %53.7 %
1840 –
1880
207.4 %71.6 %
Sources: U.S. Federal Census and New York State Census.

“Gloversville and Kingsboro remained part of the Town of Johnstown and census records lumped the two together until the 1880 Census, giving the appearance that Johnston was the more important.” [59]

Chart one depicts the change rates found in table four. The chart visually depicts the similarity of the population changes between the Johnstown and Gloversville area and the entire county. Both areas experienced similar ups and downs but the magnitude of change was greater for the Johnstown and Gloversville area.

Chart One: Population Change Rates for the Johnstown-Gloversville Area and Fulton County Between 1840 and 1880

Click for Larger View

It is impossible to present comparative statistics on the glove making industry until the 1900 U.S. Federal census. Unfortunately, this hampers our understanding of Johann’s experiences when he started his family in the late 1850s and established a home in the 1860s. While the Civil War years were static with a sharp reduction of in new glove shops and a retrenchment of existing shops as people left to serve in the military, the war effort required the production of gloves.

Moreover, it is important to note that the reporting of ‘glove manufacturers’ was severely undercounted by due to the definition of manufacturing establishments and the nature of the work process and industry. [60]

Documenting the number of glove making establishments are probably undercounted and possibly misleading. It was observed in 1900 that “a great majority of the persons employed in this industry are pieceworkers ... . The making (of gloves) by “home workers” is an important and interesting phase o:f their manufacture, and since the inception of the industry much of the glove making· has been done at the homes of families, the members of which were unable, on account of various household duties, to take employment in a factory. Many of the large glove and mitten manufacturers of Gloversville and Johnstown, N. Y., employ delivery teams to distribute and collect the work of the home.” [61]

New York state and specifically Fulton county was the center of the glove making industry in America, starting in the early 1800s through the early 1900s. For example, New York state represented sixty-four percent of the total number of glove making establishments in 1900.

“In 1901, gloves were manufactured in 27 states, but, outside of Fulton county, N. Y., the product was mostly of the coarser and cheaper grades, as it is impossible to· induce the expert labor to emigrate to another section of the country.” [62]

Table five below provides quantitative data on the dominance of Gloversville and Johnstown, Fulton County and New York state on the production of gloves in 1900. For example, eighty-eight percent of all reported glove manufacturers were in New York state. Roughly seventy percent of all capital invested, wages, and workers were in New York state. Almost sixty percent of the products were also from New York state. Fulton country represented sixty percent of all glover workers in the nation. Gloversville represented sixty percent of all glove works in the nation and sixty-five percent of all glove workers within Fulton county. 

Table Five: Comparative Summary of Statistics for Glove Making Enterprises in Futlon County, New York State and the United States: 1900

AreaNo. of
Establish-
ments
Capital
Invested
WagesAve. No.
Wage
Earners
Dozens
of pairs
of gloves
U.S. Total3819,004,4274,151,12614,1802,895,661
New York State2486,219,6472,723,7029,9071,721,831
% of U.S.88.369.165.670.059.5
Fulton County1665,517,8502, 381,1607,9311,484,579
% of U.S.43.661.357.460.051.3
Gloversville1013,660,3831,695,0355,183925,440
% of county60.866.371.265.462.3
Johnstown491,686,604580,1462,316398,657
% of county29.530.624.429.226.9
Outside of cities16170,863105,979432160,482
% of county9.63.14.55.510.8
Source: Hunt, Arthur, Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Selected statistics derived from Table 11 on Page 10  https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

Although the manufacture of gloves was of commercial importance since the early 1800s, the 1850 census was the first time where statistics were available on glove making firms for analysis. Table six bellow provides a high level view of the size of the glove making industry in the United States for the last half of the nineteenth century. The increase between 1860 and 1870 was attributable to the demand for gloves during the Civil War.

Table Six: Glove Making Establishments in the United States 1850 – 1900 [63]

Census YearNumber of
Glove Making
Establishments
Percent
Increase
1850110
186012614.5
187022175.4
188030035.7
18902248.0
190039722.5

The ability to drill down into the data is limited. Data for the earlier census years was not as detailed as found in the 1900 U.S. census. While the data is fifty years after Johan’s arrival to the United States, it is interesting to note that of the total number of glove making ‘establishments’ reported in 1900 is rather small compared to other categories of manufacturing.

Of the 397 establishments making gloves in 1900, 222 of the ‘establishments’, or 56 per cent, were operated by individuals. The remaining· 125 were what we commonly think of as commercial establishments. They were limited partnerships or incorporated companies. Also 96 percent of the establishments in 1900 were producers of leather gloves.

It is noteworthy that “over 60 per cent of the glove and mitten establishments of Fulton county were located in Gloversville. This localization of the industry is not due to economic conditions, such as low price of coal or to advantageous freight rates, but it may be attributed to the nature of the industry itself, and to the circumstances connected with its inception in the United States. …”As the industry became of commercial importance the number of families that depended upon it for a livelihood increased, until nearly every man, woman, and child in the surrounding country became proficient in the making of some special part of the glove or mitten. Foreign cutters coming to this country naturally settled in Fulton county.” (Emphasis is mine), [64]

So Why Did Johan Sperber End His Journey in Gloversville?

There were a number of possible influences that led Johann Sperber to the Gloversville, New York area. An overarching migratory influence was knowledge of past generations from his home area in Baden that came to the Mohawk Valley. This influence may have provided a general vague influence of where to go in America. He may have had contemporary personal contacts that came to the Mohawk Valley, providing information on employment opportunities.

Johann may have stopped and stayed in New York City when getting off the boat. He may have stayed in Little Germany to get his bearings, earn some money, and gain a better understanding of job prospects in the Mohawk Valley. He may have learned on the economic prospects of the glove making trade while in New York City.

While many towns and cities along the Mohawk Valley offered economic opportunities, many of those opportunities were in emerging industries in manufacturing. Johann may have been drawn to the working arrangements associated with the glove making practices in Gloversville. The glove making industry retained a semblance of the characteristics of cottage industries in Baden. [65]

“What is particularly remarkable is that even during its height, the manufacture of gloves never became one of mass production. The creation of each pair of leather gloves was the work of an individual craftsman. “The Glove Cutter” was personally responsible for the quality of his product. A middle management level was never developed in the glove industry. Each owner of any one of dozens of glove companies, both large and small, had a personal relationship with his “cutters” and sewers or “makers”. Quality was a matter of personal pride.” [66]

“What is amazing is the number of men who set up glove shops and skin mills. This great number of entrepreneurs distinguishes glove-making throughout its entire tenure in Fulton county. Large shops arose, and they, too, were numerous, but no single man or family ever dominated local industry. 

“The smallest shops continued to be attached to the owners’ homes, as did most of those who produced leather and not gloves. However, the tradition of one manufacturer dressing deerskins and producing gloves continued through the next three decades along with the trend toward specialization.” [67]

Perhaps Johann was attracted to Gloversville due to tradition, to the economic prospects of the future in glove making and to the comfort of past experiences and working relationships that were reminiscent of the homeland. [68]

Sources

Feature Photograph: This is ‘rearrangement’ of an illustration of the various facets of glove making that was done by Fredrick Remington, for an article in the Harper’s Bazar: Glove Making in Fulton County, Harper’s Bazaar, Volume XX, Number 21, May 21, 1887, New York: Hearst Corporation, http://reader.library.cornell.edu/docviewer/digital?id=hearth4732809_1454_021#page/10/mode/1up

Frederic Sackrider Remington (1857-1926) was a painter, illustrator, and sculptor who specialized in depicting the Old West. Frederic Remington and his wife Eva Adele Canton were both born in Canton, New York. Eva grew up in Gloversville and the couple got married after Eva’s father finally accepted Frederic’s second request for her hand in marriage in Gloversville on October 1st, 1884. Aside from his paintings, Remington also produced more than 3,000 drawings, 22 bronze sculptures, a Broadway play, and more than 100 articles. 

Nicole Todd, Love Stories: Frederic and Eva Remington, 14 Feb 2017,Buffalo Bill Center of the West, https://centerofthewest.org/2017/02/14/love-stories-frederic-eva-remington/

Frederic Remington, Timeline, Carter Museum, https://www.cartermuseum.org/artists/frederic-remington/frederic-remington-timeline

Remington also completed a drawing of the tanning process. See “A Day in the Tannery”, Harper’s Weekly, January 25, 1890, Vol 34, No. 1727, New York: Harbor & Bros., P72 & 74 https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015011446161&view=1up&seq=92


[1] Kamphoefner, Walter D., The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987, Page 81

Two years prior to Johann’s arrival, in 1850, New York State had the largest ‘base’ of first generation Germans reported by the Federal census. This reflected the effects of German migration in the prior twenty years. Ohio was closely behind New York state. This reflected the migration patterns from New York city up the Hudson river and across the state to Buffalo and onward to the great lakes region.

As the quote from Kamphoefner indicates, New York City was the gateway to America and the Erie canal and developing railways in New York facilitated migration to Ohio, Indiana and Illinois and Wisconsin.

Similar to New York State, Pennsylvania, particularly Philadelphia and its outlying areas, also had a long history of German migration in the 1700s and 1800s. Germans sailing to New Orleans settled in Lousiana.

Foreign Born in Germany by State 1850

State
Rank
(Territory)
StateForeign Born
German
Percentage
of Total in
United States
Cumulative
Pecentage
1New York118,39820.720.7
2Ohio111,25719.440.1
3Pennsylvania78,59213.753.8
4Missouri44,3537.761.5
5Illinois38,1606.768.2
6Maryland26,9364.772.9
7Indiana25,5844.577.4
8Louisiana17,5073.180.5
9Kentucky13,6972.482.9
10New Jersey10,6861.984.8
11-32Remaining states88,05515.3
(4)Territories5611.0
Total 573,225100.00*
May not add up to 100 percent due to rounding error. Source: 1850 U.S. Census, Table XV. – Nativities of the Population of the United States – Place of Birth – Foreign, Nativities of the Population of the United States, Births, Marriages, and Deaths, Classification of Ages,  Page xxxvi, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1850/1850a/1850a-06.pdf

[2] Ira Glazier, Ed., Germans to America Series II: Lists of Passengers Arriving at U.S. ports in the 1840s, Volume 6 April 1848 – October 1848, Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, Inc 2003, Page xiv Page xiv

[3] Page, Thomas W. “The Transportation of Immigrants and Reception Arrangements in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 19, no. 9, 1911, pp. 736. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1820349

[4] James Boyd, The Rhine Exodus of 1816/1817 within the Developing German Atlantic World, The Historical Journal, vol. 59, no. 1, 2016, page 102. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/24809839

[5] The Great Western Turnpike ran along the south side of the Mohawk River, while the Mohawk Turnpike ran along the north side. In modern times, NY Route 5 follows the path of the old Mohawk Turnpike along the northern bank of the Mohawk River, while NY Route 5S follows the path of the old Great Western Turnpike along the southern bank.

Green, Nelson, ed, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614-1925, Chapter 101: The Mohawk Turnpike and Valley Highway System, Chicago: S.J. Clark Pub. Co., 1925, PP 1465 – 1480, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/101.html

Green, Nelson, The Old Mohawk Turnpike Book, Fort Plain: Nelson Green, 1924, https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Old_Mohawk_Turnpike_Book/fT9KAAAAMAAJ?hl=en

Mohawk or Iroquois Trail, FamilySearch Wiki, FamilySearch,This page was last edited on 24 October 2023, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Mohawk_or_Iroquois_Trail

[6] Albany Post Road, Research Wiki, This page was last edited on 5 December 2022, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Albany_Post_Road

Dollarhide, William, Map Guide to American Routes, 1735-1815, Utah: AGLL, Inc, 1997,Pages 2-4 & 7

Albany Post Road, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 20 February 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albany_Post_Road

Old Albany Post Road, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Albany_Post_Road

At the time of his arrival to New York City, it was possible to utilize rail service from New York City to Albany New York.

Capsule History of the Old Albany-New York Post Road, Old Road Society of Philipstown. Retrieved 23 May 2024, http://www.oldrdsoc.org/orshist.htm

A Short History of of the Origin and Development of the Public Works Concept in the State of New York, New York Public Works, 1965, Page 7, https://www.dot.ny.gov/programs/dot-40th-anniversary/repository/A%20Short%20History.pdf

List of turnpikes in New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_turnpikes_in_New_York

New York Turnpikes, Research Wiki, FamilySearch, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/New_York_Turnpikes

[7] Old Albany Post Road, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Albany_Post_Road

[8] History of Albany, New York (1784–1860), Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 24 August 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Albany,_New_York_%281784–1860%29

[9] Green, Nelson, ed, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614-1925, Chapter 101: The Mohawk Turnpike and Valley Highway System, Chicago: S.J. Clark Pub. Co., 1925, PP 1465 – 1480, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/101.html

Green, Nelson, The Old Mohawk Turnpike Book, Fort Plain: Nelson Green, 1924, https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Old_Mohawk_Turnpike_Book/fT9KAAAAMAAJ?hl=en

[10] Map and description of map from:

Greene, Nelson, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Volume I, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Page 19, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/maps/hudson_valley_map.html

[11] Loveday Jr.,William G. The Evolution of a County, Fulton County New York, Page Accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/evolution-county

[12] The Kingsborough Patent was a land grant in colonial New York during the 18th century. The patent contained parts of the current towns of Johnstown, Mayfield, and Ephratah in present-day Fulton County, New York, including the cities of Johnstown and Gloversville.

