Migrating to East Anglia

Based on traditional and genetic genealogical research, there is plausible evidence that the YDNA ancestors of the Griff(is)(es)(ith) lineage came from Wales to the American colonies in the early 1600s. The YDNA lineage associated with the Griff(is)(es)(ith) family lived in an area that was known as Wales before and during the time period when the practice of using surnames emerged. [1]

This story is focused on documenting and estimating when, where and how the Griff(is)(es)(ith) YDNA lineage migrated from continental Europe and arrived on the British Isle. Based on genetic genealogical data, the YDNA lineage migrated from the coastal northwest edge of the European continent to the island of Provincia Britannia approximately 300 years after the withdrawal of the Roman occupation of the island. Their migration across the north sea occurred after Angles, Saxons and Jutes had established their presence on the eastern and southern areas of the island and their migration relied upon a firmly established network of differentiated sea ports along the coast lines of the North Sea. [2]

“(M)odern scholars generally believe that Germanic speakers started arriving in Britain before the end of Roman rule, probably mainly as soldiers. They may have formed a significant part of Romano-British society at the end of Roman rule, and their culture probably continued to be especially associated with the military. That immigration and conflict involving Germanic speakers increased during the 5th century, after the end of Roman rule, is still widely accepted by scholars, but it is no longer assumed that this necessarily involved the immediate formation of small Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, or a straightforward conflict between two opposed ethnic groups.[3]

The Jutes, Angles and Saxons arrived initially as warriors employed by the Roman army and then, a few generations later, settlers, to farm the land.  Their homelands in Scandinavia and the northern Frisian coast often flooded so it was difficult to sustain farming practices. Whole families set sail across the sea in small boats to live in Britain. They brought tools, weapons and farm animals with them and built new villages in East Angles. [4]

‘Wales’ in the Early Middle Ages

In medieval times, there was no single unified country or area called “Wales” for most of the period. Instead, the region was referred to by several different names depending on the language and perspective of the speaker. [5]

Wales was primarily known to its inhabitants as Cymru (or Kymry), meaning “compatriots” or “land of fellow-countrymen”. To the Anglo-Saxons, it was known as Wealas (meaning “foreigners”), which later evolved into Wales, with the land sometimes referred to in Latin as Wallia or Pura Wallia.

Key Welsh Linguistic and Geographical Terms: 

  • The term Cymry/Cymru, derived from combrogi, gained popularity in the seventh century and later to define the Welsh people in relation to themselves rather than as mere “Britons” (who inhabited all of Britain).
  • Brythoniaid is an older, broader term for all Celtic-speaking Britons.
  • Marchia Wallie refers to the “Welsh Marches” or the border area under Norman influence. 

For much of the medieval era, “Wales” was actually a collection of independent kingdoms, and people often identified more with their specific realm than with a unified nation. The most prominent were: 

  • Gwynedd: The powerful kingdom in the northwest.
  • Powys: Located in the east along the border with England.
  • Deheubarth: The major kingdom of the southwest.
  • Other smaller realms: Including Gwent, Dyfed, Morgannwg, and Brycheiniog. [6]

In 1216, Llywelyn the Great formally established the Principality of Wales (Tywysogaeth Cymru), which brought a greater degree of political unity to the region until the English conquest in 1283. [7]

The 5th and 6th centuries involved the collapse of economic networks and political structures and also saw a radical change to a new Anglo-Saxon language and culture. This change was driven by movements of peoples as well as changes which were happening in both northern Gaul and the North Sea coast of what is now Germany and the Netherlands. . . . By the late 6th century, England was dominated by small kingdoms ruled by dynasties who were pagan and which identified themselves as having differing continental ancestries.  [8]

The forefathers of our ‘Welsh’ ancestors were probably identified as Frisians or possibly Franks was part of a larger wave of Anglo-Saxon groups migrating westward across the island. A cautious but plausible narrative is that a male individual and possibly his family who was a most recent common ancestor asociated with haplogroup G-Z6748, living in the Wadden Sea–Texel zone around the late seventh century, utilized the established Anglo-Saxon-Frisian dominated North Sea trading network to migrate to East Anglia. The individual or small group moved by sea along established routes from the Dutch/North Frisian islands to the eastern shoreline of the island and ultimately settled in the Norwich region, as documented by the remains of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) associated with the haplogroup G‑Y38335 in the early eighth century.

Illustration One: Early medieval trading vessel, similar to those used by Frisian merchants in the 7th-9th centuries

Click for Larger View | Source: Early medieval trading vessel, similar to those used by Frisian merchants in the 7th-9th centuries, Early Medieval Trade between Anglo-Saxon England and Frisia, Ealdar ,https://ealdlar.com/early-medieval-trade

Based on genetic genealological data, a descendant of the lineage arrived and settled in East Anglia around 625 to 770 CE. East Anglia was an historic region in the southeastern part of the English Isle, comprising the contemporary counties of Norfolk, Suffolk, and Cambridgeshire. Historically, it was a sixth-century Anglo-Saxon kingdom, with its name deriving from the “East Angles” who predominately settled there. [9]

The Dynamic Nature of Ethnicity

Depending on which ‘lens’ of historical time we are using to look at the past (e.g. traditional genealogical time, the time of lineages or long term deep history), ethnicity is considered an imprecise analytical tool or term. [10] It is an identifier, useful to describe social and cultural groups within specific historical time perods. Even then, its qualifying labels are fluid social constructs rather than a fixed biological or genetic fact; often blending overlapping, shifting, and subjective and material factors like culture, language, ancestry, self- and group-identification.

Ethnicity is an achieved as well as an ascribed social attribute. Its meaning and significance depends on which group or person is using the term for their identity or for identifying ‘other’s’ identities. It is a social construct that can be used to differentiate social relations, power relationships and create and reinforce cultural distinctions. [11]

Unlike terms associated with strict classification systems, ethnicity is dynamic. It varies across time, geography, and personal experience. While often conflated with genetic ancestry, ethnicity is learned, socially based and cultural, not inherited through DNA. Scientific research shows more genetic variation within ethnic groups than between them, making it a poor discriminating tool. [12]

Welsh culture began to emerge following the Roman withdrawal from Britain in the fifth century, with a distinct identity taking shape among the Celtic Britons by the sixth century. The culture coalesced as these Brythonic-speaking people were pushed into the western peninsula, with the term “Cymry”used for self idenification, appearing by the seventh century. [13]

By 430 a radical cultural change is evident in Britain, affecting, for example, burial styles, building styles and clothing. Both the archaeological evidence and genetic findings indicate that these changes were influenced to at least some extent by immigrants who were coming from the North Sea coasts of what is now the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark, but some of the changes also have parallels with northern Gaul, which was similarly a country where Roman forces and government were weakening or being withdrawn. Usage of Old English cannot be proven during this period, but its closest relatives were the Old Frisian and Old Saxon dialects of the same continental coastal regions, and so some amount of migration is once again implied.[14]

Sub-Roman Britannia underwent rapid change in the course of fifty years between AD 550-600. At the start of this period, the Angle and Saxon kingdoms on the east and south coasts were firmly established. Many of the rapidly-formed Romano-British territories in those areas had been swept away in the late fifth century. A few were managing to hold out, but they were becoming increasingly surrounded and squeezed by encroaching invaders.” [15]

Political and ethnic boundaries in England between 400–800 CE were loosely correlated but rarely identical: political lines shifted rapidly, while ethnic and social identities were situational, layered, and often cross‑cut those frontiers (see illustration two). [16]

Illustration Two: Sequential Maps of Anglo-Saxon Conquest 450 – 700 CE [17]

Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, 2023, The History Files, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

After the end of Roman rule, power fragmented into small Romano‑British polities and warbands rather than clearly bounded “states” or “kingdoms”, and their authority faded unevenly across regions. Anglo‑Saxon groups (Angles, Saxons, Jutes, to a lesser extrent Frisians, etc.) arrived as federate troops and migrants into this landscape, gradually carving out lordships that hardened into early kingdoms, especially in the east and southeast. In this early phase “Britons” and “Saxons” function more as oppositional, ‘rhetorical groups in historic texts‘ illustrated in written accounts, such as those of the monk Gildas [18], rather than as stable, self‑ascribed ethnic communities mapped cleanly onto territories. Archaeology and historical studies suggest considerable local continuity of late Roman populations beneath these new ethnic political labels, complicating any simple ethnic replacement model (see illustration three). [19]

Illustration Three: Settlements of Angles, Saxons and Jutes Circa 600 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Hel-Hama, Peoples of Britain circa 600,17 June 2012, Wikimedia Commons,https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Britain_peoples_circa_600.svg

By the later sixth–seventh centuries, larger kingdoms (Northumbria, Mercia, Kent, Wessex, East Anglia, Sussex, Essex) emerged, but their boundaries remained fluid zones of overlordship, tribute, and shifting alliances rather than fixed lines. Within any one kingdom, elites might cultivate an “Anglo‑Saxon” royal identity, while subject communities could be Brittonic‑speaking, mixed, or only loosely integrated into royal structures. Political expansion (for example, Mercian pressure on Welsh polities or Wessex’s moves into Sussex, Surrey, and Kent) routinely brought people of different linguistic and cultural backgrounds under one crown without instant assimilation. Ethnic designations in narrative historical sources tend to appear at precisely these points of contest, where authors use labels (for example, Saxones, Brittones, etc.) polemically to mark insiders and outsiders. [20]

Around 600 CE, seven principal kingdoms had emerged, beginning the so-called period of the Heptarchy. The Heptarchy was the division of Anglo-Saxon England between the sixth and eighth centuries into petty kingdoms, conventionally referring to the seven kingdoms of East Anglia, Essex, Kent, Mercia, Northumbria, Sussex, and Wessex. The period of petty kingdoms came to an end in the eighth century, when England was divided into the four dominant kingdoms of East Anglia, Mercia, Northumbria, and Wessex. [21]

Illustration Four: The Heptarchy

Click for Larger View | Source: Bartholomew, John George, A literary & historical atlas of Europe, New York: Dutton, 1914, Page 23, https://archive.org/details/literaryhistatlas00bartrich/page/22/mode/2up

As some kingdoms achieved temporary hegemony (e.g. Northumbria in the seventh century, Mercia in the eighth), political success provided a platform to project certain ethnic and origin myths (e.g. royal genealogies from Woden) across wider areas. [22] Yet modern analyses argue that ethnic identity in this period is best seen as a situational construct: origin myths, law, and language could be emphasized or downplayed depending on context, especially in court politics and diplomacy. This means that when political frontiers shifted, the salience of particular ethnic labels often shifted with them, rather than ethnic “groups” moving as cohesive, bounded units. [23]

By 800 CE, the political landscape shows larger, more coherent kingdoms. Ethnic identities in Britain before 700–800 CE were not clearly defined or straightforwardly assigned; they crystallized gradually, with “English”, “Welsh” or “Scottish” identity only becoming a meaningful, wider category in the later eighth–ninth centuries. Overall, the interplay can be described as one where shifting, negotiated social group hegemonies provided occasions for ethnic labels to emerge and be utilized or mobilized, but everyday ‘social belonging’ remained highly local, mixed, and context‑dependent. [24]

While the Griff(is)(es)(ith) YDNA ancestors in the 1600s may have had a ‘Welsh’ identity, their male ancestors were Frisian or Frankish migrants that initially settled in the southeastern areas of the island as part of a larger, sustained wave of Anglo-Saxon migrants coming from the northwestern contnental coastline between roughly the tail end of the 600’s CE to the mid 700’s CE. Along the eastern shore, migratory groups of new Angle and Saxon arrivals were settling in areas that were former Roman laeti settlements, asserting their geographical and cultural influence.

Laeti, the plural form of laetus, was a term used in the late Roman Empire to denote communities of barbari (“barbarians”), i.e. foreigners, or people from outside the Empire, permitted to settle on, and granted land in, imperial territory on condition that they provide recruits for the Roman military.[25]

By the time the YDNA genetic lineage of our family arrived on the eastern shore of the island, the fall of the last sub-Roman territories was over. The remaining unconquered kingdoms in the west, an area which was becoming known as Wales, were beginning the process of unification.

Illustration Five: Estimated Migratory Path Between Haplogroup G-Y38335 and G-Y132505

Click for Larger View | Source: Migration route to ancestral haplogroup G-Y132505 from G-Y38335, GlobeTrekker, FamilyTreeDNA, accessed 4 Dec 2025

Subsequent generations of the family YDNA lineage migrated from the eastern shore westward, across the lower portion of the island, eventually locating in areas on the western peninsula around 1100 CE, each generation shifting their ‘ethnic’ group identities along the way (see illustration five above).

The Most Recent Common Ancestor of Haplogroup G-Y38335

As indicated in a previous storythe most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of haplogroup G-Z6748 may have been born around 668 CE. It is estimated that he had a 68 percent chance of being born between 525 CE and 800 CE. Another significant fact associated with this MRCA ancestor of Haplogroup G-Z6748 is that he was the last documented ancestor of the paternal line to have lived on the European mainland.

As indicated in previous stories, the genetic ancestors of the MRCA of G-Z6748 migrated through the Roman Limes area, an area that is modern day Netherlands, around the collapse of the Roman Empire, at a time and place that became increasingly controlled by Frankish groups. These ancestors continued to move northward into areas inhabited by social groups known or identified as Frisians. It is estimated that the most recent common ancestor of G-Z6748 may have lived in the Texal Island area. [26]

Illustration Six: Scientific Details of MRCA of G-Y38335

Click for Larger View | Source: Scientific Details for Haplogroup G-Y38335, FamilyTreeDNA, Accessed 12 Feb 2026, https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/G-Y38335/scientific?section=tmrca

The next documented YDNA haplogroup that is associated with a common ancestor in the lineage is G-Y38335 (see illustration six). This is presumed to be the first YDNA ancestor known to have lived on what is now called the British Isle. It is estimated that this ancestor was born around 711 CE. This ancestor could have conceivably been the child, grandchild or close descendent of the most recent common ancestor of G-Z6748. This individual had a 68 percent chance of being born between 570 and 832 CE. While this roughly 265 time span is relatively short, representing about eight or nine generations of chronological time, it is a period that witnessed noteworthy changes on both sides of the ‘Oceanus Germanicus‘ and the ‘Narrow Sea‘. [27]

A comparison of the scientific details between the ancestors associated with each of the these haplogroups indicate their relative closeness in chronological order (see illustration seven below). There is only roughly 43 years between the median birth years for each ancestor. The estimates related to their dates of birth suggest they may have been only one or two generations apart. [28]

Illustration Seven: the MRCAs of G-Z6748 and G-Y38335

Click for Larger View | Source: 68 Percent CI of G-Z6748 and G-Y38335, FamilyTreeDNA

To put 43 years in historical context, in 700 CE during the Early Middle Ages, the estimated average life expectancy at birth for males in the region that is now the Netherlands was very low, likely in the mid-30s (approximately 30–35 years). This low number does not mean that men typically died in their thirties; rather, it was driven by extremely high infant and child mortality rates. Early medieval life in the region was characterized by high risks from disease, malnutrition, and, for elite males, violence, which kept the overall average low. If a male survived the dangerous years of childhood (often to age 10 or 15), his life expectancy would increase significantly, often to 50 or 60 years. Data from seventh-century European populations indicates that while life expectancy at birth was low, many adults who survived early life could live into their 60s or 70s. [29]

The Phylogeography of G-Z6848 and G-Y38335 through the Eyes of the Globetrekker Tool

Phylogeography is the study of how genealogical lineages are distributed across geographic space through time, using genetic data to infer the historical processes that generate patterns of variation. It explicitly links phylogenetics and population genetics with biogeography. [30] Much of my phylogeographical work on the migratory path of the family YDNA lineage relies on the results from the GlobetrekkerTM mapping tool, originally developed by FamilyTreeDNA (FTDNA) as an exclusive feature for their Big Y-DNA test customers. [31]

Illustration Eight: Migratory Path of Descendants of Haplogroup G-Z6748 and Haplogroup G-Y38335

Click for Larger View | Source: Migration route to ancestral haplogroup G-Y132505 from G-Z67487, GlobeTrekker, FamilyTreeDNA, accessed 4 Dec 2025

If we look at a snapshot of a Globetrekker produced animated YDNA migratory path between most recent common ancestors of haplogroups G-Z6748 and G-Y38335, the migratory path of the decendants of haplogroup G-Z6748 starts on or around the Texal Island on the northwest coast (see illustration eight). This was an area inhabited by Frisian social groups when the most recent common ancestor associated with haplogroup G-Z6748 lived. [32] The migratory path hugs the western coast and then crosses the ‘narrow sea’ or what is now known as the English Channel. [33] The path then proceeds northward along the coast of the English Isle to an area on the coast line that is presently part of the county of Norfolk or Suffolk. From there, the migratory path returns southward along the cost and then heads westward towards the western peninsula of the English Isle.

Globetrekker uses a landscape-based least‑cost path model, not a “shortest straight line” model, so its algorithm strongly prefers hugging coasts and land over open‑sea crossings. [34] It first estimates a coordinate for each haplogroup by averaging locations of testers and ancient samples, then “snaps” any point that falls in the sea back onto nearby land. Once those points are fixed, it connects them with Least Cost Paths (LCPs), which try to find the easiest route between points, not the geometrically shortest route. [35]

The algorithm assigns high “costs” to certain environments:

  • Open ocean is weighted as much more costly than land.
  • Coastal waters within about 200 km of land are less costly, and the model prefers routes that minimize offshore distance.
  • Steep slopes and strong adverse currents also add cost.[36]

Because open sea is heavily ‘penalized’, the least‑cost solution typically follows coastlines (Texel down the Dutch coast, along the Channel, then up to Norfolk) instead of a direct sea crossing, even if a straight ‘ship‑like line’ would be shorter on a modern map or perhaps make historic sense.

So the Texel‑to‑Norfolk path you see in illustration four is not claiming that the ancestral migratory path literally followed the entire coastline. It is simply the model’s best‑fit “easy terrain” corridor linking two inferred haplogroup locations under assumptions that people stayed close to land, avoided long open‑water stretches, and moved within the ‘LGM‑style’ coastline. For historical periods when direct boat crossings were common, that coastal path is better read as a ‘broad migratory corridor‘ rather than a literal route choice.

FamilyTreeDNA has not publicly documented specific justifications for placing the most recent comon ancestor of haplogroup G‑Y38335 in the modern day Norwich/east Norfolk coastal area. The estimated location of this ancestor is perhaps driven by a general algorithm that combines the geographic distribution of the self reported dates and places of “earliest known ancestors” of modern FamilyTreeDNA Big Y testers, any associated ancient Y‑DNA samples, and the positions of downstream branches of the YDNA‑tree.

A Sea Centered Approach Toward Migration

During the time when each of these ancestors lived, a direct sea crossing between the Frisian coast (including Texel) and the East Anglian coast was more realistic than a laborious “coastal terrestrial” route. During this time perod, a mature maritime contact zone existed between the Frisian coast and the coast of Britanniae Major. [37] Based on historical and archeaological evidence, it is more realistic to predict a migratory path via sea from the Frisian coast areas of the continent to the eastern coast of the British Isle as depicted by the dotted line in illustration nine below. [38]

Illustration Nine: Alternative Migratory Path

Click for Larger View | Source: Modification of Migration route to ancestral haplogroup G-Y132505 from G-Z67487, GlobeTrekker, FamilyTreeDNA, accessed 4 Dec 2025

A number of scholars studying the early medieval Britain and the North Sea coastal world have utilized a “sea ‑ centered” or maritime‑ landscape approach in understanding this time period and geographical region. This body of research highlights the influence of:

(1) coastal marshes, estuaries, and islands as densely occupied and socially distinctive environments;

(2) landing places and small ports as key interfaces; and

(3) cross‑North‑Sea and Channel connections as fundamental to group identity formation and the economy in the sixth through tenth centuries (see side bar discussion). [39]

Guided by their maritime research orientation, their analysis and survey of archaeological sites have revealed an increase in known coastal sites: small farmsteads, seasonal camps, production zones and minor landing places that were previously invisible or dismissed as marginal. This has led to archaeological research models in which early medieval coastlines (e.g. the English Channel and southern North Sea) are seen as heavily exploited, socially complex settlement belts, not thinly populated liminal, transitional, zones.

Advances in geological and geomorphological research clarified shifting shorelines, inlets, and river mouths, making it possible to relocate early medieval landing places, estuarine routes, and drowned / eroded sites, and thus to reconstruct more complex maritime network topographies. Newly found and re‑interpreted artefact finds (coins, imported pottery, lava querns, weights and scales, precious metals) demonstrate that access to imported goods in coastal regions was widespread across many types of settlements and not confined to major emporia or trading centers. [40]

Emporium (emporia – plural) is a term that has been used to describe a geographical center of heightened trade during the Early Medieval Era.

Maritime and Seascape Archaeological Perspectives

Maritime and seascape perspectives have pushed scholars to treat coasts and seas as structuring elements in their own right, which has reshaped early medieval settlement models away from land‑locked, “central place plus hinterland” schemes toward coastal networks of settlements tied together by water.

Earlier archaeological models tended to project inland “central place” hierarchies seaward, treating the coast as a marginal fringe or simple export outlet of agrarian hinterlands. Maritime and seascape perspectives map chains of landing places, wics/emporia [41] and beach markets as a network of places whose primary routes are along coasts and tidal rivers, with the sea as the main connective medium rather than an edge of inland territory (see illustration ten).

Instead of reading coastal sites as passive outlets of inland polities, these archaeological models see distinct maritime communities whose identities are shaped by seafaring, exchange, and shared coastal ecologies on both sides of the Channel and North Sea. [42]

A notable example of this approach is found in Robert Van de Noort’s North Sea Archaeologies. He argues that taking the North Sea itself as the central “place” or focal point produces a different kind of archaeology, one that foregrounds mobility, connectivity, and human–sea entanglements. His work presents a “maritime biography” of the North Sea, tracing how human engagements with this sea changed over time rather than treating the sea as a backdrop to terrestrial histories. A key aim of his work is to show what an archaeology centered on a fluid seascape looks like, in contrast to conventional land‑based regional syntheses, and how this perspective alters interpretations of past societies. The sea is treated as a culturally constituted space, not just a void between coasts. His perspective stresses seascapes, routeways, and horizons instead of political or ethnic territories. [43]

Van de Noort’s North Sea is delimited on the west by the east coast of Britain and the Scottish archipelagos of the Orkneys and the Shetlands. On the east side, the focus of Ven de Noort’s work is delimited by the coasts of Norway south of Bergen, the Bohuslän province coast of Sweden, the shores of Denmark, the north-western coasts of Germany, as well as those of the Netherlands and Belgium, with a small part of the French coast around Dunkirk (see illustration ten).