Map of Kingsborough, comprehending the Patents of James Stewart and A. Stevens. Map #72, New York State Archives, Digital Collections, https://digitalcollections.archives.nysed.gov/index.php/Detail/objects/36596

Thomas Cowperthwait & Co., A New Map of Germany, 1850, American made map of Germany, published in Philadelphia for the New Universal Atlas of the World of 1852,   https://nwcartographic.com/products/1850-a-new-map-of-germany?variant=675778261

History of Fulton County, Fulton County New York, Page accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/brief-history-fulton-county

Fulton County, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_County,_New_York

[13] History of Fulton County, Fulton County New York, Page accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/brief-history-fulton-county

[14] Loveday Jr.,William G. The Evolution of a County, Fulton County New York, Page Accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/evolution-county

History of Fulton County, Fulton County New York, Page accessed Mar 6 2024, https://www.fultoncountyny.gov/brief-history-fulton-county

Fulton County, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton_County,_New_York

Montgomery County, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_County,_New_York

Tryon County, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tryon_County,_New_York

Lisa Slaski, Lisa,History, Fulton County MyGenWeb,  https://fulton.nygenweb.net/history/index.html

Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. “Fulton”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 Aug. 2023, https://www.britannica.com/place/Fulton-county-New-York 

[15] Canal History, New York State, https://www.canals.ny.gov/history/history.html

Finch, Roy, The Story of the New York State Canals, https://www.canals.ny.gov/history/finch_history.pdf

Canal History, New York State, https://www.canals.ny.gov/history/history.html

Klein, Christopher, 8 Ways the Erie Canal changed America, July 19, 2016, updated Oct 25, 2023, History, https://www.history.com/news/8-ways-the-erie-canal-changed-america

North, Edward P. “The Erie Canal and Transportation.” The North American Review, vol. 170, no. 518, 1900, pp. 121–33. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25104942

Bahret, James L. “Growth of New York and Suburbs Since 1790.” The Scientific Monthly, vol. 11, no. 5, 1920, pp. 404–18. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/6415

Erie Canal, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_Canal

Keene, Michael, The Psychic Highway: How the Erie Canal Changed America. Fredericksburg, Va.: Willow Manor Publishing 2016

[16] The Growth of Railroads in the Capital District, https://vizettes.com/kt/rr/cd-rr-history/index.htm

[17] Drake, Ira S, and Cowperthwait & Co Thomas. Mitchell’s new traveller’s guide through the United States, showing the rail roads, canals, stage roads &c. with distances from place to place. Philadelphia, Thomas, Cowperthwait & Co., 1853, created 1848. Map. https://www.loc.gov/item/gm70005367/ 

Drake, Ira S., Mitchell’s new traveller’s guide through the United States, showing the rail roads, canals, stage roads &c. with distances from place to place, Philadelphia, Thomas, Cowperthwait & Co., published 1853, created 1848.

Albany and Schenectady Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 13 December 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albany_and_Schenectady_Railroad.  The railroad was incorporated on April 17, 1826, as the Mohawk & Hudson Company and opened for public service on August 9, 1831. On April 19, 1847, the company name was changed to the Albany & Schenectady Railroad. The railroad was consolidated into the New York Central Railroad on May 17, 1853.

Saratoga and Schenectady Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 11 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saratoga_and_Schenectady_Railroad. The line was opened from Schenectady to Ballston Spa on July 12, 1832, and extended to Saratoga Springs in 1833 for a total of 20.8 miles (33.5 km). 

Troy & Schenectady Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_%26_Schenectady_Railroad The building of the road began in 1841, and trains began running from Schenectady to Troy, New York in the fall of 1841 (21.0 miles)

Rensselaer and Saratoga Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 7 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rensselaer_and_Saratoga_Railroad. It completed 25.2 miles (40.6 km) between Troy and Ballston Spa on March 19, 1836.

Troy and Boston Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 7 November 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_and_Boston_Railroad. (1852)It completed a railroad from Troy, New York to the Vermont state line (35 miles) in 1852.

Boston and Albany Railroad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 17 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_and_Albany_Railroad

Palmer, Richard, Three Rivers Hudson~Mohawk~Schoharie, http://threerivershms.com/utica-schenRR.htm

Greene, Nelson, ed, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614-1925 Volume II, Chapter 87: History of the New York Central Railroad and Other Valley Lines, Chicago: S.J. Clark Pub. Co. 1925, PP 1288-1306, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/087.html

Larkin, F. Daniel, Historical Context: The Railroads and New York’s Canals, Consider the Source New York, Page accessed May, 3, 2024, https://considerthesourceny.org/using-primary-sources/erie-canal-new-yorks-gift-nation/chapter-9-other-new-york-canals/historical-context-railroads-and-new-yorks-canals

[18] Greene, Nelson, Chapter 103: Mohawk Manufacturing Statistics, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Pages 1502 – 1504, https://www.schenectadyhistory.org/resources/mvgw/history/103.html also https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89077224962&view=1up&seq=11

Grist mills, saw mills, tanneries, blacksmith shops, fulling and carding mills, asheries, etc., were built at nearly all Valley centers, in the settlement period, from 1661 to 1800. The following are examples of principal industries, in which the great majority of the wage earners of the valley were engaged prior to and up to when Johann Sperber migrated to the area.

See also:

Utica, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 15 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utica,_New_York

Johnstown, New York, Wikipeadia, This page was last edited on 5 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnstown,_New_York

Gloversville, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloversville,_New_York

Utica, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 15 May 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utica,_New_York

Amsterdam, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 15 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amsterdam,_New_York

Little Falls, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Falls,_New_York

[19]  Greene, Nelson, Chapter 103: Mohawk Manufacturing Statistics, History of the Mohawk Valley: Gateway to the West 1614 – 1925, Volume II, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Co., 1925, Page 20

[20] Utica, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utica,_New_York

Koch, Daniel,  Land of the Oneidas: Central New York State and the Creation of America, From Prehistory to the Present. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2023

Rome, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 March 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome,_New_York

[21] Utica, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utica,_New_York

[22] Nadel, Stanley, Little Germany: Ethnicity, Religion, and Class in New York City 1845-80, Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1990, Page 64

[23] Hunt, Arthur L., Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Data from Table One, Page 10. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

F. W. Beers, F.W. , History of Montgomery and Fulton counties, N.Y. : with illustrations and portraits of old pioneers and prominent residents, New York : F.W. Beers & co., 1878, Pa https://archive.org/details/historyofmontgom00beer/page/n459/mode/2up

Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999

Gloversville, New York, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 May 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloversville,_New_York#:~:text=The%20city%20would%20become%20the,official%20name%20of%20the%20community.

Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

Washington Frothingham, History of Fulton County : embracing early discoveries, the advance of civilization, the labors and triumphs of Sir William Johnson, the inception and development of the glove industry; with town and local records, also military achievements of Fulton county patriots, Syracuse, N.Y. : D. Mason, 1892, Chapter XVI, The Glove Industry, Pages 154 – 170 https://archive.org/details/cu31924083983951/page/n173/mode/2up

[24] Eisenstadt, Peter, ed, , Tanning Industry, The Encyclopedia of New York State, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2005, Page 1526 – 1527

[25] Schifman, Joathan, Water, Water Everywhere, and Not a Drop to Drink, Smithsonian Magazine, Nov 25 2019, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-new-york-city-found-clean-water-180973571/

Great Swamp (New York), Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 25 October 2021, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Swamp_%28New_York%29 

Young, Michelle, Fun Maps: The Slips and Swamps of Early NYC, untapped new york, https://untappedcities.com/2015/08/20/fun-maps-the-slips-and-swamps-of-early-nyc/

Johnson, Amy, The Saw-Kill and the Making of Dutch Colonial Manhattan, Sawkill Lumber Co. ,https://www.sawkill.nyc/history-new-york-city/

History of Manhattan, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 10 April 2024, History_of_Manhattan

Norcross, Frank W., A History of the New York Swamp, New York: The Chiswick Press, 1901, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/98/A_history_of_the_New_York_Swamp_%28IA_cu31924030127181%29.pdf

Urbanus, Jason, New York’s Original Seaport, Archaelogy Magazine, Sep / Oct 2015, https://archaeology.org/issues/online/collection/new-york-original-seaport/

[26] Roberts, Sam, 200th Birthday for the Map That Made New York, Mar 20, 2011, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/nyregion/21grid.html

[27] Gannon, Devin, On this day in 1811, the Manhattan Street Grid became official, Mar 22 2017, 6sqft, https://www.6sqft.com/204-years-ago-today-the-manhattan-street-grid-became-official/

Commissioner’s Plan of 1811, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissioners%27_Plan_of_1811

The 1811 Plan, The Greatest Grid: The Master Plan of Manhattan 1811 – Now, Museum of the City of New York,  https://thegreatestgrid.mcny.org/greatest-grid/making-the-plan 

Yu, Kerry, The Greatest Grid: History of the Mater Plan of Manhattan, Feb 7, 2019, Information Visualization, Student Work at the School of Information, Pratt Institute, https://studentwork.prattsi.org/infovis/labs/the-greatest-grid-history-of-the-master-plan-of-manhattan/

McQuilkin, Alexander,  The Rise and Fall of Manhattan’s Density, Urban Omnibus, Pblication of the Architectual League of New York, https://urbanomnibus.net/2014/10/the-rise-and-fall-of-manhattans-density/

Howe, Richard, Notes On The Commissioners’ Future City, Nov 9, 2013, The Gothan Center for New York City. History, https://www.gothamcenter.org/blog/notes-on-the-commissioners-future-city

Roberts, Sam, 200th Birthday for the Map That Made New York, Mar 20, 2011, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/nyregion/21grid.html

Jaffe, Eric, Nov 21, 2011, A Visual History of Manhattan’s Grid, Bloomberg, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-11-21/a-visual-history-of-manhattan-s-grid

Panero, James,The Greatness of the Grid, Mar 23, 2012, City Journal, https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-greatness-of-the-grid

Kimmelman, Michael, The Grid at 200: Lines That Shaped Manhattan, Jan 2 2012, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/03/arts/design/manhattan-street-grid-at-museum-of-city-of-new-york.html

Barr, Jason and Gerard Koeppel, The Manhattan Street Grid Plan: Misconceptions And Corrections, Dec 4 2016, The Gothan Center for New York City History, https://www.gothamcenter.org/blog/gridplanmain

Holloway, Marguerite, How Manhattan Got Its Street Grid, Feb 15, 2013, Scientific American, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-manhattan-got-its-street-grid/

Wright, Artis Q., Designing the City of New York: The Commissioners’ Plan of 1811, New York Public Library Blog, Jul 3 2010,  https://www.nypl.org/blog/2010/07/30/designing-city-new-york-commissioners-plan-1811

[28] Barbara McMartin and W. Alec Reid, The Glove Cities, Caroga, NY: Lake View Press, 1999 Page 74

[29] Barbara McMartin and W. Alec Reid, The Glove Cities, Caroga, NY: Lake View Press, 1999 Page 8

[30] Barbara McMartin and W. Alec Reid, The Glove Cities, Caroga, NY: Lake View Press, 1999 Page 2

[31] Hunt, Arthur, Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Page 10  https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

[32] Grand Duchy of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 25 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Baden

Lambert, Audrey M. “Farm Consolidation in Western Europe.” Geography, vol. 48, no. 1, 1963, pp. 31–48. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40565503

Wegge SA. Inheritance Institutions and Landholding Inequality in Nineteenth-Century Germany: Evidence from Hesse-Cassel Villages and Towns. The Journal of Economic History. 2021;81(3):909-942. doi:10.1017/S0022050721000358 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/abs/inheritance-institutions-and-landholding-inequality-in-nineteenthcentury-germany-evidence-from-hessecassel-villages-and-towns/C0994C948FC04D3C2CB4B1B967078AA3

[33] Cottage industries is akin to what many historical researchers call Proto-industry. Proto-industry refers to the widespread growth of rural handicraft production for external markets that occurred in many parts of Europe between the 16th and 19th centuries, prior to and during the early phases of the Industrial Revolution. It involved the expansion of small-scale, home-based manufacturing of goods like textiles, ironware, pottery, etc. by peasant families. This cottage industry production was done alongside traditional agricultural work. Proto-industry arose in many parts of Europe including England, France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Belgium/Netherlands. Historians like Franklin Mendels coined the term “proto-industrialization” to describe this phenomenon. 

Mendels, Franklin F. “Proto-Industrialization: The First Phase of the Industrialization Process.” The Journal of Economic History, vol. 32, no. 1, 1972, pp. 241–61. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/2117187

Proto-industrialization, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-industrialization

Ogilvie, Sheilagh (1996). European proto-industrialization : an introductory handbook. Sheilagh C. Ogilvie, Markus Cerman. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 227–239

Ogilvie, Sheilagh, protoindustrialization, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition, 2008 Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume, https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/people-files/faculty/sco2/full-texts/Ogilvie-2008-Proto-industrialization-published.pdf

See also:

Kamphoefner, Walter D., The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987, Chapter 1: At the Crossroads of Economic Development 12 -40

Grand Duchy of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 25 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Baden

Gehrmann, Rolf. “Denomination and Number of Children: The Case of Rural Baden, 18th/19th Century.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, vol. 42, no. 2 (160), 2017, pp. 92–113. JSTORhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/44234954

Barels. Charlotte, Simon Jager, Natalie Obergrube, Long-Term Effects of Equal Sharing: Evidence from Inheritance Rules for Land, May 2022, https://economics.mit.edu/sites/default/files/publications/InheritanceInequality_BJO.pdf

[34] Kamphoefner, Walter D., The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987, Page 81

[35] Kamphoefner, Walter D., The Westfalians: From Germany to Missouri, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987, Page 28 – 29

[36] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 27

[37] Ellis, B. Eldred, Gloves and the Glove Trade, London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd, 1921 , Page 71 https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Gloves_and_the_glove_trade_%28IA_glovesglovetrade00elli%29.pdf

[38] Ellis, B. Eldred, Gloves and the Glove Trade, London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd, 1921 , Page 5-7, 71, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/93/Gloves_and_the_glove_trade_%28IA_glovesglovetrade00elli%29.pdf

[39] Smith Willard M., Gloves Past and Present, New York: The Sherwood Press, Inc., 1917, Pages 42, 54-55, 58-59

Worshipful Company of Glovers, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 June 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worshipful_Company_of_Glovers

Hunt, Arthur, Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Page 14  https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

[40] The revocation of the Edict of Nantes was an edict signed by King Louis XIV of France in October 1685, known as the Edict of Fontainebleau, which ended religious tolerance for Protestants (Huguenots) in France. The revocation ended a long period of limited religious tolerance in France and led to renewed persecution of Protestants, the destruction of their institutions, and a massive refugee crisis as Huguenots fled into exile.

Edict of Nantes, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 28 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Nantes

Edict of Fontainebleau, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 29 April 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Fontainebleau

Davis, Stephen M., Louis XIV and the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes World History Encyclopedia, 26 July 2022, https://www.worldhistory.org/article/2046/louis-xiv-and-the-revocation-of-the-edict-of-nante/#google_vignette

[41] Smith Willard M., Gloves Past and Present, New York: The Sherwood Press, Inc., 1917, Pages 45

[42] Frothington, Washington, History of Fulton County : embracing early discoveries, the advance of civilization, the labors and triumphs of Sir William Johnson, the inception and development of the glove industry; with town and local records, also military achievements of Fulton county patriots, Syracuse D. Mason & Co. 1892, Page 155, https://archive.org/details/cu31924083983951/page/n7/mode/2up

[43] The map is an 1850 map that depicts the locations of where the Glove makers from Grenoble relocated in Germany. Thomas Cowperthwait & Co., A New Map of Germany, 1850, American made map of Germany, published in Philadelphia for the New Universal Atlas of the World of 1852,   https://nwcartographic.com/products/1850-a-new-map-of-germany?variant=675778261

[44] Smith, Gloves Past and Present, Page 64

[45] Smith, Gloves Past and Present, Page 58-65

[46] The History of Glovers, Rhanders, https://rhanders.com/blogs/heritage-timeline/the-history-of-gloves

“English word glove comes from Proto-Germanic *lōfô, Proto-Germanic ga-, and later Proto-Germanic galōfô (Glove.)”