The early medieval North Sea was not a barrier but a highway – a broad maritime road linking the communities along its shores. In the 5th through 7th centuries, a remarkable parallel development unfolded on opposite sides of this sea: in Britain, the Anglo-Saxons were forging new kingdoms, while across the water on the continent, the Frisians were shaping a society of their own. Far from being strangers, these two peoples were close kin. They spoke dialects so similar that missionaries like St. Willibrord could preach to the Frisians with little need for translation, implying Old English and Old Frisian were nearly mutually intelligible. They shared common gods, artistic styles, shipbuilding techniques, and even family ties. In essence, the Anglo-Saxons of England and the medieval Frisians of the North Sea coast were two branches of the same family tree – their paths diverged, yet they remained intrinsically connected by blood, language, and culture.[44]

Illustration Ten: A Shared Maritime World of Atlantic and North Sea Channel Currents

Click for Larger View | Source: Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, Page 6, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

Seascapes not Shorelines

Maritime and seascape archaeological studies provide key evidence for substantiating the existence of Frisian maritime networks. The research associated with this perspective substantiates patterns of movement across the North Sea through archeological findings based on coastal settlements, boat technology and trade artifacts. [45]

Within this context, early medieval Frisian population movements toward the east coast of Britain is documented less by any one “smoking gun” archaeological site and more by a body of research that treats the southern North Sea as a shared maritime world rather than a hard frontier with major trading sites. This seascape‑centered archaeological approach makes Frisian migration look like one facet of a long‑running, two‑way coastal system linking the Wadden Sea, Rhine–Meuse estuary and eastern/south‑eastern Britain.

Coastal travel and trade across the North Sea and English Channel were established long before the fifth century. As early as the third and fourth centuries, Romans reported Germanic “Saxons” raiding, and later, hired as mercenaries to defend the British coast, necessitating consistent North Sea crossings. These voyages were made in wooden ships (similar to early, oar-powered, non-sailed precursors to Viking longships). Sailors used natural cues like stellar navigation, bird flight paths, and, crucial to the North Sea, the lead line and sounding rod to measure water depth. By 600 CE, Frisian traders had developed a near-monopoly on trade in the North Sea. [46]

Key Features of Migration Period Longboats

  • Clinker (Lapstrake) Construction – Overlapping planks joined with iron rivets
  • Double-Ended Design – Symmetrical bow and stern for beach landing without turning
  • Shallow Draft – Flat bottom for navigation in shallow waters
  • Lightweight Design – Enabled portaging between waterways
  • Oar Propulsion – Primary means of movement in early vessels
  • Later Sail Adoption – Added by late 7th-8th centuries
  • Open Hull – Undecked interior space
  • Shell-First Construction – Hull built before internal framing [47]

Illustration Eleven: Migration Period Longboat

Click for Larger View | Source: Migration Period Longboats: Seafaring and Inland Vessels (4th-9th Centuries), Ealdlar,https://ealdlar.com/history/frisian-longships

Artist’s reconstruction of a Migration Period longboat with covered central section, showing the characteristic curved hull and high prow and stern. Such vessels were common among Frisian and Anglo-Saxon seafarers in the 5th-7th centuries, featuring clinker-built construction that would later evolve into Viking vessels.[48]

Long‑keel, clinker‑built vessels of the broader Anglo‑Frisian and Scandinavian tradition were fully capable of open‑sea legs across the southern North Sea, as shown by ship finds, reconstructions and experimental archaeology. These vessels underpinned both the earlier Anglo‑Saxon migrations (fifth though sixth centuries) and the later Frisian trading system, indicating that open‑water crossings in this corridor were standard practice when the descendants of haplogroups G-Z6748 and G-Y38335 lived (see illustration eleven).

The clinker-type craft, especially those constructed in the Nordic tradition, were particularly strong and suited to seafaring. They were used for trade and exchange, and the ascendancy of the Frisians in the sixth century is attributed to their prowess in sailing such boats in the waters of the North Sea.

It seems reasonable to suggest, albeit in the absence of direct evidence, that the migrations of the post-Roman era were only possible due to the existence of reliable seafaring boats, which allowed for the movement of families with their possessions.[49]

A Sheltered Sea Corridor

The maritime and seascape archaeological research for the North Sea reconstructs the North Sea basin as an historically contingent landscape in its own right, shaped by Holocene era sea‑level rise, estuary formation, salt‑marsh belts and reclaimed wetlands. This archaeological approach shows that by the early medieval period, the Humber–Southern Jutland corridor framed a broad, relatively “sheltered inner sea” with predictable crossings, tidal rivers as access routes, and sand‑island/terp zones on both Frisian and English sides (see illustration twelve). [50]

Illustration Twelve Britain 400–500: Anglo-Saxon Homelands and Settlements

Click for Larger View | Source: Modification of map by mbartelsm, Britain 400–500: Anglo-Saxon Homelands and Settlements, 2 Feb 2020, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anglo-Saxon_Homelands_and_Settlements.svg

For early medieval studies, this sea corridor frames the main contact zone between eastern England, Frisia/Flanders and Denmark: Humber‑side landing places and York on one end, the Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt and Wadden harbors in the middle, and the Jutland/Schleswig ports such as Ribe on the other. It is a sea corridor that linked estuaries, wetlands and shallow‑sea routes that structured the routine movement of Anglo‑Saxon, Frisian and Danish ships, traders and migrants during the seventh to ninth centuries. [51] When you model routes and site distributions against this reconstructed seascape, traffic between Frisia and the east/south‑east English coast appears more as short‑haul coastal sailing along familiar ecological niches rather than as exceptional long‑distance voyaging. [52]

Coastal Contact Zones

A seascape perspective highlights the existence of a commerical zone of settlement locations of varying sizes between Anglo‑Saxon England and Frisia, with Dorestad, Ribe and Wadden‑Sea ports on one side and Hamwic, Ipswich, London and York on the other. Archaeological remains at these port areas show continental ceramics (e.g. Tating ware), coin series and tools moving in volume across the North Sea. Historical written sources place Frisians at the center of long‑distance trade and social diplomatic contact. Within this network, Frisian identity becomes strongly maritime: coastal traders, ship‑owners and marshland farmers whose habitual mobility, riverine reach and commercial roles made seasonal or permanent relocation to English estuaries a routine option rather than an extraordinary migration. [53] 

Archaeologists Loveluck and Tys argue that coastal “contact zones” along the Channel and southern North Sea were economically diverse and socially complex. Coastal access to material exchange networks shaped distinct regional identities and ‘value-systems‘ or sub-cultures. Coastal areas along the Channel and southern North Sea were not just peripheries in the commerce network but were part of a social network, integrating marine and river routes into everyday social and economic life. Coastal identities were shaped by participation in maritime networks that oftentimes cut across political boundaries, fostering shared practices and connections between opposite shores as well as between Frisians and Franks. (see illustration thirteen). [54]

The major trading and artisan centres (often called emporia), founded on both sides of the English Channel and southern North Sea coasts, between the seventh and ninth centuries, have been interpreted as ‘ports-of-trade’ or ‘gateway communities’, controlling the redistribution of imported luxuries, surpluses and manufactured goods for kings or regional rulers. . . . (H)owever, discoveries and rediscoveries on both sides of the Channel have produced indications of a much more complex range of settlement patterns and sites of exchange than has previously been envisaged in coastal zones.[55]

Illustration Thirteen: Location of emporia, coastal and estuarine settlements, beach/dune sites and archaeological finds/concentrations, 600 – 1000 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Combination of Figures 2 and 4 in Chris Loveluck and Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, J Mari Arch (11 Nov 2006) 1:140–169, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x , https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

Major emporia such as Dorestad, Quentovic and Hamwic, formed only the upper tier of a broader settlement and exchange hierarchy that included small ports, landing places, and rural production sites (see illustration fourteen and fifteen). [56]

Illustration Fourteen: Coastal Settlement and Exchange Hierarchy in the Early medieval Era: Channel and Southern North Sea

Click for Larger View | Source: Chart based on information in article by Chris Loveluck & Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, Journal of Maritime Archaeology (2006) 1:140–169, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x, https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_

From the late seventh century a chain of specialized ports (emporia) such as Dorestad at the Rhine delta, Ribe on the Danish North Sea coast and English sites like Hamwic and Ipswich formed the core infrastructure of North Sea trade. Dorestad in particular functioned as a major shipping hub between the Frankish interior and the North Sea world, funnelling continental goods into routes toward England and Scandinavia. Textual and archaeological finds document Frisians as key operators of this system—running ships, managing market organization, and acting as brokers between hinterland producers and overseas buyers. [57]

Illustration Fifteen: Major Emporia in Exchange Hierarchy

Click for Larger View | Source: A portion ofnFigure 1.1. Map of Northern Europe with major emporia innSøren M. Sindbæk,Emporia, high-definition archaeology, and Ribe,http://jyskarkaeologiskselskab.dk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Northern-Emporium-1-Chapter-1.pdf

Frisian merchants in the seventh to eighth centuries handled a broad spectrum of bulk staples, raw materials, and prestige items, ranging from agricultural produce and textiles to Mediterranean luxuries and slaves. [58]

Table One: Typical Flows of Products within the North Sea Trading Network

From RegionTo RegionMain goods (archaeological attestation)
Rhineland / inland FranciaFrisia, England, ScandinaviaWine in barrels, glassware, lava quern‑stones, metalwork.
Frisia / Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt deltaEngland, Francia, ScandinaviaWoollen cloth, salt, fish, amber, combs, small craft goods, redistributed Mediterranean luxuries.
EnglandFrisia and FranciaLead and tin, raw wool, hides, slaves, some textiles.
Scandinavia / BalticFrisia, FranciaFurs, amber, walrus ivory, possibly soapstone vessels.

A Long Tradition of Anglo-Frisian Relations Between the Coastal Areas

The migration was not a single event but rather a complex process spanning nearly two centuries. Some Anglo-Saxon groups arrived as invited mercenaries to assist Romano-British rulers against various external threats, while others came as traders who gradually established permanent settlements. Still others arrived as conquest groups, displacing or integrating with existing populations.[59]

The emergence of North Sea navigation and the movement of various groups during the early medieval period was not the result of a sudden social change or technological revolution but an evolution of long-standing coastal trading, mercenary activities and general migration between northern Europe and Britain. This maritime activity directly facilitated the migration of Germanic groups, primarily Angles, Saxons, and Jutes, and to a lesser extent Frisians, who began to populate Britain in significant numbers from the mid-fifth century CE, immediately following the withdrawal of Roman authority. For example, archaeological evidence of early settlements in England exist in the form of fifth-century Germanic cemeteries and settlements such as Spong Hill in Norfolk and Mucking in Essex. [60]

During the time when descendants of haplogroups G-Z6748 and G-Y38335 lived, Frisian trade networks and transport patterns between the European continent and the British island were firmly established.. The trade networks and migratory patterns were part of an expansive maritime system that linked the Rhine–Meuse–Ems delta with England, Francia, and Scandinavia, with Frisian merchants acting as key intermediaries of the North Sea world. The network was anchored in river‑mouth based emporia and coastal harbors, especially Dorestad on the lower Rhine, but also smaller Frisian trade sites on the North Frisian islands and along the Wadden Sea. These sites connected inland Frankish production zones to the wider North Sea via river routes (Rhine, Meuse, Vecht) and sea‑lanes to Britain, Flanders, the Channel coast, Jutland, and southern Scandinavia. By the later seventh and eighth centuries, this system effectively turned the North Sea, parts of the Rhineland, and the English Channel into a relatively integrated commercial space.

Dorestad (Wijk bij Duurstede) was the principal hub, growing from a modest seventh century trading place under Frisian influence into a major emporium whose heyday ran roughly from the later eighth to early ninth century (see illustration sixteen) [61] Frisian merchants maintained outposts or communities in major ports around the North Sea, including York, London, Quentovic (northern Francia), Ribe, Hedeby, Kaupang and Birka, acting as commercial intermediaries. [62] At York (Fishergate), archaeological and textual evidence points to a substantial Frisian colony engaged in trade and crafts, with imported wares reaching the city “through a Frisian medium,” and a Frisian coin (sceat) indicating contacts by 705–715 CE. [63]

Illustration Sixteen: Artist Impression of Medieval Dorestad

Click for Larger View | Source: Faber, Hans, The Batwing Doors of Dorestad. A Two-Way Gateway of Trade and Power, 26 Oct 2022, Frisia Coast Trail, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2020/10/26/dorestat/

Parallel Coastal Ecologies, Culture, and Settlement Signatures

Frisian scholarship emphasizes that “historical Frisia” was always defined by low‑lying marsh, tidal channels, and terp or mound‑based settlement, with repeated phases of abandonment and decolonization as sea‑level and sedimentation changed. On the English side, maritime research frameworks now stress that eastern coastal marshlands and sand islands from the Humber to the Fens and Kentish marshes were likewise densely and permanently occupied in the early medieval period, despite earlier assumptions of marginally populated areas. When you put those together, migration from Frisia to England appears as movement between structurally similar coastal ecologies: people already expert in dealing with similar environmental challenges, drainage and stock‑raising in wetland environments moving into Fenland embayments, estuary heads and marsh islands that demanded exactly the same knowledge. [64] 

When archaeological sites are mapped across the whole southern North Sea seascape, cultural and technological “Anglo‑Frisian” zones emerge that straddle the water, rather than stopping at the beach. Early medieval studies point to close convergence in language and material culture between communities on both sides of the sea in the centuries after the main post-Roman Migration Period. [65] Portable objects and ceramics with shared forms appear in coastal Frisia and eastern England, and some terp reoccupations on the north continental coast in the fifth–sixth centuries show “Anglo‑Saxon” style pottery embedded within Frisian contexts, underlining how intertwined these identities became within a maritime world. Archaeological seascape approaches interpret this not as simple diffusion from one static “homeland,” but as the archaeological footprint of people circulating along sea‑lanes, intermarrying and settling in multiple harbors and marshlands. [66]

Ancestors and Descendants of G-Y38335 Migrating to East Angles

In this wider historical context, the most recent common ancestor of haplogroup G‑Z6748 who may have lived in the Texel region would have been part of a small kin-group rooted in an island–marsh environment, with everyday mobility oriented along creeks and coastal routes that easily link Texel southwards (Rhine–Meuse delta) and northwards (North Frisia, Jutland, Ribe).

By the late seventh century, the Wadden Sea and adjacent islands were part of a dense maritime cultural landscape characterized by tidal inlets, salt-marsh settlements, and natural harbors that facilitated short-haul and long-distance sailing along the North Sea coast. Texel and neighboring Wadden islands functioned as ‘nodal points’ on the sailing route between Scandinavia, Frisia and destinations such as Dorestad, making them natural staging points for voyages towards England. Archaeological work on comparable North Frisian islands and coastal marshes shows mixed farming communities with strong engagement in craft production and regional exchange, embedded in a seascape where boats, creeks, and barrier islands structured movement more than inland roads. [67]

Cultural ties between the early Anglo-Saxons and Frisians remained strong until the seventh century. Their material culture and economies were remarkably similar. They spoke closely related languages and used the same runic alphabet. Well-connected through trade, political alliances, and elite networks, their kinship is evident from archaeological finds, linguistic studies, and DNA research. By around the year 600, small Anglo-Saxon and Frisian kingdoms had emerged along both sides of the southern North Sea coast. Among these were the three Anglo-Saxon kingdoms of southern East Anglia, Essex, and eastern Kent, and the two Frisian kingdoms located at the mouth of the River Rhine and in Westergo, in the northwest of the modern Netherlands.[68] See illustration seventeen below.

Illustration Seventeen: Kingdoms Sourrounding Southern North Sea c. 600 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Source: Hans Faber,Hengist and Horsa—Frisian Horses From Overseas That Founded the Kentish Kingdom, 11 May 2024,Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/frisian-horses-from-overseas-founding-the-kentish-kingdom

During the period in which the descendants of G-Z6748 and G-Y38335 lived, Frisians and Anglo‑Saxons were operating extensive ship networks across the North Sea, with regular crossings rather than only coast‑hugging transport. The Frisian kingdom at its height under rulers like Aldgisl and Radbod was a maritime power whose trade and political reach depended on open‑sea routes to Anglo‑Saxon England and beyond. [69]

Texel in the seventh–ninth centuries functioned as part of the Frisian coastal island belt in the western Wadden Sea, acting as a way‑station and local harbor zone within the broader North Sea trading system. Texel was considered part of Frisia alongside islands such as Wieringen and the mainland terp regions, forming the outer, seaward margin of the Frisian coastal landscape. This ‘wider Wadden zone’ shows continuous occupation from the late Bronze/Iron Age onward, with terpen, dikes and small harbors adapted to tidal channels and salt‑marsh environments that supported both farming and seafaring.

Given this evidence, it is likely that the most recent common ancestor of G-Z6748 or one of his immediate descendants undertook a sea route from the Frisian/Wadden coast (Texel region) either directly to the East Anglia/Norfolk area or via intermediate waypoints that were part of the ‘network of coastal settlement and exchange sites‘.

Genomic analysis of early medieval burials in eastern England indicates that a large fraction of ancestry derives from populations in present-day Netherlands, northern Germany, and Denmark, consistent with sustained migration across the southern North Sea in precisely this timeframe. Many of these migrants appear not as isolated warriors but as family groups or village segments relocating along maritime corridors, which is perhaps reflective of the migratory path for common ancestors associated with G‑Z6748 and the new sub-branch G‑Y38335 after resettlement in East Anglia. [70]

The MRCA of G-Y38335 perhaps landed at of the many landing sites on the east Anglia coast (see illustration eighteen). The ancestors of G-Z6748 were possibly traders, sailors, or farmers and small-scale migrants that followed the migratory route of the Anglo, Saxon and Jutes to the eastern shores of the island. [71]

Illustration Eighteen: East Anglia

Click for Larger View | Soure: Amitchell125, The kingdom of East Anglia during the early Anglo/Angle-Saxon period, 2 Jul 2011, Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Britain_peoples_circa_600.svg

The Anglo-Saxons settled the site of the (Norwich) some time between the 5th and 7th centuries, founding the towns of Northwic (“North Harbour”), from which Norwich takes its name, and Westwic (at Norwich-over-the-Water) and a lesser settlement at Thorpe. . . . It is possible that three separate early Anglo-Saxon settlements, one north of the river and two either side on the south, joined as they grew; or that a single Anglo-Saxon settlement, north of the river Wensum-Yare, emerged in the mid-7th century. [72]

Overall, current archaeological studies , toponymical investigations [73] and genetic work supports the view of continued, small‑scale Frisian participation in movements into eastern Britain in 700–800, embedded in a broader North Sea population flow rather than as a clearly bounded “mass Frisian migration” [74]

Early medieval narrative sources (Bede, Anglo-Saxon Chronicle) do not list Frisians among the major ethnic groups migrating to Britain. However, they were part of marginal elements of the migration movement of Angles, Saxons, and Jutes. [75] Frisians appear in English contexts from the seventh–eighth century as merchants and sailors, for example Frisian traders documented in London and a Frisian presence at York by the eighth century.[76] Hagiographical and missionary material (Willibrord, Boniface) show Anglo‑Frisian ecclesiastical and political contact across the North Sea in precisely the 690–750 window that the descendants of G-Z6748 and G-Y38335 possibly lived, which presupposes regular two‑way movement of people. [77]

Sources

Feature Banner for the Story: On the left hand side of the banner for this story portrays the phylogenetic tree for YDNA haplogroup branches or subclades of Haplogroup G-Z6748. The right hand side is snap shot of the estimated migratory path between most recent common ancestors associated with haplogrups , G-Z6748 > G-Y38335 > G-Z40857 > G-Y132505. The dotted line from the European continent and the British Isle represents an alternative route that YDNA descendants may have taken.

[1]The most recent publically recognized haplogroup for the YDNA lineage is G-BY211678. There is insufficient information to estimate the location of the most recent common ancestor asociated with haplogroup G-BY211678. The geographical location of the preceding haplogroup, G-Y132505, is estimated to be in an area currently known as Wales. Hence, the YDNA lineage is estimated to have been in the Wales since 1100 CE.

Recent YDNA Lineage for G-Y211678

HaplogroupAge EstimateYears before Prior HaplogroupImmediate DescendantsNumber of Testd Modern Descendants
HaplogroupAge EstimateTime PassedImmediate DescendantsTested Modern Descendants
G-BY2116781400 CE300 years211
G-Y1325051100 C150 years414
G-Z40857950 CE250 years460
G-Y38335700 CE<100 years262
G-Z6748650 CE2,850 years2153
Source: Ancestral Path for G-BY211678, FamilyTreeDNA, accessed March 01, 2026, https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/G-BY211678/path

[2] The Romans officially left England around AD 410, when Emperor Honorius told the Britons to “look to their own defences” as the Empire faced collapse. While 410 is the accepted date for the end of formal Roman administration and the withdrawal of legions, Roman cultural influence and some aspects of Roman-British life declined gradually over the following decades. The withdrawal led to the collapse of the Roman economy, with towns shrinking and coin usage becoming rare by AD 425.

Roman Britain, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Britain

[3] Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 19 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_settlement_of_Britain

[4] History of Anglo-Saxon England, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 19 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

Hills, Catherine, The Anglo-Saxon invasion and the beginnings of the ‘English’, Early & Medieval Migrations AD 43 -1500, https://www.ourmigrationstory.org.uk/oms/anglo-saxon-migrations

Nicolay, J. Settlement research and material culture in the northern Netherlands. Groningen: Barkhuis, 2010

[5] Wales in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wales_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Cymru, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 15 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cymru

Welsh People, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welsh_people

Etymology of Wales, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 30 October 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymology_of_Wales

Gruffudd, Pyrs, Carter, Harold, Smith, J(enkyn) Beverley. “Wales”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/place/Wales . Accessed 2 March 2026.

Principality of Wales, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Wales

[6] Wales in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wales_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Principality of Wales, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Wales

[7] Principality of Wales, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Wales

[8] History of Anglo-Saxon England, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

[9] East Anglia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 18 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Anglia

Kingdom of East Anglia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_East_Anglia

Britannica Editors. “East Anglia”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 29 Jan. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/place/East-Anglia

[10] See the following stories:

Jim Griffis, Different Layers of Genealogical Time – Part One , January 4, 2025, Griffis Family Selected Stories from the Past, https://griffis.org/different-layers-of-genealogical-time-part-one/

Jim Griffis, Weaving Facts into a Family Story in Different Layers of Genealogical Time : Part Two January 31, 2025, Griffis Family Selected Stories from the Past, https://griffis.org/weaving-facts-into-a-family-story-in-different-layers-of-genealogical-time-part-two/

Jim Griffis, The Orientation of Family Narratives Across Time Layers : Part Three , February 28, 2025, Griffis Family Selected Stories from the Past, https://griffis.org/the-orientation-of-family-narratives-across-time-layers-part-three/

[11] See: Jim Griffis, The Use of Terms “Ethnicity” and “Tribe” to Describe the Complexity and Fluidity of Groups Across the Late Prehistory and Early Historical Periods, November 30, 2025, Griffis Family, Selected Stories from the Past, https://griffis.org/the-use-of-the-terms-ethnicity-and-tribe/

[12] Scientific research consistently confirms that approximately 85-95 percent of human genetic variation exists within ethnic or population groups, while only 5-15 percent lies between them. This indicates that any two individuals from the same population are often as genetically different from each other as they are from someone in a different population, undermining the biological basis for rigid racial categories. 

Duello TM, Rivedal S, Wickland C, Weller A. Race and genetics versus ‘race’ in genetics: A systematic review of the use of African ancestry in genetic studies. Evol Med Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;9(1):232-245. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoab018. Erratum in: Evol Med Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;9(1):289-291. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoab025. PMID: 34815885; PMCID: PMC8604262. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8604262/

Graham , Sarah, Genetic Study Reveals Similarities between Diverse Populations, 20 Dec 2002, Scientific American, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/genetic-study-reveals-sim/

[13] Key aspects of the emergence of Welsh culture include:

  • Early Development (fifth–seventh century): After 410 AD, Romano-British populations in the west established independent kingdoms, creating a distinct culture separate from the Anglo-Saxon invaders.
  • Language Evolution: “Primitive Welsh” developed between 550 and 800 AD, separating from other Brythonic languages.
  • Emergence of “Cymry” (c. 633 CE): The people began calling themselves Cymry (compatriots), the country Cymru (Wales), and their language Cymraeg by the early seventh century.
  • Cultural Identity (twelfth century): Historians generally agree that a strong, unified sense of Welsh identity was firmly in place by the twelfth century.
  • Cultural Traditions: Early forms of poetry and literature were central to this emerging identity, with traditions having roots tracing back to this medieval period. 

While regional kingdoms like Gwynedd and Powys existed earlier, a collective Welsh national consciousness grew in response to the need to defend their land, language, and customs. 

Culture of Wales, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_of_Wales

History of the Welsh language, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Welsh_language

Welsh Language, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welsh_language

History of Wales, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 10 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Wales

Wales in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wales_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[14] End of Roman era and Anglo-Saxon origins, History of Anglo-Saxon England, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 19 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

[15] P.L. Kessler, Map of Anglo-Saxon Conquest Britain AD 550-600, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD550.htm

[16] Limmer, Michael Sean, TRhe Transformation of Identity in Early Medieval England: Continuity, Disruption, and Creolization, MA Thesis, University of New Mexico, Jul 2021, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=hist_etds

History of Anglo-Saxon England, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

Harland, James M., Rethinking Ethnicity and ›Otherness‹ in Early Anglo-Saxon England, medieval worlds, No. 5 , 2017, 113-142, https://medievalworlds.net/0xc1aa5572%200x00369e4f.pdf

Geary, Patrick J. , Ethnic identity as a situational construct in the early middle ages*), Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien (MAGW) Band 113, 1983, S. 15-26, https://albert.ias.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7e261ae1-cfbd-4535-991d-1967cd4badf8/content

[17] The video is a compilation of eight maps created by P.L. Kessler, see below.

Maps seven and eight reflect the geneal configuration of the island when descendants of G-Z6758 migrated to the island.

Map 1: AD 450-475

Click for Larger View | Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

Map 2: AD 475-500

Click for Larger View | Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023,
https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

Map 3: AD 500-550

Click for Larger View | Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

Map 4: AD 550-575

Click for Larger View | Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

Map 5: AD 575-600

Click for Larger View | Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

Map 6: AD 600-650

Click for Larger View | Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

Map 7: AD 650-700

Click for Larger View | Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

Map 8: AD 700

Click for Larger View | Source: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

See: P.L. Kessler, Sequential Maps of the Anglo-Saxon Conquest AD 450-700, The History Files, 2023, https://www.historyfiles.co.uk/FeaturesBritain/BritishMapAD450-700.htm

[18] Gildas (c. 500–570 AD) was a sixth-century British monk, cleric, and historian known as Gildas Sapiens (“the Wise”). He is famous for writing De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae, a sermon and historical account lamenting the decay of Britain and the destruction caused by the Saxon invasion.

Gildas, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 24 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gildas

Howells, Caleb, , Who Was Gildas? A Voice from Dark Age Britain, 17 Jul 2023, The Collector, https://www.thecollector.com/who-was-gildas/

[19] Limmer, Michael Sean, The Transformation of Identity in Early Medieval England: Continuity, Disruption, and Creolization, MA Thesis, University of New Mexico, Jul 2021, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=hist_etds

History of Anglo-Saxon England, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

Harland, James M., Rethinking Ethnicity and ›Otherness‹ in Early Anglo-Saxon England, medieval worlds, No. 5 , 2017, 113-142, https://medievalworlds.net/0xc1aa5572%200x00369e4f.pdf

Geary, Patrick J. , Ethnic identity as a situational construct in the early middle ages*), Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien (MAGW) Band 113, 1983, S. 15-26, https://albert.ias.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7e261ae1-cfbd-4535-991d-1967cd4badf8/content

[20] Harland, James M., Rethinking Ethnicity and ›Otherness‹ in Early Anglo-Saxon England, medieval worlds, No. 5 , 2017, 113-142, https://medievalworlds.net/0xc1aa5572%200x00369e4f.pdf

History of Anglo-Saxon England, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

Limmer, Michael Sean, The Transformation of Identity in Early Medieval England: Continuity, Disruption, and Creolization, MA Thesis, University of New Mexico, Jul 2021, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=hist_etds

Roller, Sarah, The 4 Kingdoms that Dominated Early Medieval England, 15 October 2018, HistoryHit, https://www.historyhit.com/the-4-kingdoms-that-dominated-early-medieval-england/

Heptarchy, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heptarchy

Geary, Patrick J. , Ethnic identity as a situational construct in the early middle ages*), Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien (MAGW) Band 113, 1983, S. 15-26, https://albert.ias.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7e261ae1-cfbd-4535-991d-1967cd4badf8/content

[21] Heptarchy, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heptarchy

[22] Geary, Patrick J. , Ethnic identity as a situational construct in the early middle ages*), Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien (MAGW) Band 113, 1983, S. 15-26, https://albert.ias.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7e261ae1-cfbd-4535-991d-1967cd4badf8/content

Limmer, Michael Sean, The Transformation of Identity in Early Medieval England: Continuity, Disruption, and Creolization, MA Thesis, University of New Mexico, Jul 2021, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=hist_etds

Harland, James M., Rethinking Ethnicity and ›Otherness‹ in Early Anglo-Saxon England, medieval worlds, No. 5 , 2017, 113-142, https://medievalworlds.net/0xc1aa5572%200x00369e4f.pdf

Roller, Sarah, The 4 Kingdoms that Dominated Early Medieval England, 15 October 2018, HistoryHit, https://www.historyhit.com/the-4-kingdoms-that-dominated-early-medieval-england/

Heptarchy, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heptarchy

History of Anglo-Saxon England, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

[23] Anglo-Saxon royal houses (Kent, Wessex, Mercia, Northumbria, East Anglia) traced their lineage to the Germanic god Woden to legitimize their rule, a practice persisting into Christian times. Pedigrees often place Woden nine generations before key 5th-century founders like Hengest, linking him to the royal lines through sons such as Bældæg, Wægdæg, or Wecta. 

Rowsell, Tom, Woden and his Roles in Anglo-Saxon Royal Genealogy. https://www.academia.edu/17509298/Woden_and_his_Roles_in_Anglo_Saxon_Royal_Genealogy

Anglo-Saxon royal genealogies, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 11 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_royal_genealogies

[24] Heptarchy, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heptarchy

History of Anglo-Saxon England, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Anglo-Saxon_England

Geary, Patrick J. , Ethnic identity as a situational construct in the early middle ages*), Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien (MAGW) Band 113, 1983, S. 15-26, https://albert.ias.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/7e261ae1-cfbd-4535-991d-1967cd4badf8/content

Limmer, Michael Sean, The Transformation of Identity in Early Medieval England: Continuity, Disruption, and Creolization, MA Thesis, University of New Mexico, Jul 2021, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1299&context=hist_etds

Harland, James M., Rethinking Ethnicity and ›Otherness‹ in Early Anglo-Saxon England, medieval worlds, No. 5 , 2017, 113-142, https://medievalworlds.net/0xc1aa5572%200x00369e4f.pdf

[25] Laeti, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 18 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laeti

Goldsworthy, Adrian, Roman Warfare, Smithsonian Books, 2005, Page 215

[26] Jim Griffis, The Ancestor of Haplogroup G-Z6748, the Terps, Transport Corridors and Landscape Archaeology – Part Eight , January 14, 2026, Griffis Family: Selected Stries from the Past , https://griffis.org/the-ancestor-of-haplogroup-g-z6748-the-terps-transport-corridors-and-landscape-archaeology-part-eight/

Jim Griffis, The Ancestors of Haplogroup G-Z6748: A Frisian or Frank – Part Nine, February 11, 2026, Griffis family: Selected Stories from the past, https://griffis.org/the-ancestors-of-haplogroup-g-z6748-a-frisian-or-frank-part-nine/

[27] Between 570 to 850 CE, the English Channel was primarily known by its Roman-derived Latin name, Oceanus Britannicus (or Mare Britannicus), meaning the “British Ocean” or “Sea of the Britons”. It was also referred to as the “Narrow Sea” and Oceanus Gallicus (Gaulish Ocean) in some contexts. Other, often localized, names included the “British Sea” or simply the “Narrow Sea”. Various sources also identify it with Breton, such as Mor Breizh (Sea of Brittany). 

Between 550 and 800 CE, during the early Middle Ages (roughly the Merovingian and early Viking period), the North Sea did not have a single universally standardized name, but it was generally referred to by Latin scholars as Oceanus Germanicus (German Ocean) or Mare Frisia (Frisian Sea).

English Chanel, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Channel

North Sea, Wikipeida, This page was last edited on 2 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Sea

[28] Finding two Most Recent Common Ancestors (MRCAs) associated with two different SNP mutations only one or two generations apart is unusual but increasingly observed with modern, high-resolution sequencing (like BigY-700), which can detect very young, private mutations. This scenario implies that two distinct, consecutive SNP mutations occurred within a very short timeframe in the same lineage. 

Detecting Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) mutations that are only one or two generations apart is considered unusual in the context of standard population genetics, but it is not impossible. 

Most SNPs used in genealogy and ancestry testing arose thousands of years ago and are shared by thousands or millions of people. A mutation that occurs in a parental gamete and appears in a child is termed a de novo mutation, which is a rare event. 

Possible Explanations

Data Misinterpretation/Calibration Error: The estimated time to the MRCA (TMRCA) can be influenced by the calibration methods (e.g., relying on STRs or incorrect generational assumptions). The apparent closeness might be a result of a shorter than expected “stem” in a phylogenetic tree. 

Rapid Successive Mutation Events (“Hotspots”): The most straightforward explanation is that the first SNP occurred in a person, and in the next generation or two, a second SNP occurred in their descendant. While SNPs are rare, certain areas of the genome are more prone to mutation than others.

Recombination of Proximal Mutations: If the two SNPs are close together on the same chromosome, they might appear as two separate events, but could actually be part of a single, larger, complex rearrangement or simultaneous double mutation.

Reversion or Recurring Mutation: It is possible that the “second” mutation is actually a reversion, where the DNA mutates back to its ancestral state, or a new, different mutation occurs at the same site, making it appear as if two distinct ancestors were responsible for two separate changes within a short time.

Non-Linear Molecular Clock (SNP Rate Variation): Molecular clocks are averages. Some lineages might experience faster-than-average mutation rates (hot branches), leading to more mutations (and therefore more apparent MRCAs) in a shorter calendar time than expected.

Extremely Low Individual Rate: The human germline mutation rate results in 45–60 new de novo mutations in every person’s genome, the odds of a specific, identifiable SNP changing in a direct, close relative (parent-child) are very low.

“Rare” vs. “Common” SNPs: A “SNP” (by definition) is usually found in less than one percent of the population, implying it is old. A mutation occurring in one generation is technically a “rare variant” or a “singleton” (unique to that individual).

Paternal Age Factor: The number of de novo mutations is strongly influenced by the age of the father at conception, increasing by about 2 mutations per year. Therefore, if a parent is very old, the likelihood of a new SNP appearing in the child increases, though it is still rare.

Exceptions (Known Cases): In rare cases, a new SNP can appear in a child (e.g., in a sperm or egg cell) and be inherited, as was the case with the mutation causing Hemophilia in Queen Victoria’s lineage. 

Is This Unusual? It is a rare, but plausible occurrence representing a “fast-moving” lineage or a highly mutable genomic region. 

  • Historically: Yes, it was considered unusual. SNP mutations were thought to take hundreds or thousands of years to accumulate.
  • Presently: It is less unusual now. With high-coverage sequencing, “private” or very young SNP mutations are being discovered, and cases with small numbers of mutations (1-3) separating individuals are common in genealogical datasets. 

Casci, T. SNPs that come in threes. Nat Rev Genet 11, 8 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2725

Scientific Details: A Deeper Dive Into Age Estimates, 19 Sep 2022, FamilyTreeDNA Blog, https://blog.familytreedna.com/tmrca-age-estimates-scientific-details/#:~:text=How%20a%20Relaxed%20Clock%20Model,lengths%2C%20and%20average%20the%20two.

Estes, Roberta, STRs vs SNPs, Multiple DNA Personalities, 10 Feb 2014, DNAeXplained – Genetic Genealogy, https://dna-explained.com/2014/02/10/strs-vs-snps-multiple-dna-personalities/

Waxman, D. and Gavrilets, S. (2005), 20 Questions on Adaptive Dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18: 1139-1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00948.x

Burbrink FT, Myers EA, Pyron RA. Understanding species limits through the formation of phylogeographic lineages. Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 2;14(10):e70263. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70263. PMID: 39364037; PMCID: PMC11446989. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11446989/

Mohiuddin M, Kooy RF, Pearson CE. De novo mutations, genetic mosaicism and human disease. Front Genet. 2022 Sep 26;13:983668. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.983668. PMID: 36226191; PMCID: PMC9550265. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9550265/

Choudhury A, Hazelhurst S, Meintjes A, Achinike-Oduaran O, Aron S, Gamieldien J, Jalali Sefid Dashti M, Mulder N, Tiffin N, Ramsay M. Population-specific common SNPs reflect demographic histories and highlight regions of genomic plasticity with functional relevance. BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 6;15(1):437. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-437. PMID: 24906912; PMCID: PMC4092225. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4092225/

Haemophilia in European royalty, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 17 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haemophilia_in_European_royalty

[29] Cole, Lauren, Medieval myth busting: life expectancy, 10 Dec 2020, Medieval Lauren, https://medievallauren.wordpress.com/2020/12/10/medieval-myth-busting-life-expectancy/

David Musgrove, “Was the early medieval period a ‘golden age’ for the elderly?”, History Extrahttps://www.historyextra.com/period/early-medieval/how-long-did-medieval-people-live-old-age-history/

Thijs Porck, “Old age as a prefiguration of Hell: Senescence in early medieval England”: https://thijsporck.com/2019/02/15/old-age/

M. A. Jonker, “Estimation of Life Expectancy in the Middle Ages”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 166, No. 1 (2003), pp. 105-117

Thijs Porck, Old Age in Early Medieval England: A Cultural History (2019)

S. Shahar, “Who were old in the Middle Ages?”, Social History of Medicine (1993), pp.313-41

[30] Phylogeography, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 October 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylogeography

Phylogeography, International Society of Genetic Genalogy Wiki, This page was last edited on 29 July 2021, https://isogg.org/wiki/Phylogeography

Avise, John C., The history and purview of phylogeography: a personal reflection, Molecular Ecology (1998) 7, 371–379, https://escholarship.org/content/qt1hv4f8vk/qt1hv4f8vk.pdf

[31] Estes, Roberta, Globetrekker – A New Feature for Big Y Customers From FamilyTreeDNA, 4 Aug 2023, DNAeXplained-Genetic Genealogy, https://dna-explained.com/2023/08/04/globetrekker-a-new-feature-for-big-y-customers-from-familytreedna/

Runfeldt, Goran, Globetrekker, Part 1: A New FamilyTreeDNA Discover™ Report That Puts Big Y on the Map, 31, Jul 2023, FamilyTreeDNA Blog, https://blog.familytreedna.com/globetrekker-discover-report

[32] See Jim Griffis, The Ancestors of Haplogroup G-Z6748: A Frisian or Frank – Part Nine, February 11, 2026, Griffis Family: Selected Stories from the Past, https://griffis.org/the-ancestors-of-haplogroup-g-z6748-a-frisian-or-frank-part-nine/

[33] English Chanel, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Channel

[34] Maier, Paul, Part 2: Advancing the Science of Phylogeography, 15 Aug 2023, FamilyTreeDNA Blog, https://blog.familytreedna.com/globetrekker-analysis/

[35] Runfeldt, Goran, Globetrekker, Part 1: A New FamilyTreeDNA Discover™ Report That Puts Big Y on the Map, 31, Jul 2023, FamilyTreeDNA Blog, https://blog.familytreedna.com/globetrekker-discover-report/

Maier, Paul, Part 2: Advancing the Science of Phylogeography, 15 Aug 2023, FamilyTreeDNA Blog, https://blog.familytreedna.com/globetrekker-analysis/

[36] Maier, Paul, Part 2: Advancing the Science of Phylogeography, 15 Aug 2023, FamilyTreeDNA Blog, https://blog.familytreedna.com/globetrekker-analysis/

[37] Sub-Roman Britain, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 February 2026,, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sub-Roman_Britain

Names of the British Isles, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 13 February 2026,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_the_British_Isles

British Isles, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Isles

[38] See for example:

Gretzinger, J., Sayer, D., Justeau, P. et al. Author Correction: The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool. Nature 611, E3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05429-y ; https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-05247-2

Genetic and archaeological study reveals secrets of Medieval migration into England, 23 Sep 2022, Press Release PR-CDS-22-75, Cranfield University, https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/press/news-2022/the-anglo-saxon-migration-new-insights-from-genetics

Sedgeford featured in major ancient DNA publication, Sedgeford Historical and Archaeological Research Project (SHARP) Blog, https://www.sharp.org.uk/single-post/sedgeford-featured-in-major-ancient-dna-publication

Hills, C. M. “Did the people of Spong Hill come from Schleswig-Holstein.” Studien zur Sachsenforschung 11 (1999): 145-154.

“Spong Hill .” Ancient Europe, 8000 B.C. to A.D. 1000: Encyclopedia of the Barbarian World. Encyclopedia.com. 3 Feb. 2026, https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/spong-hill

Hills, Catherine M, “From Isidore to Isotopes: Ivory Rings in Early Medieval Graves.” In Image and Power in the Archaeology of Early Medieval Britain: Essays in Honour of Rosemary Cramp. Edited by Helena Hamerow and Arthur MacGregor, pp. 131–146. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2001

Hills, Catherine M. Origins of the English. London: Duckworth, 2003

Hills, Catherine M., Kenneth J. Penn, and Robert J. Rickett. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham, Norfolk, Part V. East Anglian Archaeology, report no. 67. Norfolk, U.K.: Gressenhall, 1994.

McKinley, Jacqueline, The Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham, Dereham, Norfolk : Norfolk Archaeological Unit, Norfolk Museums Service, https://archive.org/details/anglosaxoncemete0000unse/mode/2up

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Anglo-Frisian History & Culture, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history

Migration Period Longboats: Seafaring and Inland Vessels (4th – 9th Centuries), https://ealdlar.com/history/frisian-longships

Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, Page 171, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

Martin Carver and Chris Loveluck with Stuart Brookes, Robin Daniels, Gareth Davies, Christopher Ferguson, Helen Geake, David Griffiths, David Hinton, Edward Oakley and Imogen Tompsett, The Early Medieval: An Maritime Archaeological Research Agenda for England, 2026, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/early-medieval-ad-400-to-1000/

Green, Helen, A Review of North Sea Archaeologies: A Maritime Biography, 10,000 BC to AD 1500 by Robert Van de Noort, The Killingrove Review, Issue 11, https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_279244_smxx.pdf

[39] See for example:

Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, Page 171, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

Loveluck, Chris & Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, Journal of Maritime Archaeology (2006) 1:141, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x, https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

Wilken D, Hadler H, Wunderlich T, Majchczack B, Schwardt M, Fediuk A, Fischer P, Willershäuser T, Klooß S, Vött A, Rabbel W. Lost in the North Sea-Geophysical and geoarchaeological prospection of the Rungholt medieval dyke system (North Frisia, Germany). PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0265463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265463. PMID: 35377888; PMCID: PMC8979465. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8979465/

IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N. Structured by the Sea: Rethinking Maritime Connectivity of the Early-Medieval Frisians. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:249-272, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/structured-by-the-sea-rethinking-maritime-connectivity-of-the-earlymedieval-frisians/329B51FF63FDD5F6B2994E78BA3C072B

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Anglo-Frisian History & Culture, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history

Migration Period Longboats: Seafaring and Inland Vessels (4th – 9th Centuries), https://ealdlar.com/history/frisian-longships

Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, Page 171, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

Martin Carver and Chris Loveluck with Stuart Brookes, Robin Daniels, Gareth Davies, Christopher Ferguson, Helen Geake, David Griffiths, David Hinton, Edward Oakley and Imogen Tompsett, The Early Medieval: An Maritime Archaeological Rresearch Agenda for England, 2026, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/early-medieval-ad-400-to-1000/

Green, Helen, A Review of North Sea Archaeologies: A Maritime Biography, 10,000 BC to AD 1500 by Robert Van de Noort, The Killingrove Review, Issue 11, https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_279244_smxx.pdf

[40] Loveluck, Chris & Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, Journal of Maritime Archaeology (2006) 1:141, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x, https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

[41] Wics or emporia were characterised by their peripheral locations, usually on the shore at the edge of a kingdom, their lack of infrastructure (containing no churches) and their short-lived nature. Typically,  a wic (an Anglo-Saxon word) would have no church or high status residence, hinting that they were almost entirely oriented towards trade. This is emphasised by the way in wics were usually twinned with other settlements. By 1000 CE , the emporia had been replaced by the revival of European towns.