Glove etymology, Cooljugator, https://cooljugator.com/etymology/en/glove#

“Old English glof “glove, covering for the hand having separate sheaths for the fingers,” also “palm of the hand,” from Proto-Germanic galofo “covering for the hand” (source also of Old Norse glofi), probably from ga- collective prefix + *lofi “hand” (source also of Old Norse lofi, Middle English love, Gothic lofa “

Glove, Online Etymology Dictionary, https://www.etymonline.com/word/glove

Redwood, Mike, Timeline for gloves, https://www.mikeredwood.com/all-about-gloves/timeline-for-gloves/ 

Redwood, Mike, Gloves and Glove-Making, Kindle Edition, Shire Publications, 2016

[47] Morrison, James, City Historian, City of Gloversville, Page accessed Jan 18, 2024, https://cityofgloversville.com/residents/city-historian/

Canhan, Hugh O., Hemlock and Hide: The Tanback Industry in Old New York, Summer 2011, Northern Woodlands, https://northernwoodlands.org/articles/article/hemlock-and-hide-the-tanbark-industry-in-old-new-york

Padmin, W., Fulton County, Then and Now, Jan 22, 2021, Fulton County Center for Regional Growth   (CRG), https://www.fccrg.org/then-now/ 

Houghton, George C., Leather, Tanned, Curried, and Finished, Census Bulletin, No 195, June 18, 1902, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1902, https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/195-manufactures-leather-tanned-curried-and-finisehd.pdf

Elizabeth R. Hosterman and Robert B. Hobbs, Leather Gloves: General Information, Oct 11 1948, Letter Curcular LC921, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/LC/nbslettercircular921.pdf

[48] Eisenstadt, Peter, ed, , Tanning and Glove Making, Fulton County, The Encyclopedia of New York State, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2005, Page 611

[49] Hunt, Arthur, Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Selected statistics derived from Table 11 on Page 15  https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

“Journal of the Society for Arts, Vol. 50, No. 2598.” The Journal of the Society of Arts, vol. 50, no. 2598, 1902, pp. 812-813. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41335655

[50] Barbara McMartin does not cite the referenced newspaper. The local newspaper may have been The Johnstown Daily Republican, 19 Oct 1895, Illustrated Supplement, Johnstown and Interesting HistoryPages 9 – 24.

Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 8

[51] For an alternative explanation of the origin of glove making in Fulton county, see: F. W. Beers, F.W. , History of Montgomery and Fulton counties, N.Y. : with illustrations and portraits of old pioneers and prominent residents, New York : F.W. Beers & co., 1878, Pa https://archive.org/details/historyofmontgom00beer/page/n459/mode/2up, Page 175

[52] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 15

[53] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 16

[54] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 18

[55] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 15

[56] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 19

[57] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities, Page 25

[58] Hunt, Arthur L., Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Bulletin No. 175, Washington D.C. May 24, 1902, Manufactures: Gloves and Mittens – Leather, Data from Table One, Page 10. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/bulletins/manufacturing/175-manufactures-gloves-mittens-leather.pdf

[59] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 10 

[60] The definition of manufacturing establishments expanded from 1850 to 1900 to capture the shift from shop and household manufacturing to centralized factory production. By 1900, the Census distinguished between larger factories and smaller shop-based manufacturing, with factories representing the bulk of output.

“In the statistics of manufactures, the establishment is taken as the basic unit, as the individual is taken in population, or the farm in agriculture.

1. Definition.-The term “establishment” as employed at this census is defined as representing one or more mills owned or controlled by one individual, firm, or corporation, located either in the same city or town, or in the same county, and engaged in the same industry. “

1900 U.S. Federal Census, Chapter II. Summary and Analysis of Results,  Page lxii , https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/decennial/1900/volume-7/volume-7-p3.pdf

[61] Hunt, Arthur L., Census Bulletin No. 175, Page 5

[62] Hunt, Arthur L., Census Bulletin No. 175, Page 11

[63] Hunt, Arthur L., Census Bulletin No. 175, Table 11, Page 10.

[64] Hunt, Arthur L., Census Bulletin No. 175, Page 10

[65] A study of German immigration to Bucks county in the same time period that Johann Sperber immigrated to Gloversville, New York addresses similar issues raised in this story of immigrating to America. Similar to Johann’s experience, the vast majority of these immigrants that moved to Nockamixon Township in Bucks County, Pennsylvania in the 1830s – 1850s came from the Upper Rhine region, and a majority of those came from Baden. Furthermore, most of the Badener were from specific areas of the Grand Duchy of Baden. Chain migration, now recognized as normative in migration history, largely accounted for the clustering of these newcomers in America. 

A major source of employment in Nockamixon Township was canal waterway work. It seems odd that the Nockamixon Township German settlers’ major entrée into the local workforce was canal work, which seemingly neither required Old World craft skills nor appeared readily compatible with farming.

“The larger reason for the Rhinelanders’ heavy concentration in canal work echoes the experience of so many immigrants in all eras: it provided an available niche.”

“While boating clearly constituted the dominant occupational opportunity for Rhinelanders in this area, the local economy also offered some of the newcomers opportunities in skilled labor commensurate with their Old World trades. Nockamixon Township provided a favorable environment because at midcentury it retained much of its preindustrial character. “

Hueston, Robert F., The Assimilation of German Immigrants into a Pennsylvania German Township, 1840–1900, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. CXXXIII, No. 1 ( January 2009), Pages 59 – 87, Two quotes – Page 66

[66] Morrison, James, City Historian, City of Gloversville, http://cityofgloversville.com/residents/city-historian/

[67] Barbara McMartin, The Glove Cities: How A People and Their Craft Built Two Cities, NY: Lake View Press, 1999, Page 16

[68] “The Auswanderer went to America less to build something new than to regain and conserve something old, which they remembered or thought they did … .”

Walker, Mack, Germany and the Emigration 1816 – 1885, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964, Page 69 https://archive.org/details/germanyemigratio0000walk/page/68/mode/2up


John Wolfgang Sperber – Part One: The First of the Sperbers in America

For about hundred years, between 1853 and 1954, there were four generations of one of our family branches in America: the Sperber Family. Then there were no more Sperbers.

This story is about the man, Johann Wolfgang Sperber, who established this family in America in the mid 1800s. Johann or John Sperber was common man. There are no landmarks named after him. You cannot find any reference to him in a newspaper. We have relatively little documentation about Johann or John Sperber.

Johann left his homeland, traveling from the Rhine Valley to a port on the English Channel. He then endured the journey across the Atlantic in a packet ship. He married a German lady with a child who experienced the same journey from Baden, Germany. They established their roots in the fast growing twin cities of Johnstown and Gloversville, New York. Johann became a glover and eventually worked in one of the largest glove making manufacturing firms in the county. A firm that was run by one of Teddy Roosevelt’s college roommates.

While his life story mirrors the lives of many German immigrants in the mid 1800s, it is still an unusual and unique life story of a common man. He was swept up in the wave of Germans who came to the United States in the mid 1800s. He may have planned as best as possible his journey to a new land but he undoubtably encountered life experiences he could never fully anticipate.

My further research into the other possible routes that John Sperber may have taken for his journey to his new homeland gives me more confidence that he departed from Havre, France. This story provides some of the research associated with my process of ‘confirming’ his journey.


John Wolfgang Sperber: A Five Part Story

The first part of the story provides an overview of the family legacy John Sperber established in his new homeland, an historical background on where John was from in Baden, Germany, the influences on his migration to the United States, and the historical evidence of his departure and arival to America.

The second part of John Sperber’s story describes his journey from Baden-Baden to Le Havre based on historical evidence and historical accounts.

The third part of the story assesses the three major inland pathways to European ports that John had options to consider. Since it is not absolutely certain that John sailed on the Germania from Le Havre, I have provided historical background on the relative accessibility of the three major routes John may have taken to make his voyage to the United States. 

The fourth part of the story discusses the possible influences that drew Johann Sperber to Fulton County, New York.

The fifth part of the story discussed his travel to New York City and his options for travel northward to the Mohawk Valley.

The sixth part of John Sperber’s story is about his establishing a new life and family in the Johnstown and Gloversville, New York area in the 1850s and 1860s.

The seventh part of the story is about the John’s Family in the context of Gloversville’s development  in the 1870s and 1880s and John’s career in the glove making industry.

The eighth part of the story is about the Sperber family in the 1890’s and the twilight of John’s life after the turn of the twentieth century


John Sperber’s Family

John Wolfgang Sperber, the Pater Familias of the Sperber family in America, is one of my great, great grandfathers. Compared with the other major family branches in the family, the Sperbers were relatively recent newcomers to America. The Speber family is part of the maternal branch of Harold Griffis‘ family. Harold’s mother was Ida Sperber.


Ida Sperber (Griffis)

Ida Sperber, (30 May 1876 – 14 Aug 1954) the youngest daughter of John Sperber and Sophia (Fliegel) Sperber. This portrait was taken around 1920 – 1925 when she was in her late 40s. Her son, Harold Griffis, was in college at the time of the photograph..

Source: Family Collection | Click for Larger View


John Sperber was part of a huge wave of German immigrants that came to the United States in the mid 1800s. Based on the review and assessment of historical sources, John immigrated to the United States around 1852 – 1853. His future sister-in-law Catherine immigrated in 1848 and his wife and the remaining in-laws migrated from Germany in 1855. As far as we know, John Sperber was the only member of his family to make the journey to America.

Family Tree of the Sperber Family

Click for Larger View

John Wolfgang Sperber and his wife, Sophia Fliegel, had six children; seven grandchildren; and five great grand children. They had two sons, John Frederick Sperber and Louis P Sperber (see the story Sperber Brothers: The Policeman in Gloversville). Louis did not have any sons. John Frederick, however, had three sons: Arthur J Sperber, Frederick John Sperber, and Guy Sperber. None of the three grandsons had any sons to carry the Sperber name forward.

John had one namesake: a great grand child through his grandson Guy Sperber. Guy’s only child was Winfield Sperber. Unfortunately Winfield was stillborn on October 18, 1916. [1] Of the remaining Sperbers, Ida Sperber was the last member of the Sperber family. Ida died in 1954.

Despite the surname not continuing through future generations, the remaining descendants of John Sperber are represented through his grandson Harold Griffis. Through Harold Griffis, he has four great grandchildren, eight great2 grandchildren, fourteen great3 grandchildren, and seven great4 grandchildren.

Surname Extinctions and Implications for Y-DNA

In 1939, a statistician named Alfred Lotka analyzed the 1920 U.S. Census and concluded that 82% of American surnames were bound to disappear. [2]

This statement sounds crazy! But there a statistical basis to anticipate the probability of a surname to go extinct. Since surnames in many Western European societies are historically associated with the surname of the male in marriage, the extinction of a family name is tied to the extinction of a Y chromosome lineages. Hence, surname extinction in Western culture and society matters to the genetic genealogist. [3]

Chart One: Probability of Eventual Extinction

Based on the fertility rate at the time the third generation of Sperber’s would initially have had children (1900-1910), there was about a 30 percent chance for surname extinction.

Johann Wolfgang Sperber from the Grand Dutchy of Baden

Map One: Margraviate of Baden [4]

Map Two: Baden Until 1803 (Red) and Later Territorial Gains [5]

Based on census documentation, John or Johann indicated he was born in “Baden”, specifically the Baden-Baden area of the Grand Duchy of Baden. Its name and borders have changed over time, reflecting the shifting alliances and feudalist power struggles in the mid 1700s to early 1800s. The area has a rich history of cultural influences and shifting political strife and alliances since the fourth century BCA. [6]

During John Sperber’s time and during the prior generations of his father and grandfather, his birthplace was part of the Margraviate of Baden-Baden and then the Grand Duchy of Baden (Großherzogtum Baden), a state in south-west Germany on the east bank of the Rhine. The Margraviate of Baden (Markgrafschaft Baden) was, at one point, an historical territory of the Holy Roman Empire.

It was named a margraviate in 1112 and existed as such until 1535 when it was split into the two margraviates of Baden-Durlach and Baden-Baden. The two parts were reunited in 1771. The restored area became the Margraviate of Baden in 1803.

Between the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1792 and 1817 when Baden became a member of the German Confederation, Baden’s allegiance went back forth between French and German interests.

Between 1803 and 1806, it was the Electorate of Baden, receiving territorial additions. In 1806, Baden became the Grand Duchy of Baden. [7]

In earlier times Baden was considered to be on both sides of the Upper Rhine river, but after the Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815), it was considered as Baden only east of the Rhine. The Dutchy of Baden was bounded by Lake Constance on the south and by the Rhine river on the south and west.

Politically, the Duchy of Baden was surrounded by French and German states. To its west was the French historical region of Alsace, to its south was Switzerland, the Palatinate [8] to its northwest, Hesse or Hessen (9) to the north, and parts of Bavaria to the northeast. Its eastern border was shared with the region of Württemberg. [10]

Many fellow Germans who were born in the Grand Duchy of Baden and emigrated to the United States indicate their birthplace as ‘Baden’.

In the 1880 U.S. Census, John’s birthplace was listed as ‘Baeren’. This perhaps was due to how John answered the census enumerator’s questions or the result of what the enumerator “heard’ phonetically during the canvassing of the census. Perhaps John answered that he was a “Bauern” , a farmer in German.

Map Three: Map of the Grand Dutchy of Baden [11]

As reflected on line 30 of the U.S. Census page below, the census enumerator, James A. Earle, listed John Sperber’s birthplace as Baeren, Germany, as well as his parents. The birth place of Sophia, John’s wife, and her parents was listed as Baden. Their four of five children that were living in the household at the time were listed as having parents that were born in Baden.