Early Medieval Emporia, Early Medieval Archaeology, http://early-med.archeurope.com/emporia/

Marissa, Which Wic?, 3 Jul 2012, Mediedal Musings, https://mediaevalmusings.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/which-wic/

Dalwood, Hal, ‘Water, Wics and Burhs’, in Maren Clegg Hyer, and Della Hooke (eds), Water and the Environment in the Anglo-Saxon World, Liverpool, 2018; online edn, Liverpool Scholarship Online, 24 May 2018), https://doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9781786940285.003.0010,

Crabtree PJ. Middle Saxon Settlement and the Rise of the Emporia: The Archaeology of the Wics and Contemporary Sites. In: Early Medieval Britain: The Rebirth of Towns in the Post-Roman West. Case Studies in Early Societies. Cambridge University Press; 2018:86-137. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/early-medieval-britain/middle-saxon-settlement-and-the-rise-of-the-emporia-the-archaeology-of-the-wics-and-contemporary-sites/0800C45C886B344E30A2C9FB9AFD97AD

Michael Dietler, Eric Gailledrat, Rosa Plana-Mallart. The Emporion in Context. Michael Dietler; Eric Gailledrat; Rosa Plana-Mallart. The emporion in the Ancient Western Mediterranean. Trade and Colonial Encounters from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period, Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée, pp.11-16, 2018, Mondes Anciens, 978-2-36781-275-5. halshs-05229729, https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05229729/document

[42] See the following for a core set of “maritime” and “seascape” oriented works that focus on the North Sea and Dutch and English coasts during 500 – 800 CE:

North Sea–Wide Seascapes and Theoretical Models:

Early medieval Frisia and Dutch coastal zone:

  • Gilles de Langen, J. A. Mol “Landscape, Trade and Power in Early‑Medieval Frisia ” In Hines & IJssennagger, eds, Frisians of the Early Middle Ages,   Boydell & Brewer; 2021. The authors use a spatial and landscape approach to question the coherence and the traditional “maritime” character of Frisia as a linear coastal strip (Bruges to Bremen). They reconstruct a regionally varied, predominantly rural society in which power and “Frisian” identity were unevenly structured and in important respects centered in West Frisia/Holland rather than the terp districts alone.
  • Nelleke IJssennagger-van der Pluijm,  “Structured by the Sea: Rethinking Maritime Connectivity of the Early-Medieval Frisians” In Hines & IJssennagger, Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. The author traces long‑term, cross‑North‑Sea links (trade, mobility, cultural exchange) and treats them as structural features of Frisian life rather than episodic contacts. By comparing Frisia with other coastal and seafaring cultures around the North Sea, she highlights shared coastal cultural zones and questions sharp political or ethnic boundaries in the maritime sphere.
  • ​McManus, Ellen & Montgomery, Janet & Evans, Jane & Lamb, Angela & Brettell, Rhea & Jelsma, Johan. (2013), “To the Land or to the Sea”: Diet and Mobility in Early Medieval Frisia. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology. 8. (2013) 255-277. 10.1080/15564894.2013.787565. See also: https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/504785/1/McManus%20et%20al%20-%20Oosterbeintum_final.pdf . The authors combine isotopes and archaeology to argue that Frisian coastal communities were strongly embedded in maritime trade and exploitation, treating sea/shore as an integrated economic and social environment.
  • Deckers, Pieterjan & Dries Tys, Early medieval communities around the North Sea: a ‘maritime culture’?, in Rica Annaert, Tinne Jacobs, Ingrid In ’t Ven & Steffi Coppens, eds, ACE Conference of Brussels: The Very beginning of Europe? Early Medieval Migration and Colonization, 2012, 81-88, https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/RELM/7/RELM007-001.pdf. The authors position Frisian coastal settlements and terpen within a network of maritime interactions; emphasizes the North Sea as a unifying medium for six6th–eighth century communities.

English east coast and emporia as seascapes:

  • Martin Carver and Chris Loveluck with Stuart Brookes, Robin Daniels, Gareth Davies, Christopher Ferguson, Helen Geake, David Griffiths, David Hinton, Edward Oakley and Imogen Tompsett, The Early Medieval: An Maritime Archaeological Rresearch Agenda for England, 2026, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/early-medieval-ad-400-to-1000/ . The English maritime research framework chapter cites Loveluck as key for understanding permanent occupation in low‑lying marshland and sand‑island sites from Humber to the Fens as coastal settlements embedded in tidal seascapes rather than marginal wetlands.

[43] Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, Page 171, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

For reviews of Vande Noort’s work, see:

Farr, R. H. (2011). [Review of North Sea Archaeologies: A Maritime Biography, 10,000 BC-AD 1500, by R. Van de Noort]. Journal of Maritime Archaeology6(1), 91–93. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43551364

Farr, Helen, Book review. Robert Van de Noort: North Sea Archaeologies: A Maritime Biography, 10,000 BC–AD 1500, July 2011, Journal of Maritime Archaeology 6(1), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313311229_Book_review_Robert_Van_de_Noort_North_Sea_Archaeologies_A_Maritime_Biography_10000_BC-AD_1500

Fitch, Simon, North Sea Archaeologies: A Maritime Biography, 10,000 BC – AD 1500
Robert Van de Noort,  Northern Scotland, 22 April 2013 Volume 4, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.3366/nor.2013.00

Green, Helen, North Sea Archaeologies: A Maritime Biography, 10,000 BC to AD 1500, The Kelvingrove Review, Issue 11, https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_279244_smxx.pdf

[44] Ealdlar, Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[45] Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

Martin Carver and Chris Loveluck with Stuart Brookes, Robin Daniels, Gareth Davies, Christopher Ferguson, Helen Geake, David Griffiths, David Hinton, Edward Oakley and Imogen Tompsett, The Early medieval, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/early-medieval-ad-400-to-1000/

Ellen McManus, Janet Montgomery, Jane Evans , Angela Lamb, Rhea Brettell, Johan Jelsma, ‘To the land or to the sea’: diet and mobility in early medieval Frisia, https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/504785/1/McManus%20et%20al%20-%20Oosterbeintum_final.pdf

Deckers, Pieterjan & Dries Tys, Early medieval communities around the North Sea: a ‘maritime culture’?, in Rica Annaert, Tinne Jacobs, Ingrid In ’t Ven & Steffi Coppens, eds, ACE Conference of Brussels: The Very beginning of Europe? Early Medieval Migration and Colonization, 2012, 81-88, https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/RELM/7/RELM007-001.pdf

Migration Period Longboats: Seafaring and Inland Vessels (4th-9th Centuries), Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/frisian-longships

Bruce-Mitford, Rupert Leo Scott, The Sutton Hoo ship-burial, London : British Museum Publications Ltd. 1975, https://archive.org/details/suttonhooshipbur0000bruc/page/n1/mode/2up

Greenhill, B. The Archaeology of Boats & Ships: An Introduction. Conway Maritime Press 1995,

McGrail, Seán, Ancient Boats in North-West Europe The archaeology of water transport to AD 1500, New York: Routledge, 1988 , https://dokumen.pub/qdownload/ancient-boats-in-north-west-europe-the-archaeology-of-water-transport-to-ad-1500-revised-058249267x-9780582492677.html

Knol E, Ijssennagger N. Palaeogeography and People: Historical Frisians in an archaeological light. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:5-24,

[46] Loveluck, Chris & Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, Journal of Maritime Archaeology (2006) 1:141, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x, https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

Wilken D, Hadler H, Wunderlich T, Majchczack B, Schwardt M, Fediuk A, Fischer P, Willershäuser T, Klooß S, Vött A, Rabbel W. Lost in the North Sea-Geophysical and geoarchaeological prospection of the Rungholt medieval dyke system (North Frisia, Germany). PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0265463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265463. PMID: 35377888; PMCID: PMC8979465. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8979465/

IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N. Structured by the Sea: Rethinking Maritime Connectivity of the Early-Medieval Frisians. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:249-272, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/structured-by-the-sea-rethinking-maritime-connectivity-of-the-earlymedieval-frisians/329B51FF63FDD5F6B2994E78BA3C072B

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Anglo-Frisian History & Culture, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history

Kemp, John and Brian D’Olier, Early Navigation in the North Sea – The Use of the Lead and Line and other Navigation Methods, The Journal of Navigation (2016), 69, 673–697. © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2015 doi:10.1017/S0373463315000934, https://www.academia.edu/90523151/Early_Navigation_in_the_North_Sea_The_Use_of_the_Lead_and_Line_and_other_Navigation_Methods

Kemp, John, The Use of the Lead and Line by Early Navigators in the North Sea?, TransNav, Volume 8 Number 4 Dec 2014, DOI 10.12716/1001.08.04.01, 481 – 483

[47] Migration Period Longboats: Seafaring and Inland Vessels (4th-9th Centuries), Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/frisian-longships

[48] Migration Period Longboats: Seafaring and Inland Vessels (4th-9th Centuries), Ealdlar,https://ealdlar.com/history/frisian-longships

[49] Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, Page 171, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

[50] The Humber–southern Jutland corridor is a geomorphological and maritime band across the southern North Sea: from the Humber estuary on England’s east coast to the south‑west coast of Jutland (via Schleswig/Funen), marking the southern “inner sea” zone where Holocene subsidence and sea‑level rise drowned a former lowland into today’s shallow North Sea.

In seascape archaeology, that line effectively separates a shallow, bank‑filled “inner North Sea” from deeper northern basins, creating a corridor of relatively predictable tides and short‑haul crossings between estuaries and barrier‑island coasts. Early medieval maritime research treats the Humber estuary and adjacent coast (Humber–Fens) on the west, and the Wadden/Jutland coast on the east, as a coherent coastal system of landing places, beach markets and emporia rather than isolated shores.

Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

Westerdahl, Christer, The Maritime Cultural Landscape: On the concept of the traditional zones of transport geography, 1998, Inst of Archaeology and Ethnology, University of Copenhagen, https://www.abc.se/~pa/publ/cult-land.htm

Loveluck C. Ports and maritime-oriented societies, AD 600–900. In: Northwest Europe in the Early Middle Ages, c.AD 600–1150: A Comparative Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2013:178-212. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/northwest-europe-in-the-early-middle-ages-cad-6001150/ports-and-maritimeoriented-societies-ad-600900/6DF0F99C5490E9592CBC879E9457A4C7

Van de Noort, Robert, Argonauts of the North Sea: Social Maritime Archaeology, 2nd Milleium BC,, 2006, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, pp. 267–287, https://www.academia.edu/3663229/Argonauts_of_the_North_Sea

Bente Sven Majchczack, A new light on early medieval North Frisia: Harbours and trading sites on the islands of Föhr and Sylt, Pages 161 – 184, in Babette Ludowici and Heike Pöppelmann, eds, New Narratives for the First Millennium AD?, Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum Alle Rechte vorbehalten , 2022, https://www.academia.edu/127066328/A_new_light_on_early_medieval_North_Frisia_Harbours_and_trading_sites_on_the_islands_of_Föhr_and_Sylt

Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/3E63327F4D3842542B0E1DD40129BE3B

Hines J, Ijssennagger N. Introduction: Frisians – Who, When, Where, Why? In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:1-4.

Hines J. The Anglo-Frisian Question. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:25-42.

Dijkstra M, Koning J de. ‘All quiet on the Western Front?’ The Western Netherlands and the ‘North Sea Culture’ in the Migration Period. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:53-74.

Pestell T. The Kingdom of East Anglia, Frisia and Continental Connections, c. ad 600–900. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:193-222.

[51] Loveluck C. Ports and maritime-oriented societies, AD 600–900. In: Northwest Europe in the Early Middle Ages, c.AD 600–1150: A Comparative Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2013:178-212. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/northwest-europe-in-the-early-middle-ages-cad-6001150/ports-and-maritimeoriented-societies-ad-600900/6DF0F99C5490E9592CBC879E9457A4C7

Martin Carver and Chris Loveluck with Stuart Brookes, Robin Daniels, Gareth Davies, Christopher Ferguson, Helen Geake, David Griffiths, David Hinton, Edward Oakley and Imogen Tompsett, The Early Medieval: An Maritime Archaeological Research Agenda for England, 2026, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/early-medieval-ad-400-to-1000/

Pestell T. The Kingdom of East Anglia, Frisia and Continental Connections, c. ad 600–900. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:193-222.

[52] Knol E, Ijssennagger N. Palaeogeography and People: Historical Frisians in an archaeological light. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:5-24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/palaeogeography-and-people-historical-frisians-in-an-archaeological-light/CA5BEE0DAC45640D30C3E40FBDC11C49

Martin Carver and Chris Loveluck with Stuart Brookes, Robin Daniels, Gareth Davies, Christopher Ferguson, Helen Geake, David Griffiths, David Hinton, Edward Oakley and Imogen Tompsett, The Early Medieval: An Maritime Archaeological Research Agenda for England, 2026, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/early-medieval-ad-400-to-1000/

Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

Hines J. The Anglo-Frisian Question. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:25-42.

[53] Chris Loveluck and Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, J Mari Arch (11 Nov 2006) 1:140–169, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x , https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

Knol E, Ijssennagger N. Palaeogeography and People: Historical Frisians in an archaeological light. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:5-24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/palaeogeography-and-people-historical-frisians-in-an-archaeological-light/CA5BEE0DAC45640D30C3E40FBDC11C49

Martin Carver and Chris Loveluck with Stuart Brookes, Robin Daniels, Gareth Davies, Christopher Ferguson, Helen Geake, David Griffiths, David Hinton, Edward Oakley and Imogen Tompsett, The Early Medieval: An Maritime Archaeological Research Agenda for England, 2026, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/early-medieval-ad-400-to-1000/

Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

[54] Chris Loveluck and Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, J Mari Arch (11 Nov 2006) 1:140–169, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x , https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

[55] Chris Loveluck and Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, J Mari Arch (11 Nov 2006) 1:140–169, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x , https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

[56] Chris Loveluck and Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, J Mari Arch (11 Nov 2006) 1:140–169, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x , https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

[57] Tys, Dries, Maritime and River Traders, Landing Places, and Emporia Ports in the Merovingian Period in and Around the Low Countries, 1 – 36 printed from Oxford Handbooks online (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). Oxford University Press, 2018. Online Publication Date: Oct 2020, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190234188.013.26, https://www.academia.edu/93991995/Maritime_and_River_Traders_Landing_Places_and_Emporia_Ports_in_the_Merovingian_Period_in_and_Around_the_Low_Countries

Sindbæk, Søren M. , Emporia, high-definition archaeology, and Ribe, 11- 23, in Northern Emporium, Sindbæk, Søren M., editor. Northern Emporium: Vol. 1 The Making of Viking-Age Ribe. vol. 122, Aarhus University Press, 2022. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv33jb4rt. 

Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/3E63327F4D3842542B0E1DD40129BE3B

Early Medieval Trade between Anglo-Saxon England and Frisia, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/early-medieval-trade

[58] Archaeological evidence from the fifth century points to significant early Germanic settlement in England, with  Spong Hill in Norfolk and Mucking in Essex serving as key examples of this transition. These sites provide crucial evidence of the migration, culture, and daily life of the incoming Anglo-Saxons. The cemeteries contain distinctive Germanic-style, urn-field cremations (similar to those in northern Germany) and, in some cases, furnished inhumations with grave goods.

Key Archaeological Evidence:

Mucking, Essex: This site represents one of the most extensive Anglo-Saxon settlements excavated in Britain, featuring over 200 Grubenhauser (sunken huts), dozens of timber halls, and two cemeteries. Located on the Thames Estuary, Mucking shows early Germanic activity starting in the early 5th century.

Spong Hill, Norfolk: Known as the largest early Anglo-Saxon cremation cemetery in Britain, excavations at Spong Hill revealed over 2,200 cremation burials and 57 inhumations, along with associated sunken-featured buildings (Grubenhauser). The findings show the site was in use for roughly 150 years, starting in the early 5th century, and suggests the presence of Germanic settlers may predate traditional accounts (AD 450).

See also:

Faber, Hans, Merciless Medieval Merchants and Slavers, 19 Jun 2020, Frisia Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/merciless-medieval-merchants

Faber, Hans, The Batwing Doors of Dorestad. A Two-Way Gateway of Trade and Power, 13 April, 2020, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Friasian Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2020/04/13/the-batwing-doors-of-northwest-europe

Bentonian, Dorestad, crossroads of the north, 30 Jun 2017, The Eighth Century and All of That, https://www.8thcentury.com/dorestad-crossroads-of-the-north/

Ealdlar, Early Medieval Trade between Anglo-Saxon England and Frisia, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/early-medieval-trade

Kosian, Menne and Henk Weerts, Rowin Van Lanen, Jaap Evert Abrahamse, The City and the River. The early medieval Emporium (trade centre) of Dorestad; integrating physical geography with archaeological data in changing environments, International Conference on Cultural Heritage and New Technologies, Vienna, 2012, https://www.academia.edu/5851685/The_City_and_the_River_The_early_medieval_Emporium_trade_centre_of_Dorestad_integrating_physical_geography_with_archaeological_data_in_changing_environments

[59] Anglo-Frisian History & Culture, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history

[60] Chris Loveluck and Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, J Mari Arch (11 Nov 2006) 1:140–169, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x , https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

Chris Loveluck and Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, J Mari Arch (11 Nov 2006) 1:140–169, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x , https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

Deckers P. Cultural Convergence in a Maritime Context: Language and material culture as parallel phenomena in the early-medieval southern North Sea region. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:173-192 , https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/cultural-convergence-in-a-maritime-context-language-and-material-culture-as-parallel-phenomena-in-the-earlymedieval-southern-north-sea-region/05DD2C1DBDC0C6A6DB11D337D2CBB32A

Knol E, Ijssennagger N. Palaeogeography and People: Historical Frisians in an archaeological light. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:5-24., https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/palaeogeography-and-people-historical-frisians-in-an-archaeological-light/CA5BEE0DAC45640D30C3E40FBDC11C49

Van de Noort, Robert, North Sea Archaeologies, Oxford University Press, 2011, Page 171, https://www.ancientportsantiques.com/wp-content/uploads/Documents/PLACES/UK-EUNorth/NorthSea-VandeNoort2011.pdf

Early Medieval Trade between Anglo-Saxon England and Frisia, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/early-medieval-trade

Anglo-Frisian History & Culture, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history

Research publications, Fryske Akademy,page Accessed 3 Mar 2026, https://www.fryske-akademy.nl/en/research/research-publications/

Majchczack, Bente Sven, A new light on early medieval North Frisia: Harbours and trading sites on the islands of Föhr and Sylt, in Babette Ludowici and Heike Pöppelmann, eds, New Narratives for the First Millennium AD?, Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum, 2022, https://www.academia.edu/127066328/A_new_light_on_early_medieval_North_Frisia_Harbours_and_trading_sites_on_the_islands_of_Föhr_and_Sylt

Lebecq, Stéphane The Frisian trade in the Dark Ages; a Frisian or a Frankish/Frisian trade? In: Carmiggelt, A.,(ed). Rotterdam Papers VII, 1992, pp. 7-15, https://www.scribd.com/doc/6919218/Lebecq-The-Frisian-trade-in-the-Dark-Ages

Sedgeford featured in major ancient DNA publication, Sedgeford Historical and Archaeological Research Project (SHARP) Blog, https://www.sharp.org.uk/single-post/sedgeford-featured-in-major-ancient-dna-publication

Hills, C. M. “Did the people of Spong Hill come from Schleswig-Holstein.” Studien zur Sachsenforschung 11 (1999): 145-154.

“Spong Hill .” Ancient Europe, 8000 B.C. to A.D. 1000: Encyclopedia of the Barbarian World. Encyclopedia.com. 3 Feb. 2026, https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/spong-hill

Hills, Catherine M, “From Isidore to Isotopes: Ivory Rings in Early Medieval Graves.” In Image and Power in the Archaeology of Early Medieval Britain: Essays in Honour of Rosemary Cramp. Edited by Helena Hamerow and Arthur MacGregor, pp. 131–146. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2001

Hills, Catherine M. Origins of the English. London: Duckworth, 2003

Hills, Catherine M., Kenneth J. Penn, and Robert J. Rickett. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham, Norfolk, Part V. East Anglian Archaeology, report no. 67. Norfolk, U.K.: Gressenhall, 1994. 

McKinley, Jacqueline, The Anglo-Saxon cemetery at Spong Hill, North Elmham, Dereham, Norfolk : Norfolk Archaeological Unit, Norfolk Museums Service, https://archive.org/details/anglosaxoncemete0000unse/mode/2up

[61] Faber, Hans, The Batwing Doors of Dorestad. A Two-Way Gateway of Trade and Power, 26 Oct, 2020, Frisian Coast Trail, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2020/10/26/dorestat/

Dorstad, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 December 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorestad

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[62] Lebecq, Stéphane The Frisian trade in the Dark Ages; a Frisian or a Frankish/Frisian trade? In: Carmiggelt, A.,(ed). Rotterdam Papers VII, 1992, pp. 7-15, https://www.scribd.com/doc/6919218/Lebecq-The-Frisian-trade-in-the-Dark-Ages

Fafinski, Mateusz, The moving centre: trade and travel in York from Roman to Anglo-Saxon times in Owen-Crocker, Gale R., and Schneider, Brian W., editors, The Anglo-Saxons : the world through their eyes  Anglo-Saxons in their World (Conference) (2010 : Manchester Centre for Anglo-Saxon Studies); Manchester Centre for Anglo-Saxon Studies, host institution. . 2014, https://mfafinski.github.io/PDFs/York.pdf

[63] Fafinski, Mateusz, The moving centre: trade and travel in York from Roman to Anglo-Saxon times in Owen-Crocker, Gale R., and Schneider, Brian W., editors, The Anglo-Saxons : the world through their eyes  Anglo-Saxons in their World (Conference) (2010 : Manchester Centre for Anglo-Saxon Studies); Manchester Centre for Anglo-Saxon Studies, host institution. . 2014, https://mfafinski.github.io/PDFs/York.pdf

[64] Knol E, Ijssennagger N. Palaeogeography and People: Historical Frisians in an archaeological light. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:5-24, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/palaeogeography-and-people-historical-frisians-in-an-archaeological-light/CA5BEE0DAC45640D30C3E40FBDC11C49

McManus, E., Montgomery, J., Evans, J., Lamb, A., Brettell, R., & Jelsma, J. (2013). ‘To the land or to the sea’ : diet and mobility in early medieval Frisia. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 8(2), 255-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564894.2013.787565; also: https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/504785/1/McManus%20et%20al%20-%20Oosterbeintum_final.pdf

Martin Carver and Chris Loveluck with Stuart Brookes, Robin Daniels, Gareth Davies, Christopher Ferguson, Helen Geake, David Griffiths, David Hinton, Edward Oakley and Imogen Tompsett, The Early Medieval: An Maritime Archaeological Research Agenda for England, 2026, https://researchframeworks.org/maritime/early-medieval-ad-400-to-1000/

[65] Dijkstra M, Koning J de. ‘All quiet on the Western Front?’ The Western Netherlands and the ‘North Sea Culture’ in the Migration Period. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:53-74.

Pestell T. The Kingdom of East Anglia, Frisia and Continental Connections, c. ad 600–900. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:193-222.

Migration Period, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

[66] Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Deckers P. Cultural Convergence in a Maritime Context: Language and material culture as parallel phenomena in the early-medieval southern North Sea region. In: Hines J, IJssennagger N, eds. Frisians and Their North Sea Neighbours: From the Fifth Century to the Viking Age. Boydell & Brewer; 2017:173-192. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-and-their-north-sea-neighbours/cultural-convergence-in-a-maritime-context-language-and-material-culture-as-parallel-phenomena-in-the-earlymedieval-southern-north-sea-region/05DD2C1DBDC0C6A6DB11D337D2CBB32A

[67] Loveluck, Chris & Dries Tys, Coastal societies, exchange and identity along the Channel and southern North Sea shores of Europe, AD 600–1000, Journal of Maritime Archaeology (2006) 1:141, DOI 10.1007/s11457-006-9007-x, https://www.academia.edu/1847904/Coastal_societies_exchange_and_identity_along_the_Channel_and_southern_North_Sea_shores_of_Europe_ad_600_1000

Sullivan, Will, , DNA From Skeletons Reveals Large Migration to Early Medieval England, 28 Sep 2022, Smithsonian Magazine, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/dna-from-skeletons-reveals-large-migration-to-early-medieval-england-180980829/

Bente Sven Majchczack, A new light on early medieval North Frisia: Harbours and trading sites on the islands of Föhr and Sylt, Pages 161 – 184, in Babette Ludowici and Heike Pöppelmann, eds, New Narratives for the First Millennium AD?, Braunschweigisches Landesmuseum Alle Rechte vorbehalten , 2022, https://www.academia.edu/127066328/A_new_light_on_early_medieval_North_Frisia_Harbours_and_trading_sites_on_the_islands_of_Föhr_and_Sylt

[68] Hans Faber,Hengist and Horsa—Frisian Horses From Overseas That Founded the Kentish Kingdom, 11 May 2024,Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/frisian-horses-from-overseas-founding-the-kentish-kingdom

[69] Frisian Kingdom, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian_Kingdom

History of Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Frisia

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 25 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

[70] Brown, Richard; Teague, Steven; Loe, Louise; Sudds, Berni; Popescu, Elizabeth, Excavations at Stoke Quay, Ipswich: Southern Gipeswic and the parish of St Augustine (East Anglian Archaeology Monograph), East Anglian Archaeology, 2021

Sullivan, Will, , DNA From Skeletons Reveals Large Migration to Early Medieval England, 28 Sep 2022, Smithsonian Magazine, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/dna-from-skeletons-reveals-large-migration-to-early-medieval-england-180980829/

Gretzinger, Joscha, Sayer, Duncan, Justeau, Pierre,Altena, Eveline, Pala, Maria, Dulias, Katharina, Edwards, Ceiridwen, Jodoin, Susanne, Lacher, Laura, Sabin, Susanna, Vågene, Åshild, Haak, Wolfgang, Ebenesersdóttir, S., Moore, Kristjan, Radzevičiūtė, Rita, Schmidt, Kara, Brace, Selina, Bager, Martina, Patterson, Nick, Schiffels, Stephan,The Anglo-Saxon migration and the formation of the early English gene pool. 21 Sep 2022, Nature, 610, 1- 8 , DO – 10.1038/s41586-022-05247-2, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363736520_The_Anglo-Saxon_migration_and_the_formation_of_the_early_English_gene_pool

[71] Rolf H. Bremmer, Firisnas in Anglo-Saxon England: A Historical and Toponymical Investigation, Pages 45 – 94, in N.R. Århammar, W.T. Beetstra, Ph.H. Breuker and J .J. Spahr van der Hoek, Fryske Nammen 3, Ljouwert: Fryske Akademy , 1981, https://www.academia.edu/3452755/Frisians_in_Anglo_Saxon_England_A_Historical_and_Toponymical_Investigation

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdar, https://ealdlar.com/history

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Eardlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[72] Norwich, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwich

Adams, David, An Archaeological Evaluation at 17-27 Fishergate, Norwich, Norfolk, Norfolk Archaeogloical Unit, Report No. 1062, June 2005, https://web.archive.org/web/20210528133034/https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-413-1%2Fdissemination%2Fpdf%2Fnorfolka1-15734_1.pdf

[73] The scholarly study of place names (toponyms), analyzing their origins, meanings, usage, and typologies.

Toponymy, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 March 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toponymy

[74] Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Anglo-Frisian History & Culture, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history

Bremmer, Rolf, Frisians in Anglo-Saxon England: A Historical and Toponymical Investigation, Pages 45 – 94, in N.R. Arhammar, W.T. Beetstra,, Ph.H. Breuker, J .J. Spahr van der Hoe, eds, Fryske Nammen 3, Liouwert: Fryske Akademy, 1981,

Mees, Bernard, Did Frisians participate in the Anglo-Saxon migrations?, 10 Sep 2025, The Age of Arthur, Substack, https://ageofarthur.substack.com/p/did-frisians-participate-in-the-anglo

[75] Bremmer, Rolf, Frisians in Anglo-Saxon England: A Historical and Toponymical Investigation, Pages 45 – 94, in N.R. Arhammar, W.T. Beetstra,,Ph.H. Breuker, J .J. Spahr van der Hoe, eds, Fryske Nammen 3, Liouwert: Fryske Akademy, 1981,

Mees, Bernard, Did Frisians participate in the Anglo-Saxon migrations?, 10 Sep 2025, The Age of Arthur, Substack, https://ageofarthur.substack.com/p/did-frisians-participate-in-the-anglo

[76] Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[77] Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

The Ancestors of Haplogroup G-Z6748: A Frisian or Frank – Part Nine

This is the ninth and last part of long multi-part story about a 2,850 year gap or absence of documented YDNA haplogroups in the Griff(is)(es)(ith) genetic YDNA paternal line. The final, ninth part of the story focuses on the possible indigenous socio-cultural groups that might have been associated with these YDNA generations leading up to and including the most recent common ancestor asociated with the haplgroup G-Z6748.

Living in a Fluctuating Frontier Zone

As indicated in previous parts of this story, the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of haplogroup G-Z6748 may have been born around 668 CE. It is estimated that he had a 68 percent chance of being born between roughly 525 CE and 800 CE. [1] This 275 year time variance is not that big when attempting to pinpoint ancient DNA remains. [2] Illustration one depicts the archaeological time period of this roughly nine generation period or 275 year range of time.

Illustration One: Estimated Birth Date of tMRCA of G-Z6748, Archaeological Time, Periods, and Historical Events

Click for Larger View | Source: Modification of part of Fig. 2. Palaeogeographical maps of (A) AD 100 and (B) AD 800 in Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human – landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

During this 275 year period of time, the MRCA of G-Z6748 or preceding YDNA generations may have lived during the Early Medieval period B or the beginning of period C of the Early Medieval period. [3] These generations also lived at the end of the dark ages and during the ‘Great Migration’ when various social groups migrated in western Europe and specifically in the Netherlands area. It is also a period of time that witnessed shifting alliances and patterns of interaction and dominance between indigenous social groups from the post Roman era and emerging groups such as the Frisians, Franks and Saxons.

Between about 500 and 800 CE, the area of the later Netherlands lay in a fluctuating frontier zone where local post‑Roman populations, “new” Frisians inhabiting the North Sea coast, incoming Saxon groups in the northeast, and expanding Frankish power from the south interacted through shifting warfare, overlordship, and alliances. Multiple historical and archaeological studies explicitly frame this as a period of changing political configurations and changing social group relations rather than simple ‘ethnic’ group replacement. [4]

In the 19th century, Dutch historians believed that the Franks, Frisians, and Saxons had populated and inhabited the Low Countries, but this theory fell out of favour in the 20th century. Due to the scarcity of written sources, knowledge of this period depends to a large degree on the interpretation of archaeological data. The traditional view of a clear-cut division between Frisians in the north and coast, Franks in the south and Saxons in the east has proven historically problematic. Archeological evidence suggests dramatically different models for different regions, with demographic continuity for some parts of the country and depopulation and possible replacement in other parts, notably the coastal areas of Frisia and Holland.[5]

Boom, Bust and Slow Recovery

As depicted in illustration one, based on various archaeological studies that have analyzed population fluctuation and density during this time period, the first millennium CE in the (present‑day) Netherlands shows a broadly shared “boom–bust–slow recovery” demographic pattern, with strong regional divergence in the depth and timing of the bust and the speed of recovery. Two major population highs have been documented and reconstructed: a middle Roman era peak (roughly AD 70–270) and a renewed rise in the early medieval period C (ca. AD 725–950). Illustration two provides a more detailed reconstruction of this pattern. in the Rhine-Meuse delta region. [6]

Between these, there is a pronounced demographic trough: a sharp decline from the later third century into the fifth century, after which population levels remain low for several centuries and never return to middle Roman values within the first millennium. [7] In the Rhine–Meuse delta, quantitative reconstructions indicate a rural population drop on the order of roughly 80 percent (ca. 78–85 percent) between the middle and late Roman periods.[8]National‑ scale’ estimates suggest that a comparable late/post‑Roman decline affected much of what is now the present‑day Netherlands, though the magnitude of contraction varies between coastal, fluvial (landscapes associated with river systems), and inland sandy regions. [9]

Illustration Two: Reconstructed Palaeodemographic Trends for the Rhine-Meuse Delta During the First Millennium CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Rowin J. van Lanen and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence – based reconstructions, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune, eds, Across Medieval Europe: Old Paradigms and New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Lieden: Sidestone Press, 2019, 113- 134, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

This demographic trough coincides with the withdrawal of Roman military and administrative structures, larger general regional political instability, and increased flooding in parts of the fluvial zone. In the post-Roman era (the Early Middle Ages), the fluvial zone in the Netherlands was a highly dynamic, wet, and largely primitive landscape characterized by the environmental configuration of the Rhine-Meuse delta. It was an area of increased flooding, and significant shifting of river branches (avulsion). This period marked a transition from a Roman managed landscape to a more natural, water-dominated enivornmental area, particularly in the central Netherlands. [10]

After several centuries of low demographic levels, settlement numbers and inferred population start to rise again from roughly the later seventh to eighth century, with a clear demographic upswing in early medieval period C. By around 800 to 1000 CE, some regions (especially parts of the coastal and fluvial zone) are on a trajectory toward becoming among the most densely populated landscapes in northwest Europe, though still below the middle Roman peak in absolute terms for many areas. This recovery is tied to more stable political configurations, renewed agrarian exploitation of wetlands and floodplains, and large‑scale land reclamation and embankment processes that accelerates from the later first millennium into the high Middle Ages. [11]

Coastal and tidal marsh zones show strong late/post‑Roman contraction and, in some sectors, near‑abandonment, with relatively late reoccupation of specific areas on dwelling mounds and reclaimed grounds. The fluvial Rhine–Meuse area follows the classic boom–bust–slow recovery curve, with very high Roman densities, severe late Roman Era depopulation, and re‑growth from the eighth to ninth centuries onward as settlements shift to slightly higher levee positions under rising flood stress. Inland coversand and higher regions tend to show smaller population fluctuations. This area also witnesses the Roman‑era rise and post‑Roman decline, but with less dramatic contraction and sometimes earlier or smoother recovery relative to the low‑lying deltaic tracts of land. [12]

Various studies stress that demographic change was not a simple, uniform “collapse,” but a set of regionally differentiated trajectories produced by the interplay of political, economic, and environmental factors. [13] Through the use of high‑resolution, evidence‑ based demographic analysis (e.g. using ancient settlement inventories, large excavation datasets, and environmental proxies) these studies have provided a methodogical basis for explaining the spatial variation in cultural change and landscape transformation across the Roman–early medieval transition. [14]

The Migratory Path Among the Franks and the Frisians

As reflected in illustration one above, during and just prior to this 275 year period when the ancestor of haplgroup G-Z6748 lived, the Merovingian Dynasty became an emerging power. The Merovingians were a dynasty of Frankish kings who ruled much of what is now France, Belgium, western Germany, and parts of neighboring regions from the mid‑fifth century until they were replaced by the Carolingians in 751 CE. The northern border of the dynasty’s territory covered an area that included the migratory path of the ancestors of the MRCA of haplogroup G-Z6748 (see illustration two). [15]

Illustration Two: Map of the Rise and Expansion of the Merovingians, c. 639 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Simeon Netchev,Map of the Rise and Expansion of the Merovingians, c. 639, 28 Dec 2025, World History Encyclopedia, https://www.worldhistory.org/image/16909/map-of-the-rise-and-expansion-of-the-merovingians/

In addition to the Frankish Merovingian Dynasty, Frisian “power blocks”[16] , in what is now the northern Netherlands, crystallized as a coastal realm under kings or group leaders like Aldgisl and Radbod between roughly the mid‑seventh century and 734 CE. Their local dominance then fragmented under Frankish rule; and later re‑emerging as looser, more regional Frisian groups into the ninth and tenth centuries (see illustrations three through five). [17]

Illustrations Three, Four and Five: Various Stages of Magna Frisia

Illustration Three

Click for Larger View | Source: Frans Riemersma, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Sep 1, 2018, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail Blog,https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Illustration Four

Click for Larger View | Source: Frans Riemersma, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Sep 1, 2018, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail Blog,https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Illustration Five

Click for Larger View | Source: Frans Riemersma, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Sep 1, 2018, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail Blog,https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Depending on where specific generations of the ‘immediate’ or preceding ancestors of the MRCA of G-Z6748 lived, they may likely have lived in areas controlled by groups identified as either Frisians or Franks. Based on the analysis of possible migratory corridors discussed in part eight of this story during this time period, illustration six depicts two possble migratory paths in the context of Frisian, Saxon and Frankish control.

In the context of the larger social and political influences, the genetic ancestors of the MRCA of G-Z6748 migrated through the Roman Limes area around the collapse of the Roman Empire, at a time and place that became increasingly controlled by the Frankish groups. These ancestors continued to move northward into areas inhabited by social groups known or identified as Frisians.

Illustration Six: Estimated Migratory Path of YDNA Ancestors and General Areas of Control by Frisians, Franks and Saxons Around 716 CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Modification of map developed by Mauls Catulus, Map of Magna Frisia in Latin, 14 Feb 2010, Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frisia_716-la.svg

A Period of Dynamic Interaction, Negotiated Power, and Evolving Identities among the Post‑Roman Communities

Archaeological evidence suggests dramatically different experiences for different regions, with demographic continuity for some parts of the area and depopulation and possible replacement in other parts, notably the coastal areas of Frisia. [18] The area that is currently the southern Netherlands experienced more continuity, with Frankish groups absorbing or mixing with remaining Romanized populations. Archaeological studies of late Roman and immediate post‑Roman settlement in the Low Countries stress continuity of local communities in parts of the river and loess zones, even as the coastal zone and nothern areas experienced major demographic change. This continuity in the southern area underlies the idea of “indigenous” post‑Roman groups (Franks) living in the river area interacting with incoming ‘re‑labelled’ Frisians and Saxons in the coastal and northern areas (see illustration seven). [19]

Illustration Seven: Approximate Positions of Indigenous Groups known from Roman Era Sources

Click for Larger View | Source: Andrew Lancaster, Netherlands in the time of the Roman empire, 2 Jul 2013, Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Netherlands_in_the_time_of_the_Roman_empire.png

During the third and fourth centuries, the population of Frisia steadily decreased, and by the fifth century it dropped dramatically. [20] The population decline of the Frisii was caused by flooding, disease and the fall of the Western Roman Empire. [21] The ancient indigenous groups—the Frisii, Batavians, and Cananefates who had lived under or alongside Roman rule—largely disappeared from the northern Netherlands. Archaeological surveys indicate that only small pockets of the original population stayed behind in areas like the Groningen coastal marshes, while coastal lands remained largely unpopulated for the next one or two centuries. [22]

Studies of the Anglo‑Saxon and Frisian migrations into the coastal Netherlands argue that new groups (Angles, Saxons, Franks) moved into lands formerly inhabited by the ancient Frisii, Cananefates and Batavians. Merovingian Frankish groups ‘retrospectivey’ labeled these mixed coastal populations “Frisians,” which itself points to a dynamic social reconfiguration of identities over the fifth through seventh centuries. [23]

Relationships between Frankish and Frisian areas in the Netherlands were highly porous in economic, social, and cultural terms, even while political and military conflicts periodically hardened boundaries between the groups. Archaeological and anthropological studies during this time period generally treat the Rhine–Meuse delta and coastal Netherlands as a long‑term contact zone rather than a firm frontier between two closed ethnic blocks. [24]

From an archaeological and anthropological standpoint, the Frankish–Frisian relationship in the Netherlands is best described as a semi‑porous frontier:

  • Politically: there were real contests and shifting borders, especially around major river‑mouth centers; [25]
  • Economically and socially: trade, mobility, mixed communities, and shared religious and legal frameworks created strong cross‑border connectivity; [26] and
  • Ethnically and culturally: identities were fluid and situational, with overlapping Frankish and Frisian social spheres rather than sealed or self-contained cultural groups. [27]

Written sources and archaeology show alternating phases of Frankish expansion, Frisian autonomy, and shifting overlordship in the central river area (e.g. the Utrecht–Dorestad region) in the seventh–eighth centuries. [28] Studies of Dorestad and neighboring sites describe the Rhine delta as a frontier where Franks and Frisians “came to oppose each other,” yet this opposition coexisted with dense cross‑border interaction. The so‑called Frisian– Frankish wars underscore competition over key emerging ‘town settlements‘ like Utrecht and Dorestad in the river lowland area, but modern scholarship emphasizes that these conflicts did not create impermeable ethnic or social barriers. [29]

Studies on Merovingian and early Carolingian political geography emphasizes that Frisians could function both as rivals and as allies or clients of the Franks, depending on local rulers and phases of expansion, showing that power relations were contingent and negotiable rather than strictly binary. [30] Broader studies of cross Channel and North Sea politics in the sixth to seventh centuries (e.g. on Frankish–Britain relations) explicitly reject simple hegemonic models in favor of “balance of power” and “complex influence” frameworks to descibe the intergroup relationships. [31] The same authors of these studies apply similar concepts to North Sea coastal regions including Frisia, underlining that elite strategies involved selectively displaying Frankish connections, trading, and raiding in a fluid political environment. [32]

The Impact of the Great Migration During this Time Period

The term ‘Migration Period’ in Europe has been predominately used to refer to the ‘Migration Period’ (around 300-800 CE), when Germanic and other ‘tribes’ or groups reshaped Europe and were associated with the Western Roman Empire’s fall (see illustration seven). [33]

Illustration Seven: The Migration Period in Europe Fourth – Sixth Centuries CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Modification of map by Simeon Netchev,Map of the Migration Period in Europe in the 4th-5th Century, 16 Jun 2021, World History Encyclopedia, https://www.worldhistory.org/image/14250/map-of-the-migration-period-in-europe-in-the-4th-5/

The Migration Period specifically refers to the important role played by the migration, invasion, and settlement of various social groups in western Europe, notably the Burgundians, Vandals, Goths, Alemanni, Alans, Huns, early Slavs, Pannonian Avars, Bulgars and Magyars within or into the territories of Europe as a whole and of the Western Roman Empire in particular. [34]

The Migration Period (circa 300–600 CE) fundamentally reshaped the Netherlands area as Germanic ‘tribes’ or aligned groups, including Franks, Saxons, and Frisians, moved into the crumbling Western Roman Empire’s northern territories. This triggered the abandonment of Roman-occupied southern areas of what is known as modern day Netherlands, leading to new cultural, linguistic, and political structures. [35]

All three of these groups were the result of early medieval ethnogenesis rather than direct continuation of Roman-period ‘tribes’ or indigenous groups. Archaeological studies also stress strong regional continuity from late Roman provincial and “native” communities, so these labels mask a heterogeneous population incorporating Batavian, Cananefatian, Chamavian and other pre-Roman / Roman-period indigenous groups (see side bar discussion on ethnogenesis).

New groups of Germanic peoples—primarily Saxons, along with Angles and Jutes—migrated into the northern regions. [36]. As mentioned above, the ‘ancient Frisii’ likely disappeared around 300 CE or the end of the third century due to coastal flooding and resettlement. [37] The newcomers who settled in the northern Netherlands adopted the name or were referred by outside groups by the name “Frisians,” though they were not descended from the ancient Frisii. These “new Frisians” became the ancestors of the medieval Frisian population.