1880 U.S. Census – Sperber Family

Click for Larger View | Source: Year: 1880; Census Place: Gloversville, Fulton, New York; Roll: 834; Page: 95A; Enumeration District: 006

After the Napoleonic Wars Germany was a federation of thirty-nine states which varied considerably in size. It was not uncommon for enclaves of one state to be embedded in the territory of another state. There were two great powers – Prussia and Austria – and several medium-sized states, of which the most important were Bavaria, Württemberg, Baden, Hanover and Saxony. There were also numerous small territories and four Free Cities (Bremen, Frankfurt, Hamburg, and Lübeck). [12]

As reflected in map four, the mosaic map of the German states was particularly confusing in the center of the federation and in the Rhine valley. This part of the country was split up into a medley of medium-sized states (Saxony, Brunswick, Nassau, Hesse-Darmstadt, Hesse-Cassel) and tiny territories in Anhalt and Thuringia.

North of the River Main, Germany was dominated by Prussia. Prussia was divided into two groups of provinces separated by Hanover and Brunswick. The eastern and central provinces were Brandenburg, Pomerania, Posen, Silesia, East and West Prussia (united 1824-78) and the province of Saxony. The two western provinces were Westphalia and the Rhineland. South of the River Main lay Bavaria, Württemberg and Baden. Their territories were in one part except that Bavaria had an isolated province (the Palatinate), west of the Rhine River.

Map Four: The German Confederation (Der Deutsche Bund) [13]

Click for Larger View

All these states controlled their own economic and social affairs. For example, customs and excise taxes, communications, currency, banking, and artisan gilds were regulated by each state and not by the Confederation of German states.

In the context of this regional political, social and economic environment, John or Johann was reportedly born in Baden on January 2, 1828. [14] As reflected in various U.S. Federal censuses, both of his parents were from Baden area. Nothing is known about John’s family. [15]

John Sperber’s birth year varies depending on the historical source. His implied or actually stated birth year ranges from 1826 to 1838. As reflected in table one, based on available sources of information, it is highly likely that John was born on January 2, 1828. “(U)nless an age reported in the census can be corroborated with another source, it should not be considered totally reliable.” [16]

Table One: Reported Birth Year and Age of John Wolfgang Sperber by Source

Implied
Age
implied
Birth Year
SourceComment
26Implied
1826
Germania Ship Manifest ListManifest indicates his age as 26. This would imply he was born in 1826
35Implied
1830
1865 N.Y. State CensusEnumerator documented his age as 35. This would imply he was born in 1828
41Implied
1829
1870 Federal CensusEnumerator documented his age as 41. This would imply he was born in 1828
47Implied
1828
1875 N.Y. State CensusEnumerator documented his age as 47. This would imply he was born in 1828
51Implied
1829
1880 Federal CensusEnumerator documented his age as 51. This would imply he was born in 1829
7218381900 Federal CensusAge and birth year are contradictory. Enumerator wrote his age as 72; his birth year as 1838. If he was 72, then his birth year would have been 1828. which would mean he was 62. 1900 U.S. Census.
2 Jan 1828Family Document of Sperber BirthsAn handwritten page of family births for Sperber family members indicates that John Sperber was born on January 2nd, 1828. See footnote [14].

Why Did John Sperber Immigrate to the United States?

We do not know specifically why John Sperber immigrated to the United States. We do not know exactly why he ended up in Gloversville, New York. It appears that he immigrated alone at the young age of 24.

His individual decision and subsequent actions to immigrate to the United States were undoubtably influenced by a combination of larger social, political, economic, technical and environmental factors. He was part of a larger wave of fellow Germans from the Rhineland that migrated to the United States. Similar to his future in-laws, the Fliegel family, his decision to emigrate was undoubtably influenced by a combination of push and pull factors and enabling factors that had similar effects on many Germans. [17]

The “Push” and “Pull” Factors Affecting the German Immigration Experience are discussed in the following stories:

The Fliegel Family: Their Journey to America October 10, 2023

The Sperber & Fliegel Families in America: Catherine Fliegel the First to Arrive September 26, 2023

A German Influence July 11, 2023

See an example of a steerage ticket and regulations governing steerage passage from Le Havre to New York City in 1854

What motives caused John Sperber to emigrate cannot be determined by available documentation or by statistics. However, from the ebb and flow of emigration trends and patterns, it is possible to draw some conclusions about the effect of large scale political and economic trends and social conditions that existed in Baden when he came to America.

After every war in which the German states were involved there was a marked increase in emigration. The emigrant wished to avoid future wars, was economically impacted or was antagonized by post-war political conditions. Times of disorder and revolution also have been an influence. The upheavals in the 1930s and in 1848 grew out of dissatisfaction with domestic political conditions. These upheavals often owed their origin to economic and social needs and usually prepared the way for emigration. If the political hopes miscarried, as in the Germany states after 1830 and 1848, despondency and bitterness succeeded. In such a frame of mind, decisions to migrate to a land of ‘freedom and opportunity’ beyond the seas, was easily reached.

Perhaps the most important factors, however, were economic and social.

“Southwestern Germany (the Palatinate, Baden, Wurttemberg) is preeminently a region of small peasant holdings. Because of the unlimited division of the holdings and the great increase of population, the land was so subdivided that many of the small farms, even in good years, could hardly support a family. When the crops failed in successive years, as frequently happened, these petty farmers and their families suffered bitterly unless they could find other employment. Faced with the impossibility of satisfying their craving for land, for an adequate living, and for economic and social betterment, the inhabitants were ready to accept the invitations of foreign agents and emigrate en masse. If the first emigrants made a fortune “over there” or sent back favorable reports, then the more faint-hearted were ready to follow. “ [18]

As reflected in chart one, John Sperber was one of many who were part of the first of the two major waves of German immigrants to migrate to the United States in the 1800s. German emigration reached its first crest in the southwest and western areas of the German states in the middle of the ’50’s, its second wave was represented by Germans in central Germany towards the end of the ’50’s, and its third in the east in the ’70’s and ’80’s.

Nearly one million German immigrants entered the United States in the 1850’s. The German immigrants arriving in the 1850’s represented almost 18 percent of the total number of German immigrants arriving to the United States between 1820 and 1920. In the 1850’s German immigrants represented a little over a third of all immigrants coming to the United States.  [19]

Chart One: German Overseas Emigration and German Immigration to United States

Click for Larger View
Annotated chart from F. Burgdorfer, Diagram 11, Chapter XII Migration Across the Frontiers of Germany, Walter  F. Wilcox, ed, International Migrations, Volume II, Interpretations, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 1931, pages 338, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5114/c5114.pdf

Economic and social conditions in the Grand Duchy of Baden were particularly less favorable for the farming population as well as the artisans and mechanics in the late 1940s and the early 1850s. Self-employed farmers, artisans, and tertiary sector workers (workers providing services rather than products) from the southwest, began migrating between the 1840s and 1860s. The winter of 1851 was notably harsh due to shortages of both grain and potatoes in Germany. [20]

“(T)he credit of small farmers cracked under the strain, and the financial ruin harried them out of Germany. … In the first place, many of them are involved in mortgages from the years before 1845 when an abundance of capital and low rates of interest had encouraged extensive and often reckless improvements. In the second place, many farmers in the hard times between 1845 and 1847 had saved themselves only by piling up debts which they found impossible to shake off before greater disaster overcame them in 1851-1852. Finally, the annual payments they had assumed after 1848 in order to free themselves from feudal obligations were no less a threat because due to the government.” [21]

Similar to the plight of the Irish tenants defaulting on payment for rent during the potato blight in Ireland during the same time period, the German peasant could not meet his economic obligations. Fathers in the Rhineland could not longer provide land for their sons. The twin attitudes of despair in Europe and hope in America overcame any lingering doubts and uncertainties to immigrate to the United States.

Emigration from the German states can be regarded as a loss or a gain according to one’s the point of view. It was frequently regarded as an advantage by those who were left behind. This point of view was manifested in governmental efforts to assist the distressed population. Given the distressed nature of farming, the inability to offer functional sizes of land as inheritance, and farm debt, economic aid was given to emigrants to reduce overpopulation, ease the strain on farming, and possibly free up economic opportunities and demands for those that stayed. For example, it was noted in 1852 that the Grand Duchy of Baden developed a system of state, local and individual cooperation which assisted in the annual departure of emigrants to the United States. In the period 1840 to 1889, approximately four million marks were spent from the public funds, state and communal level, in Baden in the form of grants in aid of emigration. [22]

In addition to subsidizing emigrants to America, the Grand Duchy of Baden also sent prisoners. In 1850, fifty people were selected and financed to find a new home in America.Between 1850 and 1852, inmates were released from Pforzheim police custody and sent to America. [23]

“The natural unwillingness to leave one’s fatherland was mitigated by the fact that, in any case, old bonds of association were loosening. The common fields were being divided, and the feudal system with its joint obligations were being modernized, changes which entailed a weakening of sentimental ties as well. ” [24]

German Emigration between 1848 and 1855

This “Great Migration” experienced a rush of Europeans to the United States between 1848 and 1855, the time in which John and his in-laws, the Fliegels, immigrated to the United States. Between 1850 and 1860 around 2.6 million immigrants came into the United States and foreign born inhabitants increased from roughly 2.5 million to over 4 million. From 1850 to 1860 the rate of growth of the foreign born was nearly three times that of the native population. [25]

The German immigrants arriving in the 1850’s represented almost 18 percent of the total number of German immigrants arriving to the United States between 1820 – 1920.  [26]

As indicated in the table two, during this time period, there was not much of an inward flow of population into the German federated states. Despite a healthy natural net increase of population growth (more births than deaths), the natural increases were offset by the number of Germans emigrating to other countries, notably to the United States. The net loss through emigration was especially large between 1847 and 1855, when crop failure and famine impaired living conditions among a largely agricultural population. Political discord and ferment also quickened the migratory flow out of the area. [27]

Immigrant vs Emigrant [28]

An immigrant is a person who has immigrated—“moved to another country, usually for permanent residence.” An emigrant, on the other hand, is “someone who leaves a country or region.”

The terms immigration and emigration refer to the act in relation to place, but they can also refer to a group or number of such people moving to and from places..

The difference is that emigration is leaving and immigration is coming—an emigrant is someone who moves away, while an immigrant is someone who moves in. Emigrant and immigrant can refer to the same person—people who are emigrating are also immigrating (if they leave, they have to go somewhere).

In some parts of Germany (Württemburg, Baden, and Palatinate) noted for their large emigration rates, it became so heavy that the population actually declined.

In Baden, despite a large excess of births between 1847 and 1855, emigration caused a continuous decline in population. On the average it amounted to 0.11 per 1000 in 1846-48, 0.14 in 49-52 and 1.04 in 1853 – 55.” [29]

Table Two: Estimated Balance Between Immigration and Emigration for German States Between 1847 – 1855 (in Thousands)

TimeAnnual
Increase
Population
Excess
Births
Over
Deaths
Excess
Immigration (+)
Emigration (-)
Total
Increase
(Rate
per 1000)
Natural
Increase
(Rate
per 1000)
Immigration (+)
Emigration(-)
(Rate per
1000)
1847-
1849
134236– 1023.836.74– 2.92
1850-
1852
261359– 1927.3510.11– 2.76
1853-
1855
64222– 1581.786.16– 4.38
Source: F. Burgdorfer, Table 120, Chapter XII Migration Across the Frontiers of Germany, Walter  F. Wilcox, ed, International Migrations, Volume II, Interpretations, NBER, 1931, pages 316, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5114/c5114.pdf

As reflected in map five below, a large proportion of the German émigrés were from the Baden area. The map provides a graphic depiction of the relative density of the location of emigrants in the German federated states between 1848 and 1854.

Map Five: Immigration from Germany 1848 – 1854 [30]

Click for Larger View | Annotation of Baden is mine.

As indicated in the table three, between 1846 and 1851 German emigration from foreign ports exceeded the number of Germans leaving from German ports. It was not until 1851 that Bremen and Hamburg (and to a lesser extent Stettin, Swinemünde, Geestemünde and Lübeck) caught up with foreign ports of embarkation, notably Le Havre.

Table Three: German Emigration Through German and Foreign Ports 1846 – 1851 (in Thousands)

YearTotal
Number
in Year
German
Ports
(Number of
Emigrants)
Percent
of Year
Foreign
Ports
(Number of
Emigrants)
Percent
of Year
184694,58138,05840%56,52360%
1847109,52942,38239%67,14761%
184881,90037,53246%44,36854%
184989,10136,24941%52,85259%
185082,40437,06145%45,34355%
1851112,54756,07050%56,47750%
’46-’51570,062247,35243%322,71057%
Source: F. Burgdorfer, Table 123, Chapter XII Migration Across the Frontiers of Germany, Walter  F. Wilcox, ed, International Migrations, Volume II, Interpretations, NBER, 1931, pages 316, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5114/c5114.pdf

Prior to the 1850’s, the major port of embarkation for German emigrants to the United States was the French port of Le Havre; it was not until 1852 that Bremen first superseded Le Havre as the major port for the emigration of German nationals,. Even after 1852, Le Havre remained the port of choice for ethnic Germans along the southwest area of the Rhine valley.

This general pattern may suggest that John Sperber had a more equal chance of emigrating from a German or foreign port by the time 1852 or 1853 rolled around. However, each of the ports of embarkation had unique characteristics that attracted German émigrés from different areas of the confederated states.

“German emigrants left from different regions of Germany and generally favored different ports of embarkation. The Dutch ports (Antwerp and Amsterdam) declined in popularity in the 1800s because of high fares and the difficulty of finding return freights to fill the ships to make the round trips profitable. Bremen was accessible to migrants from the northwest via the Weser River. Hamburg was favorable to German emigrants from the Prussian provinces east of the Elbe River. Le Havre was more accessible to the southwest German regions (such a Baden where John Sperber resided).” [31]

Technical Advancements Related to Trans-Atlantic Commerce

While there were a number of push and pull factors that influenced the migration of Germans to the United States, technological developments associated with seamanship during the 1820-1840s facilitated the movement of cargo and people. The development of the “Admiralty Compass” and the chronometer allowed maritime navigation to be so accurate that by the 1830s ships could navigate around the earth and target their destinations within an error of a mile. [32]

In addition to the improvement of navigation instruments, competition to produce ships for efficient commercial trade produced faster, sturdier ships. “The American transadantic sailing packets were in operation from 1818 to 1881, but the era of potency was the period 1818-1858.” [33].

The term packet ship was used to describe a vessel that featured regularly scheduled service on a specific point-to-point line. Usually, the individual ship operated exclusively for a specific shipping line. Packet ships were sail vessels that could accommodate mail, cargo, and people. They brought raw commodities from America to Europe and on their return run, transported immigrants to America. [34]

Inside a Packet Ship 1854

Click for Larger View | Source:  Inside a Packet Ship, 1854, From Die Gartenlaube Leipzig Fruft Neil Courtesy of the Mariners’ Museum, Wkimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Inside_a_Packet_Ship,_1854.jpg

From the inception of the use of American packet ships in 1818 through about 45 years of service leading up the impact of the Civil War, the United States dominated the north transatlantic carrying trade. The packet ship was structurally suitable for the steady month after month pounding in the North Atlantic trade. The packets were used for relatively quick turn around runs. They were built with fuller models, less top hamper, and sturdier construction that did not sacrificed weight or speed. The packet “stayed with it, punching valiantly back and forth across the Western Ocean.” The packets, with well-balanced hulls and rigging plan, was driven hard hour after hour, day after day, with never a minute of letup. [36]

“Generally, during this period, a good deal of cotton moved eastward (from the United States), and with such cargo-and but few passengers—the ships rode light and made fast runs. On the return, or westward, passage, the cargoes normally consisted of such heavy articles as iron, coal, salt, machinery, manufactured goods, copper, etc., which worked in well, for the ‘tween decks were generally occupied by passengers to near capacity.” [37]

Transatlantic sailing packet lines operated between many American ports but the New York lines from the onset outclassed all others and throughout the entire era of packet sail. The New York transatlantic packet lines so dominated the Atlantic “ferry” to Liverpool and Havre that they quickly ‘killed off or wore down’ all competition, both domestic and foreign. The service record of American packets in the Atlantic “shuttle” (New York-Liverpool, London, or Havre) is remarkable, considering the seas and winds encountered. [38]

Improvements were also made to ensure safer travel to various ports. Improvements were made in lighthouse design, illumination and construction. Coastal charts were updated with more detail on shoal formations. These technical innovations occurred in France, England and the United States. England centralized control over the management of lighthouses in 1836. The French government adopted uniform requirements for lighthouse construction in 1825. The United States had only 55 lighthouses on the east coast in 1820. By 1842, there were 256 lighthouses on the coast, along with 30 light boats and 1,000 buoys. The introduction of maritime insurance and life saving crews and local patrols mitigated the loss of ships and cargo. [41]

Immigrating to the United States: From Where and When?

When did John Sperber actually immigrate to the United States? Which European port did be depart from to sail to the United States? Why and how did he end up in Gloversville, New York?

These are questions that are subject to debate. The answers depend on one’s conclusions from judging the trustworthiness of conflicting sources of available information, the absence of specific information and placing those sources and blank spaces of information in the context of the broader historical patterns of immigration.

I believe it is “more than likely” that the Johann, John, Wolfgang Sperber arrived in New York City on June 14, 1852 on the ship “Germania” from the Le Havre Port in France.

I have couched my statement with “more than likely” based on:

  • historical documentation on immigration patterns;
  • secondary sources on the historical analysis of of the German immigration experience in the mid 1800s;
  • historical documentation on the nature and conditions of roadways, waterways and railways in France and Germany in 1850 – 1853;
  • a review of available ship manifest lists of German immigrants to America;
  • locating a Johann Sperber in a ship manifest in June 14, 1852 on the ship Germania; and
  • the comparison of conflicting information between census documents.

Historical Evidence Related to John Sperber’s Departure and Arrival

In 1900, the United States census asked questions regarding immigration dates and questions regarding country of origin. The Federal census questionnaires have changed every decade.

In most cases the changes involved requesting more detailed information, but sometimes the modifications simply reflected prevailing social and political currents.[42]

When John Sperber was around 72 years old, a census enumerator named Henry Gaylord recorded that John and his parents were born in Germany. The enumerator also documented that John had immigrated to the United States in 1853 and he had been in the United States for 47 years and was a naturalized citizen. [43]

John Sperber’s Reported Date of Immigration in 1900 U.S. Census [44]

Click for Larger View

Assuming John was the respondent to the census questions, despite being in his early 70’s at the time of the 1900 census, it might be expected that his recollection of when he arrived in the United States would be fairly accurate. For most immigrants, I imagine that the journey to America was not an easy one and it left an indelible memory of many experiences (e.g. leaving one’s homeland; the psychological, social and economic demands and uncertainties of emigrating; getting to the port; the travel on the ship; establishing a new home, etc). Emigrating from the homeland was perhaps one of the major milestones in any immigrant’s life.

Cartoon about a crass enumerator asking questions for the 1860 U.S. Federal census. [45]

However, we do not know who interacted with Henry Gaylord, the enumerator. It is possible that John misspoke and stated the wrong year of his arrival. Perhaps the enumerator did not to talk to John but to another member of the household.

Census taking is not an exact science. Having information from alternative sources or other census years can provide a firmer basis to make a statement of fact about an ancestor. [46]

“Use census information with caution, since the information may have been given to a census taker by any member of the family, or by a neighbor. Some information may have been incorrect or deliberately falsified. Compare, contrast, and correlate each census population schedule with those of other census years, and with non-census documents to get the most accurate picture of the family history.” [47]

Despite the possible errors or misstatements of facts that might be found in the New York State or Federal censuses, I would not rule out the veracity of ‘facts’ written down by Mr. Gaylord on June 4th, 1900. We know John Sperber arrived in the United States in 1852-1853 or ‘around that time‘. We know John Sperber was in the United States before his marriage to Sophia Fliegel in February 1857. He did not travel with the Fliegel family to the United States in 1854. So it is highly likely that John Sperber immigrated to America between 1848 to 1856.

The following is a photograph of the original marriage certificate for John Sperber and Sophia Fliegel. [48]

Original Certificate of Marriage February 2, 1857

Marriage document of John Wolfgang Sperber and Sophia Fliegel Source: Original Document from Family Collection | Click for Larger View

Review of Ship Manifest Lists

In my attempts to correlate census data with possible ship manifest lists, I have combed through manifest lists of ships that arrived in the United States from Northern Europe. I also have reviewed secondary data base sources of German Immigrants from a variety of sources. [49] I have also inspected microfiche copies of original ship manifests that are handwritten by captains or members of the ship’s crew that have sailed from Bremen, Hamburg, Rotterdam, Antwerp, Cologne, Liverpool, and Havre between 1850 and 1856. [50]

Generally speaking the captains’ lists have the least value, as far as the spelling of the names is concerned.  They were in most cases written by men who had no knowledge of German and to whom German surnames were a mystery they could not fathom. They wrote down the names as they were pronounced to them, spelling them as they would spell English names. As a result there are hundreds of names that have such fantastic forms that they are unrecognizable.[51]

Discovering a passenger list with a name of a relative is often the result of patience, tenacity, focus and luck. Based on the zeal of discovering an ancestor’s name in a ship manifest, you constantly need to remind yourself of avoiding the pitfall of ‘forcing’ what you see into something that is not really there (e.g. your relative on a manifest list).

After reviewing available ship manifest sources, four records appeared to point to a John or ‘Johann Sperber’. [52] After a review of those records, I have, with reservation, concluded that John Sperber arrived in New York City on June 14, 1852 on the Ship Germania. [53]

The following are pages five and six of the ship manifest. Johann Sperber is noted on the sixth page. The entire ship manifest list came be accessed as a PDF file.

Manifest of Ship Germania – Pages Five and Six – Line 13 of Page Six

Click for Larger View

At first, it was not immediately apparent that the captain’s writing reflected the name ‘Johann Sperber’ on page six. Based on a blow-up view of line 13 below, initially the last name looks like a jumbled string of scribbling. Based on a rudimentary understanding of cursive writing in the 1800s, Johann can vaguely be made out. The “J” looks like a modern cursive variant of a “G”. The number “26” is decypherable. A word “cultivator” at the end of the line, describing his occupation, can be discerned. [54]

He may have been the proprietor of his own parcel(s) of land. He could, depending on the land size, have employed other agricultural workers. If he didn’t own the land, he was called a tenant farmer. [54]

Blow Up of “Johann Sperber” – Germania Ship Manifest June 14 1852 Page 6 Line 13

Click for Larger View

There is the inherent challenge conducting historical research associated with deciphering what was written on paper and being able to read what was written.  Different styles of cursive writing in the United States as well as in the German states evolved concurrently through out the 1800s. Different styles of cursive writing can be found on documents in the mid 1800s that represent styles of writing that evolved in the late 1700s. In addition, everyone has their own style when it comes to penmanship. In fact, one could say that handwriting is as unique as fingerprints.

Within the context of the particular historical styles of cursive writing that was common in the mid 1800s, the handwriting of some ship captains looked so impeccable it almost looked like it was professionally printed. Others had handwriting that is hardly decipherable.

Ship GERMANIA at pier, Le Havre, France [55]

Source: Collections and Research, Mystic Seaport Museum http://mobius.mysticseaport.org/detail.php?module=objects&type=related&kv=197389 | Click for Larger View

The ship Germania, was part of the American New York based Havre Whitlock Line. It was a shipping line that was prominent on the New York to Le Havre Atlantic shipping route.

“Unlike other American packet lines, Whitlock was the sole owner and operator of his ships. Usually the agents, builders, and captains of the individual ships were part owners of the vessels. Ships, each with a variety of owners, were then controlled and managed by the line in strict conformity with a general plan. “ [56]

Consistent with how the Havre Whitlock packet ship line was managed, it is presumed that the ship captain of the Germania, D. H. Wood, was an American. His penmanship was rather crude. The hand writing contained vestiges of an older style of American or English penmanship. In my research I found an example of various cursive versions of upper and lower case letters that were found in the 1800 census population schedule in Pennsylvania. [57}

An analysis of Captain Wood’s writing style found in the ship manifest list suggests the name on line 13 of page six is “Sperber Johann . . . 26. . . . m . . . cultivator” . There is a column after occupation that lists place of origin. It appears that the manifest list indicates “Bavaria” above John’s name, suggesting he and others were purportedly from Bavaria.

The following close up view of the hand written name on the ship manifest suggests that the name is Johann Sperber.

Close Up Analysis of Cursive Writing : “Sperber Johann”

The following is the heading on the ship manifest for the voyage. The ship captain was D.H Wood.

Heading of Ship Manifest

The top of the manifest states:


I, D. H. Wood do solemnly, sincerely and truly swear that the following List or Manifest of Passengers, subscribed with my name, and now delivered by me to the Collector of Customs for the District of New York, contains, to  the best of my knowledge and belief, a just and true account of all the Passengers received on board the Ship Germania whereof I am Master, from Havre. So help my God.

Sworn to this 14 June 1852 D H Wood.

List or Manifest OF ALL THE PASSENGERS taken on board the Ship Germania whereof D H Wood is Master, from Havre burthen 996 77/95 tons.


John Sperber’s Voyage to the United States On the Ship Germania

To summarize what has been found on a ship’s manifest, Johann Sperber traveled on the packet ship named Germania and departed from Havre, France. Based on the ship manifest records, Johan’s birth date was 1826. Johann Sperber was 26 years old when he came to America. His birth place was listed as ‘Bavaria‘. He stayed in the steerage area of the ship. The manifest indicates his occupation as a ‘cultivator‘, a farmer.

While ‘John Sperber’ was listed as being from Bavaria on the ship’s manifest, it is possible he was lumped in with the rest of the Germans on the ship. In 1852, German immigrants departing from Havre are. largely from Bavaria and Baden.

Table Four: Distribution of Nationalities Departing from Havre in 1852 [57a]

NationalityNumber of
Immigrants
Percentage
Bavaria22,41149 %
Baden16,02135
Hesse3,6898
Prussia3,6858

Assuming this manifest list includes our John Sperber, when John Sperber traveled from Le Havre to New York City, he utilized the services of the Union Line of Havre Packets for his voyage to America. At the time of his voyage, there were eleven ships that were making regularly scheduled round trip voyages between Le Havre and New York City for the Union Line of Havre.. At the time, the Germania was one of the newer ships in the Havre Whitlock Line.

As the advertisement for the shipping schedule for the Union Line in the semiweekly New York Evening Post indicates,

Advertisement for Union Line of Havre Packets between New York City and Le Havre 1850 [58]

Click for Larger View

This advertisement was posted without any revisions in the New York Evening Post between February 12, 1851 and August 10 1852. This implies that the monthly schedules for each of these ships were relatively stable, barring unforeseen changes in weather or other issues that might delay a scheduled departure date.

Based on the advertised schedule for the Union Line of Havre, the departure dates of the Germania are reflected in table five.

Table Five: Ship Germania Departure Schedule

From NewYorkFrom Havre
October 24thDecember 8th
February 24thApril 8th
June 24thAugust 8th

If John Sperber arrived in New York City on June 14, 1852 on the Germania, then based on the reliance of information found in the above advertised ship schedule, his ship was scheduled to depart from Le Havre on April 8th 1852. If the ship departed on time, this implies the journey took 64 days. However, as reflected in table six, records on the Westbound passages for the ship Germania indicate the longest trip was 52 days.

Table Six: Germania Westbound Passages in Days

Service in LineShortestLongestAverage
1850 – 1863 (13 years)265238
Source: Fairburn, William A. (1945). Merchant Sail, Volume II  Center Lovell, ME: Fairburn Marine Educational Foundation. Pages 1198 & 1298

If we assume the advertisements in the Evening Post were accurate, then It would appear that the departure of John’s ship was delayed at the port of Le Havre. If the average westbound passage for the Germania was 33 days, then John’s voyage to Ameica may have started on or around May 8th, 1852.

A May 8th departure date would have been consistent with prior Union Line packet schedules since 1835. [59] In a March 1835 advertisement in the Evening Post, the Havre Union Line ship sailed from New York to Le Havre every month on the 8th, 16th, and 24th, and a ship sailed from Le Havre every month on the 1st, 8th, and 24th.

The New York State Register in 1845 also lists the packet schedule times for the Union Line of Havre in 1845 (see below). The same arrangements in 1835 existed ten years later. In 1845, The New York State Register identified the agents and ships that operated as the Havre Union Line. It announced that a Havre Union Line ship sailed from New York to Le Havre every month on the 8th, 16th, and 24th, and that a ship sailed from Le Havre every month on the 1st, 8th, and 24th.

New York and Havre Union Line Packets 1845 [60]

Click for Larger View

While the composition of the fleet of packet ships for the Union Line changes between 1845 and 1852 (the Germania was added to the the Union Line in 1850), the company may have had scheduled departures on the 8th of a given month despite what the company posted in the Evening Post.