Archaeological research suggests that the Migration Period brought an initial dramatic depopulation of specific areas, ecological and settlement reconfiguration, and later Frankish consolidation in what is now the Netherlands, rather than a simple “replacement” by incoming social groups.[38] The “Great Migration” in the area that is presently the Netherlands is partly visible as the absence of population: fewer sites, shorter occupation spans, and gaps in archaeological material culture rather than a clear mass-arrival new social groups. [39]

Ethnogenesis: Ethnicity, Tribes and Archaeology

Ethnogenesisis is the process by which a distinct ethnic group comes into being, emerges, or is formed, often arising from the blending, reformation, or interaction of existing groups, cultures, and populations. It involves the creation of a new, shared identity, frequently influenced by factors like migration, political changes, or social, economic, and historical experiences.  [40]

Archaeologists have shifted from treating ethnogenesis as the simple “birth” of a fixed ethnic group to seeing it as an ongoing, contested process of identity making under specific historical and political conditions. Archaeologists in the late 20th century increasingly treated ethnicity as a relational process of boundary making rather than a bundle of traits. Ethnogenesis became a way to analyze how interaction, competition, and alliance in plural societies produced new ethnic boundaries, while highlighting internal heterogeneity and situational identities. [41]

Scholars highlight cycles of emergence, maintenance, transformation, and disappearance of ethnic identities (e.g., Hu’s concept of “ethnomorphosis”), pushing archaeologists to track identity work across multiple scales and articfacts (time, landscapes, and material practices).[42]

Ethnic identities are always constructed in close association with political systems. It is politics that define ethnicity, not vice versa. Ethnic affiliation may be expressed at different scales of social organisation. At the highest level, there are macro-ethnic formations (Großstamme) such as Ionians and Achaians, or Gauls and Germans. At a local or regional level, smaller social groups may be discerned that coincide with localised political communities (e.g. poleis, civitates, or tribes). Despite frequent claims by ethnic groups to the contrary, all ethnic formations are intrinsically unstable and dynamic over time.[43]

Read More on the Use of Terms “Ethnicity” and “Tribe” to Describe the Complexity and Fluidity of Groups Across the Late Prehistory and Early Historical Periods

Here is a breakdown of the movements that shaped this territorial map:

  • Salian Franks (South/Central): Pushed by Saxons, the Salian Franks moved from the east over the Rhine into Roman territory in the fourth century. They settled in the Texandria region (modern-day Southwest Netherlands/North Brabant) as foederati (Roman allies) before establishing their base.
  • Frisians (North/Coastal): Coastal areas, especially in the north, were occupied by the Frisians, who populated the coastal provinces. This area was known as Frisia Magna or Greater Frisia (illustration six).
  • Saxons (East): Saxons pushed into the north eastern parts of the Netherlands with some Anglian/Jutish elements in the earliest coastal influx.
  • De-population and Migration: The Roman border (Limes Germanicus), which ran along the Rhine, saw a significant reduction in population, with many settlements abandoned as the Roman army withdrew, leading to a largely rural, sparsely populated landscape in the center.
  • The Power Shift: By the seventh and eighth centuries, a time when the MRCA of G-Z6748 lived, the region was contested between the Frisians in the north and the expanding Frankish Kingdom in the south, with major trading centers like Dorestad and Utrecht (Traiectum ad Rhenum) developing as key trading hubs. 

The Migration Period’s impact in the lowlands and coastal areas is best understood as an extended period of demographic and environmental change, a reorganization of settlement systems, and a gradual emergence into a Frankish – Frisian and North Sea cultural network, rather than a series of discrete migratory events.

Overlapping, Shifting Power Blocs of Franks, Frisians, and Saxons

Between 400 and 800 CE, research scholarship sees Saxons, Frisians, and Franks in the Netherlands not as three sealed “tribes” or ‘ethnic groups’ but as overlapping, shifting power blocs whose relations ran through trade, warfare, and Frankish‑driven ethnogenesis.

If we consider the above mentioned 275 year time span that encompassed the time of birth for the most recent common ancestor of G-Z6748 or his ancestor, we can portray the the larger, general social context and general impact of the Migration Period on these roughly nine generations that lived in this time frame (see table one).

Table One: Political geography and ”Ethno’ Political Characterstics Over Time

Geographical Aspectc. 500–600 CEc. 600–700 CEc. 700–800 CE
Overarching regional powerFragmented Frankish kingdoms; local warbands.Merovingian monarchy; strong regional dukes/counts.Carolingian majores domus then kings/emperors.
South of Rhine & Meuse riversFrankish control, patchy but established.Integrated into Frankish heartland.Core Carolingian domain with fiscal/monastic structuring.
Central river zoneFrontier between Franks and northern ‘Frisian’ groups.Contested Frank–Frisian interface; rise of emporia.Fully within Carolingian realm, Dorestad at peak.
North/coastal zoneLoosely organized “Frisian” and Saxon groups.Frisian kingdom controlling much of North Sea coast.Frankish conquest of Frisia and Saxony under Karl Martel–Charlemagne.

Historians today tend to characterize the tri‑partite relationship in the Netherlands as:

  • Frankish hegemonic core pushing north;
  • Frisian maritime middle ground mediating trade and resisting, then accommodating Frankish power; and
  • Saxon‑linked hinterlands interacting militarily and socially with both, later violently drawn into the Carolingian realm. [44]

Rather than three stable ethnic blocks, the literature treats them as fluid coalitions whose boundaries, political structures, and even names were repeatedly renegotiated through raids, alliances, Christianization, and the growing power of Frankish kings. The interaction is often framed as a long frontier struggle: campaigns by Frankish Merovingian and then Carolingian rulers to control northern tolls and convert Frisian and Saxon elites. [45] Frisian–Frankish wars in the seventh–eighth centuries end with Frisian defeat and incorporation; soon after, protracted Saxon wars extend similar Frankish domination eastward. [46] Nevertheless, studies emphasize continuity of local populations and laws (e.g. Lex Frisionum) under Frankish rule, suggesting integration through tribute, law‑codes, and missionary networks more than wholesale replacement. [47]

The Rhine–Meuse axis remains a political and fiscal frontier into the later seventh century, with successive shifts in control of key sites like Utrecht and Dorestad between Frankish and Frisian rulers before final Frankish consolidation. The Frisian–Frankish wars of the early eighth century, culminating in battles such as the Boarn (734 CE), bring most of the coastal Low Countries, including the northern parts of the watershed, into the Carolingian sphere. [48] From roughly the seventh century onward, a dense North Sea trading system linked Frisian, Frankish, and Saxon (in practice often Anglo‑Saxon and “Frisio‑Saxon”) communities into a single commercial zone. [49]

The Franks

The Franks first appear in the historical and archaeological record during the late Roman Empire, with evidence of interactions—often as raiders or federated allies (foederati) along the Roman frontier, especially in the lower Rhine region. [50] During the third to fifth centuries CE, Frankish groups increasingly settled within Roman territories, sometimes forcibly as a result of Roman policy (deportations or settlement of war captives), and sometimes through negotiation for land in exchange for military service. This led to a blending of Frankish and Gallo-Roman populations, as well as the transmission of Roman military, administrative, and material cultural practices to the newcomers. [51]

‘Franks’ is a Roman collective label for a series of smaller tribes in the areas east and north of the Lower Rhine who had long maintained relations with the Roman Empire. However, it wasn’t until the early 3rd century that they were given this name by the Roman authorities. The ethnicon ‘Franks’ was subject to change in the course of time, with the 3rd-century meaning differing considerably from that of the 5th century. . . . Frankish groups underwent a serious social transformation during the Late Roman period and that this was closely tied to increasing interaction – both friendly and hostile – with the Roman Empire. Viewed from this perspective, the Franks can be regarded as a ‘product’ of the complex dynamics in the Late Roman frontier.[52]

The Franks rose to prominence in the centuries following the Roman era through processes of sociopolitical consolidation, adaptation to post-Roman contexts, and deep interaction with remaining Roman systems and populations. Archaeological and anthropological studies highlight their transformation from loosely organized tribal or indigenous groups into a dominant political force that shaped early medieval Western Europe.

“(T)he Frankish identity emerged at the first half of the 3rd century out of various earlier, smaller Germanic groups, including the Salii, Sicambri, Chamavi, Bructeri, Chatti,  Chattuarii,  Ampsivarii, Tencteri, Ubii, Batavi and the Tungri, who inhabited the lower and middle Rhine valley between the Zuyderzee and the river Lahn and extended eastwards as far as the Weser, but were the most densely settled around the IJssel and between the Lippe and the Sieg. The Frankish confederation probably began to coalesce in the 210s.

The Franks eventually were divided into two groups: the Ripuarian Franks (Latin: Ripuari), who were the Franks that lived along the middle-Rhine River during the Roman Era, and the Salians, who probably originated in the Salland in Overijssel, before pressure from the Saxons then forced them to move into the empire in the 4th century and became the Salian Franks.[53]

The Salian and Ripuarian Franks emerge from the same broader Frankish confederation on the Rhine frontier, but they crystallize in different border zones and under different types of Roman interaction as reflected in table two and in illustration eight. [54]

Table Two: Summary Diferences Between Salian and Ripuarian Franks [55]

DifferencesSalian FrankRipuarian Frank
OriginsEarliest named in late Roman sources (Ammianus) as Franks “whom custom calls Salii,” living inside the Empire in Toxandria (southern Netherlands / Belgium between Meuse and Scheldt). They appear as a coastal and river‑delta frontier population, initially pirates/raiders, then foederati settled by Roman permission in the 4th century. [55a]Their ancestors are ‘right‑bank’ Rhine peoples of the middle Rhine zone (Bructeri, Chamavi, Tencteri, Sicambri, Chattuarii, etc.) who gradually coalesce into a Frankish identity along the Cologne–Rhineland frontier.
Their pre‑Toxandrian homeland is obscure; one late source (Zosimus) says they had previously lived outside the Empire and were pushed into Batavia by Saxons, but modern scholarship treats them more as a new confederate label for groups already along the lower Rhine than as a single ancient “tribe.” [55b]The name Ripuarii/Ribuarii is not definitively attested until the 7th–8th centuries, when it describes the Frankish population around Cologne and the lower/middle Rhineland; it is tied to a legal code (Lex Ribuaria) and a Merovingian regional category rather than to a clearly attested pre‑Merovingian “tribe.”
Evidence & TimingPre‑Merovingian documentation is relatively good: Roman historians mention Salii explicitly in the 4th century, in a context of imperial settlement and frontier defense; by the 5th century they form the backbone of the lower‑Rhine Frankish polity of Chlodio and then the Merovingians.Pre‑Merovingian evidence is indirect: Frankish groups are noted on the middle Rhine, but the specific label “Ripuarian” only surfaces clearly in Merovingian‑age legal and narrative sources; some scholars connect Jordanes’ Riparii at the Catalaunian Fields with them, but that identification is debated.
Frontier setting and Roman relationshipLower Rhine / North Sea Delta:
Strongly shaped by coastal defense politics, piracy, and Roman resettlement of Franks as laeti and foederati in depopulated frontier lands like Toxandria. Salian ethnogenesis is closely entangled with Roman military and agrarian policy on the lower Rhine limes border.
Middle Rhine / Cologne:
Shaped by long‑term contact between Roman Cologne and right‑bank Germanic groups, with a mix of raiding, recruitment, and gradual Frankish penetration onto the left bank, culminating in control of Cologne in the 5th century. Their emergence as a named group reflects Merovingian re‑organization of this older Rhineland frontier population.
Later legal–regional codificationLex Salica becomes the law code applied in much of northern Gaul between Loire and Silva Carbonaria, associated with the ruling Merovingian line of (ultimately) Salian background.Lex Ribuaria (c. 7th century) governs the Rhineland around Cologne and seems to build on, or parallel, the legal traditions also reflected in Lex Salica, but framed for a distinct Austrasian/Rhenish jurisdiction.

Illustration Eight: Frankish Expansion Between the Fourth and Ninth Centuries CE

Click for Larger View | Source: Maciamo Hay, A Brief History of the Franks, Eupedia, https://www.eupedia.com/europe/frankish_influence_modern_europe.shtml

Archaeologists Royens and Heeren provide a regional synthesis of archaeological and historical evidence from the Lower Rhine valley to illuminate how Roman and Frankish societies interacted and transformed during Late Antiquity. Their contention is the Franks are a Late Roman Era product. The Franks were not a long-standing ethnic group but rather a political-military formation emerging through Roman frontier interactions. Their rise was deeply entangled with Roman systems of payment, alliance, and warfare. By the fifth century, Frankish warlords had consolidated local power in former Roman territories, adopting Roman offices, titles, and material culture to legitimize their authority. [56]

These populations mixed with local survivors, forming a “hybrid Romano-Frankish frontier culture” rather than replacing the old one entirely. Archaeological evidence, such as distinct house types, weapon forms (like the francisca), and dress accessories, indicates the arrival of new population groups—likely from north of the Rhine (Elbe-Weser and Drenthe/Veluwe regions). The authors analyze a remarkable surge of gold hoard deposits found in the Lower Rhine area in the late fourth to fifth centuries. These hoard deposits are interpreted as payments to Frankish foederati, i.e., allied warbands employed by the Empire. Estimates suggest several thousand kilograms of gold circulated, showing substantial imperial investment in frontier diplomacy and defense. [57]

There is general agreement that gold circulation in Late Roman frontier regions was closely bound up with the military sphere as payment to soldiers and to leaders of federate war bands. The Late Roman gold influx into the Lower Rhine region reflects payments by the Roman authorities or usurpers to Frankish allies (foederati) in exchange for military support.  [58]

The temporal patterning of the gold influx also prompts some interesting observations. Four phases can be distinguished, based on the dating of the hoard finds (illustration nine) . We see a modest beginning in the third quarter of the 4th century, followed by a clear peak in the early 5th century. The number then falls again in the second quarter of the 5th century, before disappearing after a final hoard in c. 460 AD. Another interesting development is the spatial distribution of hoards over time. The earliest hoards are concentrated in the area east of the Rhine. In the early 5th century they went on to cover the area both east and west of the Lower Rhine.[59]

Illustration Nine: Distribution of Late Roman Gold Hoards

Click for Larger View | Source: Figure 7 in Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren, Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 145, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

Royens and Heeren reject simple narratives of “Roman decline.” Instead, they emphasize continuity through transformation—the shift from Roman provincial society to early Frankish polities resulted from adaptive processes and mixed communities along the frontier. [60]

Archaeological evidence suggests that Frankish society underwent marked militarization and increasing social hierarchy during the Late Roman period. This process was driven by both conflict and cooperation with Rome. Access to Roman arms, fortifications, and wealth enhanced Frankish capacity for warfare and power brokerage, while the decline of centralized Roman authority created a vacuum for ambitious leaders to exploit. By the late fifth century, the Franks—especially under leaders such as Clovis—united previously disparate tribal groups to form the Merovingian dynasty, consolidating power in northern Gaul and moving towards the creation of a kingdom. [61]

Once established in former Roman Gaul, the Franks showed notable adaptability. They integrated aspects of Roman culture, language, law, and administrative practice, and adopted Christianity, which aided legitimization among local elites and the Church. Archaeological studies of burial practices, settlement patterns, and material culture reflect both continuity and innovation—a pragmatic retention of certain Roman traditions (e.g. urban lay-out, Christian sites) alongside distinctively Frankish elements (weapon graves, personal adornment styles). [62]

Early Medieval Frisians and Saxons

Along the terp and salt-marsh zone of the northern Netherlands, post‑Roman reoccupation and expansion during the fifth through seventh centuries is archaeologically associated with the emergence of a new Frisian kingdom or confederation. Linguistic and archaeological studies emphasize that these “new Frisians” drew on Anglo‑Saxon–like migrant groups and surviving coastal populations. They were not a simple continuation of the Roman-period Frisii tribe. [63]

These “new Frisians” descended largely from Saxon-, Angle- and Jute‑rich migrant streams mixed with remaining coastal populations, rather than directly from the Roman‑period Frisii. [64] As part of the the early Migration‑Period inflow into the northern Low Countries; many of the Angles and Jutes moved on to Britain as “Anglo‑Saxons”, but some remained within the coastal zone that became Frisia.

On the basis of settlement archaeology, archaeologist Jos Bazelmans argues that there was a marked break in habitation in the terp and marsh areas of present‑day Friesland between the later third and fifth centuries. This hiatus suggests that the Roman‑period Frisii of the northern Dutch coastal zone did not form a continuous, sedentary population that simply “became” the early‑medieval Frisians. The re‑occupation of the region in the fifth–sixth centuries is interpreted as involving new or restructured population groups, rather than the uninterrupted survival of a Roman‑era ethnic community. The mediaval Frisians were the result of a later, politically driven reuse of an old ethnonym by the Frankish elite, superimposed on a population that had undergone substantial demographic and cultural discontinuity. [65]

Bazelmans starts from two puzzles: the disappearance of the ethnonym ‘Frisii ‘from late Roman written sources after the third century, and its reappearance as Frisii/Frisones and Frisia in Merovingian and Carolingian texts from the sixth–seventh centuries onward. Bazelmans combines (1) archaeological settlement history in present‑day Friesland, (2) the textual tradition on the Frisiiand early‑medieval Frisians, and (3) comparative work on how imperial centers create and recycle ethnonyms on their frontiers.

Because the ethnonym disappears from the written record for roughly three centuries and then reappears attached to a reorganized coastal frontier, Bazelmans concludes that the name Frisia/Frisii was reintroduced from the outside, rather than preserved locally as an unbroken self‑designation. He suggests that Merovingian Frankish elites, drawing on the Roman ethnographic tradition, revived the old name for administrative and ideological purposes when integrating the coastal zone into a Frankish frontier system in the seventh century.

In this reading, the ethnonym “Frisians” is a product of imperial categorization. The Franks used the prestigious Roman repertoire of peoples at the North Sea coast to label and order frontier populations, thereby projecting Roman antiquity onto a new political geography. Dusting off and reusing the name Frisia could also have served practical purposes, for example in asserting claims over former Roman state land or legitimising Frankish authority in a region framed as an old Roman periphery.

Bazelmans’ main theoretical conclusion is that continuity of an ethnic name in texts does not necessarily imply continuity of population, culture, or self‑identification on the ground. The Frisian case shows how an old ethnonym can be revived after a demographic and textual gap, filled with new content, and then become internalized by later inhabitants to the point that it underpins strong regional and national narratives. For early‑medieval ethnicity, he urges treating ethnonyms as historically contingent labels embedded in power relations and Roman-Frankish discursive traditions, rather than as straightforward reflections of long‑lived “peoples.”

There is no wholesale refutation of Bazelmans arguments, but several scholars nuance or push back against specific parts of his model: the strength of the demographic “break,” the degree of Frankish top‑down control over the ethnonym, and whether “Frisian” is best read as primarily political rather than an ethnic entity. Some work on Frisian and Saxon “mirror histories” accepts the textual gap Bazelmans highlights but is more cautious about turning this into a hard population rupture, stressing that limited sources make any sharp discontinuity model fragile. Instead of a simple break and replacement, these authors emphasize overlapping coastal populations, flexible identities, and the possibility that at least some late Roman groups persisted under changing labels. [66]

IJssennagger‐Van der Pluijm explicitly cites Bazelmans’ view—that “Frisian” was re‑established by the Franks as a political term—but suggests an alternative reading in which Frisia is used “primarily as a geographical term” for a coastal zone, with Frisii/Frisones referring broadly to its inhabitants. This shifts the emphasis away from a purely invented, top‑down ethnic category toward a more open, regional label that could carry ethnic, political and geographical meanings simultaneously. [67]

Archaeological papers that were published in the same ‘Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity’ volume that includes Bazelman’s paper and later debates over ethnonyms stress that externally imposed labels are regularly appropriated and reworked “from below,” and some scholars think Bazelmans underplays this local agency in the early phases. On this view, even if the Frankish elite reintroduced the name from Roman tradition, coastal communities quickly began to fill “Frisian” with their own content, so the label cannot be treated as merely imperial shorthand or a passive political tag. [68]

Some historians and linguists are uneasy with treating “Frisian” mainly as a political category, arguing that law, language and mythic history in later Old Frisian texts reveal a strong sense of gens, or group identity, shaped by shared customs and a sacred past. From this angle, Bazelmans’ stress on power and discontinuity risks underestimating the emergence of a genuine ethnic self‑understanding by the High Middle Ages, even if the name’s reactivation was conditioned by Merovingian and Carolingian politics. [69]

The End of the Phlogenetic Gap: Profound Changes Along the Migratory Path

This multipart story focused on examining a range of methdologiclal, macro social-cultural and enviromental influences that may help explain or put into context the lack of identified subclades (YDNA genetic ancestors) in the migratory path of the Griffis genetic paternal line. The period of time for this phylogenetic gap is roughly between 3000 BC and 650 CE.

Based on historical and archaeological studies, migrating generations associated with the tail end of this gap, between 525 and 800 CE, from the Rhine-Meuse delta to the northern coastal areas of the Netherlands (Frisia), would have experienced a profound transformation in lifestyle, moving from a formerly Romanized, partly abandoned riverine landscape to a dynamic, maritime-oriented, and largely independent society.

In terms of the environment, the Rhine–Meuse zone offered relatively stable riverine landscapes with levees, older settlements, and a mix of arable fields, pastures, and woodland. Generations heading north would face a different enviroment. The northern coast (Frisia and adjacent marshlands) was a low, flat salt‑marsh environment facing the North Sea, with tidal creeks, peat, and frequent flooding, so settlements clustered on artificial dwelling mounds (terpen) or natural ridges. [70]

In terms of settlements and housing conditions, the late Roman and post‑Roman communities in the river area often occupied slightly higher sand ridges and former Roman‑era sites, with dispersed farmsteads that gradually coalesced into villages. In the north, migrants would adapt to terp‑based settlement: compact farm clusters on raised mounds, surrounded by open marsh pasture and drainage channels, with periodic rebuilding and heightening after floods. [71]

The nature of subsistence and the local economies were different given the projected migratory path. The Rhine–Meuse delta supported mixed farming (e.g. grain, cattle, pigs) and benefited from proximity to former Roman markets and transport along major rivers. On the northern coast, life was more strongly oriented to cattle raising on rich salt‑marsh pastures, peat and salt exploitation, and coastal/riverine trade. Harvests were higher than on sandy inland soils but depended on successful drainage and protection from the sea. From the seventh–eighth centuries, the Frisian coastal zone participated in a North Sea trade network linking Britain, Francia, and Scandinavia, so the migrants associated with the YDNA lineage may have been were drawn into longer‑distance commerce in wool, cattle, and crafted goods.[72]

Riverine life involved flood risk, but it was more localized and structured by known river channels and levees. On the coast, people faced storm surges, occasional catastrophic inundations, and brackish water, so flood anxiety and ritual or communal responses to the sea were central to experience. [73] Standing water, peat, and marshes increased exposure to fevers (often interpreted as malaria‑like “agues”) and nutritional stress when storms damaged pasture or salinized fields. [74]

In the fifth and sixth centuries the Rhine–Meuse region was a frontier zone influenced by the fading Roman limes and the expanding Frankish kingdoms, with emerging local elites tied to Frankish power structures. The northern coastal belt from the Scheldt to the Weser was identified in early medieval sources as “Frisia,” a patchwork of Frisian petty kingdoms and communities, only gradually drawn under Frankish control in the seventh–eighth centuries. [75]

People leaving the Rhine–Meuse zone would move from a landscape with lingering Roman material culture and early Frankish Christian influence toward a Frisian cultural sphere that remained predominantly pagan until missionary efforts intensified in the seveth–eighth centuries. Over generations, migrants could shift language and identity from more Frankish‑oriented dialects toward Frisian (part of the Anglo‑Frisian group), participating in shared styles of dress, burial, and craftsmanship that linked communities around the North Sea. [76] In the early Middle Ages, Christian influence spread earliest and most densely in the south of what is now the Netherlands, somewhat later and more unevenly in the central river area, and last and most sporadically in the northern coastal/Frisian zone. [77]

. . . And What about the Phylogenetic YDNA Gap?