The Havre Union Line was actually a ‘joint venture’ between the Havre Whitlock Line and the Havre Old Line. The Havre Union transatlantic packet line was organized in the 1830s from the joining of the Havre Old Line and the Havre Whitlock Line. Three of the ships listed in the 1850 advertisement were owned by William Whitlock: the Gallia, Germania and the Bavaria. [61]

The Germania was a three masted, square-rigged ship, built in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, in 1850. The ship weighed 996 tons. It was 170 ft 8 in length and 35 ft 6 in wide and 17 ft 8 in depth in the hold of the ship. The Germania had three decks and the draft was 20 feet. [62]

Ship GERMANIA at pier, Le Havre, France [63]

Click for Larger View

The Germania sailed in William Whitlock’s line as part of the stable of New York to Havre packet ships from 1850 until the end of the Line in 1863.

In 1853, the Captain D.H. Wood commissioned a painting of the ship in Havre. At the time of writing this story, the painting is available for sale for $10,000! [64]

Frederic Roux Oainting of the Germania Presented to Captain D. Wood

Click for Larger View

After 1863, the ship was a transient (the sailing equivalent to a tramp freighter) for Whitlock. [65] The Germania was advertised as sailing in the Ladd Line of New York-New Orleans packets in 1852, and in the Brigham Line of New York-New Orleans packets in 1854. [66]

Continuation of the Story

The second part of John Sperber’s story describes his journey from Baden-Baden to Le havre based on historical evidence and historical accounts.

Sources

Feature Photograph: This is a collage of images that are part of this story. The packet ship Germania is from a photograph of the ship taken in 1863. Long after Johann Speber sailed on the Germania, the photopgra was taken at the end of her active life in 1863 on the other side of the United States (see below). The portion of the handwritten ship manifest comprises most of the collage. Johann Speber’s name is written in the lower left hand corner. In the upper right hand corner is a portion of an advertisement in 1850 that provides the scheduled voyages of the Germania between New York City and Havre. It also lists D. H. Wood, the Ship Captain. The advertisement is mentioned in the story.

GERMANIA, built 1850, carte de visite

Click for Larger View

Feature Photograph: GERMANIA, built 1850, carte de visite, Bundy & Williams USA, WA, circa 1863; overall size of original photograph: 2 1/2 x 4 in., sepia tone.

The ship was anchored at Port Ludlow, Puget Sound, about 1863, Chas. H. Townsend was the Captain of the ship at this time.. On left margin was “J. K. Bundy, S. Williams”; on reverse “BUNDY & WILLIAMS/ 314 & 326 Chapel St./ NEW HAVEN, CT./…”; in pencil. Copied from negative given/ Chas. H. Townsend by a photographer/ at Port Ludlow, Puget Sound/ about 1863. Just as the ship anchored the photograph was taken. The ship was built in 1850 at Portsmouth, N. H. by Fernald & Pettigrew. The ship was 996 tons, 170.7 x 35.5 x 17.7 and was owned by the New York & Harve Union Line.

Photograph source: http://mobius.mysticseaport.org/media.php?module=objects&type=related&kv=197383&media=0

Carte de visite was a photographic format first produced in the 1850s, which became popular in the 1860s. It consisted of a small photographic print (typically an albumen print) mounted on card stock measuring approximately 2 1/2 x 4 1/4 inches. The modest and uniform size of the carte de visite made it, along with the stereographic postcards, relatively cheap to produce and helped to popularize photography in the late 19th century. 

Carte de Visite Collection, Digital Commonwealth, Massachusetts Collections Online, Boston Public Library, https://www.digitalcommonwealth.org/collections/commonwealth:44558j44c

Carte de visite, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 10 October, 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carte_de_visite

The portion of the ship manifest in the feature photograph is from page 6 of the ship manifest that lists Johann Sperber:

Click for Larger View

[1] Winfield P. Sperber, Birth Date: 18 Oct 1916, Birth Place: Gloversville, New York, USA, Birth certificate Number: 84589, New York State Department of Health; Albany, NY, USA; New York State Birth IndexYear: 1916. Source: Ancestry.com. New York State, Birth Index, 1881-1942 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2018.
Original data: New York State Birth Index, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY.

Winflied P Sperber, Death Date: 18 Oct 1916, Death Place: Gloversville, New York, USA, Death Certificate Number: 61202; New York Department of Health; Albany, NY; NY State Death Index Source Information: Ancestry.com. New York, U.S., Death Index, 1852-1956 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2017.
Original data:NY State Death Index, New York Department of Health, Albany, NY.

“Premature birth; funeral was on October 19, 1916, undertaker was John J. Dingnan.”

Winfield Sperber, Cemetery: Prospect Hill Cemetery; Burial or Cremation Place: Gloversville, Fulton County, New York, United States of America, Find A Grave, Memorial ID: 114577146,  https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/114577146/winfield-sperber

[2] Alfred Lotka, A. 1931. The extinction of families, Journal Washington Academy Sciences Vol 31, 1931 pp. 377-380

Alfred J. Lotka, Sterility in American Marriages, Statistics, Volume 14, Statistics, 1928, talk given Nov 21 1927, Pages 99 – 109 https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.14.1.99

[3] Rob Spencer, an authoritative source of Genealogical DNA research and innovative amateur DNA genealogist has produced a number of explorations on genetic genealogy and population genetics. One subject he has addressed is the subject of the probability of the extinction of a Y-DNA line. In Western societies, surnames usually follow the male line. Hence Y-DNA lines of extinctions mirror surname extinctions in Western Europe and America.

See: Rob Spencer, Extinctions and Bottlenecks, Tracking Back: a website for genetic genealogy tools, experimentation, and discussion, http://scaledinnovation.com/gg/gg.html?rr=gwatson

John and Sophia had children between 1858 and 1878. Their first child was born prior to their marriage. The fertility rate in the United States between 1865 and 1875 declined from 5.8 to 4.9. The fertility rate for their children’s generation was 4.0 (between 1880 and 1890). The fertility rate for the third generation (initial child bearing years between 1900 and 1910) was 3.49.

Click for Larger View | For interactive view of graph go to the link in the citation below.

Chart from: Aaron O’Neill, Total fertility rate in the United States from 1800 to 2020, June 21, 2022, Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1033027/fertility-rate-us-1800-2020/#statisticContainer

Total fertility rates for the white population for these time periods are slightly lower.

YearTotal Fertility
Rate for
White Population
18505.42
18605.21
18704.55
18804.24
18903.87
19003.56
19103.42

Source: Haines, Michael. “Fertility and Mortality in the United States”. EH.Net Encyclopedia, edited by Robert Whaples. March 19, 2008. URL https://eh.net/encyclopedia/fertility-and-mortality-in-the-united-states/

Based on Spencer’s calculations, an average fertility rate, using Haines’ figures, between 1900 and 1910 of roughly 3.5 would imply a probability rate of eventual extinction at 30 percent (below).

See also: Galton–Watson process, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 10 August 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galton–Watson_process

[4] Lencer, Karte der Markgrafschaft Baden-Baden mit allen Territorien von 1535 bis 1771 (Map of the Margraviate of Baden-Baden with all territories from 1535 to 1771),  Wikicommons, Sep 2008, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Markgrafschaft_Baden-Baden.png

[5] TestTube-commonswiki, Die territorialen Zuwächse Badens zwischen 1803 und 18197 Dec 2013, (The territorial gains of Baden between 1803 and 1819), Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Baden-1803-1819.png

This is a map that was in German and I have modified and simplified the explanation in English.

[6] Margraviate of Baden-Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margraviate_of_Baden-Baden

Margraviate of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 28 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margraviate_of_Baden

Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 July 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baden

Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). “Baden, Grand Duchy of“. Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 184–188. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclopædia_Britannica/Baden,_Grand_Duchy_of

Electorate of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electorate_of_Baden

Grand Duchy of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 October 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Baden

Grand Duchy of Baden State Railway, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 August 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Baden_State_Railway

Baden History, FamilySearch, This page was last edited on 14 June 2022, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Baden_History

[7] Margraviate of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 28 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margraviate_of_Baden

Margraviate of Baden-Durlach, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 13 January 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margraviate_of_Baden-Durlach

Margraviate of Baden-Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margraviate_of_Baden-Baden

Margraviate of Baden-Hachberg, Wikipedia, his page was last edited on 24 December 2022, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margraviate_of_Baden-Hachberg

Grand Duchy of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 October 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Baden

[8] Electoral Palatinate, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 6 November 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_Palatinate

[9] History of Hesse, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 August 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Hesse

Ingrao, Charles W. The Hessian mercenary state: ideas, institutions, and reform under Frederick II, 1760-1785 (Cambridge University Press, 2003).

[10] Grand Duchy of Baden, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 October 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Duchy_of_Baden

Selgert, Felix. (2013). The Implementation of Administrative and Legal Reforms in the German State of Baden during the 19th Century. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290431368_The_Implementation_of_Administrative_and_Legal_Reforms_in_the_German_State_of_Baden_during_the_19th_Century

[11] Störfix, Map of the Grand Duchy of Baden (Germany), from 1819 to 1918, Karte des Großherzogtums Baden von 1819 bis 1918 bzw. der Republik Baden bis 1945, Wikicommons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_Baden_(1819-1945).png

[12] Free imperial city, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 November 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_imperial_city

[13] States of the German Confederation, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 April 2023, Map of German states 1815-1866, by Ziegelbrenner, from Wikipedia, Karte des Deutschen Bundes 1815–1866 / Map of German Confederation 1815–1866, 19 Jan 2008, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States_of_the_German_Confederation

[14] The source for John Sperber’s birth date are varied. However, the date of January 2nd, 1828 is found in two sources.

One source is found in a Find A Grave website record.

Vital statistics on John Sperber based on gravesite information: John Wolfgang Sperber, BIRTH: 2 Jan 1828, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; DEATH: 27 Jan 1905 (aged 77), Gloversville, Fulton County, New York, USA; BURIAL: Prospect Hill Cemetery, Gloversville, Fulton County, New York, USA;  PLOT: Sec 8; MEMORIAL ID158839082 · View Source, Find A Grave, https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/158839082/john-wolfgang-sperber

The other source is an handwritten list of Sperber family members and their respective birthdates. The page is part of the remains of a book for documenting vital facts for Sperber family members: marriages, births and deaths. The book is in poor condition. The pages are not attached but the handwriting is very clear.

Click for Larger View

The names of John and Sophia Sperber and their children are listed at the top of the page. It is not known who wrote the list of the Sperber family.

In different handwriting, the names of Harold and Evelyn Griffis and their first three children are handwritten at the base of the page. The Griffis family births were obviously added to the list by another family member. Based on the handwriting, I believe it is the handwriting of Harold Griffis.

Birth Places Reported in Federal and State Censuses

Reported
Birthplace
Reported
Parent’s
Birthplace
Source
Baden– – Year: 1870; Census Place: Johnstown, Fulton, New York; Roll: M593_938; Page: 183A
BaerenBaerenYear: 1880; Census Place: Gloversville, Fulton, New York; Roll: 834; Page: 95A; Enumeration District: 006
Enumerator probably phonetically wrote what was heard.
Germany– – New York State Archives; Albany, New York, USA; Census of the State of New York, 1865
Germany– –New York State Archives; Albany, NY, USA; Census of the State of New York, 1875
Baden-Württemberg– –Find A Grave, Memorial ID: 158839082

[15] This is based on his reporting to a census enumerator in the 1880 census. Year: 1880; Census Place: Gloversville, Fulton, New York; Roll: 834; Page: 95A; Enumeration District: 006, Line 30

Click for Larger View

[16] Loretto Dennis Szucs and Mathew Wright, Overview of the U.S. Census, Rootsweb, This page was last edited on 24 April 2016, https://wiki.rootsweb.com/wiki/index.php/Overview_of_the_U.S._Census

[17] History of German-American Relations > 1683-1900 – History and Immigration, U.S. Diplomatic Mission to German, This page was updated June 2008, https://usa.usembassy.de/garelations8300.htm

Irish and German Immigration, U.S. History , https://www.ushistory.org/us/25f.asp

Immigration and Relocation in U.S. History: The Call of Tolerance, Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/immigration/german/call-of-tolerance/

Amanda A. Tagore, Irish and German Immigrants of the Nineteenth Century: Hardships, Improvements, and Success, Pace University: Pforzheimer Honors College, May 2014, https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1144&context=honorscollege_theses

[18] F. Burgdorfer, Chapter XII Migration Across the Frontiers of Germany, Walter  F. Wilcox, ed, International Migrations, Volume II, Interpretations, NBER, 1931, pages 347, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5114/c5114.pdf

[19] United States. Department of Homeland Security. Yearbook of Immigration Statistics: 2008. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics, 2009, Table 2, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Yearbook_Immigration_Statistics_2008.pdf

See also:

History of German-American Relations > 1683-1900 – History and Immigration, U.S. Diplomatic Mission to German, This page was updated June 2008, https://usa.usembassy.de/garelations8300.htm

Irish and German Immigration, U.S. History , https://www.ushistory.org/us/25f.asp

Immigration and Relocation in U.S. History: The Call of Tolerance, Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/immigration/german/call-of-tolerance/

Amanda A. Tagore, Irish and German Immigrants of the Nineteenth Century: Hardships, Improvements, and Success, Pace University: Pforzheimer Honors College, May 2014, https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1144&context=honorscollege_theses

[20] Ira Glazier, Ed., Germans to America Series II: Lists of Passengers Arriving at U.S. ports in the 1840s, Volume 6 April 1848 – October 1848, Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, Inc 2003, Page xii

[21] Marcus Lee Hansen, The Atlantic Migration, 1607 – 1860, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951, Page 286

[22] Ibid, Page 287;

Also: F. Burgdorfer, Chapter XII Migration Across the Frontiers of Germany, Walter  F. Wilcox, ed, International Migrations, Volume II, Interpretations, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 1931, pages 364, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5114/c5114.pdf

[23] Friedrich R. Wollmershäuser, Passengers Listed in the “Allgemeine Auswanderung – Zeitung”, 1848 – 1869, Masthof Press, 2014

Emigration of Prisoners from Baden, Baden Emigration and Immigration, FamilySearch Wiki, This page was last edited on 16 March 2023, https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Baden_Emigration_and_Immigration

[24] Marcus Lee Hansen, The Atlantic Migration, 1607 – 1860, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951, Page 164

[25] Hansen, Page 280

William Dillingham, United States Immigration Commission (1907 – 1910) Statistical Review of Immigration 1820 -1910, U.S. Immigration Commission, Reports of the immigration Commission, Reports Volume III, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1911, Page 416 https://archive.org/details/reportsofimmigra03unitrich/page/416/mode/2up

[26] United States. Department of Homeland Security. Yearbook of Immigration Statistics: 2008. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Immigration Statistics, 2009, Table 2, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Yearbook_Immigration_Statistics_2008.pdf

[27] F. Burgdorfer, Chapter XII Migration Across the Frontiers of Germany, Walter  F. Wilcox, ed, International Migrations, Volume II, Interpretations, NBER, 1931, pages 317, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5114/c5114.pdf

Ira Glazier, Ed., Germans to America Series II: Lists of Passengers Arriving at U.S. Ports in the 1840s, Volume 6 April 1848 – October 1848, Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, Inc 2003, Page xiii

[28] Must an ‘Immigrant’ Also Be an ‘Emigrant’? And what’s an émigré?, Meriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/immigrant-emigrant-emigre-refugee-how-to-tell-the-difference 

Shundalyn Allen, “Immigrate” vs. “Emigrate”—What’s the Difference?, Updated 27 Jun 2023, Grammerly, https://www.grammarly.com/blog/emigrate-immigrate/

What Is The Difference Between “Immigration” vs. “Emigration”?, Updated 3 October 2019, https://www.dictionary.com/e/immigrants-vs-emigrants-vs-migrants/

[29] F. Burgdorfer, Chapter XII Migration Across the Frontiers of Germany, Walter  F. Wilcox, ed, International Migrations, Volume II, Interpretations, NBER, 1931, pages 317, https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5114/c5114.pdf

[30] Marcus Lee Hansen, The Atlantic Migration, 1607 – 1860, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951, Page 289

[31] Ira Glazier, Ed., Germans to America Series II: Lists of Passengers Arriving at U.S. Ports in the 1840s, Volume 6 April 1848 – October 1848, Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, Inc 2003, Page xiii

[32] Marcus Lee Hansen, The Atlantic Migration, 1607 – 1860, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951, Pages 174 – 178

Admiralty Compass Observatory, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 13 November 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiralty_Compass_Observatory Marine chronometer, Wikipedia, The Page was last edited on 23 Nov 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_chronometer

Henry Barrow & Co. Admiralty Standard Compass c.1845, Compass Library, https://www.compasslibrary.com/en-us/products/henry-barrow-admiralty-standard-compass-c-1845 In the event that the example of this type of compass has been sold subsequent to posting this story, see PDF version.

Jonathan D. Betts, Chronometer Timekeeping Device, Britanica, https://www.britannica.com/technology/chronometer Chronometer watch, Wikipedia,his page was last edited on 15 December 2023 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronometer_watch

Marine chronometer, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 November 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_chronometer

The above photograph is of a marine chronometer by Charles Frodsham of London, shown turned upside down to reveal the movement. Source: Marine Chronometer #2299 made by Charles Frodsham of London, circa 1844 – 1860. From the Ladd Observatory collection. Frodsham chronometer mechanism, Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frodsham_chronometer_mechanism.jpg

The above photograph is a an antique small size English chronometer in mahogany box with brass mounts. By Widenhead London. ca. 1840. Source: Dutch Antiques, https://dutchtimepieces.com/product/antique-english-chronometer/

[33] Fairburn, William A. (1945). Merchant Sail, Volume II  Center Lovell, ME: Fairburn Marine Educational Foundation. Page 1083 https://www.google.com/books/edition/Merchant_Sail/p3jVAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Havre+Whitlock+line&pg=PA1198&printsec=frontcoverPage 1083

[34] Marcus Lee Hansen, The Atlantic Migration, 1607 – 1860, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951, Page 175 – 178

Robert McNamara, Packet Ship: Ships that Left Port on Schedule were Revolutionary In the Early 1800s, Mar 6, 2017, ThoughtCo., https://www.thoughtco.com/packet-ship-definition-1773390

“Packet Boats .” History of World Trade Since 1450. . Encyclopedia.com.(December 11, 2023). https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/news-wires-white-papers-and-books/packet-boats

[35] Robert Greenhaigh Albion, Square-riggers on schedule: the New York sailing packets to England, France, and the cotton ports. London: Princeton University Press, 1938. Page 77

[36] Fairburn, William A. (1945). Merchant Sail, Volume II  Center Lovell, ME: Fairburn Marine Educational Foundation. Page 1078 https://www.google.com/books/edition/Merchant_Sail/p3jVAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Havre+Whitlock+line&pg=PA1198&printsec=frontcover

[37] Fairburn, Pages 1074-1075

[38] Fairburn, Page 1073

[39] Fairburn , Page 1073

[40] Fairburn, William , Page 1074

[41] Marcus Lee Hansen, The Atlantic Migration, 1607 – 1860, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1951, Page 17 – 1787

[42] Beth Jarosz, Continuity and Change in the U.S. Decennial Census, March 25, 2018, Population Reference Bureau (PRB) , https://www.prb.org/resources/continuity-and-change-in-the-u-s-decennial-census/

[43] The 1900 U.S. Federal Census asked six questions that were directly related to place of birth and whether the respondent had immigrated to the United States.

Questions from the 1900 U.S. Census

Question
Number
Question
13What was the person’s place of birth?
14What was the person’s father’s place of birth?
15What was the peson’s mother’s place of birth?
16What year did the person immigrate to the United States?
17How many years has the person been in the United States?
18Is the person naturalized?

U.S. Census questions for 1900, General Population Schedule, United Stated Census, History, Index of Questions, https://www.census.gov/history/www/through_the_decades/index_of_questions/1900_1.html

Frederick G. Bohme, Twenty Censuses: Population and Housing Questions, 1790-1980, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Oct 1979, Washington: Government Printing Office, Page 34, https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.319510030561275&seq=42 

[44] John Sperber indicated to the census enumerator that he immigrated to the United States in 1853, See line 98 on the following U.S. census sheet.

United States of America, Bureau of the Census. Twelfth Census of the United States, 1900. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1900. T623, 1854 rolls. Year: 1900; Census Place: Gloversville Ward 1, Fulton, New York; Roll: 1036; Page: 5; Enumeration District: 0006, Bounded By Forest, Fremont, Steele Ave, City Limits, South Main , Page 5, Line 98.

[45] Frederick G. Bohme, Twenty Censuses: Population and Housing Questions, 1790-1980, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, Oct 1979, Washington: Government Printing Office, Page 6, https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.319510030561275&seq=14

[46] Claire Prechtel-Kluskens, Who Talked to the Census Taker, Oct/Nov/Dec 2005,NGC Magazine,  National Archives, Pages 32 – 35 https://twelvekey.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/ngsmagazine2005-10.pdf

Diana L. Magnuson, History of Enumeration Procedures , 1790 – 1940, Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS USA), https://usa.ipums.org/usa/voliii/enumproc1.shtml

Magnuson and King, “Enumeration Procedures”, in Historical Methods, Volume 28, Number 1, Pages 27-32, Winter 1995.

Diana L. Magnuson, The Making of a Modern Census: the United States Census of Population, 1790-1940, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1995.

Colby Gardner, Writing the United States Census, Nov 25, 2016, Dartmouth University, History 90.01: Topics in Digital History, U.S. History Through Census Data, https://journeys.dartmouth.edu/censushistory/2016/11/16/writing-the-united-states-census/

Ruggles, S. and Magnuson, D.L., “It’s None of Their Damn Business”: Privacy and Disclosure Control in the U.S. Census, 1790–2020. Population and Development Review, 49: 651-679, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12580

Schor, Paul, ‘Introduction’, Counting Americans: How the US Census Classified the Nation (New York, 2017; online edn, Oxford Academic, 20 July 2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199917853.003.0001

[47] United States Census Accuracy, FamilySearch, Research Wiki, This page was last edited on 5 December 2022,  https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/United_States_Census_Accuracy

[48] The following is a transcription of the marriage certificate:

Transcription of Marriage Certificate

[49] There are a number of research sources for German immigrants to the United States in the 1800s. One notable source is:

Germans to America,” (GTA) compiled and edited by Ira A. Glazier and P. William Filby, is a series of books which indexes passenger arrival records of ships carrying Germans to the U.S. ports of Baltimore, Boston, New Orleans, New York, and Philadelphia. It presently covers the records of over 4 million passengers during the period January 1850 through Jun 1897. Due to its inclusion criteria, this series is considered to be an incomplete—though fairly thorough—index to German passengers arriving in America during this period. 

✍ Kimberley Powell, Germans to America, Lists of German Passengers Arriving at U.S. Ports, Thought Co., January 27, 2019, https://www.thoughtco.com/germans-to-america-1421984

Volumes one through 9 of Glazer and Filbys’ the “Germans to America” series indexed only passenger lists of ships that contained at least 80 percent German passengers. Thus, a number of Germans who came over on ships from 1850–1855 were not included. 

It is not clear how the data compiled in the Germans to America, 1850–1897 database referenced in footnote 20 below relates directly to the Glazier and Filby published volumes. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) staff have found that there are ship manifests included in the database that are not included in the respective published volumes, and that there is also a difference in the covered time periods. 

✍ Supplementary User Note 2, Balch Institute June 2003 Transfer: Germans to America, 1850 – 1897; Italians to America, 1855 – 1900; Russians to America, 1834 – 1897, NN3-CIR-98-001, National Archives and Records Administration, https://aad.archives.gov/aad/content/aad_docs/dmg_cir_immigrant_supp_user_note_2.pdf

Ira Glazier states in his introduction to volume 1, GTA includes only those lists containing a minimum of 80 percent German surnames [note 21].. This requirement in fact consists of two separate criteria: (1) the ethnic affiliation of each passenger as indicated by his/her surname, and (2) the percentage of passengers of a specific ethnic affiliation (viz., German) a ship passenger manifest must contain to qualify for publication.

See: Michel P. Palmer, Published Passenger Lists: A Review of German Immigrants  and Germans to America, Volumes 1-9 (1850-1855),26-Jul-1996, http://robertlamping.com/genea/branches/gta-revu.htm An earlier version of this article was published in German Genealogical Society of America Bulletin, vol. 4, No. 3/4 (May/August 1990), 69, 71-90. https://www.genealogienetz.de/misc/emig/gta-revu6.html

Below is a list of indexes and finding aids for New York passenger lists for 1820 to the 1890s. 

[50] I have researched a number of microfiche copies of original ship manifests for Johan Wolfgang Sperber, some of which are listed below.

I have reviewed the manifest lists of ships arriving at the New York City Port for the years from 1850 to 1855. The scanned versions of the original manifest lists are from: National Archive’s micropublication M237, “Passenger Lists of Vessels Arriving at New York, 1820-1897,” has been digitized and made available for free on the Internet at the FamilySearch Historical Record Collections and Internet Archive websites. https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Free_Online_New_York_Passenger_Lists,_1820-1897

Sources: Ancestry.com. New York, U.S., Arriving Passenger and Crew Lists (including Castle Garden and Ellis Island), 1820-1957 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2010.
Original data:View Sources.
“United States Germans to America Index, 1850-1897.” Database. FamilySearch. http://FamilySearch.org : 18 July 2022. Citing NARA NAID 566634. National Archives at College Park, Maryland.

Reviewed Ship Manifest Lists for John Sperber

National Archives Microfilm
Publication M237
Passenger Manifest
Lists by Ship
M237 Roll 851 Nov 1849–12 Jan 1850
M237 Roll 8614 Jan 1850–8 Apr 1850
M237 Roll 879 Apr 1850–14 May 1850
M237 Roll 8815 May 1850–25 May 1850
M237 Roll 8926 May 1850–30 Jun 1850
M237 Roll 901 Jul 1850–23 Jul 1850
M237 Roll 9124 Jul 1850–31 Aug 1850
M237 Roll 922 Sep 1850–30 Sep 1850
M237 Roll 931 Oct 1850–25 Oct 1850
M237 Roll 9428 Oct 1850–18 Dec 1850
M237 Roll 9520 Dec 1850–22 Feb 1851
M237 Roll 9623 Feb 1851–10 Apr 1851
M237 Roll 9711 Apr 1851–30 Apr 1851
M237 Roll 981 May 1851–26 May 1851
M237 Roll 9927 May 1851–10 Jun 1851
M237 Roll 10011 Jun 1851–30 Jun 1851
M237 Roll 1011 Jul 1851–16 Jul 1851
M237 Roll 10217 Jul 1851–4 Aug 1851
M237 Roll 1035 Aug 1851–22 Aug 1851
M237 Roll 10423 Aug 1851–13 Sep 1851
M237 Roll 10515 Sep 1851–30 Sep 1851
M237 Roll 1061 Oct 1851–31 Oct 1851
M237 Roll 1071 Nov 1851–26 Nov 1851
M237 Roll 10828 Nov 1851–5 Jan 1852
M237 Roll 1096 Jan 1852–24 Feb 1852
M237 Roll 11025 Feb 1852–31 Mar 1852
M237 Roll 1111 Apr 1852–23 Apr 1852
M237 Roll 11224 Apr 1852–11 May 1852
M237 Roll 11312 May 1852–31 May 1852
M237 Roll 1141 Jun 1852–19 Jun 1852
M237 Roll 11521 Jun 1852–5 Jul 1852
M237 Roll 1166 Jul 1852–22 Jul 1852
M237 Roll 11723 Jul 1852–10 Aug 1852
M237 Roll 11811 Aug 1852–31 Aug 1852
M237 Roll 1191 Sep 1852–25 Sep 1852
M237 Roll 12027 Sep 1852–21 Oct 1852
M237 Roll 12122 Oct 1852–30 Nov 1852
M237 Roll 1221 Dec 1852–22 Jan 1853
M237 Roll 12324 Jan 1853–8 Mar 1853
M237 Roll 1249 Mar 1853–21 Apr 1853
M237 Roll 12522 Apr 1853–21 May 1853
M237 Roll 12623 May 1853–3 Jun 1853
M237 Roll 1274 Jun 1853–17 Jun 1853
M237 Roll 12818 Jun 1853–16 Jul 1853
M237 Roll 12918 Jul 1853–12 Aug 1853
M237 Roll 13013 Aug 1853–31 Aug 1853
M237 Roll 1311 Sep 1853–19 Sep 1853
M237 Roll 13220 Sep 1853–21 Oct 1853
M237 Roll 13322 Oct 1853–17 Nov 1853
M237 Roll 13418 Nov 1853–12 Dec 1853
M237 Roll 13513 Dec 1853–18 Jan 1854
M237 Roll 13619 Jan 1854–3 Apr 1854
M237 Roll 1374 Apr 1854–21 Apr 1854
M237 Roll 13822 Apr 1854–15 May 1854
M237 Roll 13916 May 1854–22 May 1854
M237 Roll 14023 May 1854–11 Jun 1854
M237 Roll 14112 Jun 1854–30 Jun 1854
M237 Roll 1421 Jul 1854–24 Jul 1854
M237 Roll 14325 Jul 1854–13 Aug 1854
M237 Roll 14414 Aug 1854–28 Aug 1854
M237 Roll 14529 Aug 1854–19 Sep 1854
M237 Roll 14620 Sep 1854–16 Oct 1854
M237 Roll 14717 Oct 1854–11 Nov 1854
M237 Roll 14813 Nov 1854–14 Dec 1854
M237 Roll 14915 Dec 1854–11 Jan 1855
M237 Roll 15012 Jan 1855–24 Mar 1855
M237 Roll 15126 Mar 1855–7 May 1855
M237 Roll 1528 May 1855–31 May 1855
M237 Roll 1531 Jun 1855–23 Jun 1855
M237 Roll 15424 Jun 1855–20 Jul 1855
M237 Roll 15521 Jul 1855–22 Aug 1855
M237 Roll 15623 Aug 1855–24 Sep 1855
M237 Roll 15725 Sep 1855–25 Oct 1855
M237 Roll 15826 Oct 1855–15 Dec 1855
M237 Roll 15917 Dec 1855–31 Jan 1856
M237 Roll 1601 Feb 1856–31 Mar 1856
M237 Roll 1611 Apr 1856–14 May 1856
M237 Roll 16215 May 1856–9 Jun 1856
M237 Roll 16310 Jun 1856–30 Jun 1856
M237 Roll 1641 Jul 1856–25 Jul 1856
M237 Roll 16526 Jul 1856–21 Aug 1856
M237 Roll 16622 Aug 1856–18 Sep 1856
M237 Roll 16719 Sep 1856–18 Oct 1856
M237 Roll 16820 Oct 1856–17 Nov 1856
M237 Roll 16918 Nov 1856–31 Dec 1856