A Y‑DNA phylogeny showing long internal branches with few subclades, similar to the lack of known identified haplogroups over a long perod of time, is most consistent with a small, relatively isolated male lineage that expanded slowly and experienced limited splitting. This phylogenetic pattern can conceivably fit a scenario of repeated but low‑level (localized migration and local patrilocality on the northern Dutch coast between 500 and 800 CE. [78]

Long branches with minimal subclade formation usually imply either: (1) a long period with low effective male population size (drift, bottleneck, founder effect), or (2) a long period with low mutation “visibility” (few lineages sampled, or technical/mutation‑rate issues), or both. [79] In demographic terms this often reflects a founding male, or very few males, whose patriline persists for many generations with little diversification, either because few male lines exist, many side‑branches go extinct, or later expansions are recent and not yet phylogenetically resolved. [80]

If a small group of related males moved from the Rhine–Meuse zone into one or more terp communities and then remained largely endogamous and patrilocal, their Y‑line could show a long, “thin” branch: one main stem, few long‑lived offshoots. [81] Archaeology suggests reoccupation and growth of some northern terps after an earlier decline, consistent with founder events at the ‘village level’. A few successful founding patrilines could dominate local Y‑DNA distribution, producing deep but sparsely subdivided branches in subsequent subclades or branches of the genetic tree. [82]

Imagine one or two brothers from the Rhine–Meuse area settle on a terp around 600 CE. Of perhaps there was a succession of a few generations that slowly moved north-westward to the northern coast during this time period. Over a couple of centuries their male descendants remain in the same marsh community or they migrate to the English Isle in the context of the growing maritime trade, while collateral lines frequently die out or are replaced, leaving a single, long main Y‑line with few enduring splits.

Migration here is likely repetitive and small‑scale (family‑level, chain migration) rather than massive, so each episode may add only a few males; many incoming lines will be lost by drift, disease, or social disadvantage, leaving only one or two that survive into the future. [83] Technically, long branches with few observed splits can also reflect undersampling of the lineage, uneven marker discovery, or branch‑length artefacts in current Y references, so some “missing” subclades might be methodological rather than historical. [84]

Perhaps this last paragraph succinctly captures why there is this 2,850 year gap or absence of documented YDNA haplogroups in the genetic YDNA paternal line leading up to the Most Recetn Common ancestor of haplogroup G-Z6748: small scale family level chain migration and methodological artifact.

Sources:

Feature Image: The left hand image is the scientific details for the estimated birth date for the most recent common ancestor associated with haplogroup G-Z6748. The right hand map is a map of Magna Frisia in Latin from Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frisia_716-la.svg. Magna Frisia (Greater Frisia) refers to an independent Frisian kingdom that existed in the coastal regions of the Netherlands and Germany from approximately 600–734 AD, during the Early Middle Ages. At its peak, it spanned from the Zwin near Bruges in Belgium to the Weser River in Germany. Perhaps the Most Recent Common Ancestor of G-Z6748 was born in Greater Frisia.

[1] Scientific Details for G-Z6748

Click for Larger View | Source: FamilyTreeDNA,Scientific Details on Haplogroup G-Z6748, https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/G-Z6748/scientific

[2] Estimating the precise birth year of ancient human remains using only haplogroups is highly difficult and generally not possible with high precision, often resulting in uncertainties of hundreds or thousands of years. While haplogroups can provide a general, deep ancestral timeframe (e.g., thousands of years ago), determining when a specific individual lived requires combining genetic data with other methods like radiocarbon dating.

Molecular Clock Variability: Haplogroup ages are estimated by counting SNP mutations (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms – the common variations in the DNA sequence) and assuming a constant rate. However, mutation rates can vary, leading to different estimations depending on the model.

Evolutionary Time vs. Genealogical Time: A haplogroup’s “formation” date (when the mutation first appeared) is not the same as the birth year of a specific person in that lineage. 

Factors Affecting Precision:

Haplogroup Resolution: High-resolution tests (e.g., Big Y) can narrow down a lineage to a few hundred years, but many standard tests only identify high-level, ancient branches (e.g., J-CTS5368, which is 19,000 years old).

Age of the Sample: The older the remains, the less accurate the specific birth year, while more recent remains (e.g., under 1,000 years) are easier to place if they belong to a well-defined, young branch.

Contamination and Quality: Ancient DNA often suffers from degradation or contamination, making it hard to identify specific, recent downstream SNPs, which limits accuracy. 

For genealogical purposes (e.g. the (last ~500 years), haplogroups are difficult to use for precise birth years on their own. For archaeology, they are useful for identifying ancestral, migration-based, and broadly defined, ancient timeframes. 

McDonald I. Improved Models of Coalescence Ages of Y-DNA Haplogroups. Genes (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;12(6):862. doi: 10.3390/genes12060862. PMID: 34200049; PMCID: PMC8228294, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8228294/

[3] The division of the Early Medieval era (roughly 500–1000 AD) into different “a,b,c, & d” periods or sub-phases (such as Early, Middle, and Late Saxon, or regional archaeological phases) exists because historians and archaeologists need to break down 500 years of complex, non-linear change into manageable, analytical units. Because historical, social, and cultural changes did not happen simultaneously across all of Europe, these subdivisions are necessary to reflect specific, localized developments. 

The lettered phases (A–D) in Pierik’s article are not necessaily an universal scheme for the Early Middle Ages. It belongs to specific regional or thematic chronology and each such system defines A–D differently by artefact style, burial practice, and absolute dates.

The four periods A–D are defined as successive blocks within the first millennium AD, distinguished mainly by dominant landscape processes, regional geomorphological configurations, and the intensity and form of human land use across the Dutch coastal plain, river area, and Pleistocene sands. Pierik’s four periods are defined by absolute calendar dates and shifts in population trends and human impact on geomorphology, following an established Early Medieval A–D scheme used in related archaeological work.

See:

Pierik HJ. Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

Pierk, H.J. and Rowin J. van Lanen, Roman and early-medieval habitation patterns in a delta landscape: The link between settlement elevation and landscape dynamics, Quaternary International xxx (2017) 1e14, https://www.academia.edu/34741833/Pierik_and_Van_Lanen_2017_Roman_and_early_medieval_habitation_patterns_in_a_delta_landscape_The_link_between_settlement_elevation_and_landscape_dynamics

[4] History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Low Countries, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 29 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Countries

Kooijmans, Leendert P. Louwe, Kieft, C. van de, Blockmans, Wim. “history of the Low Countries”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 29 Jul. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-the-Low-Countries-prehistoric-times-to-1579-2157575

Bavuso, I. (2021)  Balance of power across the Channel: reassessing Frankish hegemony in southern England (sixth–early seventh century). Early Medieval Europe,  29:  283–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/emed.12481

Wallace-Hadrill, John Michael, Heather, Peter John, Bayley, Charles Calvert, Berentsen, William H., Turner, Henry Ashby, Sheehan, James J., Hamerow, Theodore S., Duggan, Lawrence G., Elkins, Thomas Henry, Geary, Patrick J., Leyser, K.J., Strauss, Gerald, Kirby, George Hall, Schleunes, Karl A., Barkin, Kenneth. “Germany”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 27 Jan. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany .

Fierman, Roberrt, Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Nineth Centruty AD, in Edited by John Hines, Nelleke IJssennagger-van der Pluijm (eds), Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Boydell & Brewer; 2021. 223-248., https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf

Beyen, Marnix, A Tribal Trinity: The Rise and Fall of the Franks, the Frisians and the Saxons in the Historical Consciousness of the Netherlands since 1850 , European History Quarterly30(4), 2000, 493-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/026569140003000402 (Original work published 2000) https://library.fes.de/libalt/journals/swetsfulltext/8798011.pdf

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Reimersa, Franz, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Frisia Coast Trail Blog, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Lyra Mapping, The history of the Netherlands, every year, 2017, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUWqYaEm4h8

Click for Larger View | Source: Schuffelen, Marco, Historical Maps of The Netherlands (“Holland”), Holland Timeline, (Maps of Netherlands 300 AD and 100 AD), 2009, https://www.heardutchhere.net/NLtimeline.html

Schuffelen, Marco, Historical Maps of The Netherlands (“Holland”), Holland Timeline, (Maps of Netherlands 300 AD and 100 AD), 2009, https://www.heardutchhere.net/NLtimeline.html

Ealdlar, Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[6] History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

[7] van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

van Lanen, Rowin J., and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune, eds, Across Medieval Europe: Old Paradigmsand New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Lieden: Sidestone Press, 2019, 113- 134, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

[8] van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

van Lanen, Rowin J., and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune, eds, Across Medieval Europe: Old Paradigmsand New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Lieden: Sidestone Press, 2019, 113- 134, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

[9] van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

van Lanen, Rowin J., and Bert Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune, eds, Across Medieval Europe: Old Paradigmsand New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Lieden: Sidestone Press, 2019, 113- 134, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

[10] Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Post-Roman population dynamics in the Rhine- Meuse delta (the Netherlands). RURALIA XII Conference, 11th-17th September, Kilkenny (Ireland), https://www.academia.edu/34604939/Post_Roman_population_dynamics_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_RURALIA_XII_Conference_11th_17th_September_Kilkenny_Ireland_

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline. Reconstructing and validating (post-) Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA 8 (2018) ISSN: 2039-7895 (pp. 189-218), https://www.postclassical.it/PCA_Vol.8_files/PCA8_Groenewoudt-VanLanen.pdf

[11] Pierik, Harm Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

[12] Pierik, Harm Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

[13] Pierik, Harm Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline. Reconstructing and validating (post-) Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA 8 (2018) ISSN: 2039-7895 (pp. 189-218), https://www.postclassical.it/PCA_Vol.8_files/PCA8_Groenewoudt-VanLanen.pdf

[14] Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Post-Roman population dynamics in the Rhine- Meuse delta (the Netherlands). RURALIA XII Conference, 11th-17th September, Kilkenny (Ireland), https://www.academia.edu/34604939/Post_Roman_population_dynamics_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_RURALIA_XII_Conference_11th_17th_September_Kilkenny_Ireland_

van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

[15] van Lanen RJ. Revealing the past through modelling? Reflections on connectivity, habitation and persistence in the Dutch Delta during the 1st millennium AD. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2020;99:e14. doi:10.1017/njg.2020.12, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/revealing-the-past-through-modelling-reflections-on-connectivity-habitation-and-persistence-in-the-dutch-delta-during-the-1st-millennium-ad/717D79192E8EDD6B90D58B060117EB1B

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Post-Roman population dynamics in the Rhine- Meuse delta (the Netherlands). RURALIA XII Conference, 11th-17th September, Kilkenny (Ireland), https://www.academia.edu/34604939/Post_Roman_population_dynamics_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_RURALIA_XII_Conference_11th_17th_September_Kilkenny_Ireland_

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Pierik, Harm Jan, Landscape changes and human–landscape interaction during the first millennium AD in the Netherlands, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, Volume 100, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2021.8

van Lanen RJ, de Kleijn MTM, Gouw-Bouman MTIJ, Pierik HJ. Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences. 2018;97(1-2):45-68. doi:10.1017/njg.2018.3, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/netherlands-journal-of-geosciences/article/exploring-roman-and-earlymedieval-habitation-of-the-rhinemeuse-delta-modelling-largescale-demographic-changes-and-corresponding-landuse-impact/40F68343AEEC8FF41124C5F098069863

[16] The Merovingian dynasty was the ruling family of the Franks from around the middle of the fifth century until Pepin the Short in 751. They first appear as “Kings of the Franks” in the Roman army of northern Gaul. By 509 they had united all the Franks and northern Gallo-Romans under their rule. They conquered most of Gaul, defeating the Visigoths (507) and the Burgundians (534), and also extended their rule into Raetia (537). In Germania, the Alemanni, Bavarii and Saxons accepted their lordship. The Merovingian realm was the largest and most powerful of the states of western Europe following the breakup of the empire.

Merovingian dynasty, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merovingian_dynasty

See also: Britannica Editors. “Merovingian dynasty”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 11 Jul. 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Merovingian-dynasty

[17] The phrase “power-blocks in the Netherlands” (in the context of Frisians and Saxons) is used by Odile Flierman in her chapter “Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD.” In that piece she speaks of “several regional or even supra‑regional power‑blocks in the Netherlands c. AD 600,” into which the Frisian elites fit, so in the current historiography of early medieval Frisia she perhaps is effectively the originator and main user of this specific formulation.

” . . .(I)t can be said that the timing of the reappearance of the Frisian name in the written sources does not appear random. It coincides, at least approximately, with the rise of several regional or even supra-regional power-blocks in the Netherlands c. AD 600, who had not just each other to contend with, but would soon also enter into prolonged competition with their Frankish neighbours.

Quote on page 227: Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021: 223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[18] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[19] Reimersa, Franz, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Frisia Coast Trail Blog, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Frisian Kingdom, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 8 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian_Kingdom

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

[20] Frisii, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisii

[21] Anglo-Saxon settlement in the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_settlement_in_the_Netherlands

[22] Frisii, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisii

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[23] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Blockmans, Wim, Kooijmans, Leendert P. Louwe, Kieft, C. van de. “history of the Low Countries”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 29 Jul. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-the-Low-Countries-prehistoric-times-to-1579-2157575

[24] Anglo-Saxon settlement in the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_settlement_in_the_Netherlands

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[25] Ijssennagger-van der Pluijm N, Hines J, Wood I. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages: An Archaeoethnological Perspective. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:1-12, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages-an-archaeoethnological-perspective/07A47ECEA40037B87EE255A2421C5632

Scheringa, Jelmer, Frisians, Franks and their supposed disputes over seventh century Dorestad, Lecture held at a Research-meeting of the Amsterdam Archaeological Century, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam, February 8, 2011, https://www.academia.edu/2780006/Frisians_Franks_and_their_supposed_disputes_over_seventh_century_Dorestad

IJssennagger, N. L. 2017. Central because Liminal: Frisia in a Viking Age North Sea World . Introduction Chapter 1, [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/49801402/Chapter_1.pdf

Lebecq, Stéphane The Frisian trade in the Dark Ages; a Frisian or a Frankish/Frisian trade? In: Carmiggelt, A.,(ed). Rotterdam Papers VII, 1992, pp. 7-15, https://www.scribd.com/doc/6919218/Lebecq-The-Frisian-trade-in-the-Dark-Ages

[26] Jellema, Dirk. “Frisian Trade in the Dark Ages.” Speculum, vol. 30, no. 1, 1955, pp. 15–36. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2850035

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

[27] Faber, Hans, The Batwing Doors of Dorestad. A Two-Way Gateway of Trade and Power, 26 Oct 2020, Frisia Coast Trial Blog, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2020/10/26/dorestat/

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[28] IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, Hines J, Wood I. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages: An Archaeoethnological Perspective. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:1-12. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages-an-archaeoethnological-perspective/07A47ECEA40037B87EE255A2421C5632

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

Low Countries, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 29 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Countries

IJssennagger, Nelleke L. “Between Frankish and Viking: Frisia and Frisians in the Viking Age.” Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 9 (2013): 69–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45020171

History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 January 2026,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

Blockmans, Wim, Kieft, C. van de, Kooijmans, Leendert P. Louwe. “history of the Low Countries”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 29 Jul. 2022, https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-the-Low-Countries-prehistoric-times-to-1579-2157575

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Bavuso, Irene, Balance of power across the Channel: reassessing Frankish hegemony in southern England (sixth–early seventh century), Early Medieval Europe, Volume 29, Issue3, August 2021, Pages 283-304, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12481

Barkin, Kenneth, Schleunes, Karl A., Berentsen, William H., Strauss, Gerald, Geary, Patrick J., Leyser, K.J., Wallace-Hadrill, John Michael, Heather, Peter John, Bayley, Charles Calvert, Sheehan, James J., Duggan, Lawrence G., Turner, Henry Ashby, Kirby, George Hall, Hamerow, Theodore S., Elkins, Thomas Henry. “Germany”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 31 Jan. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany

[29] Scheringa, Jelmer, Frisians, Franks and their supposed disputes over seventh century Dorestad, Lecture held at a Research-meeting of the Amsterdam Archaeological Century, University of Amsterdam. Amsterdam, February 8, 2011, https://www.academia.edu/2780006/Frisians_Franks_and_their_supposed_disputes_over_seventh_century_Dorestad

Dorestadt, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 16 December 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorestad

[30] W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

Lebecq, Stéphane The Frisian trade in the Dark Ages; a Frisian or a Frankish/Frisian trade? In: Carmiggelt, A.,(ed). Rotterdam Papers VII, 1992, pp. 7-15, https://www.scribd.com/doc/6919218/Lebecq-The-Frisian-trade-in-the-Dark-Ages

[31] IJssennagger, Nelleke L. “Between Frankish and Viking: Frisia and Frisians in the Viking Age.” Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 9 (2013): 69–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45020171

Schleunes, Karl A., Hamerow, Theodore S., Duggan, Lawrence G., Sheehan, James J., Heather, Peter John, Kirby, George Hall, Wallace-Hadrill, John Michael, Leyser, K.J., Bayley, Charles Calvert, Elkins, Thomas Henry, Geary, Patrick J., Berentsen, William H., Strauss, Gerald, Turner, Henry Ashby, Barkin, Kenneth. “Germany”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 31 Jan. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany

Low Countries, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 29 November 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Countries

[32] IJssennagger, Nelleke L. “Between Frankish and Viking: Frisia and Frisians in the Viking Age.” Viking and Medieval Scandinavia 9 (2013): 69–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/45020171

Bravuso, Irene, Balance of power across the Channel: reassessing Frankish hegemony in southern England (sixth–early seventh century), Volume29, Issue3, August 2021, Pages 283-304, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emed.12481

[33] Migration Period, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

[34] Migration Period, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

[35] Nieuwhof, Annet, Anglo-Saxon immigration or continuity? Ezinge and the coastal area of the northern Netherlands in the Migration Period, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 5, 2013/03/01, 53-83, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273449636_Anglo-Saxon_immigration_or_continuity_Ezinge_and_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_in_the_Migration_Period

History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 21 January 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273449636_Anglo-Saxon_immigration_or_continuity_Ezinge_and_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_in_the_Migration_Period

Migration Period, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 23 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Migration_Period

[36] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

[37] History of the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

[38] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Bert J. Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, pages 113-134, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune (eds) Settlement Change Across Medieval Europe Old Paradigms and New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Sidestone Press, Leiden, 2019, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

van Lanen, Rowin J. and Maurice T.M. de Kleijn , Marjolein T.I.J. Gouw-Bouman & Harm Jan Pierik, Exploring Roman and early-medieval habitation of the Rhine–Meuse delta: modelling large-scale demographic changes and corresponding land-use impact, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw, 97 – 1–2 , 45–68, 2018, https://www.academia.edu/97223602/Exploring_Roman_and_early_medieval_habitation_of_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_modelling_large_scale_demographic_changes_and_corresponding_land_use_impact

[39] van Lanen, Rowin J. and Bert J. Groenewoudt, Counting heads: Post-Roman population decline in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands) and the need for more evidence-based reconstructions, pages 113-134, in Niall Brady and Claudia Theune (eds) Settlement Change Across Medieval Europe Old Paradigms and New Vistas, Ruralia XII, Sidestone Press, Leiden, 2019, https://www.academia.edu/40523376/Counting_heads_Post_Roman_population_decline_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_and_the_need_for_more_evidence_based_reconstructions

Groenewoudt, Bert J. and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline. Reconstructing and validating (post-) Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA Post – Classical Archaeologies PCA, 8 (2018) ISSN: 2039-7895 (pp. 189-218), https://www.postclassical.it/PCA_Vol.8_files/PCA8_Groenewoudt-VanLanen.pdf

[40] Ethnogenesis, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 26 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnogenesis

[41] T.M. Weik. 2014. The Archaeology of Ethnogenesis. Annual Review Anthropology. 43:291-305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-025920

[42] Hu, Di, Approaches to the Archaeology of Ethnogenesis: Past and Emergent Perspectives, Dec 2013, Journal of Archaeological Research 21(4), 371-402 , DOI:10.1007/s10814-013-9066-0, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257578031_Approaches_to_the_Archaeology_of_Ethnogenesis_Past_and_Emergent_Perspectives

Voss, Barbara, What’s New? Rethinking ethnogenesis in the Archaeologiy of Colonialism, American Antiquity, 80(4), 2015, pp. 655–670, https://www.itzaarchaeology.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Voss_B._L._2015._Whats-New-Rethinking-Ethnogenesis.pdf

[43] Ton Derks and Nico Roymans, Introduction, in in Ton Derks & Nico Roymans, eds, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity The Role of Power and Tradition in Antiquity, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2009, Page 1, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/35248/1/340082.pdf

[44] Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, May 22, 202, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Saxons, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxons

Franks, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franks

Frisii, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisii

Anglo-Saxons, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 7 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxons

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[45] Republic of Amsterdam Radio, Illuminating the Dark Ages with Monks, Migrations and Merovingians, 8 February 2021, The Low Countries, https://www.the-low-countries.com/article/illuminating-the-dark-ages/

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

[46] Frisian–Frankish wars, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

Saxons, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxons

[47] Faber, Hans, A Frontier Known as Watery Mess: the Coast of Flander, 9 Aug 2021, Frisia Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/the-frontier-known-as-watery-mess-the-coast-of-flanders

[48] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

Frisian–Frankish wars, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 21 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisian–Frankish_wars

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

[49] Deckers, Pieterjan & Dries Tys, Early medieval communities around the North Sea: a ‘maritime culture’?, Rica Annaert, Tinne Jacobs, Ingrid In ’t Ven & Steffi Coppens, eds, ACE Conference of Brussels: The Very beginning of Europe? Early Medieval Migration and Colonization, 2012, 81-88, https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/RELM/7/RELM007-001.pdf

[50] Foederati were non-Roman tribes or groups that entered into a treaty (foedus) with the Roman Empire, providing military service in exchange for land, payment, or protection. Initially used as allies to protect borders, their reliance grew during the late Western Empire, eventually contributing to its instability. They served as mercenary allies, often maintaining their own leaders, to defend the Empire against other barbarians.