[51] William John Hinke, ed, Ralph Beaver Strassburger, Pennsylvania German Pioneers: A Publication of the Original Lists of Arivals In the Port of Philadelphia From 1727 to 1808, Volume I, Norristown, PA: Pennsylvania Gernam Society, 1934, Page xx https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniagerm05penn_1/page/n9/mode/2up

[52] Researching ship manifest lists during this time period have revealed a few records that may point to our John or Johann Sperber. I believe the Johann Sperber who arrived on June 14, 1852 is “highly likely to be” our Johann Sperber.

German Passengers Immigrating to American Around 1853 with the Name Sperber

NameAgeBirth
Year
Place of
Origin
Arrival 
Date
Departure
Port
Arrival
Port
Johann Sperber261826Bavaria14 Jun 1852HavreNew York
W. Sperber261828Leinberg20 Jun 1853BremenNew York
Joh G. Sperber181834Bavaria09 Jul 1856HamburgNew York
J. Sperber201832Bavaria08 May 1855BremenNew York

The two of the four “Sperbers”are younger than the reported dates associated with our Johann Sperber. Two of the Sperbers are reported as 26 years old.

The “W. Sperber” who arrived in the year of 1853 correlates with the 1900 U.S. census arrival date. The “W” could represent Johann’s middle name of ”Wolfgang”. It could represent “Wilhelm”. Aside from his marriage certificate, I have not found any documents where John Sperber used Wolfgang as a form of identification. The implied 1828 birth date also corresponds with the date of birth associated with his tombstone and two other census sources..

Original Ship Manifest for W. Sperber on the Ship Kunigunde from Bremen

Click for Larger View

✍ The National Archives and Records Administration; Washington, D.C.; Passenger and Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at and Departing from Ogdensburg, New York, 5/27/1948 – 11/28/1972; Microfilm Serial or NAID: M237, 1820-1897 https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/7488/images/NYM237_128-0029?treeid=&personid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=pjA1&_phstart=successSource&pId=620306

Click for Larger View

✍”United States Germans to America Index, 1850-1897,” database, FamilySearch(https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KD7R-9H2 : 27 December 2014), W. Sperber, 20 Jun 1853; citing Germans to America Passenger Data file, 1850-1897, Ship Kunigunde, departed from Bremen, arrived in New York, New York, New York, United States, NAID identifier 1746067, National Archives at College Park, Maryland.

A closer look at the ship manifest indicates that W. Sperber was a brewer and his destination was Philadelphia. It also indicates that he is from “Leinberg”. I could not find a Lienberg, Germany but found a Leonberg, which at the time, was part of the Kingdom Württenberg. Leonberg is 10 miles west of Stuttgart.

✍ Kingdom of Württemberg, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 20 October 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Württemberg

Kingdom of Württenberg

Click for Larger View | Source: Karte von Württemberg, Zustand von 1810-1945. Weitere Details zum Territorium siehe unter territoriale Besonderheiten. English: Map of Württemberg from 1810-1945, Wikicommons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:KgrWuerttemberg.png

Despite the similarities of birthdate (1828) and the date of arrival (1853), W. Sperber’s intended destination to Philadephia, his occupation as a brewer and his origin from the Kingdom of Württennberg suggest that this is not ‘our Sperber.

In addition, a “John Sperber” with similar birth and death vital statistics was found to have lived in Buffalo. The following is his obituary. It is interesting that he was employed in the brewing industry. While it is not documented, perhaps this was the W. Sperber who was the brewer destined for Philadelphia. However, many artisans, including brewers, were part of the wave of German immigration in the 1800s.

This is NOT Our John Sperber

Click for Larger View | Source: John Sperber, The Buffalo News, Weds 11 Jan 1905 Obituary, Page 4.

[53] Affiliate Manifest ID: 00006987, Affiliate ARC Identifier: 1746067 “United States Germans to America Index, 1850-1897,” database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:KD7R-9SX : 27 December 2014), Johann Sperber, 14 Jun 1852; citing Germans to America Passenger Data file, 1850-1897, Ship Germania, departed from Havre, arrived in New York, New York, New York, United States, NAID identifier 1746067, National Archives at College Park, Maryland.

Click for Larger View | Source: Search results from FamilySearch, United States Germans to America Index, 1850-1897

This record is also found on microfiche Passenger lists of vessels arriving at New York, 1820-1897 United States. Bureau of Customs; United States. National Archives and Records Service [microform], slide 552 of 830, reel 114 – June 1-19, 1852 https://archive.org/details/passengerlistsoo0114unix/page/n551/mode/2up

[54] See: Kim Kujawski, The Cultivator, The French Canadian Genealogist, https://www.tfcg.ca/cultivator-old-occupation , PDF version

[55] Ship GERMANIA at pier, Le Havre, France  France, Normandie, Le Havre after 1850 paper 7 x 3 1/2 in., Stereograph; ship GERMANIA docked at Quai Casimir Delavigne, Le Havre, France; handwritten in pencil on back “Packet Ship GERMANIA/ Chas H Townsend [sic.] Comdg.”; printed “420 Quai Casimir – Delavigne (Havre).” [GERMANIA, ship, later bark, built 1850, Portsmouth, NH, by Fernald & Pettigrew, 996 tons, 170.7 x 35.5 x 17.7; New York & Havre Union Line.] Collections and Research, Mystic Seaport Museum, PDF version and http://mobius.mysticseaport.org/detail.php?module=objects&type=related&kv=197389

[56] Havre-Union Line, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 24 September 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Havre-Union_Line

[57] The one page depiction of the cursive alphabet for this time period provides some clarity in deciphering Captain Wood’s handwriting (or the writing of one of his subordinates).

Sea Scallop (alias), Oct 15, 2019, Samples of Cursive Writing Styles of the 1800’s in a Discussion website on Researching Civil War Records & Ancestry,  A page from Rhonda I. McClelland, Recorder, County of Mercer Pennsylvania, Sample of Lettering styles from the Pennsylvania 1800 population schedule, https://civilwartalk.com/threads/samples-of-cursive-writing-styles-of-the-1800s.164094/

See also:

How to decipher unfamiliar handwriting, Natural History Museum Archives 2014, State Archives of North Carolina,  https://archives.ncdcr.gov/nhm-palaeography-guide-2014/open

Thomas Jay Kemp, Deciphering 19th Century Handwriting and Type in Records & Newspapers, GenealogyBank Blog, July 23, 2013, https://blog.genealogybank.com/deciphering-19th-century-handwriting-and-type-in-records-newspapers.html

[57a] Jean Brunstein, L’émigration allemande par le port du Havre au XIXe siècle, Annales de Normandie, Année 1984, 34-1, Pages 95-104 https://www.persee.fr/doc/annor_0003-4134_1984_num_34_1_6382

[58] This advertisement was found as a ‘standard’ advertisement of the Havre Union Shipping Line schedule between New York and Le Havre. It was routinely posted in the New York Evening Post as reflected below:

  • Evening Post 12 February 1851, Page 4
  • Evening Post 21 February 1851, Page 4
  • Evening Post 16 May 1851, Page 4
  • Evening Post 29 July 1851, Page 4
  • Evening Post, 7 October 1851, Page 4
  • Evening Post 23 October 1851, Page 4
  • Evening Post 18 November 1851, Page 4
  • Evening Post 10 December 1851, Page 4
  • Evening Post 29 January 1852, Page 4
  • Evening Post 3 March 1852, Page 4
  • Evening Post 8 April 1852, Page 4
  • Evening Post 24 July 1852, Page 4
  • Evening Post 1 July 1852, Page 4
  • Evening Post 27 July 1852, Page 4
  • Evening Post 10 August 1852, Page 4

An example of the advertisement in the New York Evening Post, 16 May 1851, Page 4 can be found at: https://nyshistoricnewspapers.org/?a=d&d=evp18510516-01.1.4&srpos=51&e=——-en-20-evp-41–txt-txIN-Germania———

Source:  Evening Post, Publisher: William C. Bryant & Co., Semiweekly, Published: 1850 – 1919, OCLC: 09482668, LCCN: sn83030390, Collection(s): New York University; Chronicling America Listing: This title on Chronicling America ; Physical Location Listing: NYS Microfilm and Print Holdings; Availability online: 3 January 1850 – 31 December 1878 (8869 issues), New York Historic Newspapers, https://nyshistoricnewspapers.org

[59] The Evening Post, New York, 16 March 1835, Page One, New York Historic Newspapers, https://nyshistoricnewspapers.org/?a=d&d=evpo18350316-01.1.1&e=——-en-20–1–txt-txIN———-

Havre Packet Ship Schedule in 1835

[60] O.L. Holley, The New-York State Register, for 1845; containing an almanac for 1845-6. With political, statistical, and other information relating to the state of New-York and the United States. Also, a complete list of county officers, attorneys, &tc. The national register contains a full list of U. States government officers, &c, New York: J. Disturnell, 1845, Page 257

[61] Fairburn, William A. (1945). Merchant Sail, Volume II. Center Lovell, Me: Fairburn Marine Educational Foundation. Pages 1136 – 1137; 1291 – 1300; 1198,;1298.

See also Albion, Robert G. (1965). Square-Riggers on Schedule: The New York Sailing Packets to England, France, and the Cotton Port, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Page 286-287

Havre Union Line, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 January 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Havre-Union_Line

All the Ships in Service for Life of the Havre Whitlock Line

Name
TonsBuiltService YearsAverage
Westbound
Passage
Days
Cadmus30618181823 – 182837
Formosa45018291829 – 183840
Albany46818311831 – 184739
Poland54618321833 – 184035
Emerald51818351838 – 184636
Duchesse
d’Orleans
79818381838 – 185238
Argo 96718411841 – 184937
Bavaria 90818461846 – 185333
Splendid 64218461847 – 185341
Gallia 119018491849 – 185233
Germania 99618501850 – 186338
Helvetia97118501851 – 186436
Carolus Magnus13491853 – 186334
William Nelson103918501856 – 186342
Average796.29183937

[62] The following information on the Germania is based on a 1859 registry of American ships..

Germania in 1859

Click for Larger View

Board of American Lloyd’s , American Lloyd’s Register of American and Foreign Shipping, New York: E & G.W. Blunt, Clayton & Ferris Printers, 1859, Page 62  Link:  https://research.mysticseaport.org/item/l0237571859/#62

[63] Andrieu, J. France, Normandie, Ship GERMANIA at pier, Le Havre, France,   Le Havre after 1850, paper 7 x 3-1/2 in.  Stereograph; sailing vessels at pier, GERMANIA in foreground; written on back “422 Ecluse de la Barre, at Saquebot, de Gernania de New-York/ au Heavre/ Packet ship Germania/ Chas Henry Townsend [sic.] Cmdg.” Printed on front “VILLES & PORTS MARITIMES” and “PHOTOIE DE J. ANDRIEU, PARIS.” [GERMANIA, ship, later bark, built 1850, Portsmouth, NH, by Fernald & Pettigrew, 996 tons, 170.7 x 35.5 x 17.7; New York & Havre Union Line.] ,Collections and Research, Mystic Seaport Museum PDF version and http://mobius.mysticseaport.org/detail.php?module=objects&type=related&kv=197388

[64] Frederic Roux (French, 1805 – 1870), Germania Presented to Captain D. Wood, Signed lower right: “Frederic Roux 1853” Mixed media including watercolor, gouache and graphite on paper; The artist’s trade card reading “Frederic Roux hydrographer et peitre au Havre en December 1853” is affixed to the backing; size 15 3/4 x 22 1/2”

Frederic Roux (French, 1805 – 1870), Germania Presented to Captain D. Wood, Trader Galleries, Page accessed 5 Jan 2024, https://aradergalleries.com/collections/maritime/products/frederic-roux-french-1805-1870-germania-presented-to-capt-d-wood

[65] As opposed to freight liners, tramp ships trade on the spot market with no fixed schedule or itinerary/ports-of-calls. Tramps are used mainly for carrying bulk commodities or homogeneous cargoes in whole shiploads, with each voyage separately negotiated between the ship’s owner and the shipper, usually through a broker.

Tramp Steamer, Also known as: tramp ship, editors of the Encyclopedia Britanica, Britanica, https://www.britannica.com/technology/tramp-steamer

Tramp trade, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 30 December 2023, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tramp_trade

[66] Robert Greenhalgh Albion, Square-riggers on Schedule; The New York Sailing Packets to England, France, and the Cotton Ports (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1938), pp. 286-287 and 299; Carl C. Cutler, Queens of the Western Ocean; The Story of America’s Mail and Passenger Sailing Lines (Annapolis: United States Naval Institute, c1961), pp. 521 and 524].