Foederati, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 28 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foederati

[51] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 135, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

Franks, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 3 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franks

Mark, Harrison, Franks, 20 Mar 2023, World History Encyclopedia, https://www.worldhistory.org/Franks/

Mark, Harrison, The Franks and the Shaping of Europe in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds, 22 Feb 2024, Brewminate, https://brewminate.com/the-franks-and-the-shaping-of-europe-in-the-ancient-and-medieval-worlds/

Hay, Maciamo, A Brief History of the Franks, Eupedia, https://www.eupedia.com/europe/frankish_influence_modern_europe.shtml

[52] Netherlands in the Roman era, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 22 September 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Roman_era

[53] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 135, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[54] Lendering, Jona, Franks, Last Modified on 13 October 2020, Articles on Ancient History, Livius.org, https://www.livius.org/articles/people/franks/

Ripuarian Franks, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 9 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripuarian_Franks

Salian Franks, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salian_Franks

[55] Ammianus Marcellinus, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 6 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammianus_Marcellinus

Lendering, Jona, Franks, Last Modified on 13 October 2020, Articles on Ancient History, Livius.org, https://www.livius.org/articles/people/franks/

Ripuarian Franks, Wkipedia, This page was last edited on 9 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ripuarian_Franks

Salian Franks, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 9 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salian_Franks

Hay, Maciamo, A Brief History of the Franks, Eupedia, https://www.eupedia.com/europe/frankish_influence_modern_europe.shtml

Mark, Harrison, Franks, 20 Mar 2023, World History Encyclopedia, https://www.worldhistory.org/Franks/

Mark, Harrison, The Franks and the Shaping of Europe in the Ancient and Medieval Worlds, 22 Feb 2024, Brewminate, https://brewminate.com/the-franks-and-the-shaping-of-europe-in-the-ancient-and-medieval-worlds/

Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 135, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

Ripuarian Franks, Jatland, This page was last edited on 4 October 2022, https://www.jatland.com/home/Ripuarian_Franks

Netherlands in the Roman Era, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 4 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Roman_era

[55a] Ammianus Marcellinus references the Salian Franks in his historical work, 
Res Gestae (often referred to as Rerum Gestarum Libri XXXI), specifically in Book XVII. See https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Ammian/17*.html

[55b] The late fifth/early sixth-century Greek historian Zosimus is the sole source for the account that the Salian Franks originated outside the Roman Empire, were expelled from their homeland by Saxons, and subsequently settled in Batavia (an island in the Rhine delta) prior to 357 AD. Zosimus describes them as a people detached from the Franks.

See: Lendering, Jona, Zosimus, New History 3.06, 11 October 2020, Livius, https://www.livius.org/sources/content/zosimus/zosimus-new-history-3/zosimus-new-history-3.06/

[56] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 133-156 https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[57] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, , 133-156, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[58] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 141, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[59] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 145-146, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[60] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 133-156, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[61] Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 133-156, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[62] Hay, Maciamo, A Brief History of the Franks, Eupedia, https://www.eupedia.com/europe/frankish_influence_modern_europe.shtml

Joachim Henning, ed, Post-Roman Towns, Trade and Settlement in Europe and Byzantium, Vol 1 The Heirs of the Roman West, Walter de Gruyter, New York, 2007, 1- 40, https://www.academia.edu/846386/_Early_European_towns_The_development_of_the_economy_in_the_Frankish_realm_between_dynamism_and_deceleration_AD_500_1100_in_Joachim_Henning_ed_Post_Roman_Towns_Trade_and_Settlement_in_Europe_and_Byzantium_vol_1_The_Heirs_of_the_Roman_West_Berlin_New_York_De_Gruyter_2007_pp_3_40

Vanthemsche G, De Peuter R. The Era of the Frankish Kingdoms: (Fifth–Tenth Centuries). In: A Concise History of Belgium. Cambridge Concise Histories. Cambridge University Press; 2023:43-72, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/concise-history-of-belgium/era-of-the-frankish-kingdoms/D711BBA9C7EB51FB70443D9C691B16BF

Reynolds, Burnam W., Franks and the Holy Roman Empire, 2023, EBSCO, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/franks-and-holy-roman-empire

Dierkens, Alain and Patrick Périn, The 5th Century advance of the Franks in Belgica II: history and archaeology, 165- 193, in E. Taayke, J.H. Looijenga, O.H. Harsema and H.R. Reinders, eds, Essays on thee Early Franks, Barkhuis, 2003, https://www.academia.edu/21039688/The_5th_c_Advance_of_the_Franks_in_Belgica_II 

Nico Roymans, Nico and Stijn Heeren,  Romano-Frankish interaction in the Lower Rhine frontier zone from the late 3rd to the 5th century – Some key archaeological trends explored, Germania 99, 2021, 135, https://www.academia.edu/95372330/Romano_Frankish_interaction_in_the_Lower_Rhine_frontier_zone_from_the_late_3rd_to_the_5th_century_Some_key_archaeological_trends_explored

[63] Frisii, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 12 December 2025,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisii

Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

People of the North Sea, 7 August 2019, Doug’s Archaeology, https://dougsarchaeology.wordpress.com/2019/08/07/people-of-the-north-sea/

Nieuwhof, Annet, Anglo-Saxon immigration or continuity? Ezinge and the coastal area of the northern Netherlands in the Migration Period, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 5, 2013/03/01, 53-83, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273449636_Anglo-Saxon_immigration_or_continuity_Ezinge_and_the_coastal_area_of_the_northern_Netherlands_in_the_Migration_Period

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[64] Netherlands in the Early Middle Ages, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 2 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netherlands_in_the_Early_Middle_Ages

History of the Netherlands, Wikipeda, This page was last edited on 4 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Netherlands

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, 22 May 2025, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[65] Bazelmans, Jos , The early-medieval use of ethnic names from classical antiquity. The case of the Frisians, 321 – 338, in Ton Derks & Nico Roymans, eds, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity The Role of Power and Tradition in Antiquity, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2009, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/35248/1/340082.pdf

Ton Derks and Nico Roymans, Introduction, in in Ton Derks & Nico Roymans, eds, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity The Role of Power and Tradition in Antiquity, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2009, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/35248/1/340082.pdf

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[66] Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf ; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[67] IJssennagger, N. L., Central because Liminal: Frisia in a Viking Age North Sea World . [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 2017, https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/49801404/Chapter_2.pdf

[68] Coloru, Omar, A Review of Ton Derks, Nico Roymans, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity: The Role of Power and Tradition. Amsterdam Archaeological Studies 13. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2009, Bryn Mawr Classical Review BMCR 2009.07.71, https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009.07.71/

Ton Derks and Nico Roymans, Introduction, in in Ton Derks & Nico Roymans, eds, Ethnic Constructs in Antiquity The Role of Power and Tradition in Antiquity, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2009, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/35248/1/340082.pdf

[69] Bremmer, R. H. Taking stock of Old Frisian studies 1992-2021. Us Wurk. Tydskrift Foar Frisistyk, 70(1-2), 1-28. 2021, doi:10.21827/5fb7c91ed9fba,

Frans Riemersma, Is Magna Frisia Fact or Fiction?, Sep 1, 2018, Salt, Samphire & Storytellers, Frisia Coast Trail Blog,https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/09/01/is-magna-frisia-fact-or-fiction

Flierman R. Mirror Histories: Frisians and Saxons from the First to the Ninth Century AD. In: Hines J, IJssennagger-van der Pluijm N, eds. Frisians of the Early Middle Ages. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Boydell & Brewer; 2021:223-248. https://research-portal.uu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/232053797/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad.pdf; Also: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/frisians-of-the-early-middle-ages/mirror-histories-frisians-and-saxons-from-the-first-to-the-ninth-century-ad/86AE8F89C42C13A6B84B63D3D06405A6

[70] Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

[71] Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

[72] Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, May 22, 202, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

Deckers, Pieterjan & Dries Tys, Early medieval communities around the North Sea: a ‘maritime culture’? , in Rica Annaert, Tinne Jacobs, Ingrid In ’t Ven & Steffi Coppens, eds, ACE Conference of Brussels: The Very beginning of Europe? Early Medieval Migration and Colonization, 2012, 81-88, https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/RELM/7/RELM007-001.pdf

[73] Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

van Popta, Y.T., Westerdahl, C.L. and Duncan, B.G. (2019), Maritime Culture in the Netherlands: accessing the late medieval maritime cultural landscapes of the north-eastern Zuiderzee. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 48: 172-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1095-9270.12333

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

[74] There is extensive documentation, particularly within environmental history and paleoclimatology, that the period between 500 and 800 CE (the Early Middle Ages/Late Antiquity) in Europe was marked by increased rainfall, widespread flooding, and the creation of standing water/marshes, which caused significant increases in malaria-like “agues” and severe nutritional stress due to agricultural damage.

The late 6th and 7th centuries followed a more humid period that began in the 4th century, which, combined with cooler temperatures, increased environmental, and social stress. This increased humidity created, or restored, large marshlands and fostered conditions for mosquitoes, leading to the resurgence of “agues” (fever/malaria).

The increased humidity resulted in severe flooding and storms, particularly in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe, which damaged pastures, destroyed crops, and salinized coastal soils. This led to a “critical extra stress” on vulnerable populations.

Mordechai, L and M. Eisenberg, T.P. Newfield, A. Izdebski, J.E. Kay, H. Poinar, The Justinianic Plague: An inconsequential pandemic?, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116 (51) 25546-25554, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903797116 (2019).

Harper, Kyle, How Climate Change and Plague Helped Bring Down the Roman Empire, 19 Dec 2017, Smithsonian Magazine, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/how-climate-change-and-disease-helped-fall-rome-180967591/

 Jongman, W. M., Jacobs, J. P. A. M., & Klein Goldewijk, G. M. (2019). Health and wealth in the Roman Empire. Economics & Human Biology, 34 , 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2019.01.005

[75] McDaniel, Ryan David, Decline and Fall? The Institutional History of Post- Imperial Western Europe, AD 400-800, 27 Aug 2012, University of New Mexico, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds/52/; https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hist_etds

Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Diverging decline : reconstructing and validating (post-)Roman population trends (AD 0-1000) in the Rhine-Meuse delta (the Netherlands), PCA, European journal of postclassical archaeologies, vol. 8 (2018), p 189-218, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327867127_Diverging_decline_Reconstructing_and_validating_post-Roman_population_trends_AD_0-1000_in_the_Rhine-Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

[76] McDaniel, Ryan David, Decline and Fall? The Institutional History of Post- Imperial Western Europe, AD 400-800, 27 Aug 2012, University of New Mexico, https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/hist_etds/52/; https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=hist_etds

Marieke van Dinter, Living Along the Limes, PhD Thesis, 23 Aug 1970, Utrecht Studies in Earth Sciences 2017, https://www.academia.edu/35123998/Living_along_the_Limes_Landscape_and_settlement_in_the_Lower_Rhine_Delta_during_Roman_and_Early_Medieval_time

Frisia, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 27 January 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frisia

Deckers, Pieterjan & Dries Tys, Early medieval communities around the North Sea: a ‘maritime culture’?, Rica Annaert, Tinne Jacobs, Ingrid In ’t Ven & Steffi Coppens, eds, ACE Conference of Brussels: The Very beginning of Europe? Early Medieval Migration and Colonization, 2012, 81-88, https://oar.onroerenderfgoed.be/publicaties/RELM/7/RELM007-001.pdf

Reimersa, Franz, Anglo-Frisian Origins: Shared Heritage Across the North Sea, May 22, 202, Ealdlar, https://ealdlar.com/history/anglo-frisian-origins

[77] South: Early and Stable Christian Core

  • By the 4th century there was already a Christian community and episcopal center at Tongeren–Maastricht, with Bishop Servatius traditionally dying and being buried in Maastricht around 384.
  • Through the early medieval period, areas south of the Meuse (roughly today’s Limburg and adjacent Brabant) belonged to the Tongeren–Maastricht–Liège diocese, so Christian institutions, churches and later abbeys such as Rolduc and Susteren formed a continuous, dominant presence there.
  • After Clovis’ baptism around 500, Frankish royal support reinforced Christianity in this southern zone, so by the 7th century it was effectively integrated into the Frankish Christian world with high rates of formal Christianization compared to the rest of the Low Countries.

Central River Area: 7th–8th Century Mission Zone:

  • The Rhine–Meuse river zone around Utrecht and later Dorestad shifted from a late Roman frontier into a missionary frontier; Frankish troops took Utrecht around 630 and King Dagobert I founded a church there, marking the area as a base for northern missions.
  • Anglo‑Saxon missionaries such as Willibrord arrived at Utrecht in 690, using it as an episcopal and monastic centre to convert neighbouring Frisian and Frankish populations in the central Netherlands.
  • Christian influence here grew significantly in the 7th–8th centuries but remained contested during periods of Frisian political control, as shown by episodes like Frisian king Radbod’s destruction of the church at Utrecht; only with Carolingian consolidation in the later 8th century does Christianization become more secure and widespread in this middle zone.

North (Broad Frisia): Slow, Fragmentary, and Late:

  • Only after Charlemagne’s subjugation of the Frisians and Saxons in the late 8th century did the region become “officially Christian,” and even then, sources note that remnants of paganism persisted in Friesland into the later Middle Ages, indicating a relatively low and slow rate of effective Christian influence compared to southern and central regions.
  • The northern coastal region (broad Frisia from Noord‑Holland through Friesland and Groningen) retained strong pre‑Christian religious traditions well into the 8th and even 9th centuries, despite early missionary attempts by figures like Amandus, Willibrord, and Boniface.
  • Frankish and Anglo‑Saxon missions repeatedly met resistance; Frisian rulers such as Radbod are described explicitly as defenders of pagan practice, and Boniface’s martyrdom near Dokkum in 754 underscores the limited penetration of Christianity there at that time.

Britannica Editors. “Frisian”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 22 Mar. 2024, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Frisian. 

History of religion in the Netherlands, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 5 February 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_religion_in_the_Netherlands

Oosterhoff, Frederika G., Willibrord – The ‘Apostle of Frisia’, 1990, https://www.christianstudylibrary.org/article/willibrord-apostle-frisia

Selderhuis, Herman J., ed, Handbook of Dutch History, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen, 2014, https://www.isdistribution.com/DocumentRender.aspx?aId=49333&asId=2

W.A. van Es & W.J.H. Verwers, Early Medieval settlements along the Rhine: precursors and contemporaries of Dorestad, Journal of Archaeology in the Low Countries, 2-1 (May 2010), https://jalc.nl/cgi/t/text/get-pdfcfad.pdf?c=jalc%3Bidno%3D0201a01

Riemersma, Frans Liudger, the First Frisian Apostle, 18 October 2020, Frisian Coast Trail, https://frisiacoasttrail.blog/2020/10/18/liudger-the-first-frisian-apostle/

[78] J. Chiaroni,  P.A. Underhill,  & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, Y chromosome diversity, human expansion, drift, and cultural evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (48) 20174-20179, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910803106 

Karmin M, Saag L, Vicente M, Wilson Sayres MA, Järve M, Talas UG, Rootsi S, Ilumäe AM, Mägi R, Mitt M, Pagani L, Puurand T, Faltyskova Z, Clemente F, Cardona A, Metspalu E, Sahakyan H, Yunusbayev B, Hudjashov G, DeGiorgio M, Loogväli EL, Eichstaedt C, Eelmets M, Chaubey G, Tambets K, Litvinov S, Mormina M, Xue Y, Ayub Q, Zoraqi G, Korneliussen TS, Akhatova F, Lachance J, Tishkoff S, Momynaliev K, Ricaut FX, Kusuma P, Razafindrazaka H, Pierron D, Cox MP, Sultana GN, Willerslev R, Muller C, Westaway M, Lambert D, Skaro V, Kovačevic L, Turdikulova S, Dalimova D, Khusainova R, Trofimova N, Akhmetova V, Khidiyatova I, Lichman DV, Isakova J, Pocheshkhova E, Sabitov Z, Barashkov NA, Nymadawa P, Mihailov E, Seng JW, Evseeva I, Migliano AB, Abdullah S, Andriadze G, Primorac D, Atramentova L, Utevska O, Yepiskoposyan L, Marjanovic D, Kushniarevich A, Behar DM, Gilissen C, Vissers L, Veltman JA, Balanovska E, Derenko M, Malyarchuk B, Metspalu A, Fedorova S, Eriksson A, Manica A, Mendez FL, Karafet TM, Veeramah KR, Bradman N, Hammer MF, Osipova LP, Balanovsky O, Khusnutdinova EK, Johnsen K, Remm M, Thomas MG, Tyler-Smith C, Underhill PA, Willerslev E, Nielsen R, Metspalu M, Villems R, Kivisild T. A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):459-66. doi: 10.1101/gr.186684.114. Epub 2015 Mar 13. PMID: 25770088; PMCID: PMC4381518. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381518/

Allison E. Mann, Eyðfinn Magnussen, Christopher R. Tillquist, Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands, preprint August 28, 2024, bioRxiv 2024.08.27.601563; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563v1.full

Altena, E., Smeding, R., van der Gaag, K.J. et al. The dutch Y-chromosome from the early middle ages to present day. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 17, 116 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-025-02224-4

Swiel Y, Kelso J, Peyrégne S. Resolving the source of branch length variation in the Y chromosome phylogeny. Genome Biol. 2025 Jan 6;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03468-4. PMID: 39762943; PMCID: PMC11702058. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702058/

[79] Allison E. Mann, Eyðfinn Magnussen, Christopher R. Tillquist, Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands, preprint August 28, 2024, bioRxiv 2024.08.27.601563; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563v1.full

Karmin M, Saag L, et al, A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):459-66. doi: 10.1101/gr.186684.114. Epub 2015 Mar 13. PMID: 25770088; PMCID: PMC4381518. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381518/

J. Chiaroni,  P.A. Underhill,  & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, Y chromosome diversity, human expansion, drift, and cultural evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (48) 20174-20179, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910803106 

Swiel Y, Kelso J, Peyrégne S. Resolving the source of branch length variation in the Y chromosome phylogeny. Genome Biol. 2025 Jan 6;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03468-4. PMID: 39762943; PMCID: PMC11702058. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702058/

[80] Adamov D, Ponomarev G, Evsyukov I, Zhabagin M, Belenikin M, Antonenko A, et al. Phylogeography and Microevolution of Y-Chromosome Haplogroup N-B482: Ancient Diffusion and Modern Relicts. Nature Anthropology 20253, 10017. https://doi.org/10.70322/natanthropol.2025.10017

Galton–Watson process, Wikipedia, This page was last edited on 14 December 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galton–Watson_process

Karmin M, Saag L, et al., A recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in culture. Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):459-66. doi: 10.1101/gr.186684.114. Epub 2015 Mar 13. PMID: 25770088; PMCID: PMC4381518. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4381518/

J. Chiaroni,  P.A. Underhill,  & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, Y chromosome diversity, human expansion, drift, and cultural evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (48) 20174-20179, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910803106

[81] Altena, E., Smeding, R., van der Gaag, K.J. et al. The dutch Y-chromosome from the early middle ages to present day. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 17, 116 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-025-02224-4

A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348)

Groenewoudt, Bert and Rowin J. van Lanen, Post-Roman population dynamics in the Rhine- Meuse delta (the Netherlands). RURALIA XII Conference, 11th-17th September, Kilkenny (Ireland), https://www.academia.edu/34604939/Post_Roman_population_dynamics_in_the_Rhine_Meuse_delta_the_Netherlands_RURALIA_XII_Conference_11th_17th_September_Kilkenny_Ireland_

[82] A. Nieuwhof, M. Bakker, E. Knol, G.J. de Langen, J.A.W. Nicolay, D. Postma, M. Schepers, T.W. Varwijk, P.C. Vos, Adapting to the sea: Human habitation in the coastal area of the northern Netherlands before medieval dike building, Ocean & Coastal Management, Volume 173, 2019, Pages 77-89, ISSN 0964-5691, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.014 .
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569118307348)\

Allison E. Mann, Eyðfinn Magnussen, Christopher R. Tillquist, Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands, preprint August 28, 2024, bioRxiv 2024.08.27.601563; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563v1.full

Faber, Hans, Have a Frisians Cocktail! A Rich Composition, 25 Dec 2015, Frisia Coast Trail, https://www.frisiacoasttrail.com/post/2018/12/25/untitled

[83] J. Chiaroni,  P.A. Underhill,  & L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, Y chromosome diversity, human expansion, drift, and cultural evolution, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (48) 20174-20179, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910803106

Allison E. Mann, Eyðfinn Magnussen, Christopher R. Tillquist, Early founder effects have determined paternal population structure in the Faroe Islands, preprint August 28, 2024, bioRxiv 2024.08.27.601563; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.08.27.601563v1.full

Adamov D, Ponomarev G, Evsyukov I, Zhabagin M, Belenikin M, Antonenko A, et al. Phylogeography and Microevolution of Y-Chromosome Haplogroup N-B482: Ancient Diffusion and Modern Relicts. Nature Anthropology 20253, 10017. https://doi.org/10.70322/natanthropol.2025.10017

[84] Swiel Y, Kelso J, Peyrégne S. Resolving the source of branch length variation in the Y chromosome phylogeny. Genome Biol. 2025 Jan 6;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03468-4. PMID: 39762943; PMCID: PMC11702058. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702058/

Zehra Köksal, Annina Preussner, Jaakko Leinonen, Taru Tukiainen, Introducing the Y-chromosomal Ancestral-like Reference Sequence—Improving the Capture of Human Evolutionary Information, Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 42, Issue 10, October 2025, msaf222, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaf222

Puurand T, Möls M, Kaplinski L, Maal K, Krjutskov K, Salumets A, Kivisild T, Remm M. Y-mer: a k-mer based method for determining human Y chromosome haplogroups from ultra-low sequencing depth data. Genome Biol. 2025 Aug 12;26(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03714-3. PMID: 40797266; PMCID: PMC12341214. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12341214/

Pille Hallast, Peter Ebert, Mark Loftus, Feyza Yilmaz, Peter A. Audano, Glennis A.Logsdon, Marc Jan Bonder, Weichen Zhou, Wolfram Höps, Kwondo Kim, Chong Li, Philip Dishuck, David Porubsky, Fotios Tsetsos, Jee Young Kwon, Qihui Zhu, Katherine M. Munson, Patrick Hasenfeld, William T. Harvey, Alexandra P. Lewis, Jennifer Kordosky, Kendra Hoekzema, The Human Genome Structural Variation Consortium (HGSVC), Jan O. Korbel, Chris Tyler-Smith, Evan E. Eichler, Xinghua Shi, Christine R. Beck, TobiasMarschall, Miriam K. Konkel, Charles Lee, Assembly of 43 diverse human Y chromosomes reveals extensive complexity and variation, bioRxiv 2022.12.01.518658; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.01.518658

Hallast, P., Ebert, P., Loftus, M. et al. Assembly of 43 human Y chromosomes reveals extensive complexity and variation. Nature 621, 355–364 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06425-